|
|
Yeah, I love the fact that we don't actually get to see No Girl or anything naff like that at the end of the scene. You could even read it as Xorn just pretending (and if she's conceptual, what's the difference?), although I like runce's take even more. When GM gets dialogue right, he sure has a way with words: "searching for you in all the wrong frequencies" - it's like something out of an indie pop song!
So much to say about this issue.
My main complaint about #135 was a lack of moral ambiguity - I'd assumed that the focus of 'Riot' would be the Omega Gang, and they seemed to be too much the obvious bad guys. But! Here we get moral ambiguity in spades, and the shift of focus to the Special Class really pays off. It's partly the fact that we've known Beak and Angel for so long - I also complained that Quentin hadn't been given enough history, but I see now that this isn't his story, not in the way I'd originally thought. And Xorn... fucking Xorn.
On the one hand, as has been said, the U-Men are very bad people indeed - Morrison's tendency to play them as slightly clownish may sometimes obscure (deliberately, I'm sure) that these are people who kill and mutilate children. Quentin's completely right about them. And yet... where does defending yourself from such people and bringing them to justie (human or "mutant justice") stop, and becoming a vigilante start? Xorn has done something quite questionable now, and the way that scene is handled leaves you pretty much in the dark about where this may lead... It *is* creepy, and it also makes me wonder - who's he hiding this from? What would Xavier think about him killing (presumably) those U-Men, especially if the whole thing was a set-up (incidentally, why does the helicopter turn up when it does - did Xorn just page Scot, or was he in on it too?) - mind you, Xavier's a bit dodgy himself, isn't he... And there's the question of influence/example - okay, the Special Class learn to defend themselves, but something about that panel of Beak smashing the rock down... And if Angel now respects Xorn, it's because he's really good at killing people, right? As do we. The warrior thing - defender of the innocent, sure, but also someone who's good at violence... Lines blurring, grey morality... Yeah.
Basically I haven't seen this question - the question of violence, and when self-defense and stopping the bad guys because retribution and blood-lust - I haven't seen it handled so well since Angel Series 2. And it's all very Buffytastic this issue. I've even started rethinking my objections to some aspects of Quire's presentation, because it occurs to me that I do appreciate villains in tv shows like that without necessarily objecting to the way they resemble people I know and seem to be demonising traits I value (Spike, Faith, etc). But I digress.
Oh, and Xavier "taking his eye off the ball" is dead right. Look how shiny his suit is, and the limo... Dear me, he's got complacent. And now he's fooked.
Beak/Quentin - Beak/Scot parallels - definitely there in this one, I think. Notice how both Beak and Quentin turn down sex in the last 2 issues (is it reading in too much to contrast that with Scot's adult, lusty indulgences? - mmm, sweaty mind sex). If we get a showdown between the two of them I will be a very, very happy bunny. |
|
|