BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Lay Down Your Guns

 
  

Page: 12(3)4

 
 
illmatic
10:24 / 14.03.03
Good thing I'm not in charge of a enthunasia ward isn't it?

Am curious to know what the mods make of it at the mo, though, or why it's occasionally so shite, but I've a feeling talking about it won't make it better and might just add fuel to the flames.

I might advance the suggestion that The Magick's "special needs" status comes from taking the whole weird subject seriously in the first place? Even in quite an "alternative" (retch) space like Barbelith, it's still the only subject that, on first appearences, completely goes against our culture's shared understanding of the world.

*"ya got away this time, ya varmit" holsters weapon, spits tobacco*
 
 
illmatic
10:26 / 14.03.03
With apologies to everyone for going so wildly off - topic - if anyone wants to advance this, quote me and start a thread....

over there
 
 
Seth
19:32 / 14.03.03
A bit too close to home, Haus. It's been a long day.

But hey.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
23:42 / 14.03.03
Much as I love it, the Magick is in a proper state right now. If I wasn't a mod I wouldn't even be reading it at the moment, much less posting (futile hostility gives me indigestion.) If anyone could advise, I'd be internally grateful.
 
 
Seth
05:07 / 15.03.03
The current discussion really needs as many contributions as possible, MC. I know it's awkward, but we need to get a range of perspectives.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
07:12 / 15.03.03
It's a proper pain in the backside... *small voice* why does everyone hate each other so much?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
11:18 / 15.03.03
Getting back (however briefly) to the war thang...

Rizla said "above all, WHO BENEFITS MOST?" Yup, a good question.

I would actually put above that "WHAT'S THE CHANCES OF US FUCKING 'THE PEOPLE WE WANT TO REVOLT' OVER AT THE LAST MINUTE AGAIN?" as far as important questions go.

'Specially considering how Turkey is being bribed to offer military space on the condition it gets what should, by rights, be Kurdistan once all this bollocks is over. And hmmm... Turkey doesn't have too much better a record than "the butcher of Baghdad" for its treatment of Kurds, does it?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
11:20 / 15.03.03
Oh, and Anna de L... (and sorry Flyboy)... the reason everyone hates each other so much is that that's what the evolution of humanity has done. Survival of the fittest=survival of those most able to fuck each other over.

(Jesus, I'm bitter today. Ask me tomorrow, I'm sure I'll be all fluffy and nice. I hope.)
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
11:53 / 15.03.03
As someone just dipping his toes in the milky waters of Barbelith after an absence - and no, I really didn't read the board at all during that time - I have to say it comes across as fatigued. Those of you who have mutable names seem to have chosen ones which express either nostalgia ("season 3", "reflect") or decay ("the only Haus left standing and it's an estate agent's")

The only thing I can suggest is that you put more in. Not time, but heart. That means you'll all have more invested, which also means you can be hurt more readily. So you have to remember that and try not to leap on and pummel the shit out of ideas which don't grab you. I've suggested it before, but perhaps now's the time: if an idea is ailing, if a thread is degrading, fix it. Try your hardest. Even if you fail, the sheer generosity of it will uplift those around you.

Accept the level at which a question is posed or an idea suggested. The tendency on Barbelith when I departed was increasingly to subject any notion to a genealogical examination, to examine it for fragments of other notions, for errors, truths and revelations.

That's a reaction which has its roots, as far as I can see, in a desire to undermine dominant and oppressive ideas, but it has to be applied selectively, or it becomes one itself. Even subcultural identities have roots and particles, and ignoble antecedents. And while the dominant culture frequently ignores analysis of its root, the subculture often cannot. Tell a country that it has no right to be what it is, and it will ignore you. Tell an individual the same thing, it's much harder to survive.

Up to now, Barbeliuth has played out like an experiment in social organisation. It's been our own little Paradise Island. Now it has to try a new face, or rust itself to death.
 
 
Lurid Archive
13:35 / 15.03.03
Hey Nick, good to see you back.

I think you are right about the effort one needs to put in. Becoming jaded can sap your own energy and spread a general air of boredom aand complacency. I'm not really sure that is happening, as people as feeling something closer to despair and frustration, but perhaps the effect is still the same.

So yeah, we should try to build rather than destroy, support rather than undermine. Except...that isn't always appropriate. And there have been a few threads recently that were based on ideas that were really unsalvageable. The point being, that to "accept a the level at which is a question is posed or an idea suggested", you need to find some merit in the idea.

There have been moves to change the argumentative style in the headshop. There was an attempt (that may resurface) of having threads where people only contributed positively, never with a disagreement. *Obviously*, the topics weren't contentious or the sort of thing that people want to disagree with. But gratuitous pummelling to one is much needed criticism to another.
 
 
Jack Denfeld
21:32 / 15.03.03
"You sound like a right winger. Sorry but you do, you're up for a war that isn't really going to do anyone any good... at least there's no evidence pointing in that direction." - Anna

Yeah, but I support the leagalization of all drugs, to include heroin and crack. Now what am I? I'm not running for political office, I don't need to appeal to left wing or right wing. I just form opinions based issue by issue. It'd be like me calling you a tree-hugging hippy for not supporting the war. It's just silly, isn't it?

"My question to you: if my sister is genuinely against the war for the wrong reasons, is this necessarily a bad thing? Is it possible that some good may come of it?"- Reflect

Good point. I see what you're saying.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
17:46 / 16.03.03
Nick: I'd rather this thread didn't turn into another 'Is Barbelith Dyyyying?' one. I think the potential remit is broader than that - certainly when I started it I was interested in discussing a feeling that has most of its roots outside of the board but which I suspected other people shared and which ties in to how we post here in several ways. That said, I agree entirely with you that what one gets out of Barbelith is always, always related to what one puts in (one reason I can't stand the "I'm off because you suck now, go home and think about *that*, fuckers" exit certain people have employed in the past). However, I don't think is really something you can tell other people to do - we all have to do it ourselves... Nor do I think that the board's been particularly lacking in input of heart - this thread alone shows that, in many of the responses. And I'd reiterate Lurid's points as well. Good to have you back from the wilderness, though.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
17:48 / 16.03.03
PS: you're right to sense nostalgia in my name, but it has a lot more to do with nostalgia for the poster I 'used' to be rather than the board 'used' to be. Or it could just be a Buffy thing. I suspect you may be reading too much into 'reflect' or the latest Haus incarnation though, but we'd have to ask them.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
19:14 / 16.03.03
My current name is a reference to the upcoming devastation of Iraq, rather than the decay of Barbelith, unless my subconscious is being unusually fiendish. It was going to be "the only Haus left in Basra, and it's...", but that sounded needlessly specific.
 
 
Seth
05:55 / 17.03.03
Mine's a means of parading the insubstantial nature of online identity. I'll be the mirror...
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
08:02 / 17.03.03
Uh, guys?

Case rests.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
08:59 / 17.03.03
And we're battling again, and I'm not sure either why or over what...

Meanwhile, can I urge anyone with an interest in the Magick, or a broader interest in how the fora of Barbelith interact, to go to the metathread in the Magick? It's talking about some fairly major possible proposed changes to the structure or the application of the Magick...
 
 
Cherry Bomb
10:43 / 17.03.03
Hmm, interesting stuff, this.
As y'all know, I haven't been around too much lately (though you should now start seeing a bit more of me again, mwahahah), and in the past month or so, when I've had a chance to read barbelith for more than a few minutes, I think about wanting to post something, then hit some arguments, and then simply think, "uggh.."

I've been very busy, and of course I've been following things with Iraq. I want Hussein gone, but I don't want to see lots of bombing and innocent lives lost in order to do it.

I hear what some of you are saying about the real or perceived (or quite likely both) futility of the peace marches, but I think it's important to at least stand up and say, "no, I don't agree with what's happening."
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
10:55 / 17.03.03
Uh, guys?

Case rests.


Nick, it's one thing to say people need to 'put more in', but to follow that with a "if you don't know, I'm not going to tell you... ahhhh, do you see?" post is really too much.
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
10:58 / 17.03.03
So, I did what you suggested, and all I can do is repeat what I said earlier: after a certain point, there is simply no gain in the painstaking examination of world-views and self-perceptions (self-delusions?) of posters and positions. At that level, all discussions are identical, all are susceptible to the same plaints, and all will result in similar chains leading to the same identical deadlock. The positions which suffer most from this are not the mundane majority ones, which don't need to demonstrate their own validity because they're self-affirming and numerous enough to sustain their own existence. The positions which suffer most are the small ones which depend on notions of differentness and identity to create themselves as entities. The Dialectic of Enlightenment in miniature.

The Magick in particular is about choosing realities which may not stand up to rigourous investigation, using belief in a given set of perceptions as a tool. But the whole of Barbelith draws on that current, because it was in part rooted in the Invisibles, which was rooted in that kind of play-thinking and goofy relativism.

You can't do that kind of play in a caustic environment. It relies on a degree of fantasy and blur. And since all positions and postures are to some degree susceptible to criticisms and genealogical investigations, why is it necessary or desirable to do so? What is gained from falsification? And what is lost?

Adversarial, critical/genealogical analysis in this context is a tool of investigation which destroys the sample. A vital component of Barbelith discussion is experiential. It is not just the matter under discussion which it is important, but the way in which it is discussed. That has to be playful, accepting of the full gammut of realities Barbelith attracts. De-legitimisation of other posters' worlds, the dialectical corrosion of their positions and identities blows that to hell.

That's not to say that there won't be identities which are incompatible, but Barbelith appears to be developing increasingly sophisticated mechanisms for dealing with troublemakers - innercircle's banished (but not deleted) threads are a fascinating emergent solution.

Remember how much fun this used to be?
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
11:02 / 17.03.03
Fly... It wasn't one. I'd just read the posts you made in response to my suggestion about mutable names and dissillusionment, and taken as a whole I just felt your replies looked like I didn't need to say any more. Dunno. There was nothing vatic, to use Haus' second-favourite word, about it. I went off and read the magick metathread and you see the result. But I'm not going to be posting as much or as rapidly as I used to, because I'm working and I'm not really re-engaged with Barbelith yet. I'm tentative, because I believe what I'm saying, and if you lot decide that you don't, there's no way I can sustain it.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
12:26 / 17.03.03
There's another forum, on which I do not post, which deletes posts which begin with "uh," or "um....", becasue it is a cheap way to suggest that the point you have made ois so childishly simple that you are literally hornswoggled that you need to add anything else. Although obviously I'm not suggesting that this was your intention, I do think it is worth taking on board. Especially when combined with "case proved", when the "case" was "the names of three posters on Barbelith reflect nostalgia and decay, which is a reflection on Barbelith itself" and none fo the responses appear to have supported particularly, much less proved, that case.

Now, we did in fact try to address what I assume you mean by "adversarial/critical/genealogical" emphases - Byron (who may have been Lyra when you left) started a non-debate thread, which suffered from a wooly conception of what was meant by "debate" , but got along quite happily for a while. Persephone started another one, this time with a defined subject matter rather than being in effect a thesis-altering chain, and that went on for a while. Nobody has started on since.

To be honest, genealogical/critical/analytical/"debate" labels often seem to suffer from poor taxonomy, partly because its proponents frequently wish to present it as a state of nature, something we must all instinctively understand. Thus, Byron's Head shop thread had the unspoken challenge "nobody must disagree", and his subsequent Policy thread the implicit proposition "nobody must disagree with me". Like the accusation of "rhetoric", these terms seem often to be a metaphysical representation of anger at the concept of contradiction in response to having been contradicted, which I think is a behaviour that has to be watched for.

Now, a few weeks ago I was concerned that the Head Shop was dyiiiiiiiiiiing, to quote Flyboy, partly because I was becoming too closely identified with it and too many people were thus assuming that to spend time talking about *me* was metonymically equivalent to talking about whatever was under discussion. I was thinking of asking to be demodded and replaced, but recently more people have joined in, some new voices and some new ideas are being heard, and valued members like Crunchy, Deva, Ganesh and perhaps at some point yoursen are helping to move things along in a variety of ways. I've taken a finger off the threadrot detector button, and am letting things ride a bit, to see what happens. At present there's some very ludic stuff going on around the majority assumption, for example, that limp wirsts and lisps are an affectation and an identifier of male homosexuality, which is rather more playful than we're used to in the Head Shop, but if you can't let your hair down once in a while what can you do?

So, perhaps the bow-wave of your contention was in fact warping reality ahead of your return. That would be kind of fun...
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
13:50 / 17.03.03
...right.

I'm glad that's happening.

But I can't read your post without feeling that it comes close in places to exemplifying what I'm talking about. You've immediately presented an analysis of the situation, laid it out clearly, and expressed concern about fuzzy thinking. But fuzzy thinking is important. That's what I'm saying. And I suspect it's required to provide space for the kind of ideas this place exists to explore.

You've pointed out that a debate-free strategy has been tried, and seems to have failed to engage popular interest. I'm not surprised. Debate-free Barbelith is like caffeine-free, colouring-free, saccharine-free diet Coke. Debate is vital. It just has to be debate which allows fuzziness to persist.

I'm not surprised you found yourself the subject of discussion. You have a very particular style. You demand considerable rigour both in formulating statements directed to you and comprehending your replies, display a daunting erudition and quite obvious good intention toward the outside world; yet at the same time, you deploy a vicious humour when you want to, and you appear sometimes to ignore the obvious more harmless interpretation of a statement in favour of an obscure and monstrous one.

The result of which is that anyone who's going to debate with you had better be serious, confident, informed, and have plenty of time on their hands.

In other words, you're probably the antithesis of Fuzzy.

There has to be a balance between casual, fuzzy, off the wall, inaccurate lunacy and blue-sky speculation and cogent, researched, referenced construction.

In this, as in so many other things, Barbelith is a microcosm. There's a tonne of stuff written in business and academia about the balances between analysis and creativity, theory and the lifeworld, masculine and feminine modes of problem-solving, the consequences of reification and exactly what that process is, and so on.

Perhaps it's just me. But there are times when I post something here which I know isn't right, and I'm hoping someone will read it and go "I get it" and shunt it up a level toward the point where it's a real idea, and someone else will grab it and do the same, and so on, until it's grown up and intricate and interesting.

The danger is that this idea will get subjected to too much scrutiny, and exposed for what it is - half-baked. Well, yes. That's why it's here - to be finished. You can't legislate for this kind of thing - you can't say 'no debate here' because that makes the whole thing toothless - an equally pointless exercise. The restraint, and the creativity, has to come from the participants, not the ground rules.

That may well be the hardest part of utopia - acting for the best outcome at all times without the guidance of rules and laws. But if it can't be done here, the outlook is dark for the rest of the world.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
14:44 / 17.03.03
Hey, I can be fuzzy! I give lovely big fuzzy huggles!

Ahem.

Sorry.

Interestingly, the "non-debate" things sort of had the same sort of angle as your I'm hoping someone will read it and go "I get it" and shunt it up a level toward the point where it's a real idea, and someone else will grab it and do the same, and so on, until it's grown up and intricate and interesting, although the first one I think attemtped to eliminate any critical examination fo the preceding thesis or statement at all....

In general, I find that saying something like "I don't quite know what I'm trying to say here" or "could somebody help me out with this idea", which is a kind of homeopathic or natural way to do what Lyron I think was tryiong to legislate for. It doesn't mean that somebody might not take your half-formed argument to pieces, but it does mean that others might see that you are not presenting a complete machine but looking for bits to be added...let's see...there was a Head Shop thread about 18 months ago which I started in the style of Peggy Phelan that idenitified a gap and had people drop stuff into that gap which went pretty well, IIRC. A measurable part of the response to any given post, I suspect, is about the tone of the post rather than the failings of its audience. The fuzzier people *are*, the fuzzier the responses are likely to be. The revolution, in a very meaningful sense, must come in part if not entirely from within.
 
 
illmatic
15:16 / 17.03.03
This may be better off in the big ol' metathread going on in the Magick but what the hell - I There's been a bit of talk over there lately along the lines of the Magick should be more "headshoppy" whatever this means. While I agree that standards could be higher, and we should aim for the good thought, debate and content, I feel comparing the two forums is essentially a mistke. The latter seems to have a strong academic and philosphical bias, revolving around arguement, proof and debate, while the former is concerned with something a lot more "woolly", parts of which are in direct contradiction to the way we're told the world works. I think to conflate the two is maybe to censor out some of the stupid, weird and irrational edges that makes Magick such an interesting subject.
 
 
Goodness Gracious Meme
21:49 / 17.03.03
Agreed. Not sure whether this should go here or in the Magick thread., but have been chewing this over.

As a reasonably long-time Head Shop poster (although intermittent in the last few months) and relative newbie/occasional poster in the Magick, I think the comparison doesn’t do either forum any favours.

There are points of comparison, they’re both specialist for a, they tend to assume a level of knowledge, and background in a discipline in threads, and possibly have a broadly creative, constructive, investigative remit (or should do?) but they can probably best achieve this is very different ways. They’re more useful as complements to each other than as mirrors.

I’ve found my recent posting in the Magick to be really valuable; it’s provided a space to explore ideas, experiences and ways of working that don’t really have a place anywhere else on Barbelith. I’ve also found significant differences in the way that experiential knowledge is valued between the two fora.

Which is not to say that the Head Shop needs to value this (although I might argue that a rigorous attitude to experiential knowledge/work, so that it doesn’t descend into persona reminisce would be just as relevant in the HS as in the Magick), but that it’s valuable to have a forum which often attracts a lot of work, thinking, posting, and investment, that does provide a space for experientially-based disciplines They’re another type of creativity, energy, work and the perhaps ‘fuzzier’ style of the Magick allows them to flourish.

Eg I’ve found it very constructive to talk about counselling and psychotherapy/healing here, as although I could discuss the theory, it’s worthless without the experiential knowledge/practice…. And that there are ‘magic moments’, leaps of faith, that can’t be discussed within a deconstructive framework, as they simply don’t exist on those terms. It’s a space I’ve been able to talk about hunches, feelings, body language, physical tics, how I feel after a certain sort of trapeze class, and I’ve found that very inspiring/energising...

My own impression is that the Magick is slightly more welcoming to those who aren’t expert, or are new to the forum. I've felt much more comfortable venturing suggestions, hunches, guesses, there, which leads to a different sort of discourse.

Again, I’m emphatically not saying that the Head Shop should follow suit, its good to have different
‘personalities’ to the ‘heavier’ fora.. I do think they HS is a tough place to enter, but perhaps that’s as it should be, over in the Magick thread there seem to be people who wish there was a bit more of that to the Magick.

I agree that that Head Shop has become overidentified with Haus, and hir ‘haus style’ (boom boom) and that this hasn’t been good for it. I do to an extent also agree with Nick’s summary of how the Haus persona works in there. But it’s also worth noting that as ze seems to be having to do most of the moderating work in the HS, that’s not terribly surprising. I think that work should be recognised. Hopefully now Deva and Nick seem to be around a bit more, the ‘distributed’ element of the moderation should kick back in. I’ve volunteered my services, though I’m probably not really Head Shop material, but I really think it’s too much for what seems to be essentially one person to be manage. Even someone who spends as much time on Barbelith as Haus.

Haus, I don’t think removing yourself at is at this moment the most constructive/useful thing you could do, but I can personally understand why you might be fed of the whole caboodle. I do think that the polarisation of threads into fights has been a problem, but that there are external reasons (as delineated on the first page of this thread) for that, and with awareness and a conscious attempt to back off/not get sidetracked into easy anger(which I distinguish from righteous anger), this is recoverable. Hence my attempt with the ‘redemption’ thread to start something that invites viewpoints, analysis and critique but that hopefully has less potential to evolve into a bitchfight.

Phew.
 
 
Seth
23:10 / 17.03.03
Apologies for not stating my case sufficiently in the thread itself. It's my desire to see certain attitudes imported from the Headshop, specifically the close examination of ideas or workings to ensure that they're built on ideologically stable ground. For example, we've become good at doing this with the seasonal 'how can I conjure this person into fancying me' threads, but that's stuff every thinking person knows: you only have to watch Buffy to understand not only the flaws of sticky lurve workings but also the desperation that brings such threads about. The example holds true, however: people must be allowed room for unusual ideas while taken to task for potentially destructive behaviour. We're fine on the former, but there's certainly room for improvement in the latter.

Hope that clarifies my thinking. And yes, this should have gone in the Magick thread. I may cut and paste it in there, if Illmatic and BiP don't have a problem with it.
 
 
Goodness Gracious Meme
23:21 / 17.03.03
go ahead. I wanted to draw out the comparisons to reflect (ha) on the HS just as much as the Magick so bunged it here...
 
 
Seth
09:07 / 18.03.03
Starting to feel as though I've chosen the wrong fictionsuit... :P
 
 
Seth
09:09 / 18.03.03
And the wrong emoticon.

Comic shop owner: "There is no emoticon for what I'm feeling!"
 
 
Goodness Gracious Meme
15:33 / 18.03.03
reverting to the original thrust of this thread just to mention that I had my first real vision of violence against someone.

Not a politician, but Amanda Platell, speaking on RIchard and Judy:

"the French are well known for their ability to sell, but not for their bravery"

And I know I should expect nothing less, but I could actually genuinely have punched her at that moment.

Not just in the context of the specific outrageousness of this comment, but for the indication of how racism is sliding back into mainstream acceptability, excused by TWAT.

AGGHGHGHGHGHGHGH
 
 
inhaler
15:47 / 18.03.03
Things are really bad in my office with the anti-French sentiment. Two weeks ago I had said something similar to what Bengali In Platforms is expressing to one of my co-workers, and two of my male colleagues (both of whom are supervisors in the office) started giving me grief, calling me "Frenchie" and taunting me by affecting some kind of cartoonish approximation of a French accent. You know, saying stuff like "tu es les asshole, douchebag", ignorant stuff like that. I tried to tell them that I thought they were being unfair and inappropriate, but one of them just slapped me in the face and the other suckerpunched me in the stomach. I tried to complain about this to my district manager, but he told me that if I said anything else that could be considered "un-American", that I would be fired immediately. So, needless to say, I've kept quiet about this ever since.

It makes me very mad that I've got to deal with this sort of ignorance at my workplace, but you know, the economy is so bad right now that I've just got to deal with it because I'm afraid of losing my job.
 
 
Jack Denfeld
17:48 / 18.03.03
What the fuck? You get beat up at your job? What the fuck?
 
 
grant
17:51 / 18.03.03
You might want to mention how many French troops were involved in Desert Storm, Desert Sabre and Operation Southern Watch.

There's more here and here.

How important is this job to you?
 
 
Goodness Gracious Meme
18:00 / 18.03.03
That's disgusting, inhaler. you poor thing.

And that's assault. You got a union/workers association, or am I being british and naive about this? if, so, go to them, even if you don't feel you want to/are able to take action, they might be able to offer support.

And it's not meant to be patronsing, and hope it doesn't come across as such, but I'd be jobhunting right now. Get out of there, somehow.


Or are you in the posish of being
 
  

Page: 12(3)4

 
  
Add Your Reply