I think shows like this tend to encourage, for reasons recently discussed in the Lost US thread, a level of analysis that may be a little problematic. I've long been of the opinion that fairly straightforward things tend to get overcomplicated as fans build in the levels of complexity they expect or want from other areas of the text. This is encouraged by the dialogue between creators and fans, easter eggs, creator podcasts, ARGs, and the nature of online fan communities. Imo, a fairly common and very understandable attribution error (something I've definitely been known to do) is to mistake problems with the writing - dialogue, plot, characterisation - for stuff that clues us in on future plot, character or mythology developments. Now, I'm not saying that is what you're doing Whiskey, as I don't know the details of the case you're making, but I suspect you might be.
That said, God forbid I should try and stifle speculation. The speculation aspect is one of the things that I love most about shows like Heroes, and I completely agree: speculation isn't necessarily simply about what we think will happen, it's often about what we think aught to happen. |