BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Temple forum

 
  

Page: 1234(5)6

 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
10:50 / 30.01.06
..the debates on Barbelith, seems to me to be a reflection of the broader "magical culture" Illmatic

I think of the Temple as a barometer of current 'magical culture' Quantum

That may be (I know jack about the current magical culture because I'm obnoxiously terratorial, hate other mages, and am too tight to spring for books and magazines), but I can't think of many other places I could have the kinds of discussions I've been having in the past year or so anywhere else. Maybe I'm just looking in the wrong places.
 
 
Seth
17:35 / 08.03.06
I’m interested in picking up the train of this conversation again as since this thread started there have been a number of fascinating Temple threads. What do people think of the forum now?

What can somebody contribute to the Temple that will be respectful and useful when that person is at odds with the way that questions are approached, in a very basic sense?

I’d be really interested in having this discussion in the Temple: a discussion about the way questions are approached. I'm not sure I could do it justice myself, so who would be up for starting such a topic?
 
 
*
17:57 / 08.03.06
In Temple, as opposed to in Headshop, I feel a bit freer to experiment with explanations that depend on my understanding of the extraordinary. If there were a thread in Head Shop (not that there ever would be) titled something like "analyzing the degree of nonrational absurdity promulgated by the Otherkin contingent" I seriously doubt I would have ventured so far afield as to suggest that one might imagine something so persistently that one could change one's subtle body into a shape that doesn't suit one's physical form. On the other hand I don't think that exploration added anything to the discussion, particularly not as compared with Gypsy's rather more insightful contributions.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
09:40 / 17.03.06
Back in January I said (with some moving around for clarity):

I had a conversation with Gypsy Lantern recently in which he pointed out that if little more than half a dozen people suddenly stopped posting in the Temple, it could and in all likelihood would revert back to... all that "invoke Neo to help you cross the road, by which we mean the Neo who lives in your head! wank over this picture of Zatanna to get laid! 23!" stuff.

This seems more true than ever.

It's odd, the Temple seems to exist only in two strong polarities with very little in between, you know? I think maybe because it's not an area I feel I know a lot about, but is one that I'm interested in, it features some pieces of writing that really grab and inspire me, really excellent stuff. Yet on the other hand, how many people would deny that it seems to act as a magnet for... well... how can I put this? People who don't seem to have a very good grasp on a number of things.
 
 
Seth
10:20 / 17.03.06
Would you mind unpacking that some more Flyboy?
 
 
rising and revolving
12:17 / 17.03.06
It's odd, the Temple seems to exist only in two strong polarities with very little in between, you know?

That's good though. It means people flip from the wanker end to the interesting things to say end suddenly and without traversing the middle ground.

So when they go, they go fast. Could be worse.
 
 
HCE
12:46 / 17.03.06
Has that happened? A move from one end to the other? (Genuine question. I haven't been reading it long enough to know.)
 
 
grant
12:57 / 17.03.06
Undulating Spine originally seemed really incoherent (as Wolfsangel), but I've picked up a lot by reading the stuff ze posts, especially the Chinese esoterica. Some of it may be cut & pasted, but I don't care.

I'm interested in the strange tilt the forum's taken away from magicky magicky spells & potions through Norse stuff into prayer. I wonder how much that's due to the influence of the name.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
13:37 / 17.03.06
Spine is an odd duck. Ze still posts some stuff I personally find risible, but ze's been a much more interesting poster in recent months.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
14:06 / 17.03.06
Recent ill-considered defense of Jake Horsley aside, I thought that the Cosmic Fireman went from being the absolute archetype of everything I find frustrating about the world of contemporary magic - to being someone who would occasionally contribute some good insightful points based on his own experiences without all the silliness that characterised his previous incarnation. Granted, he hasn't really been posting much in the Temple at all for quite some time, but I still find it heartening that there was a definite noticeable change in perspective that seemed to come about by having a lot of his assumptions challenged by other contributors. Which is more than could be said for other "problematic" posters I could think of...
 
 
Kylark
02:01 / 18.03.06
Back in January I said (with some moving around for clarity):

I had a conversation with Gypsy Lantern recently in which he pointed out that if little more than half a dozen people suddenly stopped posting in the Temple, it could and in all likelihood would revert back to... all that "invoke Neo to help you cross the road, by which we mean the Neo who lives in your head! wank over this picture of Zatanna to get laid! 23!" stuff.

This seems more true than ever.

It's odd, the Temple seems to exist only in two strong polarities with very little in between, you know?


I think I can address that... I'm new at magic, and new at Barbelith. I wonder if some of the more experienced magicians in the Temple are forgetting what it was like to try on a magickal mindframe for the first time.* New magicians are bound to engage in some silliness because the whole idea of magic is so much... fun.

There's a ton of stuff I wanted to discuss in the Operation Coincidence Driver thread, but the thread got forcibly un-threadrotted by the person who started it. Gypsy Lantern had a lot of interesting things to say. I have enormous respect for hir position, especially since ze has a legitimate practice as a magician. Maybe I'll bring it to the "Reality-Based Magick" thread. It seems we were getting into a whole discussion on the philosophy of magick, what it's for, what does and doesn't work, whether magick exists to aid in survival or can be turned to more abstract purposes, etc. I'd love to get into this more, and not in a combative way; I just have some ideas and I'd love to spar with other magicians in order to hone my reasoning, drop what's spurious, flog my favorite issues, and be exposed to new ideas. I'm kind of excited by the fact that the more experienced magicians on the Temple don't pull any punches. It shows that they take magic seriously.

I've been keen to join Barbelith ever since I've learned of its existence. Pretty much the *only* forum I was interested in was the Temple. Hopefully I'll branch into the Comics or Switchboard forums. The reason I'm interested in the Temple is that I'm serious about magick and I want to be able to learn from and discuss with others.

But so anyway, the whole OMG! 23!!!!!! silliness that flips rapidly into seriousness can probably be attributed to the fact that new mages, sorcerors, whatever (what *do* we call ourselves?) are like kids with a new toy. Eventually, some kids will get tired of the toy and move on to something else, and some kids will sit down and learn to "play" with their toy in a much more serious and in-depth way.

*I'd like to see a thread on how people got into magick, what it was like for them when they started, what stupid mistakes they made, what early successes they had that inspired them to keep going, and how their practice differs now from when they started. Maybe this thread already exists; if not, I may start one.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
11:43 / 18.03.06
I wonder if some of the more experienced magicians in the Temple are forgetting what it was like to try on a magickal mindframe for the first time.

I’m conscious of the fact that I do this. It can be difficult to remember what it was like when you first get into magic, and I daresay that with a bit of digging you could turn up some absolutely horrendous cringe-worthy posts about magic by younger versions of me on the internet somewhere. (But that’s fine by me, cos it shows development and progression of ideas). Fnording is a symptom of someone who has just got into magic, and is really excited about it and what you could do with it. So perhaps it’s wrong to be so combative towards instances of it when they occur on barbelith.

However, I think one of the strengths of the Temple is that people don’t pull their punches, it’s not a safe space where ideas go unquestioned, and a great deal of criticism, debate and unpacking of various assumptions and party lines tends to take place. This might be a bit daunting for people who are new to it, but ultimately, if it gets people thinking about things from angles they might not have considered before – I reckon it’s a good thing. I think it’s all about trying to get the Mercy/Severity balance right, and that can be a difficult line to walk sometimes.

I'd love to get into this more, and not in a combative way; I just have some ideas and I'd love to spar with other magicians in order to hone my reasoning, drop what's spurious, flog my favorite issues, and be exposed to new ideas.

I really think that’s what the Temple forum should be for. I’ll look forward to seeing you start lots of interesting threads and contributing some fresh energy and ideas. I don’t really mind it when things get a bit combative, as long as differences of opinion lead to a constructive debate and the arguments are actually going somewhere and examining aspects of theory and practice that could benefit from closer study.

I'd like to see a thread on how people got into magick, what it was like for them when they started, what stupid mistakes they made, what early successes they had that inspired them to keep going, and how their practice differs now from when they started. Maybe this thread already exists; if not, I may start one.

There’s been a couple of threads like that you might want to check out:

http://www.barbelith.com/topic/13801/from/35

http://www.barbelith.com/topic/22742

http://www.barbelith.com/topic/19429
 
 
Quantum
13:55 / 18.03.06
Yeah, go Kylark. The Temple is the unofficial Armoury forum anyway, and I'm happy with that as long as people remember to thrash out the *ideas*. Pulling no punches when calling Bullshit is great, springing into ad hominem attacks is a sign of a weak argument. IMO.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
23:17 / 09.09.06
if little more than half a dozen people suddenly stopped posting in the Temple, it could and in all likelihood would revert back to... all that "invoke Neo to help you cross the road, by which we mean the Neo who lives in your head! wank over this picture of Zatanna to get laid! 23!" stuff.

Looks like this hypothesis is going to be tested. Le sigh.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
00:17 / 10.09.06
Hey, you know what people will think of when they think of the 20th century?
 
 
All Acting Regiment
00:32 / 10.09.06
I reckon Tom could get us a script that worked like this:

0 START
1 IF INPUT = "Neo","Matrix","23","!13"$
2 THEN
3 PRINT = "Nipples! Oozy with yellowstuff!"
4 GO TO 0
 
 
Francine I
01:10 / 10.09.06
"However, I think one of the strengths of the Temple is that people don’t pull their punches, it’s not a safe space where ideas go unquestioned, and a great deal of criticism, debate and unpacking of various assumptions and party lines tends to take place. This might be a bit daunting for people who are new to it, but ultimately, if it gets people thinking about things from angles they might not have considered before – I reckon it’s a good thing."

Slight threadrot here, but I think that bit there is an excellent description of Barbelith at it's best.
 
 
grant
01:25 / 10.09.06
Looks like this hypothesis is going to be tested. Le sigh.

???
 
 
---
03:20 / 10.09.06
I'm guessing that Mordant meant a decent number of the regular-type posters haven't been around as much, and things are getting stale or something.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
10:20 / 10.09.06
A lot of regulars are quiet right now; and we've lost Pegs (Illmatic).
 
 
electric monk
15:08 / 11.09.06
Ze's gone for good then? I've been holding out hope, but...
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
15:11 / 11.09.06
Ze locked hirself out of hir suit. Dunno if ze can recover it or not.
 
 
electric monk
15:26 / 11.09.06
Wow. That is...well, I want to say "disappointing", but that doesn't come close to describing how I feel right now.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
15:44 / 11.09.06
I'm just kind of relieved that we had that influx of decent n00bs before the latest episode of Argh. Feels less like it's just a handful of people holding the fort.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
12:47 / 25.03.07
*bump*

For the benefit of newer people, and to canvass opinion from the people who were commenting when the thread started. How do we all think it's going, both as a forum for "Faith, magic and mysticism, bodywork, and applied psychology" and as a part of the board as a whole?
 
 
Make me Uncomfortable
14:10 / 25.03.07
I think the temple is great. Its one of the reasons I joined the board.
 
 
jentacular dreams
15:10 / 25.03.07
I enjoy reading it, thought I'm unsure if I'll ever have enough of a belief in it to become a practitioner, it's certainly an eye-opener to possibility.
 
 
Quantum
16:04 / 25.03.07
I'd be interested to find out how many people lurk the Temple. Lots of people said early in the thread they like to read it but don't feel able to contribute for various reasons, is that still true a year later? Would you lurkers decloak enough to raise a virtual hand?
 
 
Tsuga
17:02 / 25.03.07
I don't post in the temple, really, and only read it when I'm following interesting "recently updated" links. I don't visit much, because I'm not spiritual or anything like it, really; however when I do I'm usually pleasantly impressed with the quality there, especially from certain regular posters. Lots of you have a great skill in articulating ideas and beliefs that can either seem abstract or arcane, or making things I might feel eye-rolly about very understandable (even though I still don't agree). Temple seems to lend itself to particular kinds of problem posters, which I'm sure can be frustrating.
 
 
Mistoffelees
17:21 / 25.03.07
I´m also a lurker. Ever since I got exposed to the Liber Legis ca ten years ago, I´m interested in OBEs, Kundalini, Kabbalah, Magick and lucid dreams. But my not practising anything occult limits my possibilities for constructive contributions.
 
 
gravitybitch
19:28 / 25.03.07
I'd be interested to find out how many people lurk the Temple.

Decloaking now: I haven't been around much for a while - the influx of folks who got here through google and then couldn't be bothered to use *any* search functions just kinda got to me. I still check in once or twice a week, but I'm not sure what it would take to get me posting in the Temple on a regular basis.
 
 
c0nstant
01:41 / 26.03.07
I also lurk a lot in the temple without posting very often at all (although that's pretty much like my engagement with the entire board, maybe I'm just a lurker at heart!).

As has been mentioned previously, experience and active practise are highly prized in the Temple, and rightly so. But as I don't really 'practise' I can't engage effectively with it. To be honest, I don't even feel that my questions are sufficiently well developed to start a new thread, so mostly on the very rare occassion I do post, it's in the "stupid magic and spirituality questions" thread.
 
 
The Ghost of Tom Winter
03:59 / 26.03.07
Temple and Conversation are the top forums I lurk.

I don't post mostly because I don't have much in terms of magical experience. I joined because of the Temple Forum since it's so hard to find a bunch of people who are into 'weird' and 'occult' without being total loonies.
Plus school and what not keep me from making developed topics for meta-discussion and the like. I figure that might change with the knowledge I've gained from a few of my classes but you never know.
I do love reading it though.
 
 
Sibelian 2.0
09:26 / 26.03.07
I don't really know what to make of the Temple, but that's probably because I've had bad experiences mixing magic and teh Internets before. Generally speaking it seems very informative and really seems to operate best when it's an information gathering and distributing resource rather than an actual ritual space, as has been pointed out.

I don't really post there very often at all, mainly because I know very little in comparison with everyone else and my interest in magic has waned considerably over the years, particularly with respect to talking about magic online which for some reason now feels really sterile to me. I can't really explain why.

Sorry, this probably isn't very helpful...
 
 
illmatic
10:38 / 26.03.07
particularly with respect to talking about magic online which for some reason now feels really sterile to me

I can appreciate that. I feel much the same. All the practices that I enjoy and benefit from are those that get one out into the world and in contact with people, places etc. - they grant experiences that are somehow alive, and staring at a computer screen is a particularly poor compensation. Not to say that chatting online can't be really useful, give you some great information and be really inspiring - but I sympathise with the statement.

This is part of the reason I don't really post anymore - I'm thinking a lot about myself and my practice and chatting about it online will spring a leak - my experience isn't assimilated enough to share yet (if ever).

To answer Mordant's *bump* question, the Temple seems to be ticking over, though I don't feel it's as dynamic as it was. Perhaps a focus more on discussion than practice at the moment? The two threads I'm thinking of - The Tao te Ching and Bible threads - are both pretty in-depth though and interesting enough to read, but the last thread that had that expeiential quality was the the "Soemthing from Nothing" one which had some great stuff in it.
 
  

Page: 1234(5)6

 
  
Add Your Reply