|
|
Oh, and you understand incorrectly, by the way, Beef. I did not ask Deadsy to do anything. I merely expresed my confidence that he would offer extensive and worthwhile substantiation of his claims, because of the faith I have in him.
Perhaps he could do it in this thread, here. It's an interesting thread, if only as it shows just how much time and attention we were prepared to spend on interpersonal arguments a year ago, and it contains, quite early on, some useful and relevant statements. From the departed Ganesh:
The word "bullying" is, I think, already too emotive and charged with assumption to frame constructive discussion. Also, the discussion itself would seem to cover old ground; the concepts of bullying/dogpiling/tag-teaming are regularly picked over in Policy, and I'm unsure whether there's anything new to be brought to discussion.
And from Zippid:
I also think that DM does a certain manipulative thing where when things are relatively quiet, he mentions people he's had disagreements with, as if to goad them to respond— maybe he's looking for approval for "doing right" now, or maybe he wants to provoke them. Either way, that's not a very useful practice either.
This appears to provide quite an accurate description of what just happened. |
|
|