|
|
Saw it, thought it was quite sensational.
Some of the editing was a little jarring (especially in the pre-Hogwarts scenes), and it slides, IMO, further into "Illustrated Companion to Harry Potter" territory. That is to say, I think that the movie does depend to a great extent on the viewer's ready familiarity with the books, not so much to follow the plot, but to appreciate the significance of a lot of relatively important points (the Death Eater's tattoos, Ron's growing resentment of Harry's wealth) which are only glimpsed or implied through token interactions on the periphery of plot-development scenes. In a way, it seems like the screenwriter/director took the book itself as their repository of exposition, so they don't have to waste precious screen time on character-to-character explanations and can get right to what people want to see. This is not a criticism, so much, but it did require an expectation-adjustment so I could watch it on its own terms.
In fan-fic news, there are a couple scenes which, regrettably, will put some wind back in the sails of the Harry/Hermione 'ship. Harry/Cedric slash (and, save us all, Harry/Voldemort) is also a likely beneficiary of the movie.
Ralph Fiennes, I should add, is no less compelling for lack of a nose (bluntly, he is a gorgeous gorgeous man despite the makeup department's best efforts). He brings some life (ha!) to the clunky-on-the-page Generic Evil Bad Guy taunting, and makes the big V a far more interesting villain than he is written to be. |
|
|