To pair the term "crisis" with the term "infinite", in the sense you are using it, seems to be an oxymoron, since a crisis is, by definition, a finite event. How else might we interpret a paradox like this?
We could assume that the staff of DC doesn't understand, or perhaps care about, the difference between an "infinite" crisis and, say, a "perpetual" one--or even a "perennial" one
That's kinda my point. The term's being used so loosely it arguably surrenders meaning... |
