Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.

Underground > Conversation >

That thing i do -- feminism -- size matters

Page: 1 2 3(4)

Ex

10:53 / 01.11.06

She told me that that point-G is at the bottom of the vagina and having a bigger penis gives the man "the chance to hit more times in the point".

The G-spot is about two centimetres in, on the front wall of the vagina.

And more mechanics:

I, and many other women, can touch their own cervix. My fingers are about 2-3 inches long (sorry to be vague - no ruler). 2-3 inches is not a big penis. Furthermore, the length of a vagina changes with the overall physical posture of the vagina-owner.

So:
Vaginas are not a static length.
Vaginas do not need big penises to reach their cervix/uterus – a smallish one will do fine.

I don't think, Horus Eye/E.Coli, that you know much about female anatomy, really – which is not a problem of itself, but you are precisely making assertions about female anatomy.
And when you're told any new information about anatomy or people’s sexual responses (eg that lots of women find having their cervixes pressed painful and unpleasant, upthread) you chuck out another throwaway remark to try to shore up your original assertion (‘Maybe girls…’ ‘Maybe having…’).

In words of few syllables:

This is a really controversial topic which directly affects people.

People will continue to get ticked off if you keep throwing around unsubstantiated statements.

This annoyance is not lessened by the idea that you’re just an impulsive enthusiast.

You could try asking some questions about people's sexual responses and listening to their replies. But I think you may have drained the collective goodwill too far, and indicated that you are unwilling to listen too often, to get any answers.

E. Coli from the Milky Way

11:01 / 01.11.06

Well, ok, i have admitted that i was wrong, and i don't have any problem on admitting it further.

Ok, the only problem i have right now, besides pshycotic ways to trying to find an explanation on, why, the "size matter" topic, althought we rationally know that it is "just wrong", has that irrational part that keeps it alive as a controversial point ...

Ex

11:21 / 01.11.06

There! That's interesting! That's an interesting point! I would be very happy to discuss that. I'm particularly interested in why women, speaking about their sexual desires, seem to be encouraged into expressing appreciation of excessive size, when in quiet moments I've heard far more women being appreciative of smaller models. What controls what is permissable, even when the whole field is a bit taboo? Who does it serve? How does it work?

However, I will take a bit of a break and wash my brain off out with the handsoap in the staff loos first. Tata.

E. Coli from the Milky Way

11:24 / 01.11.06

I've heard far more women being appreciative of smaller models
RU Sirius?

Ex

11:33 / 01.11.06

No, I'm Snape.

Yes, I'm bloody serious. I'm not just arguing to MESS with yore H34D!!!1 you know - I'm arguing because everything you've asserted in this thread about the vital importance of big willies has directly contradicted my own personal experience of 15 years of discussing sex with close female friends.

E. Coli from the Milky Way

11:40 / 01.11.06

ok ok, the RU Sirius thing wasn't a provocation ...
I'm very interested on hear more, really interested, seriously ...

13:03 / 01.11.06

Ex - I'm particularly interested in why women, speaking about their sexual desires, seem to be encouraged into expressing appreciation of excessive size

Could this just be group-bawdiness. I can't say I've as much experience as you do, Ex, but I have been in groups of women where they talk incessantly about massive cocks and great big balls. While very funny, I think like you that they're not necessarily expressing what they really want, rather that they are expected to want.

Speaking from the male perspective, I've often been in groups of men where they talk about huge tits and arse fucking and getting blowjobs all the time, when in fact this has little relation to reality and what they really like/expect/actually get.

Is it just that it's easier and cooler to say "Oh, I could get my legs around a footlong right about now" in a group than "Actually, anything over 5 inches hurts my cervix".

My point is, in essence, that there's a world of difference between talking shit with your firends after a few drinks, and what you actually get up to and enjoy in the sack.

(btw, Heart in Flame, this thread was fucking hilarious. Sure, you didn't think so, but you were the best thing about it. Your righteous indignation in the face of total idiocy was impressive, absurd and brilliant. Fools x (patently wrong ideas about how the world works) + rage / mocking = very funny. If you wish a further explanation, please do ask)

13:15 / 01.11.06

As side-splittingly hysterical as this thread no doubt is, could we perhaps just let it drop?

If there is anything of worth to be extracted from it then perhaps a new thread could be started without the aggravating misogyny and whiff of racism?

Ex

13:41 / 01.11.06

Although I feel that group efforts may have shaken some small particle of sense out of this thread, I wouldn't be gutted if it sunk without trace.

I don't think anyone who would like to discuss sex, physiology and phallic cults should have to wade through four pages of spat and slur.

E. Coli from the Milky Way

14:48 / 01.11.06

ok, i agree ... only let me link one wacky video. Last word of mine here ...

THIS VIDEO IS OBVIOUSLY NOT SAFE FOR WORK.

14:58 / 01.11.06

That link might need a NSFW tag, but I'm not sure. I didn't hang around long enough for the page to fully load, but what I did see looked NSFW.

'Course I'm a repressed prude with a tiny, tiny winkie...

15:00 / 01.11.06

What is the point of that? I think you are way too obsessed with penises and penis size DHE/E.Coli.

Someone slap a NWS on that, please.

Page: 1 2 3(4)