BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Spoilers!!!

 
  

Page: 12345(6)

 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
16:54 / 12.05.07
Of course, it also relies on people having the courtesy to use the damn thing...

I've been staying out of the Who threads more than usual this year, because the "either spoilers or no speculation" option doesn't really seem much of a choice. Which is a shame; I had great fun in previous seasons.
 
 
grant
01:18 / 13.05.07
OK, the wiki is now updatified. What a fun gizmo this is.
 
 
Sibelian 2.0
18:08 / 14.05.07
Let's have a bash, then...

[+] [-] Spoiler
 
 
Sibelian 2.0
18:09 / 14.05.07
SUPER FUN!!!
 
 
Sibelian 2.0
18:11 / 14.05.07
People could put their own names in the code which would make things much easier.

An excellent suggestion.
 
 
Quantum
14:42 / 15.05.07
I'm going to call mine things like 'Poochy' and 'Marmaduke' and stuff, teehee!

[+] [-] Spoiler
 
 
Happy Dave Has Left
15:42 / 15.05.07
My turn!

[+] [-] Spoiler
 
 
Bamba
15:48 / 17.05.07
Does this work:





Spoiler text here!

EDIT: Apparently not, sorry folks, thought I had a nicer way of doing this but it doesn't seem to work here.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
02:33 / 18.05.07
I gotta say, while I really do like these +- spoiler tags, they don't really solve anything other than looking nicer than

SPOILER
.
.
.
.
.

or whatever. The problem's not really how we hide spoilers, it's how we get people to keep it in their fucking pants, really. People who can't do that are even more unlikely to put in a bunch of extra html.
 
 
Seth
06:24 / 18.05.07
Looks cool, though.

I'm going to use it to hide insults.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
15:12 / 18.05.07
Why would you hide an insult? Wouldn't that kind of defeat the object?
 
 
Spatula Clarke
16:35 / 18.05.07
They solve the problem if people use them, Stoatie.
 
 
Spaniel
17:11 / 18.05.07
Of course, the use of such functionality might start to blur the lines between spoiler threads and non-spoiler threads, in that the ability to completely hide a spoiler or spoiler discussion could take threads off into a kind of sub-thread territory.
 
 
Sibelian 2.0
17:27 / 18.05.07
... which would be a *good* thing.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
17:39 / 18.05.07
It would. Barbelith has only ever had spoiler threads because of the lack of this kind of functionality.

Doesn't mean that we need to stop spoiler threads completely, because they still have their uses - imagine the Metal gear Solid thread if we'd had to use spoiler tags in it - but it should make threads about ongoing series, new videogames and new issues of comics much easier to handle.

If, again, people bother to use the tags.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
19:41 / 18.05.07
They solve the problem if people use them, Stoatie.

Yes, but my point is that the problem arises when people can't even be bothered to hide spoilers with just a warning and a bunch of spaces. What makes you think these people would use the new ones?

Don't get me wrong, I love 'em, and think we should use them where now we just use warnings and spaces. I just don't see them being any kind of solution.
 
 
Spaniel
19:44 / 18.05.07
I'm slightly worried that with less clearly defined boundaries spoiler discussion might spill out of these sub-threads more regularly than spoilerage spills into non-spoiler threads under the trad system.

I think it's a bit premature to assume that what's being proposed here is necessarily aces - although I should stress that I am currently quite enthusiastic.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
23:09 / 18.05.07
There isn't any solution to people showing a lack of consideration for others, though. Well, there is, but mass murder isn't all that practical.

Barbelith's a really odd place in that a lot of its active members don't appear to have very much - if any - experience of other messageboards (you can also see this in the way that internet memes have a habit of hitting here relatively late in the day). Spoiler tags of this kind are fairly common elsewhere, but I do appreciate that there's the potential for overuse and misuse because of a lack of familiarity with them. Muddled threads are clearly not a good thing, but hopefully that'd just be a matter of people learning how and when to use them, how and when spoiler threads are required.

But that's possibly me being over-optimistic. You're right, Stoatie - past behaviour doesn't exactly point to this working out the way it should, and the complexity of the tag makes it even less likely that it'll be used properly on a board where an awful lot of posters still can't be fucked to make proper links.

What it does do, for me, is remove any excuse that anybody might have for not adequately flagging spoilers in future.
 
 
The Natural Way
14:44 / 19.05.07
So I can get extra shouty and annoyed then? Great!
 
 
---
06:45 / 06.07.07
Should we get extra-nerdy then and add the appropriate background colours for each forum to the wiki, so they can be added if people want to? It seems like extra messing around, but if you have the list of forum colours it's just a quick copy/paste from the list and into the code.

If so, I can screenie each forum colour, get the css code from photshop, then put it into the wiki if needed.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
17:18 / 06.07.07
We nixed that idea earlier on in the thread, Te. Invisible text isn't desirable - too much potential for hidden wankeriness.
 
 
---
22:24 / 06.07.07
ah right, I just meant the bg color though, but without altering the font color seeing as it's the same in each forum :

[+] [-] Spoiler

[+] [-] Spoiler

but after doing that and checking it I just remembered that...

[+] [-] Spoiler
 
 
Spatula Clarke
18:47 / 17.07.07
Please start using this.

Trips, I just disagreed the edit to your spoiler post in FTV&T because there was more than enough warning space provided already and as we have a working solution - this one - I don't see why we need to be continuing to make threads messy by putting loads of blank space into posts.
 
  

Page: 12345(6)

 
  
Add Your Reply