| |
|
It's obvious you don't like all the banning bandwagon shit, Granny, but you've got to at least respect that many others feel justified and reasonable in wanting to ban this person, without attributing it to some bloodthirsty mob mentality.
Well yes. The point is, after a hasty beginning, we casme to the conclusion discussion was needed. Discussion was then had, and the consensus was in favour of banning. Consensus may not always be right, but in the absence of much dissent, it's pretty much all we have to go on.
As I said much earlier, I didn't (and don't, really) much care for the attitude that says "wahay! We can ban people now! Let's get banning; it'll be AWESOME" which may or may not exist, and may or may not be down to my own misreading of the situation, but which I share your concerns about. I'd favour a more sensible discussion before drastic steps are taken.
The thing is, I'm pretty sure we've had that discussion now. As I say, consensus isn't always right (though in this case I'm totally on board), but what else can we go on, really? In the absence of T&Cs (which we STILL NEED, really quite badly, btw) consensus is the only game in town. |
|
|
