BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


"Wifegate" storm hits Barbelith [PICS]

 
  

Page: 1234(5)67

 
 
Triplets
08:48 / 08.10.05
Dang.
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
09:23 / 08.10.05
So for some time it's been clear to me that Earth's continued existence as a free biosphere is contingent on the cows. I raise this because I think we could all, while Oddman is composing his edifying response to this fascinating discussion, take time out to admire the tenacity of our bovine protectors in putting themselves in harm's way on our behalf.

Consider:

WHY are cows mutilated by aliens? FRUSTRATION AND REVENGE. Cows are not, as they appear, semi-somnolent rumunants of limited mental capacity. They are extrusions into our consciousness of a galactic commando unit called Gravid Lacks Unum. GLU is the force behind the Men In Black (not the movie, the real ones who look like Jack Palance) and the endless devotion to beating back the forces of evil displayed by this unit is legendary.

WHY are milkmaids always attractive young women in low-cut outfits? Because all the girls love a soldier. Even disguised as quadrapedal herbivores part-covered in fecal matter and lowing pointlessly, GLUs are possessed of such unbelievable sex-appeal that no hearty Swedish yokel can resist.

WHO better to protect us from alien invaders than ubiquitous, watchful animals, invisible by dint of their mundanity, waiting in deserted areas for saucer landings and materialisations? They are poised like mantises throughout the farm belt to protect our infrastructure.

WHAT is the most beef-happy nation on Earth? The mighty United States. Technologicaly advanced, they are in greatest need of defense against the prying eyes of alien overlords! The great ranches of the US are barracks fields from which squads are sent out to do their best for us.

BUT let is not foget the highly trained ninja cows of Kobe, the SUPER-GLUs...

But I digress.
 
 
Benny the Ball
09:30 / 08.10.05
I've almost posted 2000, er, posts. Just thought I'd rot up the place, and creep closer to that milestone by telling you all that. While, you know, we wait for more from Oddman. Is Oddman daddy now?
 
 
Mistoffelees
09:35 / 08.10.05
BUT let is not foget the highly trained ninja cows of Kobe, the SUPER-GLUs...

"We will fight for bovine freeheedom and hold our large heads high,
We will run free with the buffalo or diehie!"
 
 
ZF!
09:40 / 08.10.05
Right, this whole thread and all respoonses are just one big joke, huh?

Z
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
09:45 / 08.10.05
No. The cow thing is very serious.
 
 
Benny the Ball
09:58 / 08.10.05
and milky.
 
 
Ganesh
10:01 / 08.10.05
Yes, Zenfroglet, but I understand "big joke" to mean "quite serious matter", depending on the motives of the joker (as perceived subjectively/telepathically by me and while I don't expect anyone to agree with me I'm got gonna change my mind on this nuh uh).

Becoming quite a flypaper, this thread.
 
 
---
10:14 / 08.10.05
Eon, with his incredible ability to read our leader's mind, could teach it.

It's a good job I have the sarcasm detector turned on beside me here. To be honest I thought you'd been a bit badly done to Haus, and was trying to look on the positive side of the situation. He said something about 'yet another' potshot, and so I was wondering if he'd got you mixed up with someone else when I first read it.

I'll try not to read his mind this morning though, because I have a hangover. Maybe later on when I've had a couple of cups of coffee.
 
 
Evil Scientist
11:01 / 08.10.05
Wow, I go away for the evening and look at what you kids have been up to.

Oddman, old chap, surely GM is more than capable of sticking up for himself. He's a relatively witty and intelligent fellow.

Unless...unless you ARE GM! Yes, that fits perfectly. Millar invades Barbelith in the Kristan ficsuit pretending to be Morrison in order to mess with Haus (who's pretending to be Millar). Now Morrison enters the fray, pretending to be Oddman, to defend Millar who's pretending to be Morrison in the Kristan ficsuit.

Yes, yes, it's all coming together. I must away to re-draw the chart. Soon Warren Ellis shall arrive in the ficsuit of another and the circle shall be complete.

(Too much Old Brown Java coffee this morning).
 
 
Cherielabombe
11:14 / 08.10.05
OMFG this thread is hilarious!!!1!

Anyhoo, Oddman, any editor or proofreader will tell you that writers make mistakes all too often ..
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
11:58 / 08.10.05
So, does it seem to anyone else like Barbelith has just reached that point in its adolescence where it starts standing up to dad?

I think that point had already been reached even before I joined (I missed the cat-glassing thing, for example). No, I think this was more like when your folks come round unannounced and you're all on drugs.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
12:42 / 08.10.05
Paranoidwriter: When you say, I find it hard to sit back in silence when I think someone is suffering a form of abuse... you seemed not to have a problem when the someone was me and the abuse was coming from Oddman.

Haus, I think you may be misinterpreting me. I came late to this conversation (having been busy all day) and as I read though the thread I didn't feel it was necessary to reply to Oddman's initial post as others had already done so. I only made my comment when it became apparent that these replies seemed not only excessive in number but also in style and content. I may have been wrong, of course, but I have yet to read anything to the contrary; although I notice many subsequent posts aimed at Oddman seem to have a more civil tone.

- if this thread is demonstrating one thing it is that the discussion people have in their heads for reference is often not actually the one going on - cf kovacs and Meludreen in the original Superman thread, Oddman here, and of couurse Mr. George himself.

Are you including yourself among these "people"? I only ask because you appear to have ignored the points I was trying to make in my previous posts.

Also, Oddman:

What evil lurks in the hearts of men?

Only Oddman knows.

Heh heh heh.


Does this mean E. Randius was right and you've been taking the piss all along?
 
 
Spatula Clarke
12:54 / 08.10.05
I think it might mean that he wasn't taking the piss, but now that the possibility has been suggested he's decided to use it as a quick escape route.

But I'll likely change my mind at some point within the next five minutes.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
13:01 / 08.10.05
Ahhh... I feel you may be right. But I suppose time will tell, eh? In the meantime, I suppose I'd better get my asbestos suit out of the airing cupboard.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
13:22 / 08.10.05
So where's this thread going to go now? Everyone's arguing and I'm worried that people might fall out- and, here as in parachuting, falling out over shit is not a good idea.
 
 
Cherielabombe
13:35 / 08.10.05
Is Barbelith dying?
 
 
toughest, fastest, fatest
13:40 / 08.10.05


is this an appropriate moment to try sticking my first barbelith pic up?
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
13:45 / 08.10.05
Where's Jack Denfeld when we need him most?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
13:49 / 08.10.05
Meanwhile, in another corner of the internet, Jack Denfeld, the King of Barbelith, was locked in mortal combat with Pumpy Tudors...
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
13:52 / 08.10.05
Damn that Pumpy Tudors!
 
 
penitentvandal
14:44 / 08.10.05
Incidentally, that thing with the making assumptions about people and ignoring the situational factors is a a psychological concept called the Fundamental Attribution Error, Gorby. Basically, people were tested (don't ask who by - the names and references are in my notes upstairs, and I'm a lazy,lazy man, Roger) and it was discovered that when people watched another individual taking some form of action, they blamed the action on some aspect of the other person's personality, but when accounting for their own actions they invoked situational factors instead.

So, for example, when you drink five double Jack Daniels and start slurring your words and trying to convince me why Hulk Hogan should be President, it is because you are a hopeless alcoholic; but when I knock back five Wild Turkeys and start explaining why I am going to form a squad of gay merecenaries to hunt down and deprogram the Ultimate Warrior, it is because I have been under a lot of stress, dammit.

Interestingly, though, according to my Fundamentals of Psychology lecturer, the FAE also applies to people's framing of positive actions, which I find rather surprising - I would have imagined it was the opposite.

Of course, all this is probably a terribly awful explanation, due to my own incomplete, one-lecture-in understanding of the FAE, in which case I can only wait, sheepishly, for Ganesh to correct me...
 
 
Jack Fear
15:20 / 08.10.05
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:18 / 08.10.05
I only made my comment when it became apparent that these replies seemed not only excessive in number but also in style and content.

Really? I'm curious. When somebody tells you what Barbelith is for having joined one month ago, and then makes a series of wildly inaccurate, rude and offensive statements, what feels like an excessive response? Only, as I say, you seem to be OK with that. So, question. Think carefully before answering.

Now, you stated that you find it hard to sit back in silence when somebody suffers any form of abuse. As such, I don't see why you found it so easy to sit back in silence when Oddman was abusing me, before we even mention what he said about my wife. You have yet to explain that. The fact that other people had replied to him should not matter. You said but I find it hard to sit back in silence when I think someone is suffering a form of abuse. Did you not think that Oddman's harsh and abusive tirade against me was a form of abuse? If not, why not? If so, does the existence of other comments being sufficient to allow you to remain silent, can you honestly claim that it is hard for you to stay silent in the face of somebody being abused? Sounds quite easy to me. Explain your reasons.

As for ignoring the points you made in your previous posts - well, I think you've misunderstood the difference between not replying to something that is there - for example, because you think it is otiose or irrelevant - and inventing something that is not there, but out of courtesy let's take a look.


Hi Haus. Hmmm... I just re-read Oddman's post, and you have a point there.

So, you believe that Oddmna's tone _was_ harsh and abusive, and yet somehow, although you find it difficult to be silent when somebody is harsh and abusive, you managed it?

But still, sometimes it's better to be a "bigger man", so to speak, and "there's more than one way to skin a cat" (sheesh, I sound like my Mother!). Granted, it's not easy (and I'm not very good at it myself)), and such statements sound pious to the cynical ear.


Not so much pious as meaningless. If you have an action plan, you are welcome to outline it, but these are clichés. How does one act as a bigger man? What is the alternative way to skin a cat? Oddman has made a series of statements. People have reacted to that.

But even so, I can't help thinking that sometimes some of the flaming that goes on around here is on the side of overkill and tainted with more than a little vitriolic schadenfreude.

Schadenfreude describes the pleasure found in observiung the misfortunes of another. If you mean that Oddman's misfortune was that he was not brought up well enough not to make an abusive, ill-informed and idiotic post and was hauled up for it, then could you tell me who is taking pleasure in it? You seem to be ascribing emotions to people without any real basis beyond your "feelings", which are well and good but rather limited and subjective, rather than what is being written.

As has been mentioned before, incidentally, the amount of conflict on barbelith is miniscule in quantity and severity compared with many other bulletin boards. You may wish to broaden your horizons by visiting others to provide context.

Sometimes, of course, it's just harmless banter, but on occasion it feels as though I'm watching a gang tormenting an injured animal and loving the power-kick they seem to get out of it.

Alas, what it feels to you is not the supreme court of appeal here. You behave as if your unsubstantiated "feelings" are incontestable and presumably justify whatever reaction your feelings recommend. I do not believe that this is the case. I would offer that it makes more sense to read what people have actually written and then try to work from there. Otherwise you get inconsistencies like your treatment of Oddman's harsh and abusive post and the responses to it.

I'm probably wrong, of course, but I find it hard to sit back in silence when I think someone is suffering a form of abuse

See above.

But please, I REALLY don't want to cause trouble. I just thought someone should say something before the insults got out of hand.

This is awfully kind of you, but, just as we have yet to engage Oddman in an official capacity to tell us what Barbelith is for, we have yet to ask you to police it. If you want to feel that you have somehow averted what would otherwise have been a torrent of abuse, then feel away. It will be just as valid as the other conclusions you have reached based on your feelings above. However, you have no evidence that the insults would have gotten "out of hand", nor have you provided anything beyond your nebulous _feelings_ to tell us what you feel would be out of hand.

Also, I'm very tired and that probably isn't helping my interpretation and/or my ability to communicate properly.

Perhaps it would be best to deal with complex issues, about which some people are clearly getting quite upset (qv Oddman) when you have had some sleep and read the relevant material As it stands, you seem to be stating that you find it hard not to react to harsh and abusive posts (which appears not to be borne out by your behaviour), while also demanding that other people only react to harsh and abusive posts in a way that you personally feel is appropriate. This may also be a good way to act on your wish not to cause trouble.
 
 
toughest, fastest, fatest
22:39 / 08.10.05
i heart haus

(not in a gay way of course, but a manly mark millar way)
 
 
Ganesh
23:07 / 08.10.05
I only made my comment when it became apparent that these replies seemed not only excessive in number but also in style and content. I may have been wrong, of course, but I have yet to read anything to the contrary; although I notice many subsequent posts aimed at Oddman seem to have a more civil tone.

I notice that since I last posted in this thread, it's rained in South London, suggesting that I have affected the weather. I may be wrong, of course, but I have yet to read anything to the contrary.
 
 
toughest, fastest, fatest
23:09 / 08.10.05
we're definately warming up to the pirates vs global warming theme arent we?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
23:10 / 08.10.05
Arr.
 
 
Mourne Kransky
23:20 / 08.10.05
Global warming is nothing to joke about. Don't you realise there are pirates right now swashbuckling for their lives? And dodging the polar bears as they bob past.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:23 / 08.10.05
Polaarrrrrrr bears, surely?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
23:25 / 08.10.05
TRUTH.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
23:31 / 08.10.05
IT'S A BIT LIKE THAT TIME WHEN THE OCEANS DRANK DARK ATLANTIS, ISN'T IT?
 
 
toughest, fastest, fatest
23:31 / 08.10.05


how many pirates post here anyway?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:34 / 08.10.05
This may take a while...
 
 
toughest, fastest, fatest
23:42 / 08.10.05
 
  

Page: 1234(5)67

 
  
Add Your Reply