BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Prestige

 
  

Page: (1)234

 
 
Sylvia
19:29 / 23.10.06
If you have ANY interest in this movie, don't look up any spoilers beforehand. I'm quite serious.

I'm surprised no one's started a thread on this one yet. I caught it with a bunch of friends on opening night, and we all loved it. It has an intricate but rewarding narrative, solid performances all around, and a lot of things I don't want to talk about yet for fear of ruining it. I highly recommend it.

I WILL say that there are parts where the movie seems to compare the astonishment and wonder of seeing magic with the astonishment and wonder people felt at the dawning of the electrical age. I loved that. I want to go into it in more detail but will keep that spoiler-free promise for now.
 
 
X-Himy
20:02 / 23.10.06
Haven't read the book (yet), but thoroughly enjoyed the movie. I think that it could have done without the coda, where "everything was explained." But a damn fine movie nonetheless.
 
 
The Strobe
20:43 / 23.10.06
I WILL say that there are parts where the movie seems to compare the astonishment and wonder of seeing magic with the astonishment and wonder people felt at the dawning of the electrical age.

I must admit that this only confirms my suspicions that both book and film sound awfully like Carter Beats the Devil. I'm concerned they won't be as good as that book, which was just wonderful, really.
 
 
Spaniel
20:54 / 23.10.06
Yeah, the Prestige had me thinking about CMtD the second I read about it, and, no, I suspect it isn't that good, although I am looking forward to its release on these shores.
 
 
Keith, like a scientist
20:59 / 23.10.06
was a good movie...I really wish I could erase my knowledge of reading the book this past year and see it again...I'm curious if it's as obvious as I think it is.

I will say this, though, it's the only movie I've been to all year that actually got applause at the end... that's just shocking to me. No one ever claps at the end of movies these days.

Also, this is the first movie in which I actually liked Christian Bale.

The AICN reviewer made special mention of the last shot and, for the life of me, I can't remember what the last shot in the movie is... someone help?
 
 
Sylvia
21:39 / 23.10.06
The AICN reviewer made special mention of the last shot and, for the life of me, I can't remember what the last shot in the movie is... someone help?

Sure. END OF THE MOVIE SPOILERS...

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S


S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

L
O
T
S

O
F


S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

The VERY last shot of the movie is of Angier's body floating in the tank inside the now-burning abandoned theater.

I agree with X-Himy, in that the end felt a touch over-explained, and I was a little disapointed they showed us Angier's face. I wouldn't have minded silhouettes of men in tanks instead, if they felt they HAD to go ahead and spell it out for us.

Still, I liked how it completely changed the meaning of Cutter's "You don't really want to FIND the answer to the trick" monologue from the beginning that they replayed at the end.
 
 
Jared Louderback
05:03 / 24.10.06
This movie was really, really disappointing to me. The story was going in an interesting way, sort of, and then it veered suddenly in a very unappealing way. But David Bowie as Nikola Tesla might have been the greatest thing ever. Really, they need to just make a movie where bowie plays tesla, ala the comic The Five Fists of Science. Then I can die happy.
 
 
matthew.
18:58 / 25.10.06
I found the movie to be thoroughly enjoyable. Thoroughly. I had a big grin on my face the entire running time, and for me, that's the surest sign of a good movie. A lot of people said that they had seen the ending coming from a mile away and that was disappointing. Who cares? As one of the characters (or more than one) remarks, once you know the trick, it's really quite disappointing. But that's not why you've gone to see The Prestige. Not for the solution, but for the trick itself. Silly reviewers, movies are for audiences.
 
 
Elijah, Freelance Rabbi
14:20 / 26.10.06
I liked this movie a lot.

Leaving the theater my movie buff friend and I were discussing it.

SPOILER SPAAAACCEEEE

















We were talking and he told me he thought the sci fi bit was kind of a cop out at the end. We discussed this further and decided that the point was that is WAS a cop out. Wolverine knew he could never be as good a magician as Batman, he didn't really understand why until the very end, but he knew it. Wolverine knew that he couldn't be better using illusion, so he cheated, using science instead. I think that was the whole point, is that doing the trick by using Tesla's miracle machine was cheating to create an effect Batman was able to pull off due to his dedication to the craft.

The bit that had me wondering was the booking agent saying "Real magic, I haven't seen that since..." after seeing the Tesla trick for the first time.
 
 
Jack The Bodiless
15:11 / 11.11.06
Regarding book/film sounding awfully like Gold's Carter Beats The Devil - Priest's novel was published in 1995, Gold's in 2001, so if anything sounds awfully like anything... but as it turns out, The Prestige is nothing like Gold’s novel, except for the protagonist as illusionist starting point, which is a remote link if ever I’ve heard one.


S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S


S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S


S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S


Saw the film last night. Loved it... one of the best films I've seen in years. Given the subject matter, it's no surprise that it revolves around themes of obsession and secrecy, but The Prestige also has a fair bit to say about mainstream cinema’s experimentation in narrative, which have been Nolan's chief selling point as a filmmaker so far. At the beginning, Caine’s character Cutter introduces us in voiceover to Priest's (fictional) three-act structure for a magic trick/illusion – the Pledge, the Turn, and the Prestige - which itself neatly parallels the almost sacred text of the three-act structure for feature screenplays (noting that the Nolan brothers generally disdain any such structure for their work). But it’s a red herring, designed to make you think that you're going to see one of those movies with a trick ending so popular since the brilliantly constructed and highly successful The Usual Suspects and The Sixth Sense convinced hacks that the best way to sell a screenplay was to tack on an unconvincing twist.

I don’t think The Prestige has a trick, or twist ending, at least not as the concept is known these days. The subject matter, coupled with the Caine’s voiceover introduction featuring the above mentioned device, leads you to believe that the twists and turns within the narrative are leading to a final spectacular convolution which never actually happens. Not that the ending is bathetic – but the pirouetting narrative actually is the point of the film, and the Prestige of The Prestige is to leave us with a satisfying conclusion, just as the Prestige of an illusion is to have the audience gasp and cheer. Cutter says as much in that introductory voiceover, just as Angier does in the film’s coda – the former, at the Turn before the Prestige, along the lines of “but you’re not clapping yet, there’s something more” and the latter, “it was just to see the looks on their faces…”

Thematically, the narrative features secrecy mired in obsession destroying relationships, the destroyed relationships leaving the obsessive nothing left but to continue to obsess. We never find out whether Alfred Borden, as an individual, actually exists anymore than Fallon does, just as Lord Caldlow is no more the real Rupert Angier than is The Great Danton or even Angier himself. Four women stand between characters in The Prestige : Angier’s wife, doomed to a tragic end possibly because of her collusion with Borden in changing part of a trick without telling Cutter, and so beginning the murderous rivalry between them ; Borden’s wife, who is never told of his secret but probably guesses before – and precipitating – her own tragic end ; Olivia, first Angier’s lover and assistant, then Borden’s ; and Borden’s daughter, the bargaining chip between Caldlow and a jailed Borden. Again in these relationships, what comes back time and time again is mirroring, as it does during the (by now traditionally non-linear) narrative in other more obvious ways - in the tit-for-tat games of brutal ones-upmanship, Borden for Fallon, Angier for Gerald Root, Angier for his genuine doppelgangers (forshadowed by the live dove substituting the dead dove, killed in the act of the Prestige), the ‘purloined’ notebook with a twist in its mini-narrative reflected by the same device but reversed later on, Tesla for Edison (and AC for DC), wife for mistress, wife for daughter. Julia Kristeva posits the mirror-phase as a threshold state, and in each of the four women we get to see different facets of the men they mirror, just as each female character’s short arc presents a massive change for one or both of the rivals. In that sense, it’s a man’s movie – the female characters aren’t ciphers, but neither are they as fully fleshed as the two protagonists. I don’t know – is irrational secrecy and obsession just a guy thing? Not sure it is…

You can go further – class warfare! Borden’s working class twins and Angier’s equivalent, purchased with old money (Angier, seeking to learn the naturally talented Borden’s secret, is sent on a wild goose chase, and so ironically finds a way to buy himself a way to duplicate what Borden was born with), playboy and dilletante Angier buys himself the workhouse orphan’s daughter to replace his wife, Angier is bored and seeks the thrill of engagement with an audience, Borden is trapped and seeks a way to make something greater of and for himself. But at the end, all the twists and turns, the reflections and reversals, exist to provide us with a vastly entertaining story. If you were being cynical, you could say that the final ten minutes provide us with three trick endings in a row – except they don’t, not really. We’ve had enough hints to know that Fallon isn’t what he appears (the many, many extended cuts ending on his whiskered face, his telling almost total absence of dialogue or personality, Borden’s mania upon his kidnapping), and given the Chinaman’s secret, the nature of the disputed trick, the constant doubling and mirroring, the constant references to the bipolar nature of Borden’s family life, it’s no stretch to guess Borden’s own secret. Caldlow/Angier is also hardly a surprise, and certainly no more of one than the earlier notebook reversals or the bizarre double-treble-quadruple agent role forced on Olivia. If anything unsettles, it’s the unheimlich, the weirdness and dread involved with the hundred performances of Angier’s ‘The Real Transported Man’, and the Angiers left to drown. The dying Angier mutters something about never being sure which he would be – would he live or would he drown? Is the original transported and the replicate left behind, or the reverse, and, depending on which it is, which is he – the original Angier or a replicate? Which one dies, and how would he know? Angier drowns himself every night, and every night never knows whether he will be the one drowned. That’s one hell of a threshold state to be in, and for a movie all about mirrors, funhouse and otherwise, that’s one hell of a climax to the movie’s Prestige.
 
 
h1ppychick
22:59 / 11.11.06
That was a wonderful review, thank you. I saw the film last night and you've expressed my own thoughts so beautifully it's like you have a radio tuned into my mind.
 
 
Seth
00:38 / 12.11.06
Who wants to start a petition for a Wolverine vs Batman movie?
 
 
X-Himy
02:01 / 13.11.06
Batman wins. Oops...

SPOILER


Batman wins, the primacy of the rules of the sentient DCU trumps the rules of the Marvel Universe.

SPOILER ENDS
 
 
Joggy Yoghurt
14:01 / 16.11.06
So eh, which knot did Bale actually tie?
 
 
Elijah, Freelance Rabbi
15:12 / 16.11.06
What I really liked about Borden's secret is that at the funeral he was likely being 100% honest when he said he didn't know which knot he had tied.

In the novel there is some great stuff in Borden's journal where he is arguing with himself, but constantly uses 'I' for both himself and the other he is arguing with, brilliantly written I think.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
01:43 / 17.11.06
The first hour of this was great, really about the best thing I've seen at the movies in years. But after that, it seemed to come a little unstuck.

More on this later, but initially, my concerns are thus;

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

- The twist re: Bale's character - after a while, he may as well have been walking round with a large sign reading 'Do You See?'

- The portrayal of Tesla was, I think, pretty much unforgivable. There's a suggestion that the man was a charlatan, which as a judgment seems entirely a bit much coming from a (talented, but still ...) Alpha B-list Hollywood movie director.

- What actually happened in the end?

As much as I enjoyed this, and would recommend it to anyone, it did seem to get a bit lost in the fog of the writer/director's conceit about halfway through.
 
 
Seth
04:36 / 17.11.06
- What actually happened in the end?

Angier was Jack the Ripper and the final shot of the movie, post credits, was him formulating his plans to send his Tesla-made army of Rippers to take on the Vatican. Meanwhile Bordenchrist is the only man who can stop him...

I'm not sure how you could miss that. Are you some kind of buffoon?
 
 
Alex's Grandma
05:10 / 17.11.06
I like to think of myself as a well-rounded father of many who is involved in the local cricket club (but not in a sexual way.)

That aside, was there really a post-credits sequence?

Truthfully, I can't bear those. Two hours without a cig is a bit much in any case, I'm generally out the door and sparking up the minute the film's over, so the idea that I, as a cinema-goer, am in some sense expected to wait around while whatever character was responsible for the dolly grip has had their name on screen, and such ... Mr S, it is thimply anathema.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
05:34 / 17.11.06
Seriously though, what did happen in the end?

Anyone?
 
 
Whisky Priestess
09:28 / 17.11.06
ENTIRE POST FULL OF SPOILERS

DON'T EVEN GO THERE












I think I may have confused the issue, mystified as I was by the last shot. I was guilty of overcomplicating the whole thing and thinking that extra, extra twist was that the Tesla machine actually didn't work and that the man in the tank was Gerald Root ... all right, all right, I'd had a couple of glasses of wine at this stage, but that was what the ending shot and voiceover seemed to imply:

shot of tons of top hats; how do we know they have been created by Tesla's machine rather than bought and strewn about the place as "set dressing" to dupe Tesla's last wealthy patron?

shot of cat; who can tell the difference between two black cats? Could be more misdirection

shot of drowned Angier; if the cats and hats weren't replicates, what if this was just a lookalike, i.e. Gerald Root, back in his original role as Angier's double? What if he's been dropping safely onto mats all this time and the night that Borden investigates happens to be the night Angier decides to kill his pesky, demanding double?

It made sense(ish) to me at the time.

However, I now reckon that the body in the tank simply indicates that under the theatre's floorboards is where all the other drowned Angiers from the previous performances were taken ... but how many tanks does Angier have? The front of this one isn't cracked and it would be if it was the same tank Bale tried to break to save Angier 2.

And if they empty the tank of its old corpse and take it back to the theatre to receive a new victim every night, why is there a spare tank and spare corpse floating around? The corpse Borden saw would have had a post-mortem and burial, cos people thought it was the only Angier.

Fanwank: the tank shouldn't have glass sides if it's meant only to drown people - this carries the risk of the trick being blown if anyone comes under the stage and sees the sturggling Angier 2 - and as there is no audience for the drowning Angier 2 there's no need for the tank's walls to be glass.

And was it meant to be a big reveal, that Angier was drowning his doubles, or not? Cos I thought it was fairly obvious the minute we saw the shrouded tank-shaped thing leaving the theatre "every night" as the voice-over ominously tells us.
 
 
mkt
09:34 / 17.11.06
The twist re: Bale's character - after a while, he may as well have been walking round with a large sign reading 'Do You See?'

I've read a few criticisms of the film that mention the obviousness of the ending, and I'm baffled. The film is called "The Prestige". My understanding was that the whole film was about expectation, showmanship and willingly being taken in - of course you know where it's going, but you willingly suspend disbelief and enjoy the performance.
 
 
Jack The Bodiless
10:39 / 17.11.06
Absolutely. It's not as if Nolan doesn't go to great pains to make it blindingly obvious to anyone actually watching the film that Borden and Fallon are twins swapping places with one another, short of actually coming out with one of them wearing a sign saying DO YOU SEE? and the other wearing a sign saying WE ARE BROTHERS! The key is simply watching closely and having the vocabulary to decode what you're seeing, something we've only really had for the last twenty or thirty years as a collective audience. We're placed in the position of Borden, able to spot the filmmaker's sleight of hand through years of practice and so see through the chicanery, but also able to enjoy the showmanship of how the thing's pulled off, and the dramatic irony of the characters within the text not knowing what we are easily able to see.

The portrayal of Tesla as charlatan? Not sure where on earth this has come from. If anything, the film portrayed Tesla as a persecuted genius and Edison as almost a gangster. Not unforgiveable (as an aside, you're setting the bar for unforgiveable sins pretty low there) really...

What happened in the end? Tesla's machine works, to a point, by duplicating instead of/as well as transporting the original. Angier has been drowning himself for performance after performance after performance, and storing the bodies under his theatre so that no one finds out his secret. The final Raidersesque shot shows row upon row of identical tanks, and a glimpse of an Angier-corpse floating in the one of the near left, implying they all contain the same thing. Nice and easy, as Whisky says. And no it's clearly not meant to be a massive reveal, in the same way that Borden's secret isn't. Here:-

* We know what Angier wants the machine for, as this has never been made a secret - he has been tricked into thinking that Borden's Transported Man is not done with a double, but with a machine created for him by Nicola Tesla
* We are shown the results of the experiments - many top hats and two cats. Tesla tells Angier they're all his hats. No suggestion is made that this is not true, inviting us to believe that the machine has duplicated and transported the duplicate, or vice versa
* Tesla tells Angier to destroy/never use the machine, which Cutter reiterates later, which is yet more reinforcement that the machine works. As we know what Angier wanted the thing for, we know why Tesla's nervous - Angier's going to use the machine on himself, and so duplicate himself, which in those times must have seemed a monstrous concept (whither the soul? something that is reiterated at the end with Angier's final words)
* Given all the above, there is a clear narrative thread showing us what Angier is doing throughout. It's even clearer than Borden's own narrative thread, which at least allows for audience supposition and therefore could be considered a twist if you were spectacularly dumb or had never seen a movie before. Angier's secret is actually told to us as part of the story. It's not a twist. It's plot.
 
 
mkt
11:07 / 17.11.06
However, I now reckon that the body in the tank simply indicates that under the theatre's floorboards is where all the other drowned Angiers from the previous performances were taken ... but how many tanks does Angier have? The front of this one isn't cracked and it would be if it was the same tank Bale tried to break to save Angier 2.

And if they empty the tank of its old corpse and take it back to the theatre to receive a new victim every night, why is there a spare tank and spare corpse floating around? The corpse Borden saw would have had a post-mortem and burial, cos people thought it was the only Angier.


The final scene doesn't take place under the theatre - you must have missed a line. It takes place in an unspecified location (presumably a warehouse, or similar). It's referred to obliquely as "where the prestige materials are stored" (or something like that). After every show a tank containing a body is taken to the warehouse. A fresh tank is used for the next performance. The warehouse eventually contains up to a hundred tanks containing dead Angiers (depending on whether the "murder" took place on the last night of his act, or part-way through the run - I don't recall if it was specified).

Fanwank: the tank shouldn't have glass sides if it's meant only to drown people - this carries the risk of the trick being blown if anyone comes under the stage and sees the sturggling Angier 2 - and as there is no audience for the drowning Angier 2 there's no need for the tank's walls to be glass.

There is a need - to entrap Borden and to echo the death of Angier's wife. 'Sides, the only people allowed under the stage are the blind stagehands.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
11:24 / 17.11.06
I actually thought the stagehands were doubles of one another when I first saw them.

Sorry for the wild theorising above, but I have a very bad habit of trying to second and third and fourth-guess things. When I am told there is a twist, I expect the thing to go on twisting, far beyond the bounds of sanity and reason. I do this when I am reading books ALL THE TIME and it drives me nuts.

I'm like "oh ... so the mysterious killer's potential victim is actually the killer herself, except she's got multiple personality disorder so she doesn't know it - well, that's rubbish. Isn't there another twist? SURELY she can't be the killer, it's *far* too obvious and cliched ..."

S

P

O

I

L

E

R

S


Hmm. So anyway, that - and the fact that I missed the many tanks of Angiers behind the first one and thought they weren't there and that therefore that the fact there was only one corpse-tank, not loads, must be significant - was why I was confused by and trying to make sense of certain aspects of the end of the film.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
11:28 / 17.11.06
Oh, and also, because it's a film about "magic" being all trick and illusion and misdirection - so I kept expecting the "real" Tesla magic to be undermined somehow, revealed as an illusion, too.

I made this make sense for myself by the fact that much of the narrative is flashback/recounted by one man to the other - and they spend ALL their time lying to one another.
 
 
h1ppychick
11:55 / 17.11.06
Re the last couple of posts, I've been wondering if Angier intended to frame Borden/Fallon for his double's murder.

One reading is that he put his show together in order to once and for all demonstrate his superiority over Borden as a stage magician (the fact that he has to achieve this by resorting to science rather than stagecraft is beside the point). He did not know that Borden was in the audience, nor on the stage, nor then under the stage, until he heard Borden shouting for help in his failed attempt to break the glass and release the Angier-double. At this point, realising that to appear for the prestige as usual would reveal the existence of the doubles, Angier made himself scarce, leaving Borden to discovery (as someone has noted, quite why the attempts of Borden to rescue 'Angier', including the breaking of the glass and shouting for aid, weren't appropriately explored in his trial are the real mystery here).

Even if had wished to do so (which is unlikely), Angier is then in the situation that he is unable to reveal himself in Borden's defence without also bringing to light the existence of his doubles and his own repeat murders of them. Note when I say repeat murders here, depending on whether you believe the machine merely duplicates and that therefore the original is drowned each night or if it transports and replaces, in which case the double is drowned each night, the moral responsibility for the repeated murders lies with the original original Angier. (In terms of law this could open up an interesting debate as to where culpability would lie - would the remaining Angier be liable to only one count of murder or to all of them?)

The reason the tank is used to kill the spares are for the following reasons:

-it's an explainable bit of kit to have knocking about and being moved around by the blind stage-hands, having been used for the first trick of the performance.
-that Cutter had said, when trying to spare Angier's feelings on his wife's death, that he knew someone who nearly drowned who had related that the experience was not unpleasant, and as a result Angier misguidedly believes that drowning is an appropriately 'humane' method to kill his doubles. This is backed up by Cutter's remark at the end, when he realises that Angier has indeed 'got his hands dirty', to the effect that he had lied about this and that drowning was a terrible way to go.

The fact that the tank has glass sides is irrelevant. It has glass sides because it's the tank that's used in Angier's first stage trick. The stage-hands don't know that they've moved it to under the trapdoor after the first trick and that Angier has, in the intervening time, substituted the lock.
 
 
mkt
14:04 / 17.11.06
I've been wondering if Angier intended to frame Borden/Fallon for his double's murder.

Seriously? Of course he did. His actions became crueller and stranger throughout the film. We were to understand that he had become completely obsessed with getting Borden's secret that money, time, friendship and love were of no consequence to him. And now he's finally getting his hands dirty, in more ways than one.

He did not know that Borden was in the audience, nor on the stage, nor then under the stage

It would have been a pretty safe bet, though, given that Borden had sabotaged every other performance he gave (and vice versa). And anyway, he obviously did know because...

At this point, realising that to appear for the prestige as usual would reveal the existence of the doubles, Angier made himself scarce

Not possible. The double appears some distance away at the exact point that the other Angier falls into the tank, and so cannot know what's going on downstairs. As Angier made himself scarce on the night in question, he must have known that Borden was going to be downstairs before he stepped into the machine.

quite why the attempts of Borden to rescue 'Angier', including the breaking of the glass and shouting for aid, weren't appropriately explored in his trial are the real mystery here

Given that the tank had apparently been moved to catch the falling Angier and the lock had apparently been tampered with, I don't think there's much of a mystery in why his lifelong rival, conveniently on the scene at the time, was assumed to have done it.
 
 
Elijah, Freelance Rabbi
14:50 / 17.11.06
Spoilers???



Are we still bothering???






The storage area for the tanks is under the burned out/falling apart theater where he first constructed the machine.

Cutter tells Angier and Olivia over and over again that Borden is using a double. For the audience to not believe the guy who knows everything from the start of the movie is a bit silly, thus the double aspect is set up.

The twist isn't that there are 2 Bordens, the twist is that he has been living like this since the beginning of the movie, rather then using technology to 'cheat' like Angier did.

The tanks had to be glass so Borden could be framed, because he was bound to show up eventually. Angier only performed 100 times due to either storage space for the tanks or his own moralizing the death of the doubles. He knew 100 shows would be enough for Borden to show up and get back stage, and he just had to wait.
 
 
CameronStewart
15:05 / 17.11.06
Until I hear Christopher Nolan's dvd commentary in which he explains that he definitely intended for it to be obvious that Fallon was Borden's twin in disguise, I have to believe that it wasn't intentional. I do like the comment above that says that the audience spotting it mirrors Borden's ability to spot the deception in a magic trick, but I don't think that there's much in the film that suggests it was a deliberately poor disguise. Structurally it's set up to be the big shockeroo reveal at the end.

I did spot Fallon's disguise almost immediately, and was quite disappointed that it was so easy to figure out. I really enjoyed the film despite this, though.

Also, Angier definitely intended to frame Borden for the murder. He doesn't merely assume Borden will show up, he asks Cutter to place an ad for the performance that will lure Borden to the theatre.
 
 
matthew.
15:56 / 17.11.06
I'm positively annoyed that some critics' main criticism of the film is how obvious it was, and how clever they are for figuring it out and solving the mystery and spotting the twist a million minutes before "regular" people could. Christ. It's a sorry state of affairs if we're going to see movies to simply figure out the twist. I'm not annoyed. Scratch that. I'm fucking pissed that critics who complain about the ending are missing the goddamn point of the movie.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
17:02 / 17.11.06
Which is that, unlike a lot of other films competing for your entertainment money, it's good.
 
 
nighthawk
17:32 / 17.11.06
I'm positively annoyed that some critics' main criticism of the film is how obvious it was

From an article in this month's Sight and Sound about the film:

The press materials for the film are prefaced by a 'special note to journalists'. "The Prestige is a mystery structured as a cinematic majic trick. In order to allow audiences to fully enjoy the unfolding of the story, the film-makers respectfully ask that you not reveal too much about the deception at the heart of the film."

I thought that might explain why journalists were so disappointed by the 'obviousness' of the plot. I was too, to be honest. It was like a bad magic act: I was engrossed at first, but I saw the trick early on and after that everything else seemed like a gimmick. I was hoping Nolan would pull away from the 'real teleportation' angle with some final twist, and when he didn't I felt a bit cheated. I appreciate that he was limited by his source material, but it seemed out of place somehow, even though I can see how it makes sense in terms of Angier's character.

Which is a shame really, because I really like him as a director, and the first half of this film has a lot going for it. Ultimately, though, I think he's handled similar material much better in his other films. If I had time and will-power, I'd write something about the way he's obssessed with characters who are both dependent and destructive towards each other: Leonard and Teddy in Memento, Bruce Wayne and Henri Ducard in Batman Begins...

(Incidentally, was the fact that 'tesla' was the keyword for Borden's diary supposed to be anything more than a happy coincidence? I can't remember any hint that Tesla's work was connected with transportation before Angier turns up and asks about it, but perhaps I missed something earlier in the film?)
 
 
CameronStewart
17:42 / 17.11.06
One of my friends - who is a professional TV writer, funnily enough - actually didn't figure out that Fallon was a twin in disguise until it was revealed at the end, and he was genuinely delighted with the climax of the film because of it. If the misdirection had been better handled I think it would have been my favourite movie of the year - as it was, I still rate it pretty highly but that element of it still nags at me.

And I don't think I missed the point.
 
 
Elijah, Freelance Rabbi
19:47 / 17.11.06
Tesla was the word he gave to Angier because it was obvious that The New Transported Man used some huge ass electric device. Bale's character knew that Angier didn't know how the trick worked, so laid the bait for him to waste time and money traveling half way around the world.

The fact that Tesla was able to make a machine that would replicate the trick (to a degree) is the actual coincidence.
 
 
Sylvia
19:49 / 17.11.06
(Incidentally, was the fact that 'tesla' was the keyword for Borden's diary supposed to be anything more than a happy coincidence? I can't remember any hint that Tesla's work was connected with transportation before Angier turns up and asks about it, but perhaps I missed something earlier in the film?)

Remember how Angier saw Borden at the Tesla exhibition (not surprising they'd both be there through coincidence, given the presence of the world-famous Tesla and the gadgets they used in their acts)? I'm sure Borden in turn spotted Angier, with his awestruck expression at Tesla's display. I'm also sure Borden realized Angier had in turn seen him and decided to send him to Tesla to screw with him because the electricity demonstrations seemed so "magical" it would be a believable bit of misdirection.
 
  

Page: (1)234

 
  
Add Your Reply