| |
|
So, to recap:
I say you are overreacting. You say I am overreacting.
I mention obsession. You mention obsession.
I say that you have an ability to insult, cajole, obsess and complain. You say that I have an ability to ability to insult, cajole, obsess and complain.
I refuse to address your questions. You refuse to address my questions.
You make speculations about my personality and motivations. I make speculations about your character and personality.
The mirror thing seems reasonably accurate, really. So, I suppose I should probably accuse you of being a bully, to continue the process. You big bully.
Corrigenda:
Sure toksik has said something wise, but I am not willing to let you simply bully me, Haus. And you are being a bully.
Perhaps the mistake you perceive is your own, and it is you who continuescontinue to make it? Someone in another thread described you as like a perfect mirror; however, in this case you are only reflecting your own images.
Again, no, the conspiracy was not mentioned by you; however, the “Ierne fiasco” was. Now, part of the Ierne fiasco was her obsessive fear that there was a conspiracy against her; thus, since you brought it up, it seems quite clear that you are the one who wants to “retread old ground.” by returning to it in detail and denying a series of accusations that had not been made? Yeah. For sure. Like I said before, there’s there are only crappy reruns on, and I’m not so interested in viewing them, and yet here we are, sitting in from tof front of the idiot box.
“You read and write in a highly idiosyncratic way. This is a beautiful thing, and to be celebrated, but is at times unhealpful [sic.].”
Thank-you. In fact, if I recall, you paid my writing a very high compliment in that “come back thread” of Ierne’s.
“Now, some might suggest that ‘what part of litherland’ was ad hominem to begin with, before we even consider the ‘snotty’ issue.”
Again, it seems to be that you are the one who immediately brought out the big guns and went ballistic by attacking me via your comment about self esteem. To get back to toksik’s remark, while your initial post and my initial response were of light humour, I don’t think you’ll find too many people who would say that negative comments about another person’s self-esteem are in good humour. Seriously, dude, get over it. Not a correction, just a hint.
“But anyway. What, at this point, are you trying to get out of this, Zilcho?”
I believe I’ve answered that above. Um. Nope
As for the rest of your post, it’s simply more drivel that makes you look even worse than you already do. You started in with the shallow criticism about linguistic mistakes, I was merely trying to follow your lead. And likewise, I too am familiar with your “ability to insult, cajole, obsess and complain.” You aren’t any different, Haus, and that’s why some people love you, others hate you, and some—like myself—both love and hate you.
And again you close your post with a barrage of questions that reflects your own brand of shit-stirring, and aren’t worth answering, because they are only intended to provoke conflict, and not resolve it again, wrong. I asked you what you wanted, you failed to answer. This is why I didn’t answer your other inane question.Yes, dear.
Also, in closing, I wonder, are you a psychiatrist or psychologist? No? Then let’s do without all the pseudo-diagnosis’ apostrophe? You got me. No idea why regarding “esteem issues”, “obsession,” like the obsession of mine you mentioned above? OK.... and the like. ‘Cause really, who are you to be pontificating about other’s difficulties when it seems you are unable to face your own? |
|
|
