| |
|
So, I obviously consider them an evil manipulative pseudoscientific cult invented on a bet with Heinlein, with a townful of brainwashed devotees living the dianetics dream and rinsing money out of gullible hollywood stars and vulnerable people.
Funny you should say that; here's what I posted in another forum, earlier today...
Something I've noticed with Scientologists is that their energy seems to be very similar to one another - this occurs in many religions, especially those with monastic lifestyles such as the Shoalin Monks, as well as military forces, and even marriages, especially when the participants actively try to be like one another, however there are noteable differences with Scientologists.
A Shaolin Monks energy comes from within and radiates outwards, so that whilst it comes out being similar to their brethren they still retain the core of who they are, though this core gradually changes in a healthy manner as it is focused towards their goal - it's like a pyramid of the various shades of orange which then focuses towards a pure saturation and intensity, which is similar to the process other groups go through.
A Scientologists energy, however, seems to come from without, radiating inwards and smothering the core, which is rather unhealthy; what's more unhealthy is that all this energy wants to do is replicate itself for the sake of replicating itself, whereas a Shoalin Monks has a somewhat more positive goal. I'm trying to be delicate about this, but basically my impression of Scientology is that it's a hard sell, mentally dominating energy that forces itself on others and smothers them, like a choking vine does to other plants; it retreats quickly when it encounters resistance as it preys on weakness, and its only real defence is to appeal to weakness.
My advice is that unless you want to study such energy, as well as find out who the bigger predator is, it's best to avoid Scientology because it's very good at what it does. |
|
|
