|
|
Can I first, as an extremely bad winner, say WOOOOOHOOOO. 'Grant's angels' rule, dood.
*So* didn't expect to win/be any good, as I have really shit memory/attn spans and am crap at logic. (hence some of the stuff that people pegged as suspicious just being me being airheaded egJust forgot to PM the 'innocent villager' message to BC. Duh ). *But*, I guess I'm good at juggling the impact of falsity and truth and knowing the value of truth. and identifying people's likely susceptibilities. I usually use these (counselling) skills for good, and not evil. honest
And Lol, agree with WP that you were invaluable, having someone who was good to the last, at looking innocent was vital in causing confusion.
And as a balancing argument, apologise specifically to Iszabelle for pushing the 'femafia' thing. I am as I said to whisky and orr at times, an appalling competitive bastard and was prepared to rally around a feminist flag to win. jeez.
still not entirely sure whether continuing the game in meatspace isn't cheating in some obscure way or at 1the least a bad idea.
yeah, I feel this as well. Tez and I had an evening of dancing round each other right at the start of the game, oh so subtly pumping each other. I think it at least stacks the game unfairly in favour of those who may know other players in meatspace. eg Orr peggin Whisky, and incidentally, Tez pegging me and WP. So we got bloody lucky with whacking him, he'd figured that much out by then. So Orr, Byron, WP, Tez, Fly and I had an extra source of info that others didn't. And I think that's cheating.
I think Orr's case is fascinating, as it demonstrates the extent to which figuring out who's Mafia is only half of the game. As if you haven't built up a rapport with other players it doesn't matter. You *have* to be able to convince/work with others to win this game as a villagers. |
|
|