|
|
Haus, a couple of answers
1) When you say of bell hooks ANd the conclusion she arrives at is, of course, "It's not our fault. At all"., what is the "our" there? It has already been explained to you that bell hooks is not a rapper, but a black feminist writer. Are we to assume that you are assuming that bell hooks is making excuses for all black people, in her role as spokeswoman for all black people?
You can choose whatever “our” you want. Don’t make no difference. The point, for me, is that any given oneself gets to blame someone else for one's personal choices, be that "someone else" men, women, white people, rich people, George Bush, the Pope, mom and dad, the voices in my head, or God. The point is the “other-ization” of blame. In this case, we have a black feminist writer, making excuses for gangsta rappers (of any color, it seems) and their behavior. It's not for herself she makes excuses, but such line of reasoning can be applied to oneself or to anyone one feels any shred of connection with.
2) Now that Mattshepherd has admitted, very admirably, that his reading of the article was coloured by his personal feelings, will you go with his attitude shift, or maintain that your reading of the article is correct even though nobody who has actually read it agrees with you?
Yelding to peer pressure, you suggest? Weel, I would, and happily so, but the thing is, I don’t really care about the article in itself, only with the general Idea of “it’s not our/their fault”, etc, etc (read above again). And besides, what reading of the article? (see below now)
3) Have you read the article, and do you intend ever to do so? Will you read the source text next time something is referenced before commenting?
I might even read the article eventually, out of curiosity. Although, as far as I understand, it talks also of a movie called the Piano, and I have a huge problem with anything even vaguely connected to a naked Harvey Keytel (I still have nightmares with Bad Lieutenant). Anyway, since my interest is not in the article itself (read above again and again), it is unlikely reading it will change my mind on the subject. (And, if I do read, I'm not even sure I’ll tell anyway)
You see, as you may remember from previous episodes, I work as a reporter for the Police ruling Government branch in my hometown, covering crimes and military parades (depending on how good has been my day). In this profession, I keep hearing a lot, both from the criminal themselves and their families as well as from people who happen to live a thousand miles or more away from the actual problem, things like “society’s is to blame”, “they did it to me/him first”, blah, blah, and blah. So forgive if I don’t buy it. After all, I have to see up-close the aftermath of that attitude. Hell spare me, I have walked over the dry blood of dead people, of murdered people, not only fighter (from both sides) but also innocent bystanders. I know why that rationale doesn't fly, isn't supposed to fly. I can feel the why crawling under my skin sometimes.
So, to its own extend as opposed to actual crimes like murder or theft or rape, the glorification of misogyny, consumerism, violence, and self-interest sung in gangsta rap (which I find to be a, let’s say, “lesser” form of music that ruins, or at least hurts, the good political work hip-hop often does) is not excusable in any way. After all, I, being raised as a Catholic, believe in such a thing as free will (as opposed to this "determinism" invoked in that rationale).
These are quite serious questions.
There, there, of course they are.
As for Kay - it seems that Kay will do anything to avoid conceding that he was a victim of the desire to spout a slightly better punctuated version of about the same prejudice Dead Megatron has espoused.
You gonna have to help me with that. What prejudice, exactly? Against black people? Against gangsta rapper? (actually, a little bit guilty on that one) Against feminist writers? Agsainst Harvey Keitel mighty nudity? Against articles? Against, perchance, you? Weel, I can't talk about Kay, but I just don’t like the line of reasoning that says… well, by now you must’ve got it.
This includes dissembling, when dissembling fails outright fibbing, and then storming off in a welter of vague accusations
ok, now you’re just making up words...
followed by pretending that nothing has happened.
Well, let's be frank now: not much has happened here, has i? Nothing important, at least. In the big picture, I mean.
It's not a great way to conduct one's affairs, but hopefully it's working out OK for him.
Well, I’m so sorry if I didn't respond right way and in proper length to your post, but you see, I was working at the time (I’m home now), and just so happens today some guy who probably thinks life is not his fault decided it was a swell idea to put a home-made bomb on a train car full of people going to work and we got eleven wounded and I kinda spent the whole day on the phone after details (oh, such fun!), which left me only a couple of minutes here and there to make a quick, unwinding stop on Barbelith’s fora that less serious than Convo – where, paradoxally, we can find much better conversations – for some short comment on something like a possible Hulk sequel, and not this monster I’m writing right now. Unless you’d settle for “Nope”...
Anyway, I assure you I'm right here.
I'm curious to know how we feel about this apparently very modish readiness to make sweeping statements about race from a position of startling and carefully-maintained ignorance that we seem to be getting on Barbelith at the moment. I'm wondering if we ought to be thinking of putting something in the Policy.
Christ Fucking His Mother on Prime Time Television, for the last time: NOT ABOUT RACE. ABOUT EXCUSES FOR UNACEPTABLE BEHAVIOR*...
[* a behavior which I'm sure you don't approve that much, and of which, as explained above, I am nowhere near a "position of startling and carefully-maintained ignorance"]
But, wait a moment! Did you just threat me with possible banishment over me disagreeing with you and not wanting to read an article and not subjecting and conforming to you and your cadre of followers? Really? Seriously?
Ok, then.
By the way, how much of your day exaclty do you spend thinking and writing all those admonishing posts on the 'lith?. Because, in here, it's 23:32 and I'm leaving for the night of Friday [note: posted 23:55, after my "date" arrived to pick me up] You, I imagine, was at home at, what?, 2 a.m. of a Fridat night, writing all these. Is this your only hobby? Or you just suffer from insomnia?
PS. aftger that, it's weekend. Don't expect any swift response to any response to this response. In the mean time, I'll leave you with the words of... The Dogg Pound:
Yeah, this is for the ballers - gangsta rap
What all the hoes love - gangsta rap
What the hoppin six-fo's do - gangsta rap
You could do what you want to - gangsta rap
[Crooked I]
Nigga, I buy new blocks for war
A few shots, a broad, that make you drop
Then I'ma pop two cops or more
I'm too hot, come through wit two proper whores
Playin Tupac Shakur, gettin 'em blue socks the Lord
Crooked I's the name, man that boy just hopped off the train
wearin a platinum chain striked with thang
It's the youth game, doin it big
You don't like it, you and yo' kid get you and the whip, shit
Nigga, I spray clips, shots flop quicker than space ships
Then shapeshift yo' facial Matrix like a facelift
So face it, y'all ain't nuttin to see
Ain't a nigga dead or alive who fuckin wit me
Thank you for listening and good night. |
|
|