BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Ierne's Blind Date

 
  

Page: (1)234

 
 
Ierne
13:13 / 12.04.02
Since the Policy seems to be the place to discuss "problems with trolling," I've decided to post this here instead of the Conversation.

It's occured to me that modthree is correct in that I have been the only person courageous/foolish enough to openly and publicly confront him on his behavior. Understandably, if no-one's telling him what an asshole he's being, how is he possibly supposed to know, let alone have a chance to modify said behavior?

However, a great many people have told me what they think of modthree, his behavior in general and his treatment of me in particular. This has been done mostly through Private Messaging; because of the clandestine nature of the medium, it is rather difficult to express the panoply of feedback without compromising the privacy of those providing the feedback.

Ever so often in the Village Voice, gossip columnist Michael Musto offers up an entire column of "blind items" – scandalous tidbits of information on various celebrities with nary a name mentioned. he calls it "Blind Date," and it is up to the reader to figure out who Musto is talking about. I realized that by using a similar method I can not only make clear to the populace of Barbelith that I am not the only person who feels modthree is a detriment to the board, but perhaps I can also allow modthree a certain awareness of where he stands, an perspective he clearly does not have and badly needs.

The following quotes are from genuine PMs that I have received on the subject of modthree. (It is a small sampling of the feedback I've received.) Each one is dated and timed according to when it showed up in my profile. I've tried to be roughly chronological, spanning from late February 2002 to early April. And I have no intention of naming any names – I will only say that these are all people who post to the Magick Forum.

Modthree has a fragile ego and seems very insecure intellectually. He compensates by making bold, aggressive assertions and undermining others. I've seen him try to intimidate others with his "knowledge" and then play victim when challenged. – 3/21/02 4:45 PM

I'm sorry you've taken as much shit as you have over that mess. Unfortunately, I think that a lot of people think those who are 'enlightened' should sound mysterious and inscrutable. If you can't understand them they must know more than you. Self-esteem issues anyone? – 3/1/02 11:46 PM

obfusciation is intoxicating but it has a short shelf life, whereas you'll always have something to offer – sound ideas, expressed in a clear, intelligible way. Some people round here appreciate that. – 2/26/02 8:29 PM

The fucker's got his agenda again and he's hell bent to make his views accepted. It's not very surprising to see that the things he's advocating are so damn similar to the same thing he tried to cram down people's throat in the Dizzy thread. – 3/16/02 9:37 AM

As for modthree, I allow myself one systematic deconstruction of his flimsy positions per thread, then I drop the subject...Sadly, I think mod may be one of those college-student types who doesn't really know the valuative difference in an argument between an emotionally-charged opinion and the varying degrees of "fact," "precedent," "authoritative reference" etc. that actually adds weight to an argument. – 3/19/02 4:32 PM

...he's not going to impress anybody with the kind of comments we've seen lately... – 3/18/02 4:06 PM

I wanted to share your fustration over mod's admitted trolling ("No I didn't admit it I said it was POSSIBLE" = "I've got a plank. Just KIDDING") – 3/27/02 4:29 PM

I notice there are still problems with modthree. I still find his jargon-heavy, obscure posting style irritating. Just like you, I don't get how he can essentially admit to being a troll and think this is a good thing. (I say essentially, because I reckon he thinks it's ironic.) I'd advise steering clear of him...all he does is throw abuse at you while accusing you of using ad hominem arguments. Odd, considering that he never addresses what you say but who you are. He has a *thing* about you. – 3/31/02 8:38 AM

This was the most interesting PM I recieved during this period:

I am sorry to hear you getting grief from some of the members. Especially since i think it is possibly in defense of a poster I am subject to in real life...so I *know* exactly what they are defending.
In other words, don't let it get to you, they are NOT worth it, you have just seen through it early enough not to get burned to the extent othwers are sure to in time. You will not be the one to look foolish in the end.
The smoke and shadow routines are just that, smoke and shadow...I have been shocked to see first hand the persnality change some people attempt to portray on the internet. – 3/16/02 12:23 PM


I really hope this helps, because I really want him to leave me alone.
 
 
bitchiekittie
13:22 / 12.04.02
geez, if I put half of the stuff people had PMed me, also unsolicited, about other posters on here...
 
 
SMS
14:20 / 12.04.02
I'm starting to hate it here.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
14:31 / 12.04.02
Ierne, you really need to point towards the threads where this supposed harassment has taken place, 'cause I'm sure I'm not the only one here who doesn't frequent Magic and therefore has absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

Some of those PMs have left a nasty taste in my mouth.
 
 
cusm
14:58 / 12.04.02
I had rather the impression he was being offensive in a discordian sense rather than a personal one. Though granted, it takes a lot to get me personally offended, so I'll tend to take things by a lighter assumption by default.
 
 
The Monkey
15:47 / 12.04.02
Okay, I'm going to end up playing mugwump on this issue.

First of all, I'm a person who has tossed off an irritable PM or two about mod's behavior in the Magick. One of the "Blind Date" quotes is mine, and it was written at a moment of great irritation, oddly enough, not at mod's treatment of me, but rather his discussion across various threads with Lurid Archive and Ierne, etc., and his use of passive aggression and imperious tone. It was, however, a response to a warning about not "getting into it" with mod, rather than an unsolicited opinion. And even though they were heat of the moment, my vitriol were generally grounded in the fact that I have no general problem with mod beyond his participation in certain threads in The Magick.

In spite of his occasional self-nomenclature as a troll, I really don't think mod fits the bill, per se. His moments of snarkiness are really no greater than other posters' on this board when their belief systems are poked to a sufficient degree, although I must admit his tendency to frame them in terms of passive-aggressive condescension rather than aggressive-agressive contention (favored by most posters) do get my teeth on edge.

What characterizes trolling in my mind is a conscious intent to disrupt, and I really don't think that mod is trying to derail threads or simply bug people. Mod presents a very strong set of beliefs in...something...and I can't short him for that. Yes, I personally think his argument style is non-commnicative, and often freely plays with the boundary of fact-belief within the rhetorical structures. But this constitutes for me a reason to pick my battles if I want to contest a claim, and to sometimes back away when it's clear that there will be no engagement upon an intellectual level.
 
 
Ganesh
16:07 / 12.04.02
"Don't be so snippy, Tony - I'm going as fast as I can!"

(Tossing off an irritable PM. Sorry. And sorry for the rot.)
 
 
SMS
23:26 / 12.04.02
I really hope this helps, because I really want him to leave me alone

I don't think we should point out to the entire board all instances in which Mod has said something we didn't like. Or any of them, for that matter. This would be necessary if Ierne were requesting xe be given an official warning. But I'm not sure that's exactly what anybody wants. It seems something like a personal matter between Mod and maybe a few other board members, specifically Ierne. Perhaps the two of you can just agree here to sort of ignore each other? Does Mod even know this thread exists?
 
 
Persephone
23:52 / 12.04.02
This is the most horrid thing I have seen on Barbelith to date.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
00:39 / 13.04.02
Rgghh. I'm writing this with a very, very heavy heart.

I've been trying not to get too involved with this whole thing, because I didn't feel it was fair. But I'm starting to get really fucked off with the general hostility on the board as a whole and with this in particular.

First off: m3 is nowhere near as bad as Knodge- that's a rather sickening comparison. Knodge was a deliberate and vicious troll, who I recently discovered had a history of similar behavior dating back at least to 1998 (including poems about "panzies" and threats to kill another poster and his entire family). m3 has been very provoking on occasion, but ze's just not that unpleasant.

However, I've found that the style ze's adopted, with its deliberate barriers to ready communication, to be a pain. It makes discussion difficult, and it's intimidating. Maybe that's just me, maybe I ought to work harder at understanding, but I get very suspicious of a person's motives if I feel they are clouding their arguments in obscure language and jargon. And there's quite a few non-native English speakers on the board- is it really appropriate to make communicating harder?

I felt that during the dizZy scuffle, m3 could have worked harder to patch things up with Ierne. When you touch a raw nerve that way, you stop poking- you don't keep on and then blame the other person's oversensitivity.

And yes, m3 does tend to drag the same names up a lot, often in threads where the relevance of mentioning a particular poster is questionable to say the least. Ze also (and I feel bad saying this, but I think it's true) tends to go for ad hominem arguments that rely on stereotyping the poster.

Please, m3, don't take all this too hard. It's meant to be freindly, constructive criticism- I hope you'd do the same for me under similar circumstances. Understand that Ierne feels angry and hurt here, and try to find a resolution.


Fuck. I'm starting to hate it here too.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
00:50 / 13.04.02
(Written and posted before I read the bullshit above.)
 
 
Lurid Archive
01:38 / 13.04.02
No prizes for guessing that I am responsible for one of Ierne's quotes. OK, two.

I've found interacting with him frustrating from day one and though I was genuinely interested in exchanging views and opinions I have to regretfully concede that he has no interest in any realistic communication with me. He and his friends will disagree, but I thought that he treated me shabbily when I arrived and despite my attempts to subsequently engage I think he evidences an insulting disdain for dialogue. (Actually, I've probably "fed" him by trying to make some contact with him.)

This is due to all the things people have mentioned - I could talk about his style and intellectually flimsy tactics, but I think we all know what we mean. I've also seen him treat others with disrespect and with outright abuse in the case of Ierne.

That said, I agree with Monkey that he isn't really a troll - more someone who has been seduced by some intellectually (and perhaps morally) bankrupt notions. And there are those here who do think he has valuable contributions to make. I'm very sorry that people like Persephone see this as some sort of witch hunt. It is telling that the posters who support Mod3 display none of the behaviour that I and others find so irritating - insults aside, its not what he says but how he says it, on the whole.

Why bother saying this?

Well I hope that you understand, Ierne, that I've been PM'ing my comments up to now in an effort to build some bridges with mod. Its now time to come clean, to say what I think and support you publicly.
 
 
Tezcatlipoca
07:49 / 13.04.02
I too would like to post a few things that people have said to me about you in the private messages I have received

Could those "quotes" be less convincing?
 
 
The artful Knodger
09:42 / 13.04.02
Okay, they were made up. Don't take any offense Irene - I don't even know you, and I hardly ever visit the Magick forum, so I know even less about your battle with Mod.

This post however, found in policy, where I've been visiting the most lately, could easily colour mine and several peoples opinions of Mod. especially if they were new here or didn't know much about him. The anonymity of the messages only loads them with more bite, not less, IMO. Three things spring to mind:

A) Was there a possibility that you could have taken this up with him privately?

B) Private messages are meant to be private aren't they? What one person tells you about someone might not necessarily be what they would want the person they are talking about to hear. Did you ask these people for permission to post their private thoughts?

C) We are in dangerous territory here. In order to protect your sources you are arguably dodging accountability, and this is a dangerous precedent to set, as I have demonstrated above. Who's to say you didn't slip a more offensive quote in your post that didn't really get sent you? And how can you prove that the quote came from
a now deleted email or someone who will not give you permission to quote them? (That being if you didn't get permission in the first place). Is the quote taken out of context?

I am a bit biased here obviously, as Mod has stuck up for me in the past, the stupid fool.

Sign of the times or what? Someone said the board was getting more like real life every day - higher security, exclusion, lack of accountability to condemn someone, inner councils that are unquestionable.

Is this a bad thing do you think?
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
18:49 / 13.04.02
I so need a 'previously on Barbelith' right about now...
 
 
Tom Coates
19:12 / 13.04.02
I'm entirely not comfortable with this thread, and I'm not sure that it's a particularly well-advised way of approaching these issues. I consider it unfair to quote people's private messages without their permission on the board unless they've behaved towards you very unpleasantly - it's up to individuals to make known their opinions publically should they wish to. I can't help feeling that you may very well be justified in your frustrations, but that the public airing the written-in-anger gripes of a few members is a bit innappropriate. But I suggest we put this behind us for the moment and see what happens.

I do (despite everything else) think that there is a legitimate case here for having a way to expel people from the board permanently based on individuals' complaints (rather than having to do something like this public display). Perhaps if thirty people were prepared anonymously to declare that they would like someone expelled then they would be? Or that a 'voting action' could be sent to every single member of the board to vote on within a 24 hour period - and that if more than twice as many people during that time voted for expulsion as didn't then they were removed? Or something like that? The only reason I think this is because I am of the opinion that people don't feel so impotent when they have done something - and more to the point they also feel less like nothing has been done even if the popular vote goes against them...

Just thinking out loud again...
 
 
Lurid Archive
05:05 / 14.04.02
I know what you mean, Tom, but I suspect that Ierne has felt that she was the brunt of some unpleasantness and that are those on the board who supported her in these exchanges privately but not publicly.

But lets be honest, no one is calling for mod's expulsion and in fact I'd agree with monkey that mod is alright outside a couple of forums. Even in these forums, he can make valid contributions.

However, if a person has issues with another poster which they feel are shared with other board members, then perhaps it is legitimate to make this known? Maybe PM's would have been more tactful, but I imagine that Ierne needs to feel less isolated.

This isn't random abuse and is probably due to a feeling of powerlessness as Tom says. But, optimistically, I feel that there should be a positive outcome to all of this. Maybe the Italian in me believes in a bit of shouting to clear the air.

So, while I understand concerns about this thread I think we shouldn't overstate the level of inappropriateness.
 
 
Wrecks City-Zen
05:21 / 14.04.02
This is so surreal.

Knodge becoming the voice of reason on how to deal with trolls?

(Pause for nostalgia...)

Mordant, you have truly earned my respect throughout the past few months.( I'm sure you know what I am talking about ) that last post topped it for me.I wish you could have seen this place before...

So this is what the end of the 60's felt like.

(In 1973...)
 
 
Ganesh
07:08 / 14.04.02
Lurid: I agree that a spot of online shouting can a) clear the air, and b) make the slightled individual feel more empowered. Only problem is, when dealing with certain types of personality (the 'any attention is good attention' attitude of the cast-iron troll), shouting about the problem can escalate rather than dispel it.

I don't know enough about the individual(s) concerned to guess whether that's the case here. I'd hope not.
 
 
Lurid Archive
10:08 / 14.04.02
mod3 is by no stretch of the imagination a cast iron troll. I've exchanged lots of posts with him and while I don't think I know him very well at all, I don't think he is after straight attention.

Actually I've always thought that he can, on occasion, be pretty reasonable and fairly likeable - its one of the most frustrating things about arguing with him.
 
 
Tom Coates
10:34 / 14.04.02
Ok. I'm going to suggest we relax and step back from this one. I'm going to suggest that all parties in this particular exchange examine their own motives and try and legitimately think of ways in which further unnecessary conflict can be avoided. Blame is not entirely relevant. Being able to do and talk about the things you want is.
 
 
Ganesh
14:25 / 14.04.02
*considers pronouncing it 'Tohm Coates' in honour of Colon Powell...*
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
14:53 / 15.04.02
I just got back from a trip yesterday and honestly, this thread is the first thread to keep me awake at night. I'm also a contributor to Ierne's blind date quotes and I think I have a slightly different opinion on his actions in the contentious threads.

I don't think he's a troll. I don't think that the role his suit is playing is that of a troll. I do think it is similar though to certain tribal concepts of the individual who subtly pushes and disrupts the community (in this case the posters of the Magick forum and participants of spin off threads in other forums) in an attempt to gain 'power' in the wake of such discord.

Usually, the success of such tactics is based upon the members of the affected community NOT confronting him because to do so would be to commit taboo 'crimes' - such as the perceived taboo of not posting private messages publically or to not call someone on their bullshit directly because we believe that people should be allowed their voices. These 'taboos' are there for very good reasons and it is only when an individual uses these taboos against the community that they become a hindrance. (i.e., I'm NOT saying that we should air all our private stuff or censor anyone's personal viewpoints/beliefs/etc.) Success is also dictated by creating 'sides' where the disruptor has allies on one side and plays the victim against the other side, creating more discord within the community.

I admit I could be very wrong but the 'mod' has never dispelled that notion in either his public or private posts to me and as a matter of fact his one PM to me has strengthened my belief in this.

What made me stay up a good amount of the night was in deciding, why I feel I should state this in this thread. I'm not advocating kicking Modthree out or advocating a 'public stoning' I'm finding that ignoring his annoying non-communicative techniques to be effective if not also very frustrating as I spend more time trying to navigate his attacks than actually participating. At least he hasn't used the same derogatory names against me that he has Ierne and Mordant Carnival which I found to be borderline misogynistic and offensive.

I'm posting because Ierne has had to take the brunt of his attacks alone for the most part and I think this is wrong and also because there have been some perceived changes in the Magick forum.

Before the DiZzy fiasco, the Magick was one of the forums that most people on Barbelith considered to be friendly, accepting, non-incendiary, etc. Since DiZzy, and the other 'mod' threads there have been more sniping, side taking, frustration, and a shying away from sharing ideas. It's curious that none of the people involved have had any problems before that, while there have been disagreements and differences of opinion, no one got bent out of shape like that. The only common element has been Modthree's confused style of posting.

If I'm right, usually publically bringing attention to the tactics is the only way to diffuse the situation. If I'm wrong then I'm just another arrogant poster who has been pissed off and is contributing to more discord.

If it's the latter I deeply apologize. But I don't think it is.
 
 
Ierne
17:22 / 15.04.02
I am heartened to see the diversity of responses to this thread. I put a great deal of thought into whether or not it was the right thing to do, and was/am very aware of the risks involved.

The purpose was NEVER to "out" anyone or breach the confidentiality of the Private Message service that Barbelith provides. The reason I started this thread is because I was sick and tired of people in the Magick Forum telling me how they felt about modthree instead of telling him. Lothar is absolutely correct when he says:

it is similar though to certain tribal concepts of the individual who subtly pushes and disrupts the community (in this case the posters of the Magick forum and participants of spin off threads in other forums) in an attempt to gain 'power' in the wake of such discord. Usually, the success of such tactics is based upon the members of the affected community NOT confronting him because to do so would be to commit taboo 'crimes' - such as the perceived taboo of not posting private messages publically or to not call someone on their bullshit directly because we believe that people should be allowed their voices...Before the DiZzy fiasco, the Magick was one of the forums that most people on Barbelith considered to be friendly, accepting, non-incendiary, etc. Since DiZzy, and the other 'mod' threads there have been more sniping, side taking, frustration, and a shying away from sharing ideas.

I was also very irritated at constantly being told by Magick posters to "rise above him" or not to "sink to his level" – this feeds into the very concept of duality that started the entire mess. I am not "better" or "worse" than modthree. His behavior towards others IS a problem, however, and the way most people were dealing with it was by sticking their collective heads in the sand and hoping he would go away. Which wasn't working.

As to whether or not I or anyone else on this board thinks modthree is a troll: I won't go so far as to say it's irrelevant – how each of us percieves him is relevant, and obviously he's nowhere near as irritating as Andrew. However, it is important to keep in mind that modthree has claimed that title for himself. He used the term to describe his actions on this board in two different threads: the original "Sci, Rat, Emp..." thread in the Headshop which never made it onto the new board, and a thread on tattoos in the Magick. If he thinks he's a troll, and behaves accordingly, how does the Magick as a whole (or Barbelith as a whole) handle it? How does our perception of him as "nowhere near as irritating as Andrew" help or hinder our ability to deal with modthree's behavior?

I am in accord with both Lothar and Lurid Archive in that there is no desire to see modthree banned from the board. Despite modthree's petty commentary that I would "love to see him die" or "like to give him a good kicking," I feel he has the right to express his opinions. I don't think he has the right to abuse me, Lothar, Mordant or anyone else on this board in order to express those opinions, and I strongly feel that if someone takes the time to ask him for clarification, he should have the courtesy and commitment to his own opinions to clarify them, thereby enhancing communication and actually contributing to the board.

Thanks again for the feedback, everyone.
 
 
enough
00:29 / 16.04.02
I feel so dirty...

I wish to go on record as stating I detest the idea of someone compiling personal messages in order to use them as a form of evidence against another 'lither.
We can usually identify who is who just by the "type". Who know what comments were used to solicit these responses?
Sorry Ierne, I understand what you are trying to achieve by this excercise, but your tactics are questionable.I hope we can end all of this, because this finger pointing and name calling for the past few months are really having an effect on the board. To blame the diZzy thread as part of the demise...please.

All that did was confuse me, not incite anger.

RIDE THE SNAKE
 
 
The Natural Way
09:01 / 16.04.02
He is not a troll. He has a bit of a weak ego and claims things of himself, but his actions just aren't trollish. The guy has an agenda above and beyond just being irritating, that's obvious. Isn't it? I don't think his posts are deliberately obscure/confusing/etc, just that his communication skills need honing and, perhaps, his position/arguments need to be thought through a little better.
 
 
Bear
09:11 / 16.04.02
I'm shocked by the whole private message thing, I hardly ever use it and its making me paranoid do people do this alot, discuss what people have posted behind closed doors?

I'm paranoid enough as it is without thinking that people are laughing at me behind my back...
 
 
w1rebaby
09:11 / 16.04.02
If this is not an attempt to get m3 banned, is it to let m3 know what people think of him, an attempt to "shame" him into what you consider better behaviour, or an appeal to your PMers not to bitch about him to you but to go to the source?

The latter is the only reasonable motive I would accept. The first is a private matter and the second just gossip.

Regardless of whether m3 claims to be a troll, s/he is not behaving like one, which is what matters.
 
 
Papess
13:52 / 16.04.02
If no one else will say it, I will.

This is pathetic behavior. You slam people all the time Ierne and whine when they get fed up and slam you back. You bring these problems on yourself Ierne. Stop slammimg others and maybe you will not be slammed.

This is nothing more than a smear campaign and I think you have crossed the line of appropriate behavior here at Barbelith. I think YOU are the one with an agenda Ierne. You harass people until they defend themselves and then point a finger at them, complaining that they are rude and abusive.

When you attacked my post I tried to respond to you in a kind and friendly manner and you responded back to me with more insults. Then I got upset. I sent you another message that clearly showed my irritation with you. I KNOW that you have shown that pissed off PM to others. Why did you not show the kind PM too? Because you have an agenda! I hope you do not respond to this with the ole "You're taking this too personally" crap. It IS personal when someone literally bashes your beliefs or character!

BTW, people have sent me PMs about YOU before. Maybe I should have posted them! How would you like it?!

Sorry this is so harsh but you complained about my Pollyanna style before in contrast with my ONE pissed off PM. So, I figured you would prefer I say all I had too right in front of others. I have nothing to loose here, your harassing ME has left me little recourse but to stop posting as you did not encourage friendly conversation and anywhere I went to post, there you were with an antagonistic attitude, pushing buttons. I guess that is what you wanted. Congrats! Maybe m3 will stop posting here too if you are successful in your smear campaign!

Just appalled!

~May Tricks
 
 
Ierne
14:24 / 16.04.02
Actually May, I haven't shown the private messages you sent me to other people. Considering the immense effort you've made to start up a cyber-coven of your own named after Barbelith, I felt you would be very embarrassed by them. Instead, I confronted you directly concerning them in the Magick Forum, and put you on my ignore list so as to no longer receive PMs from you. Thankfully, you have stopped sending them, and I am satisfied with that.

I have also made it a point not to interact with you, since you clearly cannot accept or appreciate my points of view on various subjects pertaining to Magick, or handle criticism in any way, shape or form.

You aren't doing yourself or MOB any favors by using this thread to express your personal angst with me; however, it does show those people who might consider joining your coven exactly what they might be dealing with if they cross you.
 
 
Ierne
14:29 / 16.04.02
Also, I would like to make clear that I do understand the concerns people have concerning the method used in this thread. I repeat that my intention was not to break anyone's confidentiality, but to make clear that there was a situation that needed to be adressed. Just because someone is not causing you problems does not mean that there is no problem.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:07 / 16.04.02
It's a ticklish subject...I felt rather trepidational about mentioning emails and private messages I received at various times, including on the "Let's have a gratuitous fight scene! To me, my ninjas!" thread. Although it turns out that I was misremembering and that was in fact part of a thread, so never mind that.

On the other hand, the "privacy" of private messaging is a complex issue. OTOH, they are "private" in the sense that they are a narrowband communication between two people. But, for example, if somebody is sending me abusive Private Messages unsolicited, am I obliged to respect their "privateness"?

In this particular instance, it may have been best to have obtained consent from the senders of the PMs to have their words used anonymously, or to have broadcast mod3's PMs, which are part of the complaint as I understand it, but her intention certainly does not seem to be to "out" those who have PMed her, but rather to demonstrate that there is a group of people who believe Mod3 is misbehaving, and advocate a more direct solution than complaining to her, as sh is but one.

Perhaps this is one of those areas where the ignore button, judiciously applied across those posters, might have avoided the problem.

By the way, who is Michael Musto?
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
15:12 / 16.04.02
Michael Musto
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:17 / 16.04.02
So he's *just* a gossip columnist...what a funny profession.
 
 
Papess
16:03 / 16.04.02
It is not MY cyber-coven. It belongs to everyone who has joined. I would certainly not be embarrassed by the PMs I sent you if the whole truth was presented.

I still believe that this is unfair and nothing but a smear campaign on your part. So, this is how YOU handle things when you are crossed? Not exactly an outstanding example of conflict resolution IMO. The fact remains that you have broken confidentiallity whether it is your intention or not.

m3's actions are not worthy of such an obvious attempt to boot him. The problem of not understanding him because he obfuscates is not an issue. So what if he is presenting himself as a "know-it-all" in your opinion. These are hardly worthy of such blatantly malicious tactics.

You only began to attack my posts after MOB was formed. I am not surprised you mentioned it here. To smear MOB and myself on your agenda too? Please Ierne, this is petty, petty behavior. I do not hinge my self-worth on what you think of me or how much power I weild here at Barbelith.

~May Tricks
 
  

Page: (1)234

 
  
Add Your Reply