BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


New X-Men #135

 
  

Page: 12(3)

 
 
Matthew Fluxington
15:59 / 23.12.02
I agree that Grant should have showed us more of the backstory with these kids before thrusting them into the spotlight - I think it would have been better to compress the Fantomex storyline and have had some pages in those issues devoted to pushing those subplots along, and maybe giving more pages to the Scott/Emma subplot as well.

I think it's perfectly reasonable for a lot of those kids to be wary of having humans at the school, it's pretty likely a lot of them have had very bad experiences with humans and prefer to keep the school mutants-only, though I can't imagine why any intolerant human would choose to attend the Xavier Institute. Kneejerk reactions are pretty typical, and since these are all teenagers, it's twice as likely that some of them would have some major issues with their authority figures about the topic. It's definitely pushing it a lot to suggest that they'd suddenly be willing to murder humans, though.

Most people will agree that Xavier's got better ideas, but it's not at all unrealistic for there to be some angry kids who will be eager to embrace extreme hateful views like Quentin's regardless of the better options they may be exposed to.
 
 
Aertho
17:51 / 23.12.02
I'm not sure if other people are still doing this, but I've been comparing each of the kids to past X-Men. Isn't it odd that each group, ie The Special Class and The Omega Gang are comprised of five kids, much like the original class?

Scott Summers = Barnell Bohusk = Quentin Quire

Jean Grey = Angel = Tattoo

Henry McCoy = Ernst/Martha = Glob

Warren Worthington = Dummy = Radian

Bobby Drake = Basilisk = Redneck

Although some of the analogies are weak becasue we don't know much about some of the kids, it's still a strong point that needs to made note of. SS=BB=QQ is probably the strongest analogy... I think the adolescent romantic relationships between Beak/Angel and QQ/Tattoo are symptomatic of the adult rift between Scott/Jean.
 
 
The Falcon
01:43 / 24.12.02
The analogy might work better if you used Wolverine and Emma or Xorn for the latter two. And I see Basilisk, physically at least, as a better counterpart of Beast. I like it otherwise.

I've been thinking about these fives, too, but didn't try to shoehorn the specials in.

What does it all mean, though?
 
 
A
01:54 / 24.12.02
I just picked up a copy yesterday and i dug it quite a lot. I love how the inhaler for the hip new mutant drug looks just like an asthma inhaler. This goes along nicely with Morrison's "nerd is the new cool" thing.

Also, the bit about Kick potentially damaging the X-gene. Could it be that using Kick will result in the human-hating Quentin Quire's X-gene degrading and him becoming, for all intents and purposes, a human?

I like the bit where Quire is mocking Xavier for his Caterpillar and butterfly metaphor. It seems like Morrison taking the piss out of himself.
 
 
yawn - thing's buddy
14:06 / 24.12.02
those disappointed with the 'dumb' attitude xavier has towards drugs: drugs are not rebellious anymore, abstinence is;
we're all more bio-literate these days (well, we should be);
ignorance is not bliss;
and
perhaps xavier is talking to all you burnt out losers out there who can't get through the day without booze, grass, fags, coffee, the rest.

that bit with the whip? nasty! yknow, when qq square up and kicks into that bloke and then whips him! - fucked up that.

storytelling ability of quite one is astounding no? fuck, those scenes in the woods, the slopes, wow man wow

I will never 'get' wolverine. he just seems like a problem marvel have to put up with.

writing this on my new mercury powered magic mirror: otherwise known as a shit hot lap top

yeah baby
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
17:51 / 24.12.02
The drug thing? Drugs are bad because this is a mainstream Marvel comic and therefore intended for, if not read by, teenagers.

Therefore there are often lots of adverts about how bad drugs are (next to adverts for sugary sweets and drinks) whilst like a lot of comics by the Big Two over the last half century or so written by someone who has admitted to taking drugs.
 
 
Persephone
21:03 / 24.12.02
drugs are not rebellious anymore, abstinence is

Like the time Beak says to Angel, "Keep your beer and cigarettes -- I'm straight-edge hardcore."

"My body is a temple."

I totally loved how goofy that was.
 
 
penitentvandal
11:11 / 26.12.02
yawn - major points loss for generally coming across like a judgemental sxe kid redeemed, thankfully, by your description of Wolverine as 'a problem Marvel have to put up with'.

Drug use/abstinence = rebellion is a binary opposition, and, having read the Invisibles, we all know how silly those are. So can we say, instead, that :

drug use = drug use

and

abstinence = abstinence

and leave it at that?

Whoa there, high horse, need to climb off now...
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
11:18 / 26.12.02
Beak seems to have abandonned his straight-edge principles when tempted by the prospect of more Angel-snogging - check the panel where he's accepting a beer from her and they're about to sneak off... That makes a lot of sense, I think: when you're a teenager, you change your ideology more often than you change your socks, and double quick if there's sex (or the promise of) involved.
 
 
Persephone
11:54 / 26.12.02
Yes, that's a nice touch that feels true to me. Quentin and Beak work well as counterpoints in this regard, I think. After all, Quentin's "just going through a phase" with this new X-men business... only he may not be able to get out of this phase. And what I like about this is, it's not about Beak making good choices and Quentin making bad choices and the moral of the story is. It's almost about how circumstance rather mercilessly sorts people into their fates.

But I think that it's the Special Class, really, who are the New X-Men.
 
 
yawn - thing's buddy
18:13 / 26.12.02
vandal you should have doubled dissed me because I am clearly talking shite when I describe Wolverine as a problem for Marvel.

He's all they've got going for them.

kiddyup.
 
 
No star here laces
09:21 / 28.12.02
I take issue with a lot of the comments about QQ and the omega gang being 'disappointing' - I think the opposite. Morrison has exceeded my expectations with this, which I thought was going to be a dull retread of the magneto vs xavier argument, when it is so much more.

QQ is not supposed to be offering a rationally equivalent position to Xavier. The whole point of this character is that he should know better. He is irrationally taking out his frustrations on the world and manipulating events so that others follow him. He is aggressively targeting those weaker than himself for his own ends and to build up his own power, while at the same time manipulating the perceptions of others to make himself look like the aggrieved party and make them support him.

Sound familiar at all? Like, maybe, echoes of the Bush administration or the asylum debacle in the UK?
In the world of the New Xmen isn't Xavier the world's only superpower? I'd say the mutants have the upper hand now - everyone wants to be like them. The Umen being the most extreme example.

Of course this is not a straight analogy, hence the drugs, sex and clothing and teenage issues. But the infantilised environment of the school is a great place to show the pernicious forces of xenophobia and ego-politics at work. QQ knows how smart he is, so he wants people to respect him, dammit. And when they don't? When he's only one special kid in a school full of special kids, then he makes himself more special. This jealousy is revealed early on in his degrading of Slick.

QQ doesn't hate Xavier, he wants to be Xavier.

I think NXM is morrison really maturing as a writer because in this book he's made the jump from merely chucking interesting intellectual ideas around (as in Invisibles, Doom Patrol and The Filth) to dealing with the real interplay of emotions. Hence the new treatment of drugs - drugs are interesting on an intellectual level, but pernicious on an intellectual one. So it would make sense for the Invisibles to have a pro-drugs stance, and NXM to be anti-...

2c over.
 
 
yawn - thing's buddy
09:33 / 28.12.02
bitch: could you clarify the drugs/intellectual/pernicious comment?

yes. i agree. it's working for me. and top marks to suit who pointed out that qq is a splice of cyril the softie/pansy and dennis the menace. that is much scarier.
 
 
No star here laces
11:58 / 28.12.02
Oopsie. That should've read "drugs are interesting on an intellectual level, but pernicious on an emotional one".

In other words - it's fine if you keep it within your own head, but when you start letting the feelings drugs induce in you colour your actions (particularly towards others) then that's when trouble starts. e.g. getting in fights because you're pissed, being rude because you're coked up and thinking you're in love cos you've had a pill are all bad things, unless you recognise 'em for what they are. Which Emma does, vis a vis Kick, and QQ clearly doesn't...
 
 
Tamayyurt
14:24 / 28.12.02
can't wait for beak to go swan

Beak seems to have abandonned his straight-edge principles when tempted by the prospect of more Angel-snogging - check the panel where he's accepting a beer from her and they're about to sneak off... That makes a lot of sense, I think: when you're a teenager, you change your ideology more often than you change your socks, and double quick if there's sex (or the promise of) involved.

This has got me thinking... what would happen in Beak took Kick? He would defiantly go Swan. (or actually given the aggressiveness of the drug he would probably go Raptor!) The question is would he revert back to normal after 5 hours or keep his new look? His powers aren't energy based. At the very least he'd be able to fly on kick (no pun) and after it's over he'd still be able to do it.
 
 
Quireboy
21:39 / 03.01.03
I agree with the point about Quentin wanting to be Xavier. Wolverine describes Quentin as having a half-baked manifesto - but couldn't the same be said of Xavier? Quentin may seem like a caricature of an anarchist activist at times (though I'm sure that's deliberate) - but his rebellion is another means of exposing the dark side of Xavier's dream.

Quentin's philosophy and actions mirror Xavier's. He's doing what the professor did years ago when he formed the X-Men - developing his own mutant agenda, gathering a group of young mutants together and decking them out in weird but near identical costumes. (Note Morrison has made the X-Men's uniforms near identical, as they were originally.)

Xavier has accused Quentin of unethically influencing the minds of those around him - but he’s just as guilty of that. Consider how he dealt with the terrorists in NXM 133 - he could have telepathically sedated them but instead brainwashes them to alter their beliefs – and makes sure the Indian police won’t torture them. On the one level this seems like the act of a pacifist but really this is the X-Men operating as the though police. Quentin's actions simply take this to murderous extremes - telepathically entrapping bigoted humans.

The hijack incident also shows how Xavier is increasingly ready to intervene/meddle in affairs that have nothing to do with human/mutant relations. Preventing a massacre may be a good thing but since when has Xavier been an expert on world politics - what does he know about Kashmir?

The Riot arc really shows the wisdom of killing off Magneto - as the Institute's agenda has completely changed. Xavier is now the world's only mutant superpower, he has bases and strike teams around the world (the X-Corporation) and can monitor all of humanity through Cerebra – his own version of Eschelon.

But like the US, the X-men are struggling to deal with their growing responsibilities and new threats. US foreign/defence policy was for years based on engaging a nation state with a huge standing army (be that Russia or Iraq) and has been completely caught off guard by a terrorist network which cannot be defeated by flattening a country with airstrikes or invading it with huge numbers of ground forces. (A senior US general revealed that Pentagon strategists cheated when he took on the role of al qaida in top-level war games - they refloated battleships he sunk with small gunboats.)

As the world's only superpower the US has become used to getting other countries to play by its rules - and doesn't seem to realise that the American way (at least Bush's take on it) isn't the only way, or the right one. The same could be said of Xavier and his dream. He's out of touch with the new generation of mutants - just as Bush doesn't understand the aspirations of the developing world.

Xavier's dream is as Lilandra says in NXM 133 just 'hopes and words'. Anyone can dream of Utopia but has he come up with any practical way of achieving it other than taking in more students? His double standards are appalling - and as a result he risks being as feared by humanity as Magneto ever was. Like Bush, he's hesitant at fighting a battle with someone who has the same weapons as him - Quentin Quire's omega level telepathy here presenting the same challenge as North Korea's nuclear weapons. Note while Xavier’s happy to manipulate the minds of dangerous humans he hesitates at probing the thoughts of his students, even when he realises some of them are murderers.

So the X-Men are sitting while a bunch of killers go on the rampage under their noses. It's another way of showing how impotent Xavier's dream really is - or at least how easily it can be manipulated and twisted. Fantomex did much the same thing when claiming asylum at the X-Corporation in Paris. This is rather ironic considering that with Magneto dead Xavier's never been more powerful in terms of exposure, influence and popularity.

Fantomex has also shown how more complex Xavier's role is now - he could have avoided taking in a criminal by telling him to seek sanctuary with Magneto before. Are the X-Men vigilantes, a mutant pressure group, a multinational franchise, a peacekeeping force, or a government?

This leads on to one explanation of why Quentin’s gang are portrayed as drug users. It shows how the X-Men’s responsibilities have radically altered - they're not just about protecting mutants from humans, or protecting the world from evil mutants, but now have to deal with the consequences of social problems like drug abuse. In dealing with Cassandra the X-Men rejected handing her over to the human authorities but they have not come up with an alternative system to deal with violent and disturbed pupils.

The X-Men’s new responsibilities also raise questions about their fitness as leaders. It's one thing to have a murderer (Emma) and an assassin (Wolverine) on your team when your actions are limited to defending mutants from attack, but when you start acting as the political representatives for mutantkind it's a liability – consider the criticism that has dogged Sinn Fein in Northern Ireland whose leaders include former terrorists. But Gerry Adams doesn’t have the luxury of being able to erase people’s memories if one of his colleagues publicly attacks someone – as Jean does when Emma messes with the mind of one of the journalists during the telepathic press conference in the Imperial arc.

This again shows how Xavier's dream has become more aggressive. During Claremont’s first run when it was repeatedly pointed out that he considered such telepathic manipulation unethical. In the Dark Phoenix saga Scott and Storm were worried that Jean was turning evil when she mindwipped Kitty's father but her recent actions and those of the two other telepaths have gone unquestioned by their colleagues. We even have Emma teaching the students to probe the minds of celebrities to uncover their secrets – titillating, and a comment on our obsession with celebrity culture, but highly unethical.

Rather than redefining his dream, Xavier seems to be letting others redefine it for him – whether that’s Emma or Quentin. He even sees Cassandra’s actions as a terrible means to a good end. The outcome of the Riot seems certain to push Xavier towards a more Hawkish stance – the next arc is Assault on Weapon Plus.
The other main impact will be to expose the generational clash between the X-Men and their students. The original team could be regarded as first generation immigrants keen to integrate with a society that fears and ostracises them. But the second or third generation has lost patience with the ways of their parents - they demand respect and establish their own ghettos (mutant town).

This is perhaps another reason for introducing the kick – or should that be crack – plotline. How many drug dealers and gangsters from ethnic minorities have excused their actions by arguing that it’s the best way for them to gain wealth and respect in a society that affords them few opportunities? Similarly mutants are still ostracised so why not take a drug that makes you far more powerful rather than studying to use your powers for the good of all humanity?

The other point here is who developed this drug. Consider how black activists have claimed that the US government flooded their communities with drugs to destroy them. What better way for humans to justify cracking down on mutant emancipation than to flood their communities with drugs that turn them into murderers.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
22:05 / 03.01.03
Excellent post, and an excellent fictionsuit name.

Thanks for mentioning this:

In dealing with Cassandra the X-Men rejected handing her over to the human authorities but they have not come up with an alternative system to deal with violent and disturbed pupils.

I've been meaning to bring this up for a while - there's been talk of "mutant justice" since the beginning of New X-Men, but what could that mean? It is so vague and nebulous - what could possibly be the distinction between justice and "mutant justice", other than the possible justification of using mutant gifts in ways that people who do not have those gifts would object to? Any guesses, theories?
 
 
LDones
07:25 / 04.01.03
Tremendous points, Quireboy.
The overtly political overtones of the 'E is For Extinction' arc had slightly faded out of my mind, largely because I don't know that it was intended as such at the time; but your post makes me think of the entire run in a new perspective. It's thought provoking. So thanks.

It's a very peculiar place to be, running metaphorical parallels between Professor X and the President of the United States.

I wonder if the U-Men are behind the 'Kick'...
 
 
A
09:07 / 04.01.03
Yeah, I considered the possibility of a U-Men/Kick connection, but it seems to me that it would be odd for the U-Men, who are all about turning humans into mutants, would be behind a drug which possibly degrades the mutant X-gene, ie. quite possibly turns mutants into humans. Still, we're bound to find out more about Kick, so maybe it's possible.
 
 
Quireboy
09:54 / 04.01.03
Returning to the Bush administration analogy, there is a similar struggle going on between hawks and doves within the Xavier Institute. Phoenix taking a similar stance to Colin Powell while Quire represents the hawkish stance of Donald Rumsfeld. The outcome of this struggle may well decide whether Xavier decides to act like Clinton or Bush.

On another level, Morrison seems to be establishing Phoenix and Quentin as contrasting characters - they are both Omega level psis and represent the ideological differences between the first and second generation of mutants. Jean, like Quentin before his rebellion, was Xavier's prize pupil and has throughout New X-Men been the staunchest defender of his dream of harmony between mutants and the rest of humanity - she tells Emma in E is for Extinction that Xavier's way is now the only way. Quentin has rejected this - and how Xavier deals with that may well lead to conflict between him and Jean.

Morrison has repeatedly stated that he sees Jean as the pacifist of the team. Despite her loyalty to Xavier, she has expressed misgivings about some of his decisions and opinions. In NXM 128 she clearly feels his confidence in Emma is misplaced - and also warns him that he's beginning to sound like Cassandra Nova after he declares they have no more need of human rules. At the end of the New Worlds arc, she also lets Fantomex escape when it seems likely that Xavier would want to further question him. The seeds of doubt are already in her mind, so consider how she might react if Xavier - in light of the riot - adopts a more hawkish stance in order to integrate the more strident students, e.g. attacking Weapon Plus. (Although that may be a direct result of finding out who is stalking the special class and has created Kick.)

The other aspect of the relationship between Jean and Xavier is the (re-)emergence of the Phoenix. Morrison has stated that there will be a Phoenix storyline ending with NXM 150, possibly his final issue. The Phoenix aspect of Jean has already shown Xavier a vision where the X-men appear to be dead and the Institute is ablaze (NXM 128). Since then the Shi'ar have warned Xavier that the Phoenix has hatched and she is merciless (NXM 133). Akari warns that mutantkind has shown "toxic levels of agression" - surely a reference to Quentin's Kick-addicted gang - and that nature itself has chosen to deal with them. He then implies that Phoenix is this force of nature and she will "disinfect" mutantkind. Going back to the vision in NXM 128 this suggests that Jean is forced to use her powers to take out students on Kick.

There's been a lot of criticism of Morrison for rehashing the Phoenix force but he seems to be portaying it as a cosmic force (like that in Star Wars) that only the most powerful telkinetics - and maybe telepaths - can tap into, rather than a secondary mutation or something that has possessed Jean. As it's been mentioned that Quentin may be experiencing secondary mutation maybe he develops telekenisis and access to the Phoenix force, so the final arc of the book is a battle between him and Jean for control of it - and the ideology of the Institute. Another possibility is that Xavier begins to see Jean as a threat to his dream and decides to take her out.

I'm not familiar with all of Morrison's work and philosophical influences but the Phoenix plotline seems to continue his interest in humanity being shaped by cosmic forces (whatever they represent). From flicking through the Invisibles that certainly seems to be one aspect of the storyline and I rememeber an interview where he said that this was something he planned to develop on the old Zoids comic, where the robots and humans were merely pawns in some inter-dimensional game between some higher intelligence.

Now on New X-Men, we have Xavier wondering whether humanity is "just biomass manipulated by an intelligent evolutionary process itself" - and two opposed forces of nature, Cassandra, the anti-life mummudrai, and the Phoenix, which has traditionally been represented as a force or creation and rebirth.
 
 
LDones
00:25 / 05.01.03
To address Flux's question about 'mutant justice', I think that's a statement about implementing justice through 'higher understanding', presumably along the same lines as Xavier's moves in the airplane in NXM 133 - although, to be fair, I think it's also taken (by the characters) to suggest the more pacifist stance/credo the X-Men have taken on - solving problems without violence, by working to achieve a higher understanding on all ends. Though I think every in-continuity example of it so far can come off as rather fascist - but then again, that may be backwards thinking on my end.

I'm very curious to see how the philosophy behind Morrison's run on NXM ends up playing out. Is Quire the enemy, his questioning of ideals working against mental evolution and understanding, or is he a valid part of the system, part of a sequence of checks & balances built in to counter imperious patterns in the development of consciousness. I dunno, but I'm eager to see. :P
 
 
A
12:05 / 05.01.03
Something I dug in this issue, and have forgotten to mention until now, is that Xavier does not condemn the use of Kick on any kind of moral level, he only warns the students that it may be physically dangerous (and he seems to be basing this on actual information that indicates this, rather than government anti-drug propaganda). Note how he says "I'm not going to tell anyone what to do", or something quite similar (i don't have a copy in front of me). Then, Emma reveals that she has tried Kick in the interests of research.

I like that Xavier and his organisation do not subscribe to a simplistic anti-drug philosophy like all of us are supposed to. It may not seem like much to folks around here, but having characters that actually think rationaly about illegal drugs in a mainstream, PG rated comic seems like a pretty freakin' cool thing to me.

The idea of a school headmaster who isn't moronically anti-drugs also ties into the whole idea of mutant culture and justice and suchlike being quite different to that of us outmoded humans.
 
  

Page: 12(3)

 
  
Add Your Reply