BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Sexism in magic

 
  

Page: 12(3)45

 
 
This Sunday
09:43 / 08.04.07
I want to be very clear that I'm positing above-thread that gender is, yes, very much something playable. Sex is far more concrete, but also, not nearly as binary as it is often posited. And, seriously, anyone who's using the idea that gender-necessity or gendering is mildly suspicious at best (I mean, really, people gender fruit, paintings, and whole species of animal regardless of sex... it's absurd as anything more than a vague tool to lay over the thing, a lens to look at or through, which cannot be said as definitely about sex) to excuse excluding or ignoring anyone based on gender/sex, isn't actually doing so based on that precept. They're using it as a facade.

I just ran onto an old e-mail, years old, wherein an editor, very well-meaningly suggested that my writing could benefit my 'people' if instead of writing about magick and flirty couples disintegrating in too-expensive bars or stargazing on rooftops by using hallucinogens to pierce the haze of LA smog... I should 'reach deep down in [my] personal history' and write about drunk Indians, about crises of sexual or religious identity... and they claim it's because of a need to educate society, because we're all the same and they're so not-racist or not-bigoted... but in the end, it's this idea that (a) I should be in a panic or drunk because I'm not all-the-way-straight or all-the-way-white, which is not coming from any sort of enlightened, helpful, socially-aware standpoint. It, like someone who says sex/gender doesn't count and then discounts certain sexes or genders, is a clear case of someone using, perhaps unknowingly, a facade.

I've just realized friends of mine are refusing to even consider me or refer to me as male in any way, shape, or form. I knew that one woman, who had been through some messed up experiences and tended to avoid men fequently as a consequence, generally referred to me in feminine terms, but I hadn't noticed it with anyone else. Even I'm doing it, to a degree: I say 'me and this other girl,' if I don't catch myself, but I always say 'me and this guy.' But it's not making me feminine, any more than having a penis makes me masculine.

See, this is why I hate targeted anthologies, because even when they're full of damned good work, there is an everpresent hint that makes them, and the work inside, separate from straight-white-male-in-a-suit work. It's the default to the straight white guy. Which is a very useful tool, perhaps, if you're a straight white guy. But, if not... or if you realize that that's not all you are... it's just a tool. Useful when useful, stashed away when unused. Being in any box does not make you inherently superior to anyone in any other box... with the exception of the rude vs the polite. Civility, in the end, or at least the attempt at civility, at doing well by your neighbors, friends and family, by total strangers you may never even meet, may be the only thing that really dignifies us. The rest, including gender, is just decoration, patching, or frame. And the civility is always individual choice.
 
 
Unconditional Love
09:57 / 08.04.07
The word Morpheus comes to mind. Epop, why are you looking for justification for the reptile parts of the brain to be more magical than the forebrain? These very old magical entities that thrive on what you are describing are what people would describe as instinctual drives, that when you are so unfamiliar with them you push into conscious recognisable shapes to deal with them.

In your case you are fleeing into science to justify your contact with them and the expression they seek inside of you. To use old magickal language your giving your demons license to be unbound.

It really is a mistake to look at biology without looking at the evolutionary part, ie we have evolved as a species for a reason, so we can undo the behaviors that were once nessecary for us to survive. We no longer live communicate and express in those circumstances, life has evolved as have cultures and communities. There are quite a few factions who would like to step backwards and will use alsorts of justifications to do so, including the paradox of modern science to revisit the past with justified modern explanations.

Think also of the politics of presenting us all as hard wired animals without conscious control. No liberty, no freedom, no self autonomy, these things really do suck indeed. We have achieved a level of evolution where these things are quite important to us in our considerations to ourselves and others.

Its all good to question them, but to raise certain parts of human experience over others without conscious reflection on the self that is providing and giving forth the information? I am sure there is more to you than thriving on the reaction you get from your evocative posts.

I know what instincts i need to take a sword to, could you describe for me what instincts you think are so powerful they cant be banished, what magical forces?
 
 
Red Concrete
10:27 / 08.04.07
The figure for non-paternity is probably more like 2%, and is thought to vary across the world. I've seen the 10% figure bandied about for the UK and "western" populations, but in my personal experience as a geneticist it's not true. As far as evolutionary psychology goes... don't get me started. It is not a science. I think you're invoking genetics needlessly.

I'd love to discuss with you in the Lab, Epop, if you're willing.
 
 
Unconditional Love
10:35 / 08.04.07
Ther are alot of female writers about spirituality that are dismissed out of hand by the magical community but they are not considered the real deal or are written off as fluffy, thats the attitude that causes most damage in my experience. There are spiritual and magical entrances for everybody.

Having this prejudice scale of their are silver ravenwatsits and then there is crowley (the real deal) does not help, it reinforces this prejudice.

Its like saying a university text is going to be far more enjoyable than a romance novel because the idea of university has a higher social status than romance as narrative. Again its social conditioning of associations of male and female qualities to abstract institutions and notions.

Its the perceived notions of male and female language constructs that need to be disassembled in ones own consciousness, its very hard work, i dont always remember that.

To exclude all the women who write in the vein of what many people would describe as new age is a real part of the problem, their is a growing body of female literature written in this area and wicca, but their is an ongoing attitude among the 'hardcore' occultists that this is not the real deal, perhaps their is a suggestion their that it is not man enough.

It can also be seen in the colour coding of the products being sold as male and female, take alook at the front covers of new age books and occult texts, again more social conditioning.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
13:45 / 08.04.07
So, Mordant, why are you a solitary practitioner then?

I don't know really, it just sort of worked out that way, seems silly when I look at what I'm missing out on.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
14:47 / 08.04.07
Other people have picked that hideous, revolting abortion of a post to bits already, so I won't bother. I can't be bothered. I vastly prefer to attack the post rather than the poster, as this is the approach most conducive to a mutually beneficial exchange of views. In this case I'm going to make an exception.

Epop, you are a sad, sick fuck. You are unwell. You are broken. You have a bit missing somewhere.

Your understanding of evolutionary psychology is trivial, fractional. I know of no scientist working in the field who seeks to justify rape. Go read some more fucking books, you ignorant tosser. Or, actually, don't, get up off your arse and get out there, experience the world and the people in it if you dare.

The Western tradition of Magick is a fine and wonderful thing, a grand system complete and beautiful all to itself. This does not make it the only system, as you seem to have assumed.

Reading biographies does not make you as clued-up as you think you are. Yeah, magic can be a terrible and destructive force. I've sunk half a bottle of brandy at midday because I was too scared to be sober, I've been dragged screaming to Hel and back, I've been wounded, mutilated and devoured and it's hardly even started yet. How do I know that there are successful, well, healthy magicians? By reading fucking biographies? No, I've met them, you fool, I've gone down the pub with them and hung out round their flats. It's not about the "good life," it's about being able to function across worlds, this one and the others.

Let me tell you something, chum: You are not a magician. The way you talk about magic makes me fucking sick. It makes me weary to my bones. It breaks my heart. Well done for adopting such a hopelessly rigid mindset, I hope it keeps you warm at night. As long as you cleave to it, you will never be a magician. You might perform rituals, you might fire off the odd spell or two, you might even get some results, but you're no more a magician than I am a chimney-sweep. You're a slave, a prisoner, you are food for the alien chaos that lies outside of magic and eats its own tail; you will never win free because you will never recieve awareness. Enjoy the abyss, you trivial fraction of a man.
 
 
Mako is a hungry fish
15:03 / 08.04.07
Ouch... momments like these I reconsider how much effort I put into developing my empathy skills.

Having this prejudice scale of their are silver ravenwatsits and then there is crowley (the real deal) does not help, it reinforces this prejudice.

A good point and one that I often forget when I step into the occult bookstore, going so far as to label certain publishers or authors the "such and such school of shake n bake McMagic", forgetting that if I truly had the right to judge them as such then this right would be based on the ability to find mountains of magic in even the most mundane of things.

mmm... alliteratey.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
15:11 / 08.04.07
There are mountains of magic in the most mundane of things. There is fuck all in To Ride a Silver Fuckstick and its many clones. I would rather hand a n00b mage a copy of fucking Razzle than anything by SRW. I don't think there's anything wrong with distinguishing between useful texts, texts which are basically rubbish but have a few useful techniques in there somewhere, and pap churned out to make money.
 
 
Unconditional Love
15:50 / 08.04.07
I don't know anymore, i used to carry the above attitude i describe above around with me and i wonder is it discernment on my part or am i actually just dismissing books because they don't look male enough, black red orange yellow dark blues and greens compared to pastels, pinks, light blues and whites.

What is it in the design of occult books and the fonts chosen that makes them seem certain ways, not that there are generic styles but there seems to be a pattern to the colours as there does with movies for example.

Also i wonder just how much some of the titles that are described by others as crap aren't an inspiration to somebody else, a way for them to put a foot on the path and begin to walk. That might be a soft hearted approach to literature and its worth, but looking at the texts i surround myself with and how representational they are of me is a start to see how i am constructing myself, how do i reflect myself in the environment i create around me.

Ive seen people inspired by reiki, something i used to think of as fluff rubbish, do chakra meditations with none of the research into the various systems of chakras and it seems to help there mental well being for a time, transforming how they dress there body language how they percieve themselves and there bodies, and thats why i wonder, i used to look down from an egoic height, but my memory and experience has shown me just how useful everything i used to think of as fluff can be, especially when it comes to peoples well being.

If magick/spirituality is to have a community based ethical approach then to some extent i think thats important, if those fluffy books or products can touch just one person and make them aware of something else another perception, i think thats merited. i am not saying its the whole of the answer, but its a foot in the door.

I know for myself with all the literature i have read and the practice i have begun in the last 7 years its been easy to climb up on the backs of academic literature and greater mages, but i have to remember that i started by listening to Shamen records and reading the black arts by Richard Cavendish and playing imaginary games in playtime at school and role playing games. Although i may try to distance myself from all of it sometimes it all has a place in my practice somewhere here or there.

I wonder if all the mystical trivia and fantasy and whimsical daydreaming doesn't contribute just as much as the suggested backbone of magical practice, the real deal.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
16:28 / 08.04.07
I think the trivia and fantasising are different though. They're an organic part of your development as a person, part of your psychospiritual landscape. They have their place and should be valued, as long as they don't take over completely.

Fluff-texts are... non-organic. Created deliberately to suck resources out of people in exchange for damn all. They are a trap. I seriously have to wonder about the people who write these things; if they actually have a practice of their own, why not write about that? Why peddle something hollow? I can't understand lying about magic, I mean, man, it's magic! It's not the most important thing in the world, but it's too important to bullshit about. And if they don't have a practice, don't they notice that this shit just doesn't *work*? Crowley was a total git for slipping unecessary cruelty and misery into his books, but at least with Crowley if you buckle down and use what's there you will achieve something.

I find it interesting that you locate these kinds of texts in the "female" segment, and in truth there do seem to be a lot of female authors on Llewellyn's books. Sort of takes us back to what I was trying to get at in the UC thread--where are the females at the cutting edge, why is female magical writing all 80s hair and dressing-gowns?
 
 
Ticker
16:38 / 08.04.07
XK - you say you have numbers? Ok, show me your numbers.

Let's look at what numbers will be helpful to both of us


Let's start with Ham Radio operators, and miniature war games. I'm *quite* well aware that there are a lot of females playing MMOs, for example, but seriously, I think that you are putting your own observations of life aside to discuss your models of the world: these fields are, by and large, almost devoid of women because, by and large, chicks simply do not dig it.

Yes: chicks.


Ok first of all I call bullshit on sexist terms. Please stop using them so we can have a productive discussion.

Second of all stop moving the goal posts on 'nerdism'. I can give you numbers of females in various areas of interest to disprove your assumption that there aren't any. I can also give you numbers to show you how our culture represses women in vairous fields. Not going to get us anywhere quickly.


Now, don't confuse this with somebody who was never exposed to "feminism" or gender equivalence thinking. I'm a Post-Feminist, if you like. In my experience the retarded approach which has been taking to dealing with the issues of gender in our culture, particularly in the academic world, are not only completely unhelpful, but their stupidity and lack of observational reality simply beggars the imagination?


this doesn't make any sense. What are you trying to say?


You know why women are a lot harder, on average, to get into bed than men? Start counting calories for reproduction. Take a really hard look at evolutionary biology.


I have. In fact i have a couple of great books here that plainly state all sorts of people reproduce. Your view is your opinion, not fact. what shall we agree upon as suitable facts?


I'm an animal. So are you. No amount of whining about fairness changes the fact that rape is the *core* of a good deal of female behavior not only in the human world, but right across the mammal and other animal kingdom. If you don't think that darwinian factors largely maul, kill and eat cultural considerations, why is it that **REGARDLESS** of "cultural" factors, roughly 10% of children were fathered by somebody other than the person who is called their father?


I happen to have a book right here that blows that out of the water. It's called 'The myth of monogamy' that 10% you're looking at isn't rape derived, it is derived from affairs. Also you haven't really studied Darwin have you? Again t his reads as opinion not fact.


The reason it's the same across the entire human race is because it's too damn important to be left to the forebrain: 10% of kids are "garden variety" because it's something that apparently works in evolutionary terms. Same with homosexuality - whatever the payoff there is, it's clearly important enough to be replicated in all kinds of mammalian species. Maybe it's like sickle cell anemia, maybe it's something vastly more profound, but queer is everywhere.


Again you're not saying anything I can use. You are making a rush of statements not grounded in research. What does 'garden variety' actually mean?



Let me push this harder: men earn 1/3rd more than women. This is useful because women are *biologically* *attracted* to men with money, in the same way that men are *biologically* *attracted* to women with strong physical symmetry and a 1/3 waist/hip ratio. These things are hardwired and culture and personality are forces which act upon this substrate, not replace it.


Men earn more money because we live in a sexist society in which minorities are paid less. Your waist hip ratio info is not founded in the science I have available. Care to share it?


As for whether magic is a hobby for you or a serious profession, I can't speak to your experience, but you don't *sound* like somebody who's seen the same kind of territory I'm discussing, and - from many years of experience - if you haven't started having brushes with anhilation, you're probably in the foot hills.


Have you read my posts? If you had I don't believe you'd be making this statement. Unlike you i have shared my personal work with this community. I invite you to do the same.



And, equally importantly, there's nothing at the top of the mountain. You go there because you must, and for no other reason.


I found a great deal on the top of mountains. We have a few threads dealing with getting out there and doing these things.


I'm sorry if this sounds harsh or unfeeling, but I think it's very very important to really put some things in perspective here. Magic is fun right up until you realize that there is no law to watch your back, and that you're involved in schemes that go back six, eight, ten thousand years straight. If you haven't met the beings I'm talking about when I say "don't give a shit about your humanity" and so forth be very, very glad. Try to keep it that way.


Again it doesn't sound harsh and unfeeling as much as uneducated, uninformed and completely prejuidiced. You are not grounding any of your statements in either personal experience or in varifiable third party information.


On this Nath stuff? Go back and read about Gorakshnath and Maccsyendranath on the Island of Women. Now in the version I know of that story, Gorakshnath realizes that Maccsyendranath has become confused and deluded by the material world, so he kill and skins both of Maccsynedranath's sons and hangs the skins up for Maccsyendranath to see to wake him out of the dream he's fallen into.



I like myths too but not every one of them is suitable for absolutes.


And those are the good guys.

The bad guys are like Stalin or Mao... tens of millions killed in cages by starvation, mostly. Read what the Tibetans say Padmasambhava did to the mountain spirits - boiling their flesh off their bones in lakes of boiling blood, until they would submit to the "dharma" or, at least, his personal version of the Law. Really, read.


Ok what's your point? Are we trading boogie men or what?


Magic of any power is fucked up dangerous shit that destroys your life. You can tell that by reading the biographical accounts of the Golden Dawn as they die in gutters, or the OTO as they go insane, blow themselves to smithereens, or also die in gutters. Why in god's name don't people think this through.


what you are presenting is only a fraction of the magical experience available to people. You're not offering perosnal accounts, only repeating other people's. Everyone has unique experiences and some may share common themes. Howver you are not stating anything useful only repeating the same words over and over.


Now, you might point to exceptions - magicians you know who, over all, seem to have The Good Life. They do exist. I suggest you examine them in exquisite detail and try and figure out what makes them different.


Hey. Ask me how. There's a bunch of them on this board. Have you read their work?


I'll tell you that, in my experience, usually it's because they've sold out to things man was not meant to know and are in the same position as that little light on the end of the Anglerfish's stalk.


Ok I'm getting a big whiff of ficitional horror story informed accounts here. Let's bring in the facts, shall we?Who are you talking about?


You might wonder if I walk the talk. The answer is yes: I've put my shit on the line for years, I've got a material life which includes demonstrated and manifest global change in both the environmental and humanitarian domain and I'm kicking quite a lot of ass right now in my own way.


Ok wheel it out. Let's look at it.


But it is *ferociously* hard and I think that a lot of the reason that we've seen such a decline in the quality of western magical tradition awareness (and, yes, I include chaos, thelema and so on in that bag) is because people have largely forgotten what the role of the magician is.


Or appearently how to discuss these things constructively? I'm not finding *anything of use in this entire post*. Are you just pontificating or what?


We are first up against the wall, first over the trenches, and first into the future. And it's like being the teeth on a gigantic species-level circular saw hacking through the toxic realities of the future to try and maintain a world worth living in. Personal transcendence is largely bait.


Again you are not saying anything useful or specific. It might be pretty but it's a repeat of what others have said.


This stuff does not kick in while you are still working largely with microcosmic energies. The worst thing you can do at those levels is blow up your family's lives. But outside of that, one you plug into the mains, the fun begins and if you have any brains you wish you had simply never started to explore the territory.


If you can't be specific I can't work with you. You've become noise even with my attempts to follow you aren't giving me examples. Do you mean like Ted Holiday?


I'm not even sure why I'm posting this. I guess it needed to be said. Keep your magic within the microcosmic personal-life domain, or expect, eventually, to hit a level of power and capability where you become useful and the enormous group karmas of trying to maintain life on earth in a suitable, happy form simply storm into your world and take over your life.


I'm not sure why you're posting either. what do you wish to communicate to me? That life is dangerous? That magic carries potential dangers?


It's like having a lot of money: you are suddenly responsible for every person you did not feed. Or being very smart, and piddling it away on some obscure passion that helps nobody while people die in the streets for lack of historical understanding or inspiration. You step up to plate and somebody hands you a bat and you're in and you never get out again.


Okay this sounds like you're talking about personal responsibility. Are you having a hard time doing magical work?


If you haven't seen this, you could say it does not exist, it is not there. You'd be dreaming.


In this entire long post you did not state anything I could use to increase my awareness or understanding of the world.
 
 
Unconditional Love
17:22 / 08.04.07
I really don't know why its published in that kind of pretext, but i suspect it has everything to do with a perceived customer from a publishers view point and the demographic they intend to hit.

I think thats where the publisher may well get in front of the intent of the authors and the editing process has something to do with it as well, depending on the publisher.

On another point thou i am not sure magic is that separate from what we do ordinarily, because often what we come to consider as ordinary very much involves a state of trance or altered consciousness, an immediate example for me would be sitting down in front of my p.c, a transition takes place that is built up of a longtime of habitual behaviors and responses that is in a sense similar to ritualistic behavior but not the same as.

Going back to colours and fonts with an emphasis on curves rather than straight lines, its something i picked up working in a video shop years back, i could direct different people to different shelves by displaying certain colour products in certain areas, i never kept any solid research but i am sure it exists in the advertising field.
Its interesting that gender has those colour attributions as do the ideas of straightness and curves.

I work with 5 Egyptian goddesses forms at present and something i am noticing in invocation is just how difficult i am finding it to identify and visualize myself with a female body, I can get the animal aspects of the forms in a gender neutral context, but i get the impression that as a male and being largely heterosexual its easier to venerate what i perceive as feminine as to be separate from me, something i can unite with. I wonder if with practice it will be easier for me to invoke a feminine presence within myself, but i also wonder how would i really know how to differentiate that presence from a male one, Does the emphasis that human beings place on gender physically actually really play a part in the presence of a spirit or are spiritual representations more like convenient forms of understanding for human beings?

Perhaps its in our ability to understand entities that forms their presentation, but at the same time does this not reflect our own understanding of ourselves and our relationships?

So for example do i project the feminine as something other than myself in order to move towards be attracted by what i perceive in that fashion and then how will that change as i become more adept in invoking a female form in my person and mental self representation.
 
 
Mako is a hungry fish
17:24 / 08.04.07
I would rather hand a n00b mage a copy of fucking Razzle than anything by SRW... pap churned out to make money.

I can't really argue that a fool needs some things made very clear for them to understand, and that some works are clearer than others, but I can argue that a sage doesn't suffer from such limitations. Every philosophy holds truth to those who adhere to it, and this truth is usually in line with their maturity level; we're not going to burn oscar the grouch in his garbage bin because he's not teaching five year olds the mysteries of quantum gravity, even though it'd make for a satisfying viewing experience and encourage Dr HoneyDew to work a little harder for tenure.
 
 
Unconditional Love
17:54 / 08.04.07
Ok this has brought something else forth, something about a perception of my own sexuality that may apply to shifting shape and the relative perception of gender and sexuality.

As i started therapy for the abuses that took place in my childhood i had to explore the future identity of my sexuality. Its not as a set definite state of completion but i had to look at the values present in my own sexual experience.

So i took a close look at my own sexual experience and realized that all my loving relationships had been with women and the the brief sexual experiences with men had echoes of the abuse i received as a child. i quite literally chose as an end point where this therapy is concerned a sexual identity of heterosexual (thats not to say thats permanent, but for intense purposes i treat it that way at present).

This opened up a huge vista in my magical thinking, i had a friendship with a transsexual many years back and became aware of just how possible it was to change in gender and now i can see in myself a point at which i move out of the sexual ambiguity i have felt for many years and become something.

As i discovered notions of how the ancient egyptians concieved of gender being different parts of the person of spirit (and many other cultures do similar) it started to hit home to me just prevalent the current social conditioning is and to some degree how it works. I have found often that learning to become a thing is also learning how to undo a thing or grow in perception of its inadequacies that can be improved.

Add to this and my discovery that research suggests that sexual peak shows similar brain reaction to religous/spiritual experience and i began to incorporate these elements in my practice. Since i know i have felt the most loving involvement with women i have moved my devotion to goddesses to the forefront of my practice, because i need to explore what it means to be feminine, because i have to understand my memories of love, but i wonder as a man can i ever really understand what it is to be feminine, or am i just letting the terms delude me.

At the sametime i have the notion that yes there are feminine powers in this world and they do operate in a completely different way to male powers, because the experience of my devotions proves it to me.

At which point i begin to settle for very confused, my magic is not separated from my personal psychology and self reflection which is perhaps why i make some of the points i have made above, but then perhaps to separate and catagorise like that is the problem, not seeing the whole of the situation missing some of the variables involved in how i self construct my own gender and sexuality.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
17:55 / 08.04.07
I'm happy for there to be basic how-to manuals out there, that's not what I'm kvetching about. (I think magic is a bit different to an academic subject though because it's all so experiential; you genuinely can't learn it from a book, you have to get your hands dirty or you'll never learn at all.) Those are fine. Got most of my early education out of books like that, fluffy book-club bumph that was largely full of drivel but contained enough in the way of useful techniques to get me started.

What frustrates me are the books that don't even have this kind of thing going for them; books that preach recycled crud, books that lie and trap and limit just like the authors are limited. I can trace a lot of my biggest and most enduring magical screwups and hangups to books written by people who, it is clear to me now, didn't ever actually do a lot of magic but felt qualified to tell everybody else how it should be done. Less like Oscar the Grouch teaching the kiddies their ABCs and more like picking the students up and shoving them in the trashcan. Seriously, the limits and restrictions I placed on my practice all the time I was growing up and right into adulthood are horrendous when I look back on them. All that hedging and fudging and harm-it-noneing, all the insane obsessive what-iffing, I trace back to popular fallacies disseminated by fluff texts.

F'rexample, when I was 16 I did a spell to win a poetry contest that went like "My will is to win this poetry contest, unless there's a really amazing poem submitted that would otherwise not be discovered or someone who needs the money more than I do..." and so on and so on. I picture my spells flapping around helplessly on the altar like seagulls in an oilslick, unable to get off the ground. And my whole practice was lousy with shit like that! For years and years! Even when I was a chaos magician I had this little harm-it-none doodle that I used to add to all my sigils. Terrible, awful mess. Only managed to stop doing it a couple of years ago really. And I did this why? Because that's what the books said. Didn't even occur to me to question it. I can't feel too bad though since it obviously didn't occur to those authors either, which makes me think they can't have been doing much magic.

I think this kind of thing is especially bad for people who start young. Magic helps shape your whole relationship with the world; it shapes you. I began actively practicing ritual magic at around 8 and oy, the crap I have internalised. Can barely get wealth spells to work worth a damn even now. And those merciless bastards with their punishing daily programmes of work (which I doubt the authors stuck to themselves) and flagellating comments about how if you can't stick to the programme you're a phoney... the staggering lack of compassion for oneself, I learned that from the books as well. Mercy! Still trying to scrape that shit from my shoes to this very day. It distresses me to think of the next gen of young magicians going through the same thing, hence my despite for SRW and her ilk.
 
 
penitentvandal
18:45 / 08.04.07
On another point thou i am not sure magic is that separate from what we do ordinarily, because often what we come to consider as ordinary very much involves a state of trance or altered consciousness, an immediate example for me would be sitting down in front of my p.c, a transition takes place that is built up of a longtime of habitual behaviors and responses that is in a sense similar to ritualistic behavior but not the same as.

This is something that interests me lately. I've became heavily into the idea of developing an 'empty-handed' magickal style, 'unlearning' my rigid dependence on banishing rituals, sexual gnosis, triple-layered spells (mantra/sigil/poem) or it won't work, etc.

My model for this has been Miyamoto Musashi, the samurai who wrote the book of five rings: when he reached a certain level of proficiency in swordsmanship, he never again used a sword. He would cut sticks of bamboo and fight swordsmen with them (and win). He used whatever was to hand in his environment which, it seems to me, is what chaos magic should be all about.

One aspect of this has been observing how ostensibly ordinary procedures actually follow magical templates. Everyone does empty-handed magic all the time, is the short form of what I've discovered.
 
 
Unconditional Love
20:36 / 08.04.07
I think your right velvet many people are engaged in a form of almost unconscious magic on a daily basis, some of it born of habit/ritual and some with long forgotten intent, part of the process there seems to be to either trick it into awareness again and transform it, or to let it lay and use it as a vehicle.

Talks, i see what your saying, The lack of self compassion is one that strikes me alot, i don't mind hard work if the fruits teach me something, but alot of magical texts especially of the late eighties that i ran into gave the impression that i should be a monk or similar in order to practice. Louis T cullings sex magick from my early twenties, some of the practices, painful genitals. Really not good. bad instruction on how to delay orgasm.

But then Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law had me blind for years to love is the law, love under will. add to that, nothing is true everything is permitted and my consciousness turned into a riot for about 10 years.

But having said that although there was alot of pain hidden beneath the adoption of these things, for a time they were an effective coping strategy. I know thats not how everyone relates to them, but crowleys notions and chaos magic gave me a youth culture for the times i grew up in.

Since having had chance to examine them, without the drugs i have come to other conclusions,bringing in turn more questions.

Still i have seen fluff do good things for peoples short term sense of well being. I probably should not imply that that is magic, but it gives me just a little hope that there maybe something in all that stuff worth salvaging.
 
 
penitentvandal
20:45 / 08.04.07
Mordant - I think you're on the money with regard to the ways bad magical teaching can limit people. In fact, in my experience, even good teaching can limit you. I've gleaned a lot from Pete Carroll's work over the years, but it's only recently that I've begun to see how much I've been limited by a throwaway line in Psybergnosis, which I read during a period of major magical growth in my life: a chapter where he berates people for taking a zen approach to magic, and basically lays out a view that unless you're all about teh sigillz on a regular basis, you aren't a magician. This actually inspired me, at the time, to return to a more basic practice, which helped: but further down the road it led to me adopting a blinkered approach to magic that really limited me. Only recently have I began breaking out of those limitations.

I'm not making an equivalence with Carroll and Ravenwolf here: you can learn good stuff following Carroll's methods. You can also follow them and make bad, limiting mistakes. I don't know how true that is of Ravenwolf, et al, and if the ratio is nine parts useless bullshit to one part harmful lies, then it's definitely not worth it.
 
 
Epop Bastart the Justified, I
21:34 / 08.04.07
Mordant: firstly, at no point did I justify rape. I simply stated that it appears to be a dominant force in our recent evolution, and a good deal of female psychology for many women is based around that fact, both as a shadow of the past, and a practical reality in the present.

Women are afraid of getting raped. That fear is an old fear, and it's likely wired in the way that fear of snakes is wired. Hence, protector-seeking behavior is also wired and **ON AVERAGE** this is not hard to see if you look around at the culture around you. I did not come to these conclusions sitting at home wagging my dick at sigils: I came to them by putting people who had been raped back together afterwards.

For a good number of years, my "side practice" was dealing with heavily sexually abused and traumatized women and helping them find healing. I probably reassembled eight or ten people over the course of about 10 years, until my own personal makeup changed and people stopped showing up to teach me things by showing me their damage and asking for an opinion.

I learned those skills because I myself had been repeatedly and violently gang raped multiple times, including being strangled and left for dead, before the age of 10.

So: point one. You can take every assumption that you make about my ability to deal with these issues from a place of understanding, and you can ram it up your ass.

As for who I am or what I do: I'm not going to bring my work to the table here, because I have a private life. But in terms of practical action to do something about the condition of this planet, my work is *top of the league* in the objective, real world in two or three areas. One of the biggest breakthroughs in low cost housing for the poor is my innovation, and the work I'm doing in preventing the use of biometric identification technology to implement totalitarian regimes is extremely highly thought of by people in the field.

So if that's what partial people who are food for chaotic aliens do, I'd love to see what real men are capable of.

XK - at no point did I say the 10% number was rape-derived. I pointed to it as a number which is reported as being objectively measured and invariant across human cultures, indicating that at least some parts of sexual behavior are - on average - universal and invariant to a much deeper degree than current academic concerns would indicate.

Somebody on the thread indicated that they thought that number was 2% and culture relative - I'd like a link.

On Dworkin, yes, I've read Dworkin - at least, in 1991 I made it through one of her novels ("Fire and Ice" I think it was called, and gave up part way through one of her other works.) A more gender-biased, prejudiced man-hating bitch from hell I've never seen: she makes Mein Kampf look like Jimmy Neutron has Two Daddies.

I'm glad I've made a few of you angry enough to show a few teeth, because I posted like a complete asshole. I'm not sure why nobody tore me to pieces on the stuff about income inequality: that's a clear and gaping indefensible position, and leads to a very interesting conversation about the dynamics of mate selection and child rearing capital.

Just think about how badly you misjudged my character based on my conclusions.

As for the rest of it: I think that it's pretty clear that BiaS, Mordant and myself have seen the territory that I was describing when I said "years at a time of near annihilation." If you haven't seen that territory, then, well, I'd say that you probably haven't strayed into the areas of reality where that's what the terrain looks like.

Most of the serious work, as far as I can tell, starts in the state of being that the Golden Dawn called Adeptus Minor. Of course, you pretty much have to die to get there.

Then you get a little vacation, and then you wind up in fucking Adeptus Major. Of course, the original GD crew tried to get people through Adeptus Major as quickly as possible so that they didn't fry out in Gevurah, and did this by pushing them through into Adeptus Exemptus.

I'm pretty sure it blew up because the technology was ill-suited to open practice in a Victorian environment, but that's a long story.

If you think back to where this whole thing started, it was The Invisibles.

The Invisibles was, in some sense, Grant's personal magical diary. By exposing people directly to those inner workings a hell of a lot of people got something of an initiatory leg up, but at a fundamental level, Grant does not know where the fuck to go next. Got to some place and, as we all know, plateauxed out.

That left a lot of people who got initiated from his work, or were heavily influenced and inspired by it, stuck. When the person doing most of the spiritual ground breaking - the guy sitting at the alchemical apparatus producing the Amrita stalls - those who are working with the knowledge and insight he generated get stuck too. As a comparative point, consider Chogyam Trungpa's spiritual community. When he was alive it was go go go, and then he dies and let me tell you there's a lot of people who expected to be growing and developing their whole lives who are just there stalled, hanging in space.

This is you: had Grant continued to lead, break ground, and produce at the level of the first series, this place would be alive, a constant input of new ideas and energy, good material to discuss and to learn from. Like it or not, The Invisibles was an education, but because Grant didn't go all the way and didn't work very cleanly (too much drugs, not enough contact with other serious practitioners) it left a lot of people two semesters short of a degree.

Capiche?

Nothing *wrong* with this situation, but I've kept an eye on Barbelith for many years, and it's gone off the boil by degrees because nobody is putting in the kind of power and light that it takes to keep a spiritual community burning hot like this place was in the early days. Age is some part of it too: the 20s is a much easier age to really grow than the 30s for many, many peeps.

Break ground, people. If a few of you are close to being Adepts - and I don't mean this in the somewhat lame and technical Golden Dawn sense but in the more general sense - shove on the rest of the way through, teach and lead. Or this place will continue to close over, ossify, and become a place where people take their own ideas very, very seriously, and do not look out and up into the world around them, which cares not one whit for their personal opinions on right, wrong, or the nature of reality.

When I said grow up, I mean it.
 
 
Papess
21:49 / 08.04.07
Oh for fuck's sake.

For a good number of years, my "side practice" was dealing with heavily sexually abused and traumatized women and helping them find healing. I probably reassembled eight or ten people over the course of about 10 years, until my own personal makeup changed and people stopped showing up to teach me things by showing me their damage and asking for an opinion.

You know, I would hate to be a client of yours. Wait, you are using quotes so, am I to assume that you are just pretending to be a therapist? I have never known anyone with any real qualifications to use a phrasing like "I probably reassembled eight or ten people", unless they were on some power trip about it.

Oh. Right.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
21:51 / 08.04.07
I retract my accusation that your post justified rape. Trivialised rape, yeah. Belittled. Used for cheap effect. Your survivour status does not give you any special privilages when it comes to shoving that kind of thing down anyone else's throat. As for putting rape victims back together--dude, based on the way you've conducted yourself here I wouldn't trust you to put a Duplo doll's house together, let alone an abused human being.

You've been watching Barbelith for years? And now you've decended from on high to save us from our stagnation? Wow, thanks. That's great. I feel so honoured. Maybe while you were watching us you could have turned your benificent eye upon the Feminism 101 thread, where the crap you're spouting about Dworkin got a thorough debunking. My guess is, though, that you haven't looked at the rest of the board at al. You've been reading the Temple forum and have decided that we'd make a nice audience for your delusional grandstanding and self-aggrandisment. We've had cut-price Messiahs like you down here before, chum. We ran them out of town on a rail, and that's precisely what's going to happen to you if you don't cut the crap.

Now: Grow the fuck up.
 
 
Epop Bastart the Justified, I
22:25 / 08.04.07
Whatever, Mordant. You might confuse me with people you've seen before, but believe me, there aren't many people like me around.

If there were, this would would be a much better place.

As for my skills in reassembling people - horses for courses. Different approaches for different times.

Context dependent.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
22:28 / 08.04.07
believe me, there aren't many people like me around.

If there were, this would would be a much better place.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Whatever, Snake Chow.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:31 / 08.04.07
On Dworkin, yes, I've read Dworkin - at least, in 1991 I made it through one of her novels ("Fire and Ice" I think it was called, and gave up part way through one of her other works.)

Ah - none of the philosophy, then. Figures. It is a bit challenging.

So, anyway, does anyone want to spend any more time on this? I don't think the title of this thread is "Epop's rich inner life", so maybe it should go to Policy, eh?
 
 
Epop Bastart the Justified, I
22:33 / 08.04.07
Not impressed, Mordant. I actually have the goods, and my work in the world speaks for me.

You have no data, and I'm not dragging my real life in here. End of story.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
22:39 / 08.04.07
I don't think the title of this thread is "Epop's rich inner life", so maybe it should go to Policy, eh?

Yeah, I think we can most profitably take this show elsewhere. People, it's pretty clear what we're dealing with here. You know the drill: Do Not Feed, etc.
 
 
Epop Bastart the Justified, I
22:43 / 08.04.07
Look upon my works, ye mighty, and despair.

:-)

Seriously, you don't know me so don't judge. It ain't what it looks like...
 
 
Alex's Grandma
23:26 / 08.04.07
You might confuse me with people you've seen before, but believe me, there aren't many people like me around.

Ok, but would you like to expand on the precise magical practices that have led you from the foothills to the mountain of the spritual experience, and so on? If you genuinely feel as if you're possessed of hidden knowledge that it would be dangerous to share with the unenlightened, then fair enough, but on the other hand, I imagine a lot of people on here, in the Temple anyway, are already familiar with the effects of large doses of LSD.

But maybe I'm being unreasonable - I don't know.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
23:27 / 08.04.07
I've started a thread here to discuss a possible ban. Could all further comment on Epop's posts be re-routed there, so we can get back to the matter at hand: Sexism in magic.
 
 
Epop Bastart the Justified, I
23:33 / 08.04.07
Yeah, I thought about this some more. Bottom line: I don't care what you think of me because I don't have to. In my own way I'm moving the world forward in extremely tangible and real and powerful ways, and I did not come here to make friends with people who are so confident of their stories, based on a few percent of the experience I have, that they're willing to sit up and call nonsense.

I put a pretty big dent in the struggles over global warming and American energy policy. In the real world, in my day job, I played a critical role.

The work on refugee issues likewise just became an international project with collaboration from a lot of very senior and very bottom line people. You'll be seeing it in the papers in the next few years.

The work on preventing the totalitarian use of biometrics is at an earlier stage, but has a similar degree of recognition in the field.

Real stuff, done with these two hands and this one brain, and a magical practice which peels the paint off nearby buildings.

If you think you can roll with that level of work, I'd like to see results. Because I put my money where my mouth is: I used my spiritual practice, including magical techniques, to change the world four times, and I'm just getting started.
 
 
Red Concrete
23:39 / 08.04.07
Somebody on the thread indicated that they thought that number was 2% and culture relative - I'd like a link.

My head hurts a little, so I'm not going to dig too far. A couple of meta-analyses on non-paternity, but you will need subscriptions.

link 1 is a meta-analysis from 91 with estimates ranging from 1.4 to 30%. IMO the more reliable estimates are the lower ones.
link 2 is a recent large study with an estimate close to 1%.

There are studies which have related it to socioeconomic status - I'm positive of that. My own empirical experience has compared rates between Ireland and the UK, with about a 5-fold difference, IIRC (unpublished).

I'm not comfortable in the Temple, but if you are the slightest bit interested in evolutionary psychology (or science for that matter), I've bumped the Lab sociobiology thread. Sorry for the OT threadrot, folks.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
01:13 / 09.04.07
Bottom line: I don't care what you think of me because I don't have to. In my own way I'm moving the world forward in extremely tangible and real and powerful ways, and I did not come here to make friends with people who are so confident of their stories, based on a few percent of the experience I have, that they're willing to sit up and call nonsense.

B-but this is the kind of thing that George W Bush might eventually say in his autobiography, don't you think? Great works, unspecified, that John Q Public will never be able to understand.

You're still being a bit unclear. Let's face it, anybody with a working idea of 'The Necronomicon' would be able to put together a similar set of ideas to the ones you've expressed on here about magic, etc, and then allude to them, vaguely, over the internet.

I'm interested in your views about the Chapel Perilous, and so on; but until you're prepared to go into a bit more detail, it sounds, really, as if you finished the Great Work a little too early. Obviously, I don't know what you've been up to, but all this material about rape is not so good for a magician, surely?

From what I understand of it, you're in a vulnerable state.

Best thing, really, is not to do anything rash.
 
 
Epop Bastart the Justified, I
02:57 / 09.04.07
Over the past six years, I've had direct involvement in *real world* projects which have revolutionized several areas of government policy.

Ok?

I did that work as a magician, and I did it as an engineer or perhaps a scientist. In 2001 I crossed the Abyss, and I immediately got handed a bill of work by the Powers that Be which turned into some pretty significant things.

Real world. I carry a lot of weight for a lot of people and I'm not going to jeopardize that by pointing out my projects but I have my areas of influence and I work like a freaking dog.

But that whole thing expanded out from magical and spiritual practice, and those dimensions are never absent from it. Perhaps like the 10th of the 10 Bulls, I've returned to the market place. Nobody I work with, and very few of the people I meet ever come to know that I was once a magician.

I'm not kidding when I say "Grow Up." There are *not enough people* in this state to carry the load, and I've seen several people that I trusted as co-workers just burn out in the last five years and go offline because the strains were so great.
 
 
panthergod
15:47 / 09.04.07
I like how alot of the time when people who consider themselves to be 'tolerant' and 'open minded' encounter someone with whom they deeply disagree, they try to stifle that voice at the first opportunity.

Frankly, much of what Epop said makes sense, from a surface standpoint, his problem is that he lacks nuance in alowwing the legitimacy of other expereinces, and comes across as too aggressive, arrogant and unlikable in approach for his legitimate arguments to be objectively considered by those put off by his net 'personality'.

For one, I can't see how Motherhood isn't an inherent aspect of being a woman, whether or not a woman decides to or is able to have children or not. To me, that smacks of intellectual dishonesty and denial on a massive scale. Forgive me if this comes across as asshole-ish, I truly don't mean to sound that way.

But then, I'm only a man.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:59 / 09.04.07
What deep well was mined to produce that "I love how (SOMETHING I DON"T LIKE, HA HA I AM THE TRICKSTER)" line, panthergod? Did you have to cross the abyss to discover an opening line so devastating in its originality?
 
  

Page: 12(3)45

 
  
Add Your Reply