BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Bullying on Barbelith

 
  

Page: 12(3)4567

 
 
The Falcon
17:19 / 04.09.06
Very well: in future, what do you propose be done in a similar situation?
 
 
The Falcon
17:28 / 04.09.06
Sorry if that comes over curt; I am abandoning my bullish posture over what I will do in future, because clearly this is not consensual, and would genuinely like to discuss now what measures need and should be taken in future, should a similar incident occur.
 
 
The Falcon
17:30 / 04.09.06
...ack. And also what should be done about the present one, which remains irresolved to my mind.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
18:04 / 04.09.06
Well, what happened here? Views were aired. Knickers were twisted. Shouting happened. It wasn't perfect, but honestly what is? Instead of people managing to talk about Barbelith as a social space, the narrative has been coopted by _technical_ questions about who had to agree to or disagree with what moderator action. Thank God they _didn't_ go through - between the protests and the confusion, we would never have parsed noise and signal.

Anyway. Ways this might have been handled differently, off the top of my head:

1) When Dead Megatron starting calling people out, however noble and blameless his motivations, a responsible moderator could have contacted him and asked him not to do that. Regrettably, since I was not on Barbelith and since DM appears not to be reading my posts anyway, hence the calling out in the first place, this was not something I was able to do.

2) If one of the callees rises to the bait, and it turns into a scrap, people try not to take sides and increase the tension. People instead ask both sides to be calm.

3) If this does not work, a lock can be placed on the thread. Locks are handy things - they are very easy to reverse, especially in a mod-rich environment like the Conversation, and they do not actually change the shape of the board. Also, if one person takes the fight to a new thread, it is very easy to identify that person as the person who is keeping the nasty going.

4) The Policy is used to sort out the grievance, or at least to make it clear that _if it is continued in those terms in that environment_ it will be open season on their posts. If it can be done, the thread is unlocked. At that point, if people want to go crazy with deletions if the fighting recommences, that's probably fair enough.

5) Some sort of mediation or discussion programme follows.

Now, I think this was complicated here by the whole "we only have 24 hours to save Dead Megatron's 30th birthday" factor, which, I'm sorry, seemed a bit melodramatic. Flyboy shouldn't have turned up, Dead Megatron shouldn't have dared him to turn up. The stupidity of this whole setup was obvious to Cassandra pretty early on, and ze called it. I'm afraid that the protection of the Birthday thread doesn't seem valid if you make the call-out at the start of the thread. You've all seen The Lost Boys, right?

That notwithstanding, those steps, I think, might be useful. _Un_fortunately, in the time it has taken to write that Dead Megatron has demonstrated in another thread that he is actually seeking conflict, which makes me doubt the whole "I only wanted Flyboy to come and be loved" gloss yet further, so we've got a slightly different situation here. Those bullets might work in a slightly different situtation, though, at least.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
18:09 / 04.09.06
Good points.

But what about Triplets? And what he said?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
18:15 / 04.09.06
Well, I think that has to fit into the mediation process, yes? Saying sorry might be a good start, for a lot of people.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
18:22 / 04.09.06
That's what I thought, and so did many others.

And Haus, my intention is not to bait you, but it was DM's territory, he was virtually pished and on a happy-high, his fly was undone at his only ever 30th birthday celebrations, and then a load of REALLY nasty shit (behind which I can still only see the worst of intentions,) came flying his way and ruined his nice, white, John Travolta suit. Not only that, but it happened more than once.

Sure, DM shouldn't have made (I suggest) stupid goading remarks. But still... At the time and still now, what happened in response feels disproportionate and in very unique circumstances. Am I far wrong?
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
18:27 / 04.09.06
Sorry, I was merely using graphical emphasis (capital letters), and forgot this looks like I'm shouting; I just wanted to emphasise the point about how very nasty and badly timed that was.
 
 
Haus of Mystery
18:55 / 04.09.06
Mmmm. Nothing really to add except that Triplets' statement was appallingly tasteless. Seems simple enough that if you don't like a poster a thread dedicated to their Birthday might be one to avoid. Unless you wanted to start a fight of course...

But that doesn't happen on Barbelith, does it?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:23 / 04.09.06
Well, then. Yes, very rude. Has anyone asked Triplets about it, though? Has he been back to the board? Is he aware that he even posted it, if we go by the "very pissed indeed" argument? Has he a history of antagonism with the boy Megatron? Was he perhaps incensed by what he saw as the goading of myself and Flyboy behind the shield of the thirty candles? I'm still hopeful that it was a man-to-man bit of joshing gone horribly awry, personally, and that Triplets will pop up and make manly apologies. That would neatly sort it out, and we could get on with the serious stuff.

My issue with this recent bout of coprolalia is that it means that genuine concerns get lost among abuse, counter-abuse, objection - I'm saddened that by giving in to the urge to give up on argument and resort to insult, posters capable of a lot better, whatever the provocation (a)effectively start throwing away their posts by posting far beneath their level and (b) make it much easier for less explosive but equally or more negative behaviour to get under the radar by making a lot of light and noise about how Poster N has crossed a line. Also, (c) it's not very nice. So, I think apologies would be nice, but on t'other hand if the result of an apology would be to temporarily defuse a situation that is just going to peak again, I'm not sure it's a very big thing in the long run, and nor do I think that not apologising should result in bannination (about which Dead Megatron was, of course, JOKING!!!) - it will result in Barbelith as a group reacting accordingly, and in the people who are not apologising being asked to explain themselves or to be treated differently from then on by people who felt that an apology or a good explanation of why no apology was forthcoming was required and neither was given.

On the other hand I'd be a hypocrite if I said that I didn't understand the impulse to just give up on dialogue when faced by somebody who will generally either not read what you have written or not understand it and then make that your problem.

I'm off, I think - between all this stuff and work I got very little sleep indeed last night. Hope this helps.
 
 
Haus of Mystery
20:38 / 04.09.06
For every crass or antagonistic thing that Poster X says, there's also Poster Y following them round trying to get the fireworks started again. It's all so fucking repetetive and terribly dull. And self-absorbed.
I dunno. Seems like a lot of good and thoughtful posters are leaving the board at the moment and I can't help but feel the incessant bickering and rehashing of arguements could be partly responsible.
I know Triplets is an interesting and erudite poster. I'm sure that they've got good grounds for beef with DM.
But that statement was pretty vile, and there've been gigantic pile-on group kickings for such statements before, and it would suck to let it go just because DM's perceived by some to be a worthless member of the Board.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:44 / 04.09.06
And hence the question about whether Triplets has been on the board since and whether he has been contacted and told of the response. Does he regularly read the Policy, even?
 
 
Ganesh
20:52 / 04.09.06
Triplets was on the board last night, I PMed him and made him aware of it.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
20:59 / 04.09.06
Hmm...

I did respond quite quickly at the time; in fact, only three minutes later:

Triplets: I don't think we should be celebrating failiure. Specifically the failiure of an abortionist.

Ganesh: [pedant] Or failure of spelling "failure", come to that. [/pedant]

p.w: I don't think we should be celebrating failiure. Specifically the failiure of an abortionist.

Now that's what I call out of order. Care to unpack that Triplets?



Also, Triplets did at least pop back once to the board and posted in the Pete Doherty thread later that night, although it was more the early hours of the morning.

But no, I can't say that I know whether he has read all, or any of the threads, or not. Seems like an odd thing to do though, drop a stinker, run out, and not come back to see if everyone was laughing or holding their noses. But I suppose he might have been pissed or might have been pulled away from the screen on important business, or maybe someone's hacking his suit? Dunno for sure.

As for Flyboy, I PM'ed him and explained my stance on all this yesterday (I think). I even jokingly gave him a heads up in the Your Watch thread towards the Moderation Requests thread; which I admit was part playful, part "people are talking about you over there"; and a part still perturbed by what I'd seen as very harsh and still unanswered actions on his part. Since then, I've seen him pop into these threads here and there, but I've got a bit lost as to which comments are in which thread; it's a bit like the Spaghetti Junction in here at the mo', innit?

Mind you, I don't recall Flyboy apologising or expressing any sign that he thinks maybe he should. So far, I think he's standing by his actions. But I don't know, for sure.

So, you're right, Haus. There are too many unknowns, and thus, for clarity and (hopefully) all our sakes...


Flyboy and Triplets, I hope you don't mind me asking, but:


1) How do you each see the events of the other night?

2) What were your intentions at the time?

3) How do you see your and other's roles in what happened?

4) Do you think you did anything wrong?

5) Do you have any regrets about your part in what happened?

6) What have you learned from all this? Would you do anything differently if faced with a similar situation?

And I'm sorry if this means you end up having to repeat yourselves (seems a fairly common problem lately for all of us), and also I hope you don't mind me addressing you almost as though your not here. My first person, 3rd person whatnots are a bit jumbled.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
21:05 / 04.09.06
Oops! Interposted with Ganesh. So it seems Triplets is aware.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
21:26 / 04.09.06
I made an apology here, p.w.

I have to admit I was disappointed, p.w., that you hadn't responded to my apology with the same enthusiasm that you lavished on 33 when he apologised.
 
 
pony
21:44 / 04.09.06
Now, it seems that this may have been ill-advised, strategically, and may have upset a significant number of people. For that, I apologise.

this looks a lot more like an apology for the results of your actions than the apology for your actions themselves. i don't want to be seen as jumping on bandwagons, but it seems that if the board finds that egregious posts demand an apology for what was done with an explanation of why it was wrong (33, et al...), that standard should really apply across the board...
 
 
Tryphena Absent
21:59 / 04.09.06
This is completely obscene.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
22:06 / 04.09.06
junior, if "the board" (which is not a monolith, although it would be simpler one way or another if it were) does decide that my rudeness to Dead Megatron and 33's combination of racism, homophobia and misogyny are equally "egregious", then a certain clarity will have been reached as to what kind of place Barbelith aspires to be. (Although I note with some sadness that in order for 33 to be banned, things had to be framed in terms of individuals being harrassed, and that his racism was never really acknowledged, probably because if having ill-informed, racist opinions about music was a banning offence... well, I wouldn't be in this mess, for one thing.)
 
 
pony
22:15 / 04.09.06
flyboy-

i never meant to imply that the board had some sort of monlithic policy on this sort of thing, i just wanted to point out that quite a few members of the board seem to find completely off-topic, personal, vitriolic attacks to be inappropriate. if we're going to set precedent that hating someone is a valid excuse for what is harrassment, and that it's the sort of thing that needs no apology, i think that needs to be discussed.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
22:25 / 04.09.06
Well, I think we agree that my remarks were indeed inappropriate and that an apology was warranted - that's why I apologised.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
22:39 / 04.09.06
Ah...sorry, Flyboy, didn't really register that bit, I admit. But I suppose it was because it was embedded within a lot of hostile text which seemed to contradict it.

e.g. So the alternative would seem to be for me to start a thread detailing the sustained low-level idiocy punctuated by moments of out-and-out jaw-dropping wilful stupidity and fucked-up attitudes that has characterised DM's posts since he joined the board, ranging from forms of stupidity which are just head-slapping (aesthetic), to ones which are outright dangerous and harmful (political) - and unlike some people I see no evidence that he has changed, only that he has become a little more aware of what he can and can't get away with, which is not the same thing - merely to explain why seeing his name on the board gives me hives. I've been tempted, believe you me - I think "Has Dead Megatron ever posted anything of worth to the board?" would be the title, and the question still stands. But would the situation we find ourselves in now be any different? Would I really have avoided the calls for that to deleted, for me to be stripped of my moderator powers, banned, etc.? No.

So, what I did do, then, was to try to make it clear to DM - at a time when he has recently been given a form of validation which he would benefit not him, nor Kali, nor anyone else in the world who ever has to encounter him, but especially not the people of this board who aspire to it becoming anything better than a Maxim messageboard - that there are some people here who are not happy with him being on the board if he carries on posting as he has done for the past year. Now, it seems that this may have been ill-advised, strategically, and may have upset a significant number of people. For that, I apologise. ...


It's quite (erm) spikey, isn't it? I mean, it reads to me as though you're sorry for upsetting others, but not at all really sorry for being nasty to DM, which is why the rest of us are upset in the first place. It's cool that you express how you feel about him and give good reasons why you feel that way, but I don't think your language is at all helpful (like me earlier with "fuck-holes") and your apology is brief (briefer than 33's) and does not make up for posts such as the following in DM's birthday thread.


Perhaps I'm wrong, and this thread should be a place wherein Dead Megatron, and the contribution he has made to the board, are celebrated. Perhaps people should link to their favourite Dead Megatron posts, the ones where he's been most intelligent, witty, perceptive. Perhaps this will alter my opinion that encountering a post by Dead Megatron in a thread is, at best, inconsequential, and at worst, a bit like finding a turd on one's front doorstep. (here)

If that had happened in RL, I'd have taken you aside and said "fuckin 'ell mate, it's his 30thbirthday, let him cry if he wants to; just leave him alone or go home or something. Choose your battles."

In many ways, I sincerely think, a fair number of us tried to do that in all the threads that you, Flyboy, were posting in before it all went to Policy and afterwards. Maybe I'm wrong though and that's just my memory of that night as it unfolded and different threads were bumped by different folks.

Indeed, I even said I felt sorry for you and Triplets and felt torn apart by the whole sorry mess.

Why? Because I identified with you losing your patience. Only last week, I called someone a wanker in real-life (and ze was being a proper aggressive, arrogant wanker to many people) two hours after he invited me to his Birthday Party. Did I go to the party? Hell no. I haven't even asked mutual friends what was said when they went and saw him. Why bother? He was out of order, I was out of order. Next time I see him, I'll apologise. If he doesn't do likewise, then I was right, he is a wanker.

(Not saying anyone here's a wanker, of course)

I mean it really is good (IMO) that you apologise for making the rest of us upset, but why not just apologise to DM specifically and properly? -- just this once, about this one occasion, where you have over-stepped the line with big spikey boots, and been very insulting and spiteful to someone on their birthday without that much provocation (I mean I bet you've faced faar worse than that,eh?). At the time, to me, it reminded me of sudden outbreaks of violence I've seen kick off between footbal fans who had only seconds earlier on been teasing.

Please don't get me wrong, I"m not angry or scared or anything. But to be honest, I'm very tired. Myself and others have tried endlessly to express why we thought what you said was out of order, and many of us have increasingly refined and modified our behviour towards you in this discussion (me included).

I've discovered a lot about your and DM's past, about deleting posts, about flirting and some of peoples responses to certain types of flirty. But that's about it, really. We're still at square one: when and why you and Triplets insulted DM in the ways you did.

That typed, DM, once / if Flyboy and Triplets apologise properly will you please stop baiting people out of the blue, people who you know already have issues with you? The likelihood is that, even if you're well intended and joking, they will interpret ambiguous or annoying statements as a challenge. Even if it's your 30th Birthday bash.

I need to sleep soon...

Hope I haven't made things worse.
 
 
pony
22:44 / 04.09.06
i think where we differ is the issue of whether you owe DM an apology, which more than one person has mentioned is sort of a requisite of geting this situation resolved. as it stands, it seems like you've taken a stance of feeling justified in trying to harrass DM off the board, but feeling that you should apologize to everyone else about just how ugly this tactic is.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
22:44 / 04.09.06
Damn it! I am tired. I forgot to check for new posts before posting and didn't see your recent post, Flyboy.

I'm glad we agree that what you said to DM was inappropriate and that an apology was warranted. Wait. That is what you're saying? You are saying, "Sorry DM for posting an inappropriate comment. I apologise." ?

I don't want to make this any longer and painfully drawn out than it needs to be, I just want you to be specific about what and to whom you're apologising. Is that cool?

(Am I coaching you now? )
 
 
pony
22:45 / 04.09.06
(that was directed at fly, btw... sorry about the crosspost)
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
23:05 / 04.09.06
Bah, I just re-read my last two posts and reminded myself of a sketch from 'The Day Today?':

MORRIS: And after that, a Day Today information special from Conor Hammil!

[Conor Hammil is in the studio, holding a steering wheel in his hands. He pretends to drive.]

HAMMIL: Hey, you! Look at me! I'm driving my sports car. Going at 50, 60, 70! The wind's in my hair, 80! Oh look, there's a bend - who cares! 90! Get out of my way, you squares! I'm doing 100 because it's cool! Of course it's cool to drive fast! Just one question.

[The camera zooms in on Hammil's face with a screech of brakes.]

HAMMIL: Is this cool? [Holds up a picture of someone with a bandaged face] Is this cool? [Another picture] Is this cool? [You get the idea...] Is this cool? Is this cool? Is this cool? Is that cool? All these people - are they cool? [Rips open his shirt to reveal a huge operation scar printed on his T-shirt] Is this cool? [Goes over to a corpse on a slab] This guy - cool, is he? This guy - is he cool? [A man with a scarred face looks at his girlfriend, who turns away in disgust] This woman - [Hammil shoves her face-first through a pane of glass] - is she cool? So what about me? Do I look cool? [He throws himself under the front bumper of a 4x4] Well do I? Do I look cool, do I really look cool? Do I? Do I? Do I?
(copied and pasted from full script


Ahh... Good night, you crazy cats.
 
 
Dead Megatron
23:15 / 04.09.06
That typed, DM, once / if Flyboy and Triplets apologise properly will you please stop baiting people out of the blue, people who you know already have issues with you? The likelihood is that, even if you're well intended and joking, they will interpret ambiguous or annoying statements as a challenge. Even if it's your 30th Birthday bash.

No onces / ifs necessary. This baiting* is never happening again. It was a one time deal, on a thread I started abut my birthday, and done because I was curious on what they would say (never imagined this, though). I apologise for the serious damage it caused to the last few days of our life in Barbelith.


* not sure I agree with the term, but I'll take it
 
 
Tuna Ghost: Pratt knot hero
00:29 / 05.09.06
I don't want to make this any longer and painfully drawn out than it needs to be,...

Then keep up the great work, buddy!

i think where we differ is the issue of whether you owe DM an apology, which more than one person has mentioned is sort of a requisite of geting this situation resolved.

Which situation, exactly? The animosity between the two? Inappropriate comments in the wrong thread? This situation right here, the thread discussing what happened and what is currently happening within said thread?

as it stands, it seems like you've taken a stance of feeling justified in trying to harrass DM off the board, but feeling that you should apologize to everyone else about just how ugly this tactic is.

Did we ever agree on what constitutes harrassment? I don't doubt Flyboy feels justified in making DM feel that his (DM's) rather vocal presence is unwelcome, but are we, collectively, saying this is harrassment? Or bullying? Is anyone saying that, actually.

I did not appreciate the comments made in DM's birthday thread, but I don't feel I have the standing to reprove Flyboy beyond a simple "not cool, man" or a "you're acting like some kind of jerk". Several people said an apology was in order, and one was made. I don't think he apologized directly to DM and I'm not going to hold my breath for one.

What would this apology sound like? "DM, I don't like you and wish you had never come to Barbelith, which is now a lesser place for your presence, but maybe I should have only made this abundantly clear in threads that are not your specific birthday thread." I think his apology actually sounded like that anyway. I mean, what are we expecting here (serious question)?
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
00:44 / 05.09.06
Then keep up the great work, buddy!

Aww...Cheers, chuck. I do try. You too, eh?
 
 
The Falcon
00:55 / 05.09.06
if having ill-informed, racist opinions about music was a banning offence... well, I wouldn't be in this mess, for one thing.

If you'd engaged at that level, in a thread where that topic was being discussed, (almost) no-one would have a problem. I'm fairly certain I'd have supported you, in fact. However, as it stands, I think any member is able to question another's relative merit to the board but not, to my mind, their relative merits as a human being which - chances are - you are not especially privy to, in any case, and not in the manner of personal abuse.

(It's entirely likely I am being sanctimonious about birthday threads, too, because - look - here's mine, and here's yours. They're very nice, and we obliquely wish one another happy birthday. That's really super nice, too. I'd have found someone dripping poison in either very upsetting and deeply unnecessary, I should think.)

I don't think posters, regardless of standing, should or do have carte blanche to attack other posters, again regardless of standing, on grounds other than ideology. In cases of interpersonal friction, unless there is a viable case for banning, I think you will either have to coexist by ignoring one another (I hear tell of a button for this; if I'd my way any software alterations would make it permanent, rather than weekly) or by trying to engage on some level - I don't imagine many people especially want to view a protracted harassment, presumably with an end being to get another gone. Or you will have to leave, if you cannot cope with this other's very presence - I think personally that this would be a pretty dreadful outcome, greatly to the detriment of my own enjoyment of this board, and I sincerely hope you can understand that this (farrago) is not fuelled by any shadowy personal agenda.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
08:30 / 05.09.06
You know, I think we're getting a bit mixed up here.

Dead Megatron called Flyboy specifically to post in his birthday thread, and then complained of an uncalled personal attack when he did.

Flyboy's next post was about Kali and Dead Megatron's flrting, at which point Kali suggested to Flyboy that it would be better for him if he did not read the thread - which is of course entirely correct, but fails to take into account the fact that the birthday boy had specifically called Flyboy (and myself, as it happens) into the thread.

Trolling takes its name from a type of fishing, in which one drags one's line backwards and forwards across a lake behind a boat, seeking to catch a fish.

Now, if your argument is "Flyboy, you are better than Dead Megatron. We expect you to express that superiority, for example by ignoring him when he specifically mentions your name and invites you to contribute to a thread" - well, that's fine. However, in doing that you are making a judgement about Flyboy and DM's relative merits as human beings. Flyboy, on the other hand, is not as far as I can tell at any point making a judgement in the three posts he makes to the birthday thread about DM's merits as a human being, but rather to the value of his contribution to Barbelith:

For you, perhaps. For the rest of us, it seems the sorry state of affairs we've endured over the last annus horribilis is only going to continue, and possibly worsen.

This seems specifically to refer to Barbelith - Flyboy talks about the last year, during which DM has been contributing to Barbelith, and not the last 29 years, during which DM has been alive.

Is there any chance at all that the two of you might GET A SODDING ROOM? Preferably one that can be locked from the outside?

This is about behaviour on Barbelith.

Perhaps I'm wrong, and this thread should be a place wherein Dead Megatron, and the contribution he has made to the board, are celebrated. Perhaps people should link to their favourite Dead Megatron posts, the ones where he's been most intelligent, witty, perceptive. Perhaps this will alter my opinion that encountering a post by Dead Megatron in a thread is, at best, inconsequential, and at worst, a bit like finding a turd on one's front doorstep.

Absolutely, specifically about his contribution to Barbelith.

After that, Dead Megatron says that he is close to seeking the banning of Flyboy and Triplets, with no apparent indication that he is JOKING!!!, and at that point I think the game changes rather.

So, those posts, as far as I can see, are about the impact Dead Megatron, and his flirtation with Kali, have on Barbelith. They are without a doubt negative, but when you say:

However, as it stands, I think any member is able to question another's relative merit to the board but not, to my mind, their relative merits as a human being which - chances are - you are not especially privy to, in any case, and not in the manner of personal abuse.

You appear not to be talking about any of these posts, which represent the entirety of Flyboy's contribution to the thread.

Venn diagram time. Circle one - things Flyboy has said on Barbelith in the time leading up to this Policy outbreak. Circle two - things said in Dead Megatron's birthday thread. Circle three - things that are insulting in a way that appears to go outside people's contribution to Barbelith.

Circle one and circle three seem to have an overlap - I think there are comments in the Barbecrush thread that are personally insulting to Dead Megatron - but they have nothing to do with:

(It's entirely likely I am being sanctimonious about birthday threads, too, because - look - here's mine, and here's yours. They're very nice, and we obliquely wish one another happy birthday. That's really super nice, too. I'd have found someone dripping poison in either very upsetting and deeply unnecessary, I should think.)

Because they are outside the set of things said in Dead Megatron's birthday thread. The overlap of circle two and circle three contains, among other things, Triplets comment that DM's birthday commemorates the failure of an abortionist. However, this is not in the set of things Flyboy has said.

Unless I have missed something, the intersection of circles one and two contains three items, which I have quoted above. I don't see any of those as reaching beyond Barbelith, and so do not see them as fitting into the intersection of circles one, two and three. Unless you believe that Flyboy actually wants Dead Megatron and Kali to meet in an actual room somewhere between Brasil and Georgia - perhaps Chihuahua - which Flyboy can then fly to and lock from the outside, but that's frankly a stretch.

So, if we're going to do this, I think we might want to start by not a) mixing up what Flyboy said and what Triplets said and b) not mixing up things said in the "protected" birthday thread and things not said in the "protected" birthday thread, before then going on to question what is a comment on somebody's contribution to Barbelith and what is a comment on somebody's worth as a human being, and then onto when an uncalled comment is actually uncalled.

PW:

As for Flyboy, I PM'ed him and explained my stance on all this yesterday (I think). I even jokingly gave him a heads up in the Your Watch thread towards the Moderation Requests thread; which I admit was part playful

What you said was:

And talking of cowardly shots to the back of the head, have you been and read the Moderations Request thread, yet, regarding your recent behaviour toward DM?

Where you directed him to a thread in which you called him a fuck-hole (yes, I know, you apologised subsequently, but right at that moment, not so much). Do you honestly believe that that reads as "playful"? Or that you are, in the eyes of anyone reading it or even in your own eyes when you read it back, joking? Do we need to talk about this, now? Only, I am profundly uncomfortable with this "joking" defence against what might actually otherwise look kind of like bullying. You are joking there, Dead Megatron is joking when he says that he is thinking of moving to get Flyboy and Triplets banned... Flyboy has not to my knowledge so far claimed that he was joking, and I think that that is perfectly appropriate, since this is not really a laughing matter.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
08:32 / 05.09.06
Ahem.;

Circle one and circle three seem to have an overlap - I think there are comments in the Barbecrush thread that are personally insulting to Dead Megatron - but they have nothing to do with:
 
 
pony
09:04 / 05.09.06
i'm going to go out on ledge here (there are just to many threads to search through at this point), but i'm willing to bet that whover used the word "uncalled" (if anyone) was using it in the colloqial sense of "inappropriate", not literally "not called". unfortunately, i can't support this with anything other than common sense, but still...
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
09:45 / 05.09.06
I'm trying to avoid posting anything "wrong" here, so I'm going to just state my oppinion and leave it at that. I feel like I'm watching a group of people down the pub, and half the group are trying to get an answer out of one of the higher social standing members, the one whos quick witted, but also can shout the loudest, and uses both to diminsh the reasonable arguments being made by his friends and peers into unfair attacks. Now obviosuly this is a sound debating tactic, and without trying to become Stephen Colbert, this feels wrong in this instance. Hate to use that word now, but as I said, I feel uncomfortable with the way this thread has gone.

This thread was started due to a specific situation that arose, but feels more like an apology from those who questioned the actions enough to start this thread. It seems like everyone here is bending over backwards and trying to smooth things over with flyboy (sorry to use you as the bad guy, but seeing as Captain Trips hasn't replied, I can't really call him on this) which seems a little rough. Again, not attacking, just observing. See, even I'm doing it.

Flyboy obviouslty thinks his apology was the right one to make, and I can agree with him to a certain extent (though ... panic attack ... paradox ... brain leaking out of ear...). He stands by his response to DM, which however harsh anyone here may think it was, was his opinion, one he is more than allowed to express. He has apologised for upsetting anyone, so thats good. But it kind of sidesteps the main point of making an apology. It's like punching someone in the face and apologising to everyone who saw it, but still feeling no remorse for commiting the act. While I see where you are coming from, I have a hard time of getting down with it. Could you not just be the bigger man and offer a handshake to DM, no matter how much you dislike him, and then wait for him to actually make another foul before laying the smakedown?

I also have problems with the whole "Let's run through some things I'm not going to do." This thing you've got against simple correspondance with people you don't like - it's something you've thrown about before, and it seems counter-intuitive. Surely the aim here is to get new bodies on the board, and then show them the right way to express themselves, allow them to grow etc. By sitting on this anger, by not telling people where they are going wrong, by just writting them off as soon as you can, you're doing the board a disservice. I mean, fuck, when I was at my zenith of trying to be the biggest prick on here, people telling me to chill out, to calm down, to step away, to express myself properly, not to use attacks was about the only thing that has allowed me to gain at least a little self respect. Even Haus, who is clearly the person who I have had the most problems with responds to me, jokes with me, explains why he dislikes my behaviour. That little bit of respect, the respect of responding to someone in a way which doesn't feel like theyre spitting in your face, or looking down on you, that breeds respect. I've got a lot of respect for Haus, I value the guys oppinion. If he'd stated how responding to me was a chore, one beneath him, I would have naturally been more antaganistic towrds him, more so than I was, and would have thought of him him as a massive prick (which I don't, no sly digs here).

Well thats my 10p, though it was probably worth a lot less. Turned up to the party late and this seems like a bit late to say all this, but you guys know how much I love the sound of my own voice...
 
 
Evil Scientist
10:21 / 05.09.06
Haus, I know it's been mentioned upthread but looking what DM said the only post I can see where he may have been inviting criticism of him on the thread is in his opening post where he says:

So, this is it! I'm opening this self-centered space so any Barbelithian who think I deserve some congratulations may do so with no need for threadrot. Those of you with amazing magical powers who wish to send me some good vibes, it would be mostly appreciated (those of you who hate my guts and wish to send me a couple of curses may also do so, but be warned: precautions have been taken)

It could be interpretted as an invitation by DM to people who don't like him to come and have a go.

However, DM does post on Temple a lot. So a request for magic-using board members to send "good vibes" his way whilst noting that he doesn't mind if anyone wants to curse him because he's taken precautions could well be a genuine request without any subtext.

Further down, he does say:

Boboss, 24 hours ago, I'd disagree, but, now, something strange is happening to my mind. All of the sudden, I can't be trusted no more. Twenties are for babies.

Can't wait for Haus and Flyboy to stop by this thread.


This doesn't strike me a call for conflict, but it's all about personal interpretation again I guess. The relationship between DM and certain other board members must, I suppose be taken into account. So one slant on this is that by following a statement that he can't be trusted anymore with a hope that you and Fly turn up he is saying that he hopes an argument is immanent.

But it seems a bit ambiguous to be taken like that. Just as it can't automatically be assumed to be a hope that, in that thread at least, DM and his critics could be friends in a WW1 playing football in no-man's land kind of way.



To move over into the thread's subject of bullying on Barbelith.

If one poster (Person A) considers another poster (Person B) to be damaging to the site, for whatever reason, but is also aware that the poster in question has not breached Barbetiquette to ban-able levels then there are only so many options left to them.

A can put B on Ignore, which doesn't deal with the on-going problem of someone being damaging to Barbelith but at least means that Person A isn't exposed to Person B.

Another option is that A can engage with B on any thread where they both happen to be posting. Tear holes in their arguments and generally put pressure on them to either up their game or get out of the pool. In my limited experience on here the level of passion exhibited (or rather, percieved to be being exhibited) by Person A is often reflected/enhanced by Person B, so there is the risk that any dispute between the two descends into flamewar-esque threadrot.

Note: This does not assume that Person A is in the wrong for being passionate in their posts. Person B is equally responsible if they choose to misinterpret passion for agression and respond accordingly.

It's hard to define what constitutes bullying on a message board. Many of the recent banned members made it clear that they felt they were being targetted by much of the active board community simply for having a different opinion. To them the constant criticism felt like bullying, although those involved in the banning discussions did not feel that this was the case.

One person continually pressuring another because they don't feel that they are either contributing to the boards or are harmful in some way is not necessarily bullying.

Taken from the Bully wiki:

Researchers generally accept that bullying contains four essential elements:

1) The behavior is aggressive and negative.

2) The behavior is carried out repeatedly.

3) The behavior occurs in a relationship where there is an imbalance of power between the parties involved.

4) The behavior is purposeful.


Whilst it may have some similarity to bullying I would argue that, in general, there is not an imbalance of power between members on the board. Unless you consider a possible situation involving a long-term active poster using their social status within the boards as a shield against criticism from others (ie "Fuck you, I can say what I like! I've been here longer!"). However on Barbelith I don't see that happening (unless I'm woefully naive).
 
  

Page: 12(3)4567

 
  
Add Your Reply