|
|
What I took to be the point of Laura is that her existence - i.e. everything about her - is appropriated.
Penny has her dancing - even if it is everything of her, even if she has nothing else and is going to marry some strapping rugby player in the future, even if she's not sparklingly intelligent, witty and urbane - she has something she does that she loves.
Marc has the curse as an emotional signifier - whether he inflicted it on himself or whether his long-lost-sort of-love placed it on him doesn't matter, because, 'put here, come here, same difference', to badly misquote an unpopular writer 'round here.
Seth and Silent Girl have their own ways and means - even by the perversity of holding an event that will attract Phonomancers and then banning them from doing what they do (most likely in the knowledge that they'll do it anyway, but hey.)
Emily Aster has Emily Aster, having cut away and attempted to to replace Claire, however successfully.
Even Lloyd has his ideas and, obviously, some interesting talent, even if his social skills leave something to be desired.
But Laura... She has the quotes, which she's not afraid of claiming as her own if the other person won't know she's doing it, and she has in the Long Blondes what Emily Aster once had in the Manics, but she doesn't have a self, exactly, being defined by what she's not (Penny), what she wants (Marc, apparently) and what she knows she can't have (Lloyd, or, at least, Lloyd's ideas).
She would appear to be all potential and no originality, and stagnating because of it. She's not necessarily evil; she's just stuck.
Just my take on it, anyway. Too serious? Try this instead... |
|
|