BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Haus of Questions - Barbinterview

 
  

Page: (1)23456

 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
11:29 / 23.09.02
Hello, sweethearts. Mr. Expressionless has sent me over an absolutely bulbous sack of questions, which I shall attempt to answer with completeness and courtesy. Or by swearing.

So, onto the questions - I am answering these in the order they were sent to me at present, in the name of simplicity.

And we begin:

- My question: Indulge my gullible self- do you actually have Mad hax0r skillz, or was that in jest?

In jest, I fear. I can tell one end of a computer from the other but any claim to l33t Hax0r Sk33lz I might make will end only in humiliation and laughter. For tech stuff, I have to rely on a dear friend, who is writing an O'Reilly book on RSS and taking over the professorship in Hypermedia at Westminster College, and as such has to crank his brain down several floors before being able to give me the information I need. Like "can I play Diablo on this, them". In exchange for his consultancy, I rugby-tackle to the ground anyone who comes near him attempting to sell him an iPod. Although that may be more for his wife's sake than mine.


- Where do you get your ideas?

You see, people will think I'm being flippant when I say "Herman's Head", but actually...I suspect that much of the weirdness in my head is a result of my recall for things of my childhood (and the emotional states therein) being far better than my recall of the more recent events that have resulted in my being the warm and wonderful person I am today (eidetic memory, full or partial, generally decaying through one's teens). Herman's Head is a good example of this as, as any fule kno, it had only 30-odd episodes, not enough for syndication, and has thus sunk beneath the waves forever, living on only in The Simpsons. Therefore my aspic-coated memories of Herman's Head are entirely of their time (about 1992, IIRC, and I often do), and the tension between that recollection and my current perceptions of the world is quite sparky and fun.

In general, a lot of my ideas I can take no credit for, but rather the genetic quirks of a decent memory and insomnia.

Although at the moment I could definitely do with more ideas - I am going through a terribly flat period, and my Blakes 7 epic is definitely in need of a shot in the arm.


- If you had to nominate one book you love above all others could you do it? What book is it? Why did you choose it?

Lordy - I'm not sure if I could. I mean, how do you decide whether the Epic of Gilgamesh is better than The Little Prince (actually, this is fairly simple - the Little Prince is better, especially if you want to have a good cry)? I love the Making Out books with a pale fire that gnaws at the marrow of my bones, but I'm not entirely sure that I would vouchsafe any one of them the laurel (except arguably "Nina Won't Tell", which FUCKING ROCKS).

Hmmm....if there were a gun to my head, I would probably suggest the Iliad, because it's the fictitious work that has probably had the greatest single impact on my life, and also because it is quite simply superb - for sheer quality of language, strength of character, and the beauty of the language.

As for book in English, the one I probably reread most frequently, at least at the moment, is "Book of Matches" by Simon Armitage. It's just very comforting that you can be popular *and* really very good indeed.

- Someone once told me privately that "Haus is so posh he makes my teeth hurt". But they meant it nicely, I know that for a fact. The question is, just how posh are you, exactly?

Um...thsi is the first of several questions about my social class, and I am going to try to pace myself.

Not that posh, basically. My speech is RP, but given the other options were East Anglia and East Midlands that's probably for the best. I pronounce "Covent Garden" to rhyme with "oven", but on the other hand I do wear white after Labour Day. I do wear suits outsdie working hours, but then I don't wear suits to work so it's probably more of a novelty thing. I am, technically speaking, a gentleman, but what that means is anybody's guess. I eat with my fork in the left hand, but I think most Brits do anyway, so that's no good.

Certainly you would have to go back a very long way to find anything resembling aristo blood in my family, and that would be Welsh, and as such probably by definition non-U.



- When was the last time, if ever, you had an involuntary kneejerk racist/sexist/homophobic thought, and how did you punish yourself?


Funny question - don't people have involuntary racist/sexist/homophobic thoughts reasonably regularly, or at least notice that they are lookign at people in terms of their race/gender/sexuality?

If one could simply float through life unaffected by the prejudices and psychoses of one's culture and education, the world would be a happy place indeed, but I don't quite know if one can. The whole point, for me at least, is to try to understand where these feelings are coming from, and why they exist in society in general and in you in particular, and then to address them?

So, in terms of the recognition/punishment paradigm, the last one I can think of was when I became twitchy about the two young black men walking towards me with their hoods up, and I punished myself by getting beaten up and my wallet nicked. But I like to think that I was thinking even at the time, "you know, in a sense we're all victims here".

- How many members of Barbelith would you say you "hated"?

Again, a funny question - and perhaps one that springs from my press rather than my person (rather like the Cerberus of PC thing above).

I wouldn't say I hated anyone on Barbelith. Some people I have limited respect for, either as a result of their opinions or the way they choose to express themselves. I think there is a question about what annoys me about the way people post later on, so I will leave that for now. Some appear to think they have vendetta between our two houses, normally as a result of wounded pride when their patented Ideological Cure for Everything is savaged as sub-Kantian drivel. Some people hold attitudes that I find repellent, or just very tiresome. Some are unable to take criticism of their ideas, or cannot take it without assuming it to be an attack on their person, but as long as they stay out of the Head Shop I'm good with that.

But hate? For me to hate somebody they'd have to have done something pretty nasty to me, or possibly be a Mugabe-level nasty in general. I can't think of anyone offhand whom I could be said to "hate" here. Some people annoy me. Some people make me angry. Some people bore my tits off, at times far further off than I could hope to travel to retrieve them before necrosis sets in. But I think it's important to distinguish between hating behaviours and hating people.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
12:42 / 23.09.02
You are trapped in a lift with Jim Davidson. How would the conversation go?

I don't think there would be a conversation. I mean, I would simply not be able to say anything civil whatsoever, and nothing I say is going to change his mind about what he does or is, so why bother? Likewise violence, although briefly satisfying, would ultimately solve nothing, and he has the rat-like look of one who might turn very nasty indeed if cornered.

So, possibly just a friendly injunction not to say a single fucking word until the doors are levered open. Or perhaps a lengthy list of everybody I know who think he's a shitfucker, starting at my mum and working down. Or, and I am increasingly attracted to this one, an extremely clumsy and persistent series of come-ons.

Yes, I think so. So, the conversation would begin "my, isn't it hot in this tiny, tiny elevator?"
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
13:33 / 23.09.02
When you were a callow youth, did you ever masturbate to a picture of a comic-book superheroine? If so, who was she? If you don't want to identify her, just say which company the comic was published by.

D00d, I was an adolescent in a left-wing feminist household. I was masturbating to invitations to join the science-fiction book club. I was masturbating over BBC2 drama. Statistically, there's a fair chance I spuffed over your mum's face, mathematically speaking.

As for comics - I'm slightly surprised you assume women - I remember as a child writing some slash*tastic* stuff about Nightcrawler, my first love and perhaps my greatest, before I really knew what naughties were. However, to return to your question: um...Phoenix 2. Shadowcat (which isn't noncepatrol if you're 13 and she's 16, all right?). Magick as the Darkchilde. Oh, and there's a bit in the New Mutants when Cannonball has been knocked to the ground and Selene is standing over him in a very I'm-about-to-drain-your-life-energy way, and....ahem.

Anyway. Plato.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
13:34 / 23.09.02
Phoenix 2 as in Rachel Summers?

The X-Men Phoenix stuff gets really confusing.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
13:43 / 23.09.02
Yeah - the only comic that would be recognisable as such by Americans that I read as a kid was Excalibur, which was occasionally found in WH Smiths for 50p, but usually picked up on book-shopping trips into Leicester. There was an English printing of Secret Wars, which was A4, so the pages were all blown up and blotchy on cheap shiny paper, and another in the same format of Secret Wars II, by the end of which I was losing interest. I think I stopped reading comics in about 1989/1990 and then started again in 1995 or thereabouts, when I started going out with somebody who owned a complete set of the Sandman (up to wherever it was at the time), and lived in a town with its own comic shop.

I also used to read the Eagle, but can't remember pumping the protein over the new-look afro-tastic Professor Peabody, and 2000AD...

Ah. Judge Anderson. Silly of me.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:04 / 23.09.02
You have, on previous occasion, edited a post to say something to the effect that autobiography is a weakness (autobiography is for the weak, actually). What is your reasoning behind this and how does this affect your opinion of those that use it to either justify or explain a stance, theory or dogma?

Ah yes. To provide a bit of context, that was in response to a topic in the Head Shop about...hmmm....crime and punishment, or something to that effect. I had had the temerity to disagree with bitchiekittie; I believe that it was one of those "as a mother" statements, so I really should have known better, and her response put me straight.

Ah yes, here we go:

have you ever had anyone fuck you when you didnt want them to, haus? has anyone ever held you down and hurt you, just because they wanted to, and could? I suppose that just goes away, right? the pain and fear of the victim just disappear one day, and all the things behind someones motivations to perform such a violent and hateful act on another person

Now, the message here is obviously, basically, "if you disagree with me you are pro the raping of children", which, if I had been a good little Head Shopper, I would have ignored as the jejune baiting it so clearly was. However, this was back in the never-never-land that is about page 10 of the Head Shop archive, and a much younger and fresher Tannhauser thought it worth responding to her question. About forty seconds and a sweet, refreshing draft of grown-up juice later, a rather wiser Tannhauser realised that that was exactly the kind of threadrotty nonsense that I was meant to be suggesting that other people avoid in the Head Shop, and to stick to the matter at hand.

Therefore, "autobiography is for the week" was my stated reason for the edit, as a tongue-in-cheek way of pointing out that for the purposes of a discussion on crime and stigma it was not relevant to discuss whether Ben Affleck had ever had sex with me in a very uncomfortable place (what, the back seat of a....oh, never mind), howsoever fascinating the question might be. And as a chiding to myself for having allowed myself to rise to the bait, wandering completely off-topic in order to indulge in that most Barbelith of vices, talking about myself in a situation almost completely unrelated to the issue at hand.

As for how does this affect your opinion of those that use it (autobiography) to either justify or explain a stance, theory or dogma?...well, that was primarily not a joke per se but also not a statement of universal truth, nor positioned as such. But, to answer the question....I see autobiography, like having read books or designed computer programs or interviewed Grant Morrison or anything else that might feed into a post, as a tool. Take the story from my past above. It is a useful tool for expanding on and putting a context around SBP's question. What I don't see it as is a finished piece of work.

That's the kind of thinking that goes, to quote somebody I once spoke to, "I was at a party in Golder's Green and all the people there were wankers, so I hate Jews", or the ever-popular "I/my dad/my dad's mate was mugged by black men. Can't trust 'em." Because you can't get there from here. So, people who assume that autobiography alone is a compelling argument, or even very interesting, in a discussion *about* something are usually misguided at best and threadrotting desperately at worst.

On the other hand, many threads in the Conversation and elsewhere suit themselves very well to such recollective rap sessions, with or without conclusions. But one of the things people are sometimes slow to realise, especially if they are sometimes slow, is that there are tens, maybe even dozens of things in this universe that aren't all about oneself, and which thus require some perception of an existence outside oneself to address with any hope of profit.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
17:17 / 23.09.02
What, if anything, did you learn from the "Burning Down the Haus" thread you started way back when?

Hmmm....something I should probably have realised - that those most likely to end up on the receiving end of what for want of a better term could be called a Haus job are those least likely to be able to deal with it well (Haus being a ludic suit on serious Earth). Which I think is probably a fundamental problem with the whole...Hausiness issue, and one I am still thinking on...this ties into various "Haus and the thing behind him", questions, tho', so more of that later.

Also, that a lot of people seem to enjoy at the very least having him around, or think he is quite a useful thing to have around, or just plain like him, dammit. But also that the Haus/ur-Haus dichotomy (of which more later) is actually a lot more clearly marked for some than I had previously anticipated. Hoom.

Anyway, it was at a time when I was very messy-headed indeed (so expect another one fairly soon, fight fans - probably just called "Kill me now"), and it was sort of reassuring, so on a purely selfish level it cheered me up that people who just genuinely thought I was a cunty (I know, but it's deviant focalisation week at the Haus of Structuralist Trickery) were vocal rather than numerous. So huggles all round.
 
 
Ethan Hawke
17:31 / 23.09.02
May I interject a quick question prompted by this latest reply, that may or may not be covered in those that you intend to answer?

When posting to Barbelith, do you *consciously* write as "Haus", or do you undergo some sort of lycanthropic transformation whenever you log on? If the latter, do you grow fangs as well? Also, does it worry you a little bit when you refer to "Haus" in the third person?
thx.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
17:54 / 23.09.02
Is anybody actually reading this, by the way?

What is your demographic information (race/gender/class/age/education/career)?

Ah, a nice short one.

Race and gender I choose not to answer, because the answers are probably going to take days just for me to stop agonising about, except to say that I have a fair amount of Welsh blood (hence the short temper and insufferable superiority complex, a cloud unseen of witness responds), and if I'm not phenotypically a boy then I'm *extraordinarily* funny-lookin'.

Oh, bollocks. This isn't a short one at all, is it?

Class I have terrible trouble with, because I'm never quite sure, which at least person has pointed out is probably because I have never really had to think about it because I'm BLOODSUCKING SCUM.

Which is fair enough, I suppose. Possibly Planet of Sound's lengthy meltdown, during which he accused me through the froth of being "lower upper middle class" is about right, and I like it because it uses ALL THE MODIFIERS in ALL THE POCKETS. Sorry. Class makes me shout. So, possibly I have none.

Anyway....two of my parents were in education before death and stress stopped play, the other in business at a decent level. Um...both parents graduates, one of Oxbridge Academy, London (World War 2 history and veterinary studies), but both the first members of their families to have a degree rather than a trade. They could probably bail me out of most financial embarrassments I would be likely to get myself into, but this is more a reflection on my pathetically limited ambition than their Croesitude. Since I probably wouldn't accept handouts anyway (says many a well-fed man), family class may not be an issue. Probably as a result of their self-consciousness about their own humble but happy roots, I got saddled with a silly accent and an unhappy home life, the two marks of a true gentleman. Oh, and I'm a gentleman, but only because I'm a scholar of Oxbridge Academy, London, which apparently is a backdoor, but basically means I think I can wear a sword in certain highly straitened contexts (if in doubt, err on side of caution) and a big flappy gown pretty much any time I like.

Education - see above. Three comprehensive primaries, from 7 to 11, during a period of which I also attended a tutor, a bit of home schooling, a minor public school (I think - can never remember if it sends a representative to the Headmasters' conference or not. Hey, does that mean Fortress Maximus is a public school?) which was old rather than good, and what is widely acknowledged as one of the more shambolic careers Oxbridge Academy, London (just outside Strawberry Hill. It's in the Book) has ever seen.

Age - late twenties, and as of yesterday a little later.

Career - more of a scramble downhill, really.

P.S. t.o.d.d.- I think the form is that people can throw in questions whenever they want - that's what happened with the last one, so fire away.
 
 
that
18:00 / 23.09.02
Happy Birthday Haus? Or was yesterday just a general every day type of getting older?
 
 
Lurid Archive
18:00 / 23.09.02
I'm reading. And I am the only one to feel uncomfortable with "Oxbridge Academy, London"? Maybe that says more about me.
 
 
Lurid Archive
18:02 / 23.09.02
Just to be clear, it is the transparent yet insistent euphemism that makes me feel uncomfortable. I'm sure that someone can tell me why.
 
 
grant
18:02 / 23.09.02
An unrelated question, maybe:

Do you think of yourself consciously as "English"?
Have you ever traveled outside of England? Britain? Europe?
 
 
Seth
18:10 / 23.09.02
Definitely reading and enjoying. The stuff about getting mugged made me laugh loads. Not because you got mugged, it was the way you told it. Erm... dig self out of hole...
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
18:17 / 23.09.02
Yay! An actually quick one!

I think I probably am constructed as English, and am probably quite acculturated to be English, but my ancestry is largely Welsh, and my reference points often from times when England didn't really exist, so who knows? I think I would certainly get picked out of a line-up as English, especially if I did that nervously Hugh Grantish thing that apparently I do. I don't feel terribly much a part of the proud institutions of England, but I do acknowledge the convenience of everyone around me speaking the language...

Have spent time in Wales (natch) and Scotland (tho' not for a while), never Ireland, for a number of reasons, Italy, France, Greece, Norway, not Germany, a couple of places in Europe I'm struggling to remember because I am wery tired indeedyweedy um....oh! America! Forgot that. Liked it very much. Very pleasant. Absolutely no sense of scale whatsoever. Very odd. Has "Totally Spies" on at a decent hour. Some people have invited me to live in Florence, but I think I might give it a miss for the moment - too much going on. Want to explore a bit more of own head (and indeed own bed) before striking out again.


(Lurid - interesting. It's my fault, I fear - from Batman and Robin, of course, but people on Barbelith kept talking about people who went to Oxbridge, until I started to think of it as an actual place. Like Uxbridge).

(Exp - I can see it now. "When have you been in absolutely excruciating physical or emotional pain? Describe in detail)
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
18:19 / 23.09.02
Reading, enjoying, and wishing you a happy birthday, if indeed 'twas so.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
18:21 / 23.09.02
You're honestly telling me Uxbridge is a real place?
Boy, do I feel a twat.
 
 
Eloi Tsabaoth
19:42 / 23.09.02
http://uk.maps.yahoo.com/py/lg:uk/lc:uk/maps.py?BFCat=&Pyt=Tmap&newFL=Use+Address+Below&addr=&csz=oxbridge&country=uk&Get%A0Map=Get+Map

Never actually been there. or Camford.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
20:45 / 23.09.02
Camford real too? You're shitting me.

Haus- were you to choose an ideal pub from the following, which would it be- the Green Man in Dulwich, or the Dull Man in Greenwich?

Oh, and who's harder- Alexander Pope or Pope Alexander?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:07 / 23.09.02
Trick question. There were several Pope Alexanders, of varying hardness. Alexander VI could kick Pope's ass. Or more precisely, hire somebody for same.

As for the Green Man/Dull Man controversy, I simply can't may what you sean.

I'd spooner go to the Soaring Jeleste
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:54 / 23.09.02
Now, back to our regularly scheduled programme...

How does your background impact your worldview?

Hoom. Interesting one. I'd like to be able to say that, having sprung full-grown from the forehead of Zeus (not the god, the really big bloke in the Rocky films), I have no background and ergo my non-existent background is without affect or effect.

However, I guess that's not entirely true. My father was essentially very up for me being the next step up the evolutionary ladder of la famille Tannhauser, which only made it much, much funnier when my sister turned out to be the clever one. We share a mutual lack of interest in politival or corporate power that I suspect gives him hives in unguarded moments.

Subsequently, I was raised in the wild by lesbians, which may do something to explain some of the later questions. Certainly when one of them (my sparent, to recoin a phrase) died (and you know, there's a very funny story about that), I think I wigged out somewhat.

Ahem. OK. I wigged out a lot. A lot a lot. Not by any means the wiggedest out I've ever been, but certainly a hint of wig in a bald, bald world. And perhaps that has fuelled my interest in gender and sexuality (see below), along with my morbid hatred of Christmas.

Certainly it's done wonders for my respect for Roland Barthes, just because I happened to grab a copy of Mythologies when invited by her family to take anything as a keepsake that had no measurable resale value.

Oh, you mean the public-school-and-Oxbridge-Academy stuff? Buggered if I know. If I find anyone who is exactly like me but didn't go to such an endlessly entertaining fictional university, I'll be sure to ask. I imagine ze'll have more friends who live in Fulham.
 
 
illmatic
07:43 / 24.09.02
Haus, I am reading. Even stranger, enjoying.
 
 
Bear
07:53 / 24.09.02
Everyones reading I'm sure although I have to clear something up, although I'm quite scared about correctly Haus it'll probably turn out that he's right but I don't think Zeus was ever in Rocky, No Holds Barred of Course but Rocky?

Although after checking imdb he probably was in Rocky somewhere as it seems he's been in everything.
 
 
jUne, a sunshiny month
08:04 / 24.09.02
>I was masturbating to invitations to join
>the science-fiction book club

i knew that the Haus cannot write 250 words without giving a least one real big laugh. thanks, and thanks for the rest, too. oh, and happy b, you old dirty st-Exup' fan.
 
 
No star here laces
11:05 / 24.09.02
It's noticeable that in your debating style you prefer to refute rather than propose. Is this because you don't believe in universal panaceas and overarching theories, or because it's the best way to win?
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
11:18 / 24.09.02
Reading, laughing my tits off in places, have just been fired.
Thanks Haus
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
11:26 / 24.09.02
Neither. I'm generally of the opinion that telling other people what I believe about things is not so terribly important. Or, more precisely, that what I believe about things is a proposition, as useful or useless as many, depending on your perspective, but that people tend to be pretty fond of the propositions they already have, and there need be no compelling reason for them to trade.

So, rather than just going "no, fuck you, your proposition is shit, accept *my* proposition (which is not exactly a style desperately in need of reinforcement in the world in general, much less Barbelith)", it seems better to try to get people to explore whether their proposition (even if it is shit) is valid in circumstance x, how it is valid, where its strengths and weaknesses lie, where it is falling into a fallacy that was identified millennia ago, and so on....with the aim that the theory will either be identified as fatally flawed and discarded, or that it will successfully cope with all of these possible problems and emerge as a stronger and more flexible thesis, with somebody who has actually thought it through a bit able to defend it more ably, or moderate it accordingly. It's the elenchic method, after a fashion.

When somebody is unaware of the possibility that their proposition may be other than a confection of preexistent Platonic perfection, this may certainly seem like mindless gainsaying, but "winning" is never really the point of any argument, and if it becomes relevant who "wins" it is usually a sign that the discussion has descended into petty bickering and is unlikely to change or inform anything.

Besides, I *do* propose things quite frequently, just usually as ideas to move discussions on or change their angle rather than as divine truths for the cowering masses (dear, departed GRIM was very good for that kind of thing).
 
 
No star here laces
12:06 / 24.09.02
Oooh. You do believe in universal panaceas then? Cool.
 
 
Haus about we all give each other a big lovely huggle?
12:54 / 24.09.02
I don't believe in universal panaceas. A universal panacea cures all ills. Therefore, you can't have universal panaceas.

(Although winning is an irrelevance, it's sometimes very hard not to)

I believe that people have to find their own panacea, universal (which I suspect is otiose) or otherwise. One might see life, how it is lived, as the overarching theme of any individual, just as alchemically one could represent the end of life as the event or property that ends all bodily weakness, and speaking purely for myself I don't think I'd be a very good life coach. So, I certainly believe in some things, and many of those things tie together into what for want of a better term could be called an overarching belief structure, but I'm quite open to persuasion that those beliefs are wrong or icky.
 
 
No star here laces
13:01 / 24.09.02
Oh, I see. You're just a hippy then.

(ceci n'est pas un debate)
 
 
Persephone
13:31 / 24.09.02
But what are some things that you believe in, and will you show --even sketch lightly-- how some of those things tie together?

Youth wants to know!
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
13:40 / 24.09.02
Sweetheart, nobody is *just* anything, except possibly just a simpleton; you should perhaps have worked that out by now. You may be being fooled by the alchemical language. I assumed it would make you feel more comfortable. Because "panacea" is an alchemical term. Do you see?

But yes, hippy. Possibly so. I believe in peace, love, unity and respect, much as you did before the mean streets turned you into a cold-eyed killer. However, I don't imagine that people generally have a coherent view of the world, much less the free disc space to defragment their ideas into a coherent, space-saving philosophy. So before you start advancing your world-conquering ideology, you may possibly want to try a series of simple tests to see if it is in fact utterly moronic.

Now, if we're all done, back to the questionnaire.

(Seph - Illmatic - I think there are a bunch of questions cxovering that sort of ground coming up - can I take a raincheck until later?)
 
 
illmatic
14:13 / 24.09.02
Not really all done, I'm afraid. A late question based on reading the above: Are there any beliefs systems/ideologies that you personally are committed to? Or even drawn to more than others, despite visible flaws?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:43 / 24.09.02
What was your educational focus at school?

I don't know if I really had one. A shy, lanky boy, I was unfortunately all too naturally deserved the soubriquet "Flimsy", and were it not for the discovery of a remarkable talent for cricket I -

Oh, hang on. That's Lord Peter Wimsey. Sorry.

Much of my focus at school focussed on not getting hit, at which unfortunately I was for some time not very good. As you might expect, I was the classic socially retarded bright kid who never wore shorts except under duress (or, to be fair, any other member of the Comparative Philology department) and misinterpreted his exclusion from the activities of his classmates as a sign of superiority rather than a sign of being absolutely spackulous, as it was more accurately if rather cruelly generally identified.

(Note - if you want the story about how I seduced my nanny at the age of eleven, we could do that too)

Fortunately, round about 15-17, lots of things changed which generally improved my attitude a lot. Most obviously, I befriended a young man whose interest included the comparatively rare combination of Catholic philosophy and violence, who was kind of my "Can't Buy Me Love"-style "in" to the world of the rough boys. As we moved up the ladder, I started helping people who were struggling with the school's slightly arcane teaching methods with their work. Also, I started seeing someone who, for all their many faults, did help me to loosen up somewhat. Oh, and I won my house a lot of points for various things (although of course lost fifty points for being a *fucking tease*), which actually helped matters enormously.

Which was good, because it was all getting a bit bean-steamingly intense in there, for reasons too unpleasantly medical to go into at length.

But yes - by the end of school I was a lot more integrated with my community, which was invaluable and probably taught me some basic skills that were absolute life-savers at college.

As for academic focus - well, I seemed to do pretty well at most things up at GCSE - except Chemistry. I hate chemistry. I know it's unfair and I can only apologise to any chemists in the audience. It's not even that I find it boring; things like that whole add-the-acid-to-the-marble-chips-to-make-the-gas stuff was friggin' fascinating. I just couldn't do it, and I wasn't used to failing at things at the time. Grrr. Also, all chemistry teachers smell funny, which I suspect is probably a hazard of the job.

Once GCSEs, AO-levels and that kind of thing were out of the way, working out A-levels was a bit of a challenge - the syllabus (and the fact that not enough people wanted to do Ancient Greek. Well, anyone, actually. Except me) meant that I had to drop some stuff I was interested in - humanities and arts, basically. I was probably about due to drop French, as I firmly believe that speaking foreign languages well is disrespectful to the customs of correction that have allowed nation to speak unto nation in a slightly infuriating way for millennia, but history was a bit of a blow, and I was abit hacked off that the school couldn't find the space, but not hacked off enough to make any effort. That left me with the three classical subjects, the ever-ridiculous General Studies, and English, partly to make my dear silver-bearded mother happy, partly because, hey, an A-level in reading? Just bring it...

Was that the sort of answer you were looking for?

How do you think other posters see you? Does it matter?


Well now (nb. this mannerism is an ironic nod to the fact that Avon doesn't do it nearly as much as he is commonly thought to). Some of them, for example Lurid and Stoatie tonight, see me through a pint glass, which is apparently very flattering. Others probably see me as na idiot, a boor, a buffoon, a bully, a fascist, a lapdog of those armies of dangerously equipped commissars of political correctness we see round our way all the time, or alternatively (and actually this is a bit of a chiz, because - see the "Burning Down the Haus" quezzie upstream - I do actually know at the very least how a fair few people purport or purported to see me. The common verdict seems to operate somewhere between "necesary evil" and "really nice guy when you meet him face to face". Oh, and, it seems from the questions sent in so far, very posh, very rude and very attracted to Rex=Citi-Zen. Oh, and very much possessed of l33t Hax0r sK33lS. Which is interesting.

As to the other part. It's gratifying when somebody observes that I have just said something clever or funny, or indeed that, hey, he's a funny guy, you know. (Do I amuse you? What, like a clown?) It's less gratifying when somebody gets the Haus blinkers on and decides that actually reading what I am saying is less important than embarking on some generally futile quest to score points, or indeed when people think I am taking the piss when I am not, just because I can't possibly be being sincere, what with being Haus and all. It bespeaks a profound lack of understanding of characterisation...
 
 
invisible_al
09:36 / 25.09.02
Slight change of pace

What attracted you to Fencing out of the martial arts? Are you any good?
 
  

Page: (1)23456

 
  
Add Your Reply