|
|
I think we're thinking alike, Rothkoid. I was originally interested in N vs. P as --I think it was Nick who said this-- a sort of Myers-Brigg indicator, but interactive. But for the most part, it seems to have developed into ...not a "safe" zone... but a sort of holodeck where people can enact behaviors that would otherwise not be acceptable, a sort of "Australian rules" Barbelith, if I may say that. So if the rules are no rules, then thongs will come into play. But, if thongs draw you up short --I just wonder how many double entendres and awkward phrasings I can stuff into one post-- then, you do have to look back and re-evaluate the whole jeu? |
|
|