BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


That thing i do -- feminism -- size matters

 
  

Page: 1(2)34

 
 
Spaniel
11:12 / 31.10.06
Come on, Mordant, nothing beats a big fat cock!
 
 
E. Coli from the Milky Way
11:12 / 31.10.06
Ok hearth, that reference was done by Paka Diaz in article in some magazine, that's because i got interested in the issue.

The penis is important because it "activates", or gives consciuousness to the woman of that part in the womb.

I've not sex in 8 years because i was no stable, and i didn't wanted to use partners like some kind of shelter, or something like that (to vampirize them).

Now i'm stable by myself i'm opened to relationships again.

Anyway I'm not advocating for some fallocentric society or something like that, but i think size matters, yeah.
 
 
E. Coli from the Milky Way
11:16 / 31.10.06
And well, ok, i'm tired of hearing women talk about the penis of her partners, don't make me think that now i'm deluded or something like that, holy cow!
 
 
Spaniel
11:18 / 31.10.06
Slow down, mate, there's clearly a language barrier that needs to be negotiated here.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
11:18 / 31.10.06
The penis is important because it "activates", or gives consciuousness to the woman of that part in the womb.


How does the penis give consciousness of that part in the womb, exactly? I would have thought it was rare to the point of freakishness for the penis to somehow penetrate the cervix and enter the womb, whereas many women become acutely conscious of their wombs at least once a month with or without the assitance of a penis.
 
 
Ganesh
11:23 / 31.10.06
This is all rather Lailaesque: a steaming broth of information with no filter or attempt at quality control, meaning the occasional gobbet of (over)referenced fact bobs alongside mish-mashed assumptions, suppositions and good hefty chunks of personal 'baggage' on matters sexual and reproductive. Along with evidence evaluation, it's invariably the connective (pseudo)logic that's askew. The individual advancing the thrown-together mash-up typically has difficulty communication to us all why 2 and 2 really does equal 23.

This isn't actually Laila, of course. It's a similarly 'psychotic' approach, though.
 
 
E. Coli from the Milky Way
11:33 / 31.10.06
Ok Mordant, the same way an ass penetration gives consciousness of the G-Point in men.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
11:41 / 31.10.06
But men being penetrated don't benefit from a bigger penis either. A large object isn't anymore likely to stimulate the male G-spot (the prostate gland) and is more likely to cause discomfort and injury.
 
 
E. Coli from the Milky Way
11:51 / 31.10.06
yeah, well, i don't have a womb, it's obvious, i don't know. On that you've said with being conscious of the womb once a month, yeah -- but the hormone segregation are completely different: estrogenous is an anphetamine.

It's arguably that the psychosomatic link is made between the mechanical stimulation of the womb and the (pleasure) hormones segregated (take all that psychological conditioning techniques and all that).

Ok, only speculations.

Better I shut up my mouth up, stop babbling and all that.

Hey, but these conversations are funny, don't you think??

Ok, Mordant, I'm lost. Haven't called yet that friends of the suicide mission? Please show me the way!
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
11:53 / 31.10.06
Poeme

How much longer
Are we going to have to deal
With cretins like this fucker?
 
 
Papess
11:59 / 31.10.06
I don't see what the argument is. That large penises and childbirth can result in the fullest orgasm for women therefore, we are driven biologically to seek the largest penis to mate with?

Thank goodness that isn't everyone's criteria when mating. Personally, the biggest organ I want on my sexual partner would be their brain.

This "uterine orgasm" is more of a full body orgasm. It can be acheived during childbirth and it can be acheived with the proper techniques which have little relationship to the size of one's penis. In fact, you don't really need a penis for it. A fist, or a tongue or a finger could do it. You just have to know what you are doing. Hence, why I prefer bigger brains, rather than bigger boy bits.

Seeing how the application of creativity and intelligence is the very thing that defines human sex from that of animals, taking that element away in your theory reduces humans to a series of biological urges. Which frankly, most people here are quite evolved from being slaves to. Which is one reason why I think your theory, Digital Horus Eye, may come off as primitive, if not insulting.
 
 
Papess
12:06 / 31.10.06
Or as Quantum put so succinctly:

Danger. WHOOP WHOOP. Beware. We are not monkeys.
 
 
pointless & uncalled for
12:07 / 31.10.06
Personally, the biggest organ I want on my sexual partner would be their brain.

Ha ha

Good luck with that.
 
 
Papess
12:09 / 31.10.06
Hehe, maybe I didn't state that correctly.

Their biggest sexual organ.
 
 
Quantum
12:10 / 31.10.06
that big fat cock can break a psychosomatic dead lik between brain and uterus.

What the holy fuck are you on about? What's a psychosomatic dead link?

Click on this link, here, for a clear diagram of the female internal reproductive anatomy. See where it says G-spot? Notice how it's nowhere near the uterus? Why are you contesting that a big dick is better for women when actual real live women say it isn't? What makes you think getting poked in the cervix breaks a psychosomatic dead link?

I like Flyboy's pome.
 
 
E. Coli from the Milky Way
12:11 / 31.10.06
Well Electrix, i'm not seeking to reduce humankind to biological urges -- not in the way you're saying; in my view everything is biology and maybe the thing called "god" or "spirit" can be viewed too like a biological urge.

About you say of your partner's brain and all of this, it can be arguable that brain and dick attraction maybe are different programs running at diferent levels: see this.

Of course my intention it is not to insult no one. ¿Primitive? Yeah, maybe ... but don't dismiss the primitive part of the life -- it is an important part, i think ...
 
 
Quantum
12:13 / 31.10.06
So <(o)>¬, tell us about your views on feminism. (Shame about Sonja by the way, gutted for you mate.)
 
 
Ex
12:13 / 31.10.06
Mr Horus Eye:

Hey, but these conversations are funny, don't you think??

It's not top of my list of amusing moments to log on to a board I generally enjoy and be told I really need doing with a big dick. It's the kind of ill-justified and widespread codswallop that makes people's lives less pleasant and more difficult.

So really, I think I would have preferred a thread about a small town in Cornwall which has become infested with feral but friendly ferrets, and how the locals are donating hundreds of jumpers for them to nest in over the coming Winter. It would have had as much factual back-up as your thread, but wouldn't have made me fear for the future of the world quite so much.
 
 
Papess
12:14 / 31.10.06
WHat dick attraction?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
12:15 / 31.10.06
What I really don't understand is how come, if it's such a strong evolutionary urge, only one person in this entire thread seems to be aware of it happening. Surely something like that would be fairly universal?
 
 
Quantum
12:16 / 31.10.06
Led by a neuroscientist, an anthropologist and a social psychologist, the team found love-related neurophysiological systems inside a magnetic resonance imaging machine. (from the link)

I initially thought 'Fuck! In an MRI machine?! What could it possibly fall in love with?'
 
 
E. Coli from the Milky Way
12:16 / 31.10.06
And Quantum, I said "the same way that G-Point in men" meaning a "similar way", not the G-point in women ...
 
 
Ganesh
12:16 / 31.10.06
On the upside, this discussion has prompted me to suggest my partner change his screen name to Relatively Oversized Xoc.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
12:18 / 31.10.06
It's arguably that the psychosomatic link is made between the mechanical stimulation of the womb and the (pleasure) hormones segregated (take all that psychological conditioning techniques and all that).

But as has been pointed out, the womb itself is unlikely to be stimulated during penetrative sex. And penetrative sex is not necessarily the best way to ensure a release of pleasure hormones, since penetrative sex does not always result in sufficient stimulation to achieve orgasm. Indeed, penetration doesn't need to occur at all for orgasm to happen, and other forms of stimulation are likely to be far more effective.

These are all things that you'd be aware of if you had even the most basic understanding of female sexuality and anatomy. I mean, the kind of grasp you'd get from a biology textbook aimed at 14-year-olds. Or the leaflet inside a box of tampons, for that matter.

Hey, but these conversations are funny, don't you think??

No, I personally find them rather draining.
 
 
Quantum
12:18 / 31.10.06
Now I've got a whole saga playing out in my mind about a doomed romance between a lovelorn MRI scanner and an X-ray machine with a really, really big dick.
 
 
Papess
12:20 / 31.10.06
The question is: Does can Xoc give a "uterine orgasm?"?

Really, (pffft), to think that just because a man has a large cock he can pull off even just a regular female orgasm is sheer ignorance.
 
 
E. Coli from the Milky Way
12:20 / 31.10.06
I've never said that all that you need is a big cock, ok?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
12:21 / 31.10.06
Led by a neuroscientist, an anthropologist and a social psychologist, the team found love-related neurophysiological systems inside a magnetic resonance imaging machine.

Surely that's the blurb from an old Panther SF paperback?
 
 
Ex
12:22 / 31.10.06
OK, I'll approach some of the mechanics - wouldn't it be just as easy to mechanically stimulate my uterus by rubbing my adbdomen?
 
 
E. Coli from the Milky Way
12:23 / 31.10.06
But as has been pointed out, the womb itself is unlikely to be stimulated during penetrative sex.
Yeah, but a large enough penis can reach the womb's neck. That's the point.
 
 
Papess
12:23 / 31.10.06
Oh baby, pleasure my uterus!

That is wrong in so many ways.
 
 
Quantum
12:24 / 31.10.06
The womb's neck. Isn't that the cervix?
 
 
E. Coli from the Milky Way
12:25 / 31.10.06
And yeah, Ex, that's it. That article states that much woman achieve "uterinus orgasm" rubbing the abdomen. Also you have hindi "belly dance" that enhances that mechanics too!
 
 
Quantum
12:26 / 31.10.06
Surely that's the blurb from an old Panther SF paperback?

Once I've written Resonate My Uterus and got a publisher, it will be.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
12:27 / 31.10.06
I've never said that all that you need is a big cock, ok?

No. That was, of course, The Beatles.
 
  

Page: 1(2)34

 
  
Add Your Reply