BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Tom! The Board Is Broken!

 
  

Page: 12(3)4

 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
07:30 / 28.07.07
I would suggest that, at least for the early days, we go back to being 'The Nexus', or does that sound too Matrix and wankey?
 
 
Phex: Dorset Doom
08:00 / 28.07.07
Yes. In the name of all that is unholy, yes, that sounds wankey and there is no way in hell we should go back to The Nexus.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
09:19 / 28.07.07
The Mesh.

The Node.

I wouldn't mind being part of a Node.
 
 
Feverfew
18:59 / 28.07.07
"Not the Big Red Circle"?
 
 
Princess
19:03 / 28.07.07
ARTISTIC RECTUM
@ www.pinworm.com
 
 
Phex: Dorset Doom
19:52 / 28.07.07
We've kinda had this discussion before. That said, I do like TtS's suggestion 'The Mesh', or possibly just Mesh or M.E.S.H.
 
 
This Sunday
21:47 / 28.07.07
I suppose calling it The Blue Chicken Liver (www.thebluechickenliver.com) is too much hope for?

I do think distribution of moderating powers keeps there from being a clear entity to implore to, or to demonize when we disagree with a call. Not that I feel I'm particularly owed anything by anyone, however this or a new board are run, but I'll take King Mob over King Log or King Stork.

Some degree of privacy for certain aspects of the future-board would be interesting, though. Certain conversations could flourish under that, and then there's the folks who wouldn't be attracted to the board under false notions if they weren't seeing it pop up when they, say, google a certain comics writing guy.

I'm content to leave it in the hands of others, though. Between being hamhanded at programming and computery stuff and being frequently the unintentionally contrary voice in the choir, I'm not steering the ship even if people were inclined to let me. We have people better suited for that.
 
 
Tom Coates
07:49 / 29.07.07
You're right to say that Barbelith isn't the most fully-featured board, and you're right to say that we have significant problems that couldn't be fixed without incursions into the code. And of course, we've already established that I'm not really in the right place to be able to bring Barbelith up to the place it should be.

However, I would like to add some of my pointers to this discussion. GIven that I've been running a board to a greater or lesser extent now for over eight years, here's my two-penneth.

Most of the alternative boards you're proposing don't have good ways to screen people coming into the board. You guys don't think that's important now, but given that the board nearly fell apart dozens of times under the influence of trolls, that the board regularly decides it wants to eject people (and couldn't do so if membership was open, as they'd just sign up again), I think you have to seriously consider whether you'd be comfortable dealing with that stuff again. Unless you got someone to actually rewrite the board and extend it, you'd likely be just replacing one highly suboptimal situation with another.

We actually opened up the board for new members a couple of times in the past and pretty quickly everyone demanded I shut it down again. Too many people wandering off the internet, signing up, writing one stupid post and never coming back again. You guys all got furious.

Banning is a piece of functionality that the board clearly should have had for years, and I'm sorry that it's been left with me. I can't promise that we'll fix that any time soon. And yes, the new membership deal is pretty appalling. But again, you have to ask what you can actually accomplish out there. Running a board is a pretty thankless task in a lot of ways, and I'm not sure you'd find yourselves in a particularly better situation at the end of it.

Let me make myself clear. If people want me to shut down barbelith and point people towards somewhere else to continue the discussion, then I will do so. If people want the archives of posts (not pms, though) exported, then I will do so. I won't export user login names or passwords or anything like that though, so you'd have to lose some of that stuff. It would have to be an archive (I couldn't compromise people's privacy by doing something like that).

I just want you guys to seriously think beforehand how you'd deal with the problems that we deal with here and recognise that if it was as easy as installing an off-the-shelf board and moving everything from here into it, I'd probably have done that years ago. WE started off in off-the-shelf software, after all.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
16:08 / 01.08.07
The situation with membership only exists because we've no effective or speedy way of banning people, though. And that, in turn, is what's slowed the whole place down to an absolute crawl. Honestly Tom, it feels less like it's treading water now and more like it's struggling to keep its mouth above the surface to breathe.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
02:03 / 02.08.07
The situation with membership only exists because we've no effective or speedy way of banning people, though. And that, in turn, is what's slowed the whole place down to an absolute crawl.

I don't know if this is really the case.

The latest banning thread ended inconclusively, so it wouldn't have mattered what the process was, presumably?

While I can see the argument for opening up Barbelith to whoever wants to join, new voices etc, subject to instant banning if they breach the board's rules, I'm still at something of a loss as to how that would make the place better.

Surely, unless interesting people are prepared to write interesting material on here, the whole thing's a bust?
 
 
Alex's Grandma
02:08 / 02.08.07
Honestly Tom, it feels less like it's treading water now and more like it's struggling to keep its mouth above the surface to breathe

As an aside; hold the butter, hold the mayo, hold the lettuce, the mustard and the bread.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
07:45 / 02.08.07
I think that's true actually, if you can ban fast and effectively then it really doesn't matter if you have two or three trolls a week, you can get rid of them. You need someone who is reading the board and has the time to ban it though.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
16:13 / 02.08.07
Exactly.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
16:29 / 02.08.07
Tom, can you explain it again slowly for me, because I am thick:

Is the situation that you could give a couple of people the power to ban/kick people off, by making them Administrators rather than Moderators? And if that is correct, what is your reason for not being willing to do that?
 
 
jamesPD
17:04 / 02.08.07
There might not be an account with greater rights above moderator and below the administrator privileges Tom has. In which case he might be wary about handing over an account which would enable one of the users here to see personal PMs, email address etc.

Just a stab in the dark, I'm sure Tom can clarify.
 
 
invisible_al
09:23 / 06.08.07
I suspect you might actually need access to the database to ban people, in which case it's Tom or nobody.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
10:10 / 06.08.07
Well no actually, that's not how the world works, the CEO isn't the only person with access to the database at every organisation in the western world, that's how you go bust.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
10:24 / 06.08.07
True. However, if your employees are not strictly speaking employees but just people, and the database contains information which was provided under the understanding of confidentiality, _and_ this information cannnot be partitioned off, that becomes a bit trickier.

More pragmatically, if the current iteration of the board software could be organised in such a way that other people could ban, it would have been done by now, unless Tom really didn't want to do it. So, it is either impossible or the only person who could set it up is not going to - either way, we probably have to think around it while discussing ways that any future board could deal with banning.
 
 
Tom Coates
07:04 / 30.08.07
At the moment banning people requires me going into the database, finding their user number and marking them as 'banned'. It doesn't take an enormous amount of time, but it is fiddly and it's not something as it stands that I could really open up more widely because it gives you access to the database, all the private messages etc. etc.

I have no issue with their being functionality to allow mods to ban people, except that I'm not capable of building it and I've had trouble convincing Cal to build it.

I should point out though that in the past, traditionally, the board has been highly resistant to people being banned at all, and most attempts to ban people have resulted in long long long drawn-out debates. On the few occasions that I've taken a position early on and banned people I've been taken to task for it fairly vociferously. I could say at this point, make your mind up!

As it stands, I believe we said that if I got an e-mail from Haus (and maybe one other person? Paleface?) saying someone should be banned, that I'd work on the principle that you guys had all agreed to it and I'd ban them immediately. I haven't received a single e-mail.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
08:16 / 30.08.07
Yep - we haven't had any banning discussions since that was mooted, but in theory I think it's a good idea. Moving this discussion to "Topics of Concern - Banning".
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
08:43 / 30.08.07
On the few occasions that I've taken a position early on and banned people I've been taken to task for it fairly vociferously. I could say at this point, make your mind up!

I think we have fewer trollpologists to jump on the tables and rant about How We Are All The Fetch, or whatever. They've either wised up or got banned themselves.
 
 
8===>Q: alyn
00:59 / 14.09.07
...or gotten bored and gone elsewhere.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
23:10 / 20.11.07
IT IS STILL BROKED

bored.
 
 
Breefield
03:00 / 01.04.08
So, I've read through all this, I'm not trying to...barge in, I don't think anyone here on Barbelith knows me too well and I don't want to come off wrong, but I think I have a solution of sorts. I've read all about the problems, and need for fixes, etc, and I'm an aspiring programmer with a need for portfolio content. So I, in my spare time (about 2 weeks or so, off and on) I've rebuilt Barbelith from the ground up.

Here are some of the things I've addressed, and I'm sure some will need changing, specifically with the application system.

Admins are given full reign over the board and users, they can go everywhere except into user's private messages.

Admins can also assign users to a position of moderating a forum.

Moderators can edit users posts relative to the forum, or forums they moderate.

New registrants receive a verification email which they MUST click a link within to become active on the board.

Users are given folders i.e. barbelith.breefield.com/profiles/Breefield/

Posts are given folders i.e. barbelith.breefield.com/post/2/

Forums have more descriptive folder names i.e. http://barbelith.breefield.com/forum/laboratory/

I've done some testing in IE7 and Safari, but I've developed it in Firefox, so the possibility for browser error probably will fall into the IE6 category. I also notice one small underline problem in Safari which I'm trying to fix.

There's still work to be done, I need to make it so that moderators / admins can delete posts, delete topics, and move them as well.

You can check it all out at barbelith.breefield.com

I have a ton of free time, so changes can be made very quickly, as well as fixes.

Please sign up on the board and start testing stuff out, let me know if you run into any problems whatsoever.

<3 Dustin
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
07:41 / 01.04.08
Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner - my suggestion would be to change the colour scheme and the name, and market it as an alternative bulletin board. You might want to offer some particulars on who you are somewhere around it, also - at present you'd be harvesting email addresses without a lot of background.
 
 
Breefield
11:38 / 01.04.08
Yeah, I kinda realize that. Hum...well, I'll look into doing that.

As far as the name and color schema. I didn't want to make changes to what people were familiar with, without talking to them first. Plus I really like Barbelith's design. Then for the name, well, that's far to big for me to go about changing wildly.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
11:59 / 01.04.08
Wow,good effort!

Yeah, the Barbelith name is kind of problematic. It has a sentimental appeal for many, but has in the past resulted in people turning up expectant of an Invisibles or Grant Morrison fansite and kicking up a bit rough when they find something else. Were I you, I'd pick a different monniker.
 
 
grant
14:04 / 01.04.08
Morebelith!
 
 
Spatula Clarke
15:46 / 01.04.08
Seriously, your own name and design would be far preferable to this. Inherit the design and you'll inherit all of the baggage that people here have.

Clean sweep or I'm afraid it's destined to failure.

At this moment in time, I wouldn't touch a Barbelith v.2. A brand new board, yes.
 
 
Quantum
16:14 / 01.04.08
I thought for a moment it was an April Fool gag...
 
 
HCE
18:07 / 01.04.08
It's not?
 
 
HCE
18:17 / 01.04.08
Huh. It's not.
 
 
Breefield
18:32 / 01.04.08
I quite like the rainbow schema. It stands out, that's what I like most, but without being obnoxious. I think a new name should be in order, and I quite like grant’s idea of Morebelith! Even if he was just being facetious…

But I think the main reason I’ve gone with these colors and the name with the addition of the beta was so that people would recognize it as a new Barbelith. Not a new board. I don’t want to make a board and have Barbelith’s members join up, I want to renovate the current Barbelith, making it fresh, clean, and snappy.

At this moment in time, I wouldn't touch a Barbelith v.2. A brand new board, yes.

My point is, it’s not going to be Barbelith v.2. and it won’t be a new board either (like I said, there are plenty of other boards where Barbelith’s members can go) It’s just going to be Barbelith with new code, and the possibility for extensions / additions / snappy fixes.

I have more to say but the bell just rang and I have to get to class. I’ll elaborate later.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
19:08 / 01.04.08
Well, good luck to you, but I'm finding it difficult to understand how reusing old design and layout = fresh, clean, snappy. Even with a new underlying structure.

I'd also warn against using somebody else's design without first seeking their permission.

Resuming silent running.
 
 
HCE
19:59 / 01.04.08
I appreciate the effort you've put in, Breefield, even if I disagree with some of your choices about how to handle the project.
 
  

Page: 12(3)4

 
  
Add Your Reply