BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Bullying on Barbelith

 
  

Page: 12345(6)7

 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
19:13 / 06.09.06
Meanwhile, this is being ported over by request from the Moderation Requests Thread, since it is clearly no longer about Moderation Requests... (DM in italics in his own and my posts, me and others as necessary in bold)

Dead Megatron, popping into the discussion about whether to delete various posts in his Birthday thread (and incidentally whether to ban or otherwise censure Flyboy and Triplets, although one person claims they were joking and another claimed shortly afterwards that he had not in fact proposed their banning):

I just want to point out a few things:

I did not move for any post to be deleted

I did not move for any poster to be banned

I did not request anyone to apologise for anything

I made a "perhaps you should be banned" and a "dance, puppet" joke, but I did it in hope it would make the pesonnal attacks to stop (I'm sure someone will say that is not what I said or meant, though)

I have absoutely nothing to do - nor do I want to - with Haus argumentation in the past three pages or so of this thread on why Flyboy attitude towards me is uderstandable (I suppose that this was his point, if he had one at some point)

I would like, however, to move now for my birthday thread to be locked. Why? Because the party is over, and the ballroom needs be cleaned up*. Plus, it would be symbolic of my desire to bury the hatchet, as it is.

* I did intent to post a few pics of my party in it, but after yesterday, I really don't feel like sharing such a good moment of my life with Barbelith. After all, people may take offense.



I responded:

I have absoutely nothing to do - nor do I want to - with Haus argumentation in the past three pages or so of this thread on why Flyboy attitude towards me is uderstandable (I suppose that this was his point, if he had one at some point)

Helllo, Dead Megatron, and happy birthday.

I'd like to direct your attention to a couple of places, all in this thread. First up, the first post I made here, where I specifically said that I thought that Flyboy should lay off you.

Next up, I'd like to point you to the place where I say, specifically, that I believe that Flyboy and Triplets should apologise to you. Then to the place where I agree that it is reasonable to find their behaviour unsavoury and to protest it. Then to the place where I agree that they were out of order. Normally I would provide links, but I think it would be good for you to read this discussion as a whole to winkle those statements out, for reasons that may become clear later.

If you do read the relevant part of this thread, you'll find that most of the rest of my conversation on this thread is not actually about Flyboy at all. It is about the specific questions of when posts should be deleted in the Conversation, when people should be proposed for banning, and about the more general topic of how you and I interact. Specifically, it is about the fact that about two months ago you undertook not to post to threads which you had not read. I believed that this represented a significant step towards your profitable engagement with Barbelith, and I have pointed out here that I have been trying to be nice to you since then, to encourage this process. As such, I was therefore hurt that you repeatedly lumped me in with Flyboy, who did not apparently share my faith, and specifically that you decided to claim that your invitation was made, and I quote, in an:

"I hope they show up and we can leave our differences aside for a while and have a good time together for a change, and they can pick up the hatred tomorrow, if they really must" kind of way.

I did not feel that a daily dose of hatred in any way characterised my interactions with you - I had not actually posted to Barbelith for a week, and was only pulled back by this car crash and the sense of duty that had me reading the Policy, which incidentally means I missed your birthday thread anyway - and it saddened me that you had appeared not actually to have paid attention to what was actually happening on Barbelith before deciding to make this self-exculpatory and unfair statement.

As I said, I had taken your commitment to read threads before posting to them to be a sign of a commitment to being a more productive member of Barbelith. I was saddened that your comments about "hatred" suggested that you had not actually stuck to this entry-level commitment to try to contribute value to Barbelith. I am now further saddened that your mischaracterisation of what I have said in this thread seems to prove that you have decided not to stick to the promise you made - to read threads before posting to them - at all. Given that that undertaking was made in your family's name, and that didn't stop you breaking it, I don't know how you'd get the trust back, there.

Forget about Flyboy for a second, if you can; this is about you. I trusted your word, and you have now made me feel like a hopelessly idealistic fool for doing so. This saddens me.


Dead Megatron, IMHO rather missing the point:

What part of "nor do I want to" do you not get?

"put aside the hatred" is a figure of speech, you literally-obsessed person. Change to animosity, or lack of friendship, or incompatibility of personalties, or anything you like. I don't really care.

(And I'm not the one who called you "dung-covered village idiot", remember?)

I did read this thread very carefully, which is why I decided not to engage in the argument in anyway, if possible. (this single post being the exception)

And, if you say I should forget about Flyboy for a moment, maybe you should remember that this discussion was about him and his attacks on me, until you turned it into a nittypicky-fest on all my past mistakes as justification to why Flyboy had the right of being abusive towards me (a logic that I find morally questionable), most of which I have already apologised for, and none of which have anything to do with the case in point.

So, this is all I'm going to say about this subject. If you insist, be warned you will not get any further response. (which, I guess, means you win in your book. Yay!)

unbelievable...


I, quite unhappy:

OK. This not for Dead Megatron, but for the rest of the board.

If Dead Megatron did read this carefully, then he is lying about what it says and what I have said. If he did not read it carefully, then he lied to me two months ago, and is now lying again. Either way, he is either unwilling or unable to interact with Barbelith as a place where people's words are given the consideration of reading and response.

Either way, I'm afraid that he is heading towards troll territory, and pretty fast. I want to resolve this, but I am clearly not going to be able to do it with him. I would like to invite senior members in good standing to offer suggestions. Possibly by PM, or in another thread.


Flowers:

How about backing off him for a bit? For a number of reasons DM has been rather at the centre of discussions over the weekend and perhaps now's the time to take a breather. Let's try and go for a week before we start talking about the next person we throw off the island shall we?


Olulabelle:

Haus, is doing it by PM a good idea, really? If you think DM is moving towards troll territory and you would like to discuss that, surely it would be best to do that openly?

Flyboy:

I take it this [the suggestion to "back off"] is addressed to Dead Megatron, regarding his claims that Haus has said precisely the opposite of what we can all see he said?

Myself:

I have absolutely no faith in DM's ability to back off me, Flowers, which is a problem. However, if he apologises for misrepresenting my efforts to treat him like a worthwhile member of Barbelith for the last two months, then we can maybe negotiate a truce, which he can have fun breaking later.


Ganesh, on my fear that DM was heading towards troll territory, and pretty fast.:

I, for one, don't agree. Could we all perhaps agree to take at least 24 hours out before coming back to this? I'd like to contribute constructively, Haus, but am feeling the looming-sabbatical tiredness you've previously mentioned, and would hugely appreciate a gap in the proceedings.

Myself:

Ganesh: Surely. I'd like to finish up, however, by returning to that ol' Transformers thread. Both Dead Megatron and Flyboy has cited it as a case of the one goading t'other. E. Randy Dupre, Cameron Stewart and others also at variouspoints lose their patience. And yet, I appear to be in there, bantering, chatting, not insulting and generally treating Dead Megatron like a worthwhile member of Barbelith. Or how about here, where I again seem actually to be cutting him a surprising amount of slack, given his largely "look at me!" posts. I actually thought we were making progress there - he was actually referencing things that were happening by here. Of course, if I'd known that he was ignoring all that in order to strenghthen his bulkwarks against this hatred I apparently feel for him - or animosity, or lack of friendship, or incompatibility of personalties, it really doesn't matter which - I probably wouldn't have bothered. It does at least explain what at the time seemed this frankly bizarre second bite at the "having a go at me" cherry, here - I hadn't noticed that we were mortal enemies.

Now I really am depressed.


That covers the key points I think. Ganesh asked for a 24-hour pause to celebrate our birthdays, and a day later I posted:

24 hours later, and a year older, I'm not sure whether and where t do this, but I guess I wanted to flag that I still feel v. let down, especially after this in the mercifully-locked "Dead Megatron: His Crimes" thread.

I believe Haus already have linked recently on the Moderation Request thread every single mistake I've made

This is a) darkly hilarious and b) a sign of the same disturbing tendency. Once DM has decided, based on sketchy, sketchy readings, that he has an enemy, it seems the nibbling will never stop. I'd like it to, quite soon. Best estimates?


I note that DM has edited that post retroactively, which is nice, if unacknowledged. There was a request to move the discussion. I proposed that the bullying thread might be a good enough place to put it, as DM's behaviour could be seen as bullying (with the various provisos at the beginning of this thread). DM inquired as to how it could be seen as bullying.

Well, here's how I see it. DM keeps on telling lies about what I have said. It may be that he is not reading what I write, in which case he has gone back on his vow on his family's name to do so. It may be that he is incapable of understanding it - which is fair: there are some long words and run-on sentences. However, I don't see that this should be made to be my fault or indeed my problem. In the meantime, by constantly attempting to traduce my good name, in the face of what I am surprised to report is still pretty mild-mannered correction, I find myself forced to conclude that DM is attacking me on a personal level - specifically, seeking to misrepresent my thinking and writing in a way that will make others think less of me. This may be malicious, it may be lazy or it may be due to incomprehension, but he appears unwilling or unable to listen to what I am saying, which would be fine if he did not keep editorialising and attempting to tell Barbelith what I am saying. As it is, I'm saddened that trying to treat him like a worthwhile member of Barbelith has been thrown back in my face like this, and I believe that his actions towards me are not acceptable behaviour. In the combination of aggression, rudeness and misrepresentation of the facts, I see the germ of a bullying posture. I would like this to stop, either by DM reading and being clear in his understanding of my posts (asking me if he gets confused, politely and once), or DM being (and this is a mind-bending concept, but it might just work) quiet until he is confident, perhaps with the help of PM exchanges with a patient and impartial judge with decent language skills, that he understands what is going on and has something positive and useful to add to it.

This has nothing to do with Flyboy or Triplets, let me make clear, before any water is muddied. It is about Dead Megatron's behaviour towards me.
 
 
Dead Megatron
19:22 / 06.09.06
That's bang-on tooting right, DM! I don't think Flyboy should apologise for the comment made by Triplets. By extension, I think that a lot of the discussion in the early stages of this exciting process conflated Flyboy and Triplet's actions, and created an equivalency between them which simply did not exist, which led to confusion and a lack of individual equality before the court of opinion.

With all of which I also agree. The fact they were acting in the same thread in a similar fashion was the main reason they were both discussed as a single item.


My intention with the Venn diagram, that pulses wetly before you, communicating if nothing else that I have the handwriting of a dangerous lunatic, was to provide an easily-understood way to tease these strands apart.

And my intention on commenting was to help pw understand what I believed to be your point. I'm sorry if my question was poorly written: I should have said "apologise for the abortionist remark", instad for "apologise for nothing". That was a badly translated Brazilian idiomatic expression, and it had no intention of misinterpeting the diagram. (and that post was meant toa dress only the diagram, not all previous posts of yours)

But I have to say, you have a gorgeous caligraphy.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
19:26 / 06.09.06
I'm trying to stay nice, patient, upbeat, light-hearted, warm, postive, and true, yeah?

Well den, right: I started finkin', and I fawt "Yeah, right, I know, I'll find me a silly, happy dance pict-yah, yeah? To post when all dis blows over and the parties kickin' again.." Yeah?... D'ya ged me? Sose anyways, yeah, I typed in "Silly dance" into Google, yeah, and guess what the top result was, blood?...

Nah man, guess...

Seriously, bro. Try it! It's well dark, innit?
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
19:27 / 06.09.06
An' I'm talking to ALL ma bredrin, yeah? No factions in the community, yeah?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
19:39 / 06.09.06
Ah, those Brasilian idioms - they'll getcha every time. OK, let's call that one case closed. Now, let's talk about me.
 
 
Ganesh
19:54 / 06.09.06
Haus, I'm loath to get too (re)involved here, but I'm not sure that talk of "lies" and "enemies" is helpful. I think this whole issue is clouded by the fact that there's been such a morass of action/reaction between Dead Megatron and other posters, over the last year, that looking to alight on a particular point in the process and say, "X started it here" is always going to seem somewhat arbitrary. I'm not saying this is what you're doing, but I do think the low(but-increasing-in)-level animosity around DM has been more than one-way and I, for one, am finding it difficult to work out which (allegedly goading/baiting/ad hominem) comments spawned which.

In interpreting whomeantwhatwhentheysaidx, we're presumably individually influenced by our own experience of the posters involved - DM, Triplets, Flyboy - and as I posted here, I seem to have a more positive experience than some with DM, where emotive conflict is concerned. I remember being very angry with him over two instances of what I viewed as his homophobia. A one-to-one dialogue, part of which took place via PM, demonstrated to me that DM is someone who is able to reflect, apologise and modify his behaviour accordingly. He's not posted anything comparably homo-derogatory since (to the best of my knowledge) and, if he did, I feel confident he'd listen to me when I explained my objections.

This is perhaps why I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt here. That, and the fact that I think he has been the recipient of unpleasant and misplaced comments. But hey ho - sometimes we have to let these things go, for the sake of everyone's sanity.

Is there any way that all those of us involved could agree that enough's been said about this, and mutually not continue to pursue the matter? Flyboy's offered an apology (which some of us might be iffy about, but which still constitutes an apology); Triplets hasn't. It's presumably the latter point that still rankles, but since Triplets doesn't seem to be engaging actively with the subject right now, is there any possibility of our mutually accepting that further apologies will not be forthcoming for now, pulling back from this whole thing, and letting it drift for a bit. Is anyone not finding it exhausting?
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
20:00 / 06.09.06
Ageed.

*Zips mouth closeed like Zippy*
 
 
Dead Megatron
20:02 / 06.09.06
Oh yes, please God, yes, I SOOOOOO second that! I second that so much I'll have to second it twice.

Clase closed as far as I'm concerned.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
20:20 / 06.09.06
I'm almost reluctant to say this as I'm sure was meant as an innocent joke, but ~

To post when all dis blows over and the parties kickin' again.." Yeah?... D'ya ged me? Sose anyways, yeah, I typed in "Silly dance" into Google, yeah, and guess what the top result was, blood?...


~ I kind of cringed at what I assume is an impression of a Black London accent.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:24 / 06.09.06
A one-to-one dialogue, part of which took place via PM, demonstrated to me that DM is someone who is able to reflect, apologise and modify his behaviour accordingly.

Then I hope he will in this case. Nonetheless, I have provided a clear timetable of actions here - you can follow the dates by following the links above. So, your statement:

I think this whole issue is clouded by the fact that there's been such a morass of action/reaction between Dead Megatron and other posters, over the last year, that looking to alight on a particular point in the process and say, "X started it here" is going to seem somewhat arbitrary.

Is simply not an accurate supposition in this case. If you care to follow the links, you will find that they have dates to the left of them which will give you the timeline from the original resolution in "Burning Down the Hais part 2", my attempts to treat DM as a worthwhile member of Barbelith subsequently, his rather surprising return to that thread and his misrepresentations of me in recent days. As such, although you have now no doubt given DM permission to ignore this, which means that we may have to deal with another outbreak of this later and at a point where I may be less inclined to be forgiving, it remains the case until anything resembling a credible counterargument is put forward that he has consistently either failed to read or failed to understand (and declined to seek help with) what I have said, favouring instead a hallucinatory narrative in which Flyboy and I are, as Triplets and Flyboy were at the beginning of the farce, conflated in a way that is likely to engender conflict and ill feeling.

If you wish to spare your exhaustion in exchange for my greater exhaustion subsequently, I will as a favour go along with this. However, I do not personally believe that in doing so we are doing Dead Megatron any favours, nor that by ignoring such strongarm tactics we are doing anything but encouraging them in future.
 
 
Ganesh
20:24 / 06.09.06
Mmmmm. Perhaps a subject for another thread, Wonderstarr?
 
 
Ganesh
20:28 / 06.09.06
Haus, I don't think your linked dates go back far enough; I daresay DM can point to stuff preceding the Burning Down The Haus threads, and you can point to stuff before that, etc., etc. Pinpointing where the animosity began is likely to take time and patience which, frankly, I don't possess. I'm therefore not even pretending I'm embarking on such an exercise. I'm throwing in my own example of DM accepting criticism, apologising and modifying his behaviour, then bailing out of the excavation. Continue if you will; I'm merely saying this is outwith the bounds of my energy right now.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
20:33 / 06.09.06
Very briefly off-topic: I don't know, Ganesh. I felt embarrassed by it but not exactly offended, so I don't know what thread I'd take it to. If anyone else felt that post was worth porting to another thread, I would contribute to the discussion there.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:42 / 06.09.06
Pinpointing where the animosity began is likely to take time and patience which, frankly, I don't possess.

Yes, which is why I did not attempt to pinpoint where the animosity began. I have pinpointed, perfectly accurately, the point at which Dead Megatron undertook to read threads before posting to them, the resultant attempts by myself to treat him etc, and the point at which he appears to have decided conclusively to stop doing that. I would never ask you to embark on so nebulous a quest as the one you detail above. If you do not have the patience to comply with my more limited aims, as ennumerated above, then that's fine, but please do me the honour of agreeing that that is what you do not have the time and the patience to do.

EDIT - actually, the very tired could just look at the phrase:

I have absoutely nothing to do - nor do I want to - with Haus argumentation in the past three pages or so of this thread on why Flyboy attitude towards me is uderstandable (I suppose that this was his point, if he had one at some point)

And compare it with any kind of reality. That might save time. Ultimately, though, this is about Dead Megatron changing, and that change has to come from within. If you think I'm being unfair, DM, feel free to take me up here or by PM, but I'm afraid you'll have to explain your reasons for thinking so, with reference to things I have actually said.
 
 
Ganesh
20:44 / 06.09.06
Fine.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
20:46 / 06.09.06
Perhaps a subject for another thread, Wonderstarr?

I don't know, Dr G. The frankly somewhat baffling remarks were made here, after all.

It's probably best to draw a discreet veil over ... whatever that was; an apology's no doubt forthcoming in any case - why address it elsewhere?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
21:08 / 06.09.06
Hokay, G. - I feel a little regretful about that, and I am concerned that we're condoning aggression again, but I don't want to force you back to the workhouse. This was meant to be my time off Barbelith, after all , so I can relate. I'll be interested to see what, if anything, the rest of Barbelith thinks.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
21:11 / 06.09.06
*Unzips and gasps for air*

I have nothing to apologise for, yet.... Have I?....

Erm... Who have I offended? What accent was that I was employing? What did it sound like to you and why?....

"Oh shit, Buffy, I must have puked up the key again and sleep walked or something. Plus, the medicine's wearing off.... Help?... I know, put the record on again or something.... "

SMACK!

"ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz..........."

STEREO; Tracy Chapman sings: "....If not now, then when?..... ....No words to say...."
 
 
miss wonderstarr
21:18 / 06.09.06
Who have I offended? What accent was that I was employing? What did it sound like to you and why?....

I think I can answer this one; in fact, I think I already answered it. I said above "I felt embarrassed by it but not exactly offended."

I also said "I kind of cringed at what I assume is an impression of a Black London accent." Why did it sound like that? Because... it... it didn't seem to be a representation of any other accent or dialect I could decipher. Maybe you meant something quite different.

If we need to unpack this, and anyone is interested, I am happy to discuss my response (such as it is) on the appropriate thread.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
21:48 / 06.09.06
VKMW;

The 'Barbannoy' thread in Conversation, possibly? It's not so much about *offence* as feeling of mild irritation.
 
 
Triplets
00:40 / 07.09.06
Hello all.

Firstly, I'd like to apologise for making such comments to/at DM in his birthday thread. As MacCready said, doing this in the middle of that thread was inappropriate and picky-fight-worthy. Again apologies.

However, I have to make clear that DM's brand of low-level yet persistently aggressive misogyny has been eating at me for a while (and his challenging of certain established posters has given me the impression that he revels in his 'bad boy' status to an extent) and it was probably the idea that we celebrate him (and his attendant bad points as I see them) for any reason that fucked me off a great deal, hence the reaction.

But that reaction was inappropriate and I apologise to the board for that.
 
 
Dead Megatron
04:27 / 07.09.06
I accept the apologies, but I ned to know: what low-level yet persistently agressive misoginy? Because, if I'm doing, I'm not doing it consciously.

Examples?
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
07:50 / 07.09.06
Okay, here's a possible example: I have no idea what this post is about. That is to say, you don't seem to have any interest in discussing the band in question's music in that thread. Now, sharing your knowledge of the Sao Paulo scene is good, and helpful. Stories about not seeing the band live and celebrations of the international day of rock are kind of off the point, but fair enough, really.

But when you then drop in a big picture of the band and the comment:

So, which one of them you think should be more tired of being sexy? I vote for the girl in cowboy boots

- it gives the impression that you do not want to talk about the band's music, just which of them is more HOTT. I could be wrong, and you could think that NME review is a really great piece of writing (it's not) - but you didn't say so. You just wanted to talk about which one of them "should be more tired of being sexy", which is even more irritating given the fact that it's a reference to their name, which in turn is a reference to a woman's desire NOT to be seen as a sex object all the time!

Which, I suppose, might not rankle if it did not seem to be your immediate first reaction so often. This is the same reason, I think, why several of us started rolling our eyes when the first response to Kali's 'Things we do for money' thread was sure to include a "don't forget to PM me a link" - which in another context, i.e. to be blunt coming from someone else, might seem a lot less sexualised and, well, creepy. The context here also involves your self-professed identity as a man who loves the ladies and can't shut up about it, who is only held back by the materialistic sensibility of the local heterosexual women, and who gets pissed off with women for not being into the same things you are, not in spite of but because you are such a sensitive, appreciative lover.

This is the point at which my sense of aesthetics and my politics coincide: it's all just a little bit predictable, DM.
 
 
Tom Coates
09:03 / 07.09.06
Would it be fair of me to say that Barbelith has no constraint against offending people, but it has a strong constraint against harrassing people to the extent that they don't feel welcome on the board because of who they are? I'm really uncomfortable with the use of statements of offense being used as a cause for action. Spam, long-term trolling, harrassment seem to me to be good bases for action. But not so much offence.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
09:08 / 07.09.06
I agree with that, Tom. There are lots of problems with the concept of things being "offensive" - ranging from practical ones specific to this board, to broader political problems - even though I find it hard not to slip up and use that word. I and at least one other person wrote about this before - I'll try and find the thread.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
09:13 / 07.09.06
In the meantime, though, I would add that "it has a strong constraint against harrassing people to the extent that they don't feel welcome on the board because of who they are" is only true about certain definitions of "who they are", and it would be wrong (factually, as things stand, and in the sense of ill-advisable in the future) to pretend otherwise. If someone says they feel unwelcome on the board because they identify as a Holocaust denier, I'm simply not going to react the same way as if someone says they feel unwelcome on the board because they identify as a woman, and I doubt many other people would either. There are grey areas, though, where there will be less consensus.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
09:17 / 07.09.06
Umm - how can he be a misogynist if he's reveling in a "self-professed identity as a man who loves the ladies and can't shut up about it"? Doesn't that mean that he hates what he loves? Isn't that a paradox?
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
09:21 / 07.09.06
Jesus Christ. Seriously? Are we seriously going to have to do this one again? Are you SERIOUSLY going to wheel out the old gold-medallion-on-hairy-chest "I don't hate women, I love them, just for being so sexy" nonsense? It's 2006, not 1976.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
09:26 / 07.09.06
No - you posted a link with the phrase your self-professed identity as a man who loves the ladies and can't shut up about it, as a reason you thought that the misogynist comment was reasonable. I pretty much disagree with the thoughts behind this. But it seemed more fun to point this out with flippancy, mainly because if I was to engage with what you where saying on any real level I'd end up crying. And probably accused of misogyny again.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
09:27 / 07.09.06
mainly because if I was to engage with what you where saying on any real level I'd end up crying

There are those who think that new experiences are often worth the tears they can cause, Mathlete. Why don't you try this one out and see?
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
09:41 / 07.09.06
Ok - with regards to the CSS thing - I think DM likes the sound of his own voice, and has to be involved in all levels of Barbelith, so when he posts in a thread he posts whatever he can - so he posted an NME review (which makes me more angry than this comment) and then a throwaway remark. I have no problem with DM saying he thinks a female member of a band is sexy. In the same way I had no problem with Ganesh in the BB7 thread expressing how in the early weeks of BB he thought Sezer was sexy. I don't see it as the mark of a misogynist, low level or otherwise.

"don't forget to PM me a link..." - is it the flirting that annoys, or that you were forced to imagine an oiled DM gyrating on some poor brazillian women?

I guess with regards to the materialistic women thing, it's the bit when he says

And plus, this is a dog eat dog kind of place (and not in a good way), so competition for sex around here is very very harsh if you don't have a seven digit bank account, which I don't. I do get around sometimes, yes, despite Haus's best hopes (I love you to, dear), but mostly when I'm out of this concrete & steel hell-bred materialistic capitalist evil city...

Is he not just saying Sao Paulo is expensive to take girls out in?

That's my P.O.V
 
 
Quantum
09:44 / 07.09.06
The phrase competition for sex is worrying with or without the money issue. It implies to me Teh Laydeez dangling their sex in front of rival men to see who'll give them the best offer, y'know, because sex is a reward women give to men.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
09:49 / 07.09.06
Let's take it back to the concrete streets: original beats and basic entry level concepts of feminism.

If you assume that the only or default route to sex for heterosexual men is to "take girls out", Mathlete, then you are not "just saying" anything that does not contain some whopping great sexist assumptions. Note that I am not sure Dead Megatron was quite saying that, but your reading of it is still one which could validly be said to contain sexism...
 
 
Quantum
09:53 / 07.09.06
Basic entry level concepts of feminism (and classic rapping from Jurassic) aside, if I were a laydee I might be unhappy about DM's attitude to people with tits.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
10:00 / 07.09.06
wait - are you suggesting that the standard way of developing relationships with the goal of them becoming sexual (whether as a partner, or simply for sex) isn't to go places, do things? Are you suggesting these are simply "playground tactics"? From personal experience, I generally "take girls out" or go on dates with girls I am physically attracted to but don't know very well but would like to see if our personalities match up and maybe see if something will develop or not.

Is it the phrase "take girls out" thats wrong?
 
  

Page: 12345(6)7

 
  
Add Your Reply