BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


So where do we go now (but nowhere)?

 
  

Page: 123(4)

 
 
FinderWolf
18:07 / 07.01.05
Between Bush's plan to cut/remake Social Security (which many GOP leaders are not in favor of) and the White House hiring a paid administration commentator to promote the No Child Left Behind Act on his syndicated talk show, the Bush admin. is hurting pretty bad right now, methinks.
 
 
FinderWolf
14:35 / 11.01.05
Bush's nominee to replace Tom Ridge as Homeland Defense Secretary looks like Lurch...that is all, carry on...
 
 
FinderWolf
12:57 / 12.01.05
Yahoo News:

THE SEARCH FOR IRAQ WEAPONS HAS OFFICIALLY ENDED

The hunt for biological, chemical and nuclear weapons in Iraq (news - web sites) has come to an end nearly two years after President Bush (news - web sites) ordered U.S. troops to disarm Saddam Hussein (news - web sites). The top CIA (news - web sites) weapons hunter is home, and analysts are back at Langley.

In interviews, officials who served with the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) said the violence in Iraq, coupled with a lack of new information, led them to fold up the effort shortly before Christmas.

Four months after Charles A. Duelfer, who led the weapons hunt in 2004, submitted an interim report to Congress that contradicted nearly every prewar assertion about Iraq made by top Bush administration officials, a senior intelligence official said the findings will stand as the ISG's final conclusions and will be published this spring.

Bush has expressed disappointment that no weapons or weapons programs were found, but the White House has been reluctant to call off the hunt, holding out the possibility that weapons were moved out of Iraq before the war or are well hidden somewhere inside the country. But the intelligence official said that possibility is very small.

---------
 
 
FinderWolf
12:45 / 14.01.05
Wow...this would be funny if it weren't so scary:

---

Bush Mulls Over Things He Might Not Say Again

1 hour, 46 minutes ago Top Stories - Los Angeles Times
From Associated Press

WASHINGTON — President Bush (news - web sites) expressed misgivings Thursday for two of his most famous expressions: "Bring 'em on," in reference to Iraqis attacking U.S. troops, and his vow to get Osama bin Laden (news - web sites) "dead or alive."

During a roundtable interview with reporters from 14 newspapers, Bush acknowledged that his tough language "had an unintended consequence."

On July 2, 2003, two months after he had declared an end to major combat in Iraq (news - web sites), Bush promised U.S. forces would stay until the creation of a free government there. To those who would attack U.S. forces in an attempt to deter that mission, Bush said, "My answer is, Bring 'em on."

"Sometimes, words have consequences you don't intend them to mean," Bush said Thursday. " 'Bring 'em on' is the classic example, when I was really trying to rally the troops and make it clear to them that I fully understood, you know, what a great job they were doing. And those words had an unintended consequence. It kind of, some interpreted it to be defiance in the face of danger. That certainly wasn't the case."

In the week after the Sept. 11 attacks, Bush was asked if he wanted Bin Laden, the terrorist leader blamed for the attacks, dead.

"I want justice," Bush said. "And there's an old poster out West, that I recall, that said, 'Wanted, Dead or Alive.' "

Recalling the Bin Laden remark, Bush said Thursday: "I can remember getting back to the White House, and Laura said, 'Why did you do that for?' I said, 'Well, it was just an expression that came out. I didn't rehearse it.'

-------------

"WHY DID YOU DO THAT FOR?" This is how our Prez (and his wife) speak. Butchering grammar every step of the way.

Unintended consequence = YOU ARE DUMB
 
  

Page: 123(4)

 
  
Add Your Reply