| |
|
At risk of adding more petroleum to the ensuing blaze...
So suppose you are white and want a Japanese symbol on your shoulder. You actualy studied religion in Tokyo and Kyoto for a while and also knew some of the language, although this has completely deteriorated over the years to 2-year old status. Most people would say that you have more than a lifetime passing interest and appreciation in this culture. Is this tatoo justified?
Likewise, say you want Hebrew script on your back (sycnhronicity Jack...)- specifically EMET. You don't speak or read Hebrew, but want this particular word because of the golem connotations, as well as what the word means (Truth), as well as a true appreciation for the intricacy and layered meanings of the Hebrew language (Truth becoming Death, Aleph being Light and inspiration and without it is disintergration...). You are technically Jewish according to Israel law, due to maternal bloodlines passing it down even though you were never raised as such. (Long, detailed history of your grandmother being taken to Synagouge in secret at night and going to an Irish Catholic school during the day so that the Chicago White Sox can safely pretend in public that their accountant is a good Catholic) Is this tatoo justified?
Full disclosure: I have no tatoos, yet I am considering the latter. I considered the former, but decided against it because... well, every trendy fucker has one- as has been so eloquently expressed already.
And I can't find it on the website, but there was a brillaint Onion "In The News" bit that said "Woman's Arm A Confusing Jumble Of Cultural Symbols". Damn... it's gone I think. Well here's this.
Travel the world in a single piece of skin... |
|
|