BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Generally Snobbish Pretentious Asshole Mentality

 
  

Page: 123(4)5

 
 
Tuna Ghost: Pratt knot hero
20:44 / 20.06.05
Well, I think that wraps things up nicely. Who wants some sangria I made in the terlet?
 
 
I'm Rick Jones, bitch
20:45 / 20.06.05
Thank you for engaging my tired resignation with a drive of vitirol and panache (that to be completely honest leaves me hard as a rock) then putting me on ignore. You have proven completely, utterly and using SCIENCE that you have no personal vendetta whatsoever with me, and I must bow to your superior moon-man logic.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
20:47 / 20.06.05
The "terlet"? Is that where the Blue Goldfish lives? (groan -- bad, bad, joke!)

Nurse!
 
 
I'm Rick Jones, bitch
20:49 / 20.06.05
Nurse
 
 
Olulabelle
20:50 / 20.06.05
I'm not entirely convinced that announcing you're putting someone on ignore in the middle of a thread such as this is quite the right way to go about things.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
20:51 / 20.06.05
Ahh... there you are! A round of something strong for everyone, please Matron. (I'll stop now, I promise)
 
 
Ganesh
20:51 / 20.06.05
Arguably not, Olulabelle, but he has engaged with the example given, rather than simply returning the shit-flinging.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
21:11 / 20.06.05
the first thing I see after that is the standard cuntish reply of "no, it's just you"

Well that's how I see it. If you don't want to engage with the more aggressive posters on this board then you have the option to pay their posts no attention. You're in control of your own response and you don't have to pay people any mind if you don't like what they're saying or think that they have a point but they're being unreasonable in their delivery of the response. When people are harsh with me I either bite back or concede, it generally depends what type of mood I'm in but I know it's as much my problem as anyone else's.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
21:20 / 20.06.05
Fair points, all - I was popping back to edit the previous post for bad weather and a more conciliatory tone, but Radiator has already seen it, so not a huge amount of point. I imagine that he has totally ignored the evidence provided and claimed that by getting me to engage with the example when he didn't care really at all, he has somehow won.

Anyway, to the point. That was intended to demonstrate that people's recollections of events are wildly variable and highly subjective, and that when people make solid reference to particular threads this does at least allow a broader group of people to make their own judgements about what is actually going on. Radiator in good faith believed that as soon as he posted to that thread I came screaming down from the hills to attack him, because he edited out everything that was not useful to that belief. He may believe it still. From a standing start, without nipping back and taking a look, I couldn't with absolute confidence have denied it. So, evidence and examples - they let other people see how you are seeing things, and give them the chance to provide alternative perspectives or reality checks in a way that "there is a generally snobbish pretentious asshole mentality" does not. It also means that you are demonstrably checking your sources and taking the accusations you are making seriously, which will help others to take them seriously also. And these are pretty serious things to complain about, if only because serious restorative action would involve the entire board.

So, for example, King Mob started by complaining about a "prevalent" mentality, but when asked about this first offfered and then refused to provide any further examples. This gave the impression that he was not really very serious about this, which impression, to be fair to him, he confirmed - this was not apparently a protest, merely an observation, or more precisely a sensation. That requires a different treatment to a supported and argued case.

So, yeah. I'd suggest thinking about what you're going to cite if you have a serious point to make, and looking at those citations first, because it is likely, as Dudley has demonstrated but is unlikely to acknowledge, that you may well remember things in a manner that represents you in a good and your antagonist in a bad light, especially if, as so many of our past champions of justice have been, you are basically a bit deluded.
 
 
Olulabelle
21:45 / 20.06.05
You know, for me that comics thread (which I have never read before) reads entirely as an argument that has blown up apropos of nothing at all, other than the fact that two posters have obviously had disagreements in the past and are utterly convinced it's going to happen again.

At the beginning it seems fairly clear that both posters involved were trying very hard not to have an argument, but then suddenly they seem to decide to give up trying very hard not to have the argument and just have it, instead.

It doesn't read to me like anyone is being hideously mean, or deliberately being antagonistic. It just feels like it begins as an accident and then grows until no-one can resist posting bits of each others posts in big chunks purely to rip them apart.

What it's not is snobbish or pretentious behaviour.

What is definitely is is classic 'having to have the last word' Barbelith.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
21:47 / 20.06.05
No it isn't. (Sorry, off to Dark Place...)
 
 
Ganesh
21:55 / 20.06.05
It also clearly isn't a "personal vendetta" - or, if it is, it's a rather inefficient one, since much time is being wasted on discussing comics 'n' shit.
 
 
HCE
23:48 / 20.06.05
Haus, please take into consideration that one possible response to the feeling that one is being sniped at unfairly is to try not to dwell on it. Thus, examples of unwelcome behavior may not be readily at hand, precisely because one is not a troll, and is therefore not keeping a logbook of one's own sensations, to use your apt term. It doesn't necessarily mean that the sensations in question are based on pure fantasy. So how do you go about checking your impressions against some external source? It's a wee bind for those who think keeping a record of slights is poor form, but who are still affected. I'd be happy to hear your suggestions about what would constitute a productive and courteous way to handle this.

Perhaps an example of good behavior would be useful at this juncture.
 
 
Ganesh
00:41 / 21.06.05
Not dwelling on perceived slights seems eminently sensible - but presumably the individuals who take this tack tend not to be the ones who make accusations, either generalised ("generally snobbish pretentious asshole mentality") or specific ("you dislike me enough to enter into threads on account of it"), which they later find themselves unable to substantiate.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
01:28 / 21.06.05
I'd tend to define 'good behaviour' on an interweb chatroom in terms of how amusing it is ( Are the night hawks at the diner crying tears of laughter into their Irish coffees and so on, ) and in that respect anyway, I dare say Haus hasn't really got too much to worry about.
 
 
The Falcon
02:02 / 21.06.05
Dudley; I don't think I posted in the thread that Haus didn't appear in order to bait you, so much as interlocute. But I meant to. Sure, it escalated, but you had a role therein.

And he's got a not indecent account there; there's a bit of the usual derision, but it's fairly accurate. The teat comment is, I'd advise, not one for the pub with strangers.

Your shouty behaviour had agitated me both there and in a couple of early 7S threads, and I tried to be conciliatory, but that doesn't work because you're evidently prone to occasional temper-tantrums at your computer, whose fault it is not really, and I have to read about it. It's quite undignifying, as opposed to your 'I, too, am in love' thread where you took your ribbing very well, and the various other places where you've said things of interest and/or amusement.

And, while I've said the exact same in the past, I really don't think Barbelith is just another messageboard. For my purposes, which is talking about comics, by and large, it's utterly unparalleled. It ain't even a question. You're also going to be all over that Games forum - I'm really aching to say something about MGS2, but I'm sitting on it just now. And I know you've unused accounts elsewhere, so don't start.

Just try and remember there are real people at the other end of terminals reading you and we'll probably be fine.

P.S. There's a thread ages ago, where people told me roughly this too.
 
 
I'm Rick Jones, bitch
08:24 / 21.06.05
Well, I've been trying to be less shouty since. And such.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
09:43 / 21.06.05
Haus, please take into consideration that one possible response to the feeling that one is being sniped at unfairly is to try not to dwell on it. Thus, examples of unwelcome behavior may not be readily at hand, precisely because one is not a troll, and is therefore not keeping a logbook of one's own sensations, to use your apt term.

That's a good point; as I said, I didn't remember exactly how the example Dudley cited went, and if I had relied on my imperfect recall would probably have gone through it differently. Somebody else, without the advantage of another providing an example. If that example is just a feeling, well... you get into this difficult situation where one person says "I feel that other people on Barbelith are being rude". The problem with that being that in the absence of any corroborating evidence which could provide an idea of what that individual perceives as rudeness, it's quite hard to know what to do next, except resolve to be extra polite either to that person (which shifts the burden of record-keeping onto the hypothetical general user), or alter one's entire behaviour towards the entire board in the hope that the value that imparts is greater than the value it removes, from your experience of Barbelith and Barbelith's experience of you. That's tricky.

Also, at times I think being rude is perfectly reasonable. Opinions vary on this, obviously, but (to provide examples) in a case where, for example, somebody has said that he would not like to go to India because if he banged the locals his cock would drop off, I believe that rudeness is not unreasonable. I would not be polite if somebody said this in the pub, and I don't see any particular need to be polite about it on the Internet. Rudeness can, I think, be a useful mechanism, although not a complete one, for showing somebody that their behaviour is not acceptible on Barbelith, and in the absence of moderators kicking people off or deleting their posts, social mechanisms are the most functional way to do this. When this is deployed and how people react to it is a personal question: qv the recent Morpheus issue.

However, that doesn't address the unsubstantiated feeling. As Ganesh says, the people who are inclined not to rack up a list of grievances are, I think, generally also going to be the people who do not start threads like this, because they will see them as unproductive. Beyond that, if such a person wants to record their perceptions.. well, one can say from the outset that this is just a feeling, without valid substantiation, although that would for me raise the question again of what one does with that feeling. Otherwise, one could think about reseach tools - identifying examples that have informed that feeling, and deciding how much time and effort you want to put into being able to explain to oneself and others where that feeling may have originated. King Mob decided that his feeling of a general and prevalent attitude could be suported by reference to one specific incidence, which was discussed, but declined to provide further examples. Dudders identified one specific example of me perpetuating a vendetta against him, but fell down by not actually looking back at that example to make sure his recall of the facts was correct.

At times like this, I think the site: tag in google is very useful. By adding site:http://www.barbelith.com to a phrase, one can usually find the thread in which that phrase was used. So, in this case I used that modifier with the search term 'Countdown to Infinite Crisis", and got the thread in question. That can be useful, if somebody feels it is necessary, for trying to track down and provide context to half-remembered instances.

Generally, I think intention is key here. If you see a serious problem with Barbelith, and you want something _done_ about it, you need to put in legwork, think through what you're saying and search out as many examples as you can find. Such a thread should possibly go in the Policy. If you want to make an observation about what you feel is a problem with Barbelith, but do not have evidence or the will to gather it, work out what kind of a response you are looking for. Think about the difference between "I feel sometimes that people on Barbelith are unecessarily hostile" and "there is a prevalent tendency on Barbelith for people to be snobbish pretentious assholes", for example. I think this thread is quite instructive, in some ways: King Mob wanted to tell us what was wrong with Barbelith, but also wanted to avoid having to provide examples instantiating the general trend he had identified. I think you can do one or the other of those two things but probably not both.
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
10:19 / 21.06.05
I do so love these threads.
 
 
Ganesh
10:51 / 21.06.05
I think they love you too.
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
11:00 / 21.06.05
Do you think there's something I could say or do to ensure it's continuance?
 
 
Ganesh
11:02 / 21.06.05
One-liners are good.
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
11:37 / 21.06.05
Really?

I think they'd cheapen the vitriol.

I mean look at how much effort people have put in, that deserves respect.
 
 
Ganesh
11:40 / 21.06.05
Post more, then, m'dear.
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
12:00 / 21.06.05
As a veteran of a number of these threads I don't feel I have anything particularly new to add. I just enjoy well written cattyness and the pretty, pretty bickering.

Does this make me a bad person?
 
 
Ganesh
12:27 / 21.06.05
No, just a rather threadrotty one.

Said Mr Kettle, before exiting Thread Left.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
12:42 / 21.06.05
Come come, Reidcourchie. If we do not teach the younglings how to bitch and snark, who shall? We have an example to set.

But seriously - these kinds of accusations against individuals or Barbelith itself do indeed come up a fair amount, but given the cycling membership that need not be a surprising or even a bad thing, as among the snark one usually finds some interesting stuff that can be taken away, and which will hopefully continue to inform the ongoing use of Barbelith, such as the questions raised by Nightclub Dwight about how one _does_ register an emotional response to Barbelith without causing offence. That's a question we can profitably think about, which may lower the snark, or at least allow it to be more productively focused, next time around.
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
13:03 / 21.06.05
Which is all fair and good but go on, admit that you love this.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
13:34 / 21.06.05
I enjoy the cut and thrust at times, but sometimes watching the same tantrum gets pretty depressing, especially if the same person who first threw it four years ago is having it.
 
 
HCE
15:55 / 21.06.05
You make a good point about doing the legwork if you want to see a change, rather than merely wanting to air your grievances. Sometimes, getting it off your chest is enough. As I believe was mentioned earlier, it is probably also useful to have some notion of what change it is you'd like to see, if venting is not enough.
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
07:40 / 22.06.05
Posted by Haus

"but sometimes watching the same tantrum gets pretty depressing, especially if the same person who first threw it four years ago is having it."

Then don't engage?
 
 
Ganesh
07:49 / 22.06.05
The difficulty with non-engagement is that it can be seen as tacit acceptance (that yes, there is a generally snobbish pretentious asshole mentality, or whatever) that the individual doing the accusing has a point.
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
08:05 / 22.06.05
Really? In a message board with this many members? Do you mean to say that if I had not posted on this thread you would assume that I agreed with King Mob's comments? Because to be perfectly honest I would imagine that the majority people reading the thread would assume that they knew how the actual posters felt about it rather than trying to second guess what those who hadn't posted about it felt.

At the end of the day, whilst this is a cool place and I can see why people are invested in it at some level or another are we not largely on her for enjoyment? This is not to say you can't get other things from it (info, comraderie etc.) but we are here voluntarily so it seems silly to engage in something which is "tiresome".
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
08:11 / 22.06.05
Well, yes. I mean, if somebody said "you're all pretentious assholes" and nobody responded, what does that actually achieve? On one level, it might suggest tacit agreement - we have certainly had trolls before who have enlisted everyone who has not constantly restated their opposition to thier methods as ant ally in their manifesto to change Barbelith to suit their needs. Also, and I think just as importantly, what's the _use_ of that? It tells us what one person thinks, but it gets us no further to understanding what others think, or whether there is a problem that needs to be addressed. This thread has provided us with some useful points - that memories of threads are often edited to make the person making the complaint look better and anybody they do not like look worse, so it's best to ensure that the evidence that supports your contention actually exsits. Also, that you cannot expect to make judgements about a board culture or an individual member of the board without being expected to support it, and that if you do want to complain it might be well to think about what your complaint is actually intended to achieve.

These are all good things to have discussed, I think.
 
 
Ganesh
08:11 / 22.06.05
Yes, really. I think that, particularly for those individuals who've been around for many years and have a fair bit invested in Barbelith as a community, there is a pressure of sorts to respond to this stuff. There's certainly a pressure, if one recalls the situation differently, to point to the evidence and say, "no, that's not how it was/is".

Oer perhaps that's just me.
 
  

Page: 123(4)5

 
  
Add Your Reply