BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


BRICK OUTHOUSE: A Jack Reacher novel

 
  

Page: 123(4)56

 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
16:47 / 09.10.06
I've got WITHOUT FAIL up next... after I finish the thriller I'm reading at the moment (I usually read thrillers when I'm on the nighshift, and had those two pencilled in for this week just gone, but was blind for the first two days, which has slowed me down...)
 
 
miss wonderstarr
20:47 / 31.10.06
I saved up THE VISITOR ~ US title RUNNING BLIND (bafflingly), Australian title BEYOND STUPI ~ and read it on a long haul flight. Maybe it was the time I'd spent away from the very specific tone of Reacher's adventures, but I really enjoyed this one. It felt meaty, detailed, deeply satisfying. Like a steak, Reacher thought. Or a Snickers.

On the other hand, I guessed the murderer, the motive and the method about a third of the way in. So I guess I've learned to think like Reacher, who of course figured it out two thirds of the way through and made everyone else guess (ludicrously, holding back on it and giving out a clue every 3 hours or so) until the end. It seemed obvious to me how the women were being killed, and from that, of course, the killer's identity jumps out. The motive is easy to deduce as a next step, and from that point you're just testing your theory against a bunch of pretty deft and clever red herrings and decoys. OK, so maybe the method is ridiculous, as I think Stoatie suggested upthread. I actually found those scenes extremely eerie and chill.

[SPOILER:
The longterm Reacher reader is actually helped by the fact that ONE SHOT follows a similar pattern whereby an apparent serial killer is camouflaging the single really meaningful assassination.]

Apart from the plot, which I found part pleasure and part disappointment ~ it's the first time I've worked out the story's twist ages before it happened, but then I was a little dismayed that I was right, and that Child hadn't been cleverer than me ~ there are classic Reacher moments to relish.

I'm going to post this cause my connection keeps going down...
 
 
miss wonderstarr
20:57 / 31.10.06
... there's a key moment describing Reacher's female companion in this novel (steady girlfriend Jodie slipping out of the picture here; I'm not sure if I read them in sequence so I'm not clear about when exactly her relationship with Reacher ends) which concludes simply with "SHE LOOKED SPECTACULAR".

Why a female, junior FBI agent who seeks advancement and wants to avoid lecherous male attention, and so adopts expensive, extensively-tailored male suits in an attempt to turn guys off and be treated seriously, would then never wear a bra, so that her nipples show through her shirt all day at work, and be constantly aware of it, blushing whenever Reacher glances at her chest, is utterly beyond me.

There are some amusing routines and exchanges between them though, such as when Reacher draws out his findings over days of travel, stubbornly keeping his theories private from his FBI partner even though there are women's lives at risk and the killer's advancing by the second:

-- What is it we're missing? she asked.

-- You're going about it all wrong. It's about the killer's mobility patterns, Reacher told her.

-- We need to know now, Reacher.

-- I'll tell you tomorrow, Reacher grunted, settling down to sleep.

Then there's his method of teaching through dialogue, asking apparently-irrelevant questions:

-- What have the killer's patterns of travel got to do with it, Reacher? she asked.

-- Did your family ever take you on driving holidays, as a kid? Reacher replied.


This is going to be my last Reacher until THE HARD WAY comes out in softcover, but I've enjoyed the journey.
 
 
Blake Head
21:29 / 31.10.06
A complete set of the previous Reacher novels (in softback) plus the new one in hardback came into my shop, so I'm being tempted... Given that the main criticism seems to be how formulaic they are, is there actually any point in owning more than one (other than in having surplus toshy page turners I mean) are they all variations on a theme? Or is there one most representative book that would be good to start with? I'm being tempted by the one that goes back to his days in the military, but I'm not sure. Such indecision! What would Reacher do?
 
 
miss wonderstarr
21:56 / 31.10.06
I would recommend One Shot above the others... then probably Tripwire followed by The Visitor, as they're both superior quality (tight plots, classic Reacher amusement) and also consecutive in terms of the overall story arc, such as it is.

I felt Killing Floor and ... is it Without Fail or Die Trying, with the militia group? Anyway, Die Trying I think, to be the cheesiest, most like bog-standard hard-man thriller.

If Without Fail is the one where Reacher joins the FBI to protect the VP, I'd also recommend that in company with The Enemy, as they're both quite centrally about Reacher's brother Joe. Actually, Killing Floor ties in with that too, even though it has a significantly different tone to later Reacher and, I think, features a slightly different Reacher.

Echo Burning and Persuader are just OK, in my opinion.
 
 
Blake Head
20:25 / 08.11.06
For a lot of the reasons given up above, I ended up really enjoying One Shot (thanks muchly for the recommend Miss Wonderstarr, and for starting the thread), the odd and improbable moments, the semi-parodic prose style, it being very readable, but plenty of jarring moments as well. I do think (going by this thread) that it would almost work best as one “best of” novel of all the truly incongruous elements pieced together around one plot.

I think that part of it is struggling to work out why Reacher chooses to get involved, rather than to keep moving, why he chooses to compromise his masking of identity - as an example I think there’s one point where he’s all over the local news as a murder suspect. Obviously it’s important when he does intervene, a matter of life and death (and usually death) but he does seem essentially motiveless with regards to each “quest” or “mission”, and it’s here that it does sometimes feel parodic – Reacher doesn’t need a motive because he’s tied in to the narrative constraints of the thriller genre, he simply needs to get things done in the most direct and stylish way possible.

Like Flyboy said, it’s a seductive fantasy of living without affectation and the baggage of modern life, and what particularly struck me was the sense in which living “off the grid” also gives Reacher freedom from living under capitalism, no job, no possessions, no fixed abode, continually sloughing off clothes, tools and weapons – it’s almost Paleolithic. Admittedly, there’s a lack of adornment to anything he hands over money for, clothes to last a few days, food and coffee from diners, no-frills hotel rooms (anything else wouldn’t seem to be Reacher like) but at the same time he appears to have no income. And, maybe someone who’s read more of them can address this, is it ever addressed how Reacher affords this lifestyle? Does he have money saved up from his years in the military or does he periodically top-up his bank account with rewards for his various good deeds (he seems so far to resist the idea that he’s doing what he’s doing for money)? It’s just feeling like a very weird dream of living a frugal, bare essentials lifestyle, invisibly supported by the removal from most people’s need to participate in a basic economy. Again, not that that’s important within the genre, but there’s usually at least the pretence of an actual professional interest and reward.

The other big thing, really, and I think a few people have commented around similar areas, is that Reacher never seems surprised by anything. His deductive abilities (or assumptions) mean that he’s always either figured things out definitively or is on the way, assuredly, to gaining the information he needs. Which I think can also be argued happens at a moral level, he’s never unsure of his cause. So he’s a character that never seems to experience doubt (with the interesting exception above of feeling his life was threatened), which normally I would have thought to be dramatically essential. Which I think would lead to an extraordinarily boring real-life individual, so I can’t quite see why Men Want To Be Him / Women Want To Be With Him. He just seems (random hidden depths aside) to be an incredibly dull person living (invulnerably) within an exciting and uncertain life.

All that said, being quite tempted by The Hard Way, perhaps primarily because I’d like to see Child / Reacher’s take on England, but lots on my plate, so we’ll see.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
20:43 / 08.11.06
he does seem essentially motiveless with regards to each “quest” or “mission”, and it’s here that it does sometimes feel parodic – Reacher doesn’t need a motive because he’s tied in to the narrative constraints of the thriller genre, he simply needs to get things done in the most direct and stylish way possible.

You're right that of course, ultimately Reacher gets involved for the sake of the novel, because otherwise it'd end. But in each book, there is some turning point where he decides to stop just hanging around because he has to (he's a prisoner in a truck; twice he's a murder suspect who ends up helping the cops) and starts getting involved because he wants to. And usually that's some tipping point related to the innocent being exploited. Reacher fixes on some victim ~ an old couple, a girl mixed up in the action, an ex-colleague, a woman who didn't deserve what happened ~ and uses that as the excuse to pursue a mission. It's an excuse for the book, because it keeps the novel going beyond 100 pages, and also it's an excuse for Reacher really, because he needs these missions. He needs to keep moving, he needs to keep some kind of purpose, he needs to feel righteous and fuelled, and in pursuit of some moral justice. Just wandering, seeking out the best coffee in Oklahoma and going to Wyoming next day because he likes the idea ~ hearing about some blues singer in Nashville and catching the bus there the following week ~ isn't really enough to keep him going, though he pretends it is, and the novels never admit any different. But from what we learn of Reacher, I believe that aimless life wouldn't actually be enough for him. The adventures we read about, which take up maybe 10% of his life, actually keep him "alive" in a real sense.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
20:48 / 08.11.06
And, maybe someone who’s read more of them can address this, is it ever addressed how Reacher affords this lifestyle? Does he have money saved up from his years in the military or does he periodically top-up his bank account with rewards for his various good deeds (he seems so far to resist the idea that he’s doing what he’s doing for money)? It’s just feeling like a very weird dream of living a frugal, bare essentials lifestyle, invisibly supported by the removal from most people’s need to participate in a basic economy.

He took a lump sum from the military, and checks out cash regularly from bank branches. By the time of "The Visitor" he's out of money. He does, however, get rewards at various points, and

S
P
O
I
L
E
R

for The Visitor

He sells the house at the end of that novel, which obviously makes him a mint and funds him probably from that point until the present day.

Obviously living in motels isn't very economical, even if they're cheap motels ~ I booked a horrible one recently and I think it was about $30 per night, $50 at weekends. Your money would run out pretty quick if you ate huge meals in diners every day, and bought a new outfit every 3. Still, I suppose if you made $600,000 or so from a house sale, it'd fund that lifestyle for a few years? I don't know. Do the math.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
20:52 / 08.11.06
So he’s a character that never seems to experience doubt (with the interesting exception above of feeling his life was threatened), which normally I would have thought to be dramatically essential. Which I think would lead to an extraordinarily boring real-life individual

Kind of, but he's only sussed out what's going on because he has this childlike wondering personality... this tendency to lie there or sit in a room on his own, just figuring things out. He works out permutations and imagines consequences, letting his mind wander on associations around a theme (this is stated outright in One Shot and The Visitor) or just playing music in his head (especially Killing Floor), or doing mental calculations.

So he's not annoyingly confident or always in control of the facts. He works things out because he's always thinking about things ~ trivial things, as well as things integral to the plot. He imagines where the atoms from his breath will be gathering outside the roof, given the temperature and the fog, just to pass the time; and he also imagines what kind of salary a suspect will have, based on her suitcase, and works out the killer's identity that way.

That's one thing I find appealing about JR actually ~ this childlike wondering, the tendency to always ask questions and to ponder on everything.

Like you, Blake ~ and I liked your post a lot ~ I am holding off on The Hard Way now. Maybe waiting for another long flight, or something that deserves it.
 
 
h1ppychick
11:21 / 09.11.06
I have just ordered One Shot from Amazon. I will report back later.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
15:26 / 09.11.06
I thought The Hard Way was up there with One Shot, personally. I've currently taken a NaNoWriMo hiatus from reading Without Fail (the one where he gets kidnapped) but have been enjoying it immensely so far.
 
 
Blake Head
17:00 / 09.11.06
Thanks for that Miss W - the picture obviously hangs together a little better when you’ve read a few more of them! I think as a character Reacher is really interesting, more because of what he doesn’t do than anything else. The money thing makes a bit more sense, though it’s really what that lifestyle represents that I thought was so striking. I see what you mean about the compulsive wondering, I think it’s that the surety that Reacher arrives at, or presents to the world, seems, not illogical, but arises from deductive reasoning that – as it’s presented – would seem to leave many more options, arising from unknown factors and unknowable variables, than Reacher acknowledges. It’s as though Reacher’s mind acts like a finely honed Occam’s Razor, sifting through data and silently discarding the irrelevant, but (at least in One Shot) he’s never wrong-footed by a more complex situation, and while that might be one of his strengths, it felt very alien to the way I think. Which might also be part of the appeal I suppose.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
10:15 / 05.12.06
Right, I am never reading another Reacher book again. Not in public, anyway. Two reasons:

1) WP sits in pub, with a coffee, on her own, at lunchtime, reading a book. Could the signals be any more LEAVE ME THE FUCK ALONE I AM READING?
Nevertheless, the man sitting at the next table (faded khakis, late 40s, unshaven, slightly manic) decided not only to start a very one-sided conversation but to confide in me that he had read all nine Reacher novels, that Jack was his hero, but that Lee Child should set them in England not America because "he's English innee"?

As with Pratchett and Tolkien, it's not the authors or the works I object to so much as the (other) people who like them. Present company excepted, naturally.

2) Also, I am a little disappointed, because after having been pleasurably kept in the dark by One Shot I have now (thanks to plenty of practise on The Prestige thread, and generally inability to not second guess and twist-seek) have figured out the twist of Tripwire. I'm going to put spoiler space in because I'm so sure:

S

P

O

I

L

E

R

S

"Hook" Hobie is not Victor Hobie; Victor Hobie died in the helicopter crash, and the military prisoner being transported, Steve Allen, swapped dog-tags and took his identity.

S

P

O

I

L

E

R

S

(I'm going to look a right tit if I'm wrong, aren't I?)

I guessed the basic twist (although not the details as they hadn't at that time been supplied) of this about half-way through the book when Jodie and Reacher were in the French restaurant and Jodie opined that Hobie was still alive and Reacher was sure he was dead. (At this point the reader is being directed to believe he's still alive).

And I just thought - hmm, this is interesting, because it's implied that he's wrong - but Reacher's never wrong. The man drinks ten litres of water a day and can dig swimming pools in such a way as to exercise the muscles in his eyebrows and scrotum - how can he be wrong?

Answer being, he isn't. And I thought it would have been more interesting if, one time, for a bit, in a small way, Reacher was. wrong Probably anathema to people like my friend in the pub, the wannabe Jack, but more fun for everyone else, I reckon.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
12:46 / 05.12.06
Ah, but what were you drinking your coffee out of, Whisky?
 
 
Whisky Priestess
15:13 / 05.12.06
Some sort of vessel. White. Tall. Ceramic.

"A mug," guessed Reacher.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
16:02 / 05.12.06
Drinking out of mugs is a mug's game. Paper cups. So you can leave at a moment's notice.

(Although I've been a bit baffled by this... you could leave just as quickly if you were drinking out of china).
 
 
miss wonderstarr
16:11 / 05.12.06
Foam, actually.

There are occasions when Reacher makes a mistake and beats himself up about it (not literally) ~ it's quite a big deal in at least two books, where he misreads the situation, acts wrongly because of it and really chastises himself. Unfortunately I can't quite remember which ones. I'm thinking Echo Burning perhaps, and also in Without Fail and The Visitor he doesn't click until late in the book, so by implication he's been on the wrong track for about two-thirds of it.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
08:45 / 06.12.06
I feel like we ought to form some sort of proper book club around the novels, actually. Drink black coffee, no cream, no sugar, out of foam cups and eat eggs round at somebody's local diner, while discussing the merits of Killing Floor (one I haven't read). And then wash it all down with ten gallons of water each.

Who's with me?
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
08:37 / 14.12.06
A bit late to the party, but seeing as Reacher is my new God, thought I'd share with you my favouite moment (so far) from Tripwire;

"And how are you going to get to Miami?" She asked "This time of night?"
He smiled back at her. Confidently.
"You're gonna drive me." He said.
"Do I have time to get dressed?"
"Just shoes." He said


Just shoes. Amazing.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
18:16 / 28.02.07
It's nearly time again. Reacher time. This week, WHSmiths have THE HARD WAY in soft, paper covers (Soft. Paper.) for half the normal price. I've bought my copy and I'm saving it for a long flight to Sydney on April 2, and believe me it is tough not reading more than the first few pages included at the tail-end of ONE SHOT. It's like ignoring a fat line of coke.

One fun side-effect of THE HARD WAY coming out soft is that I get a kick of seeing "my" Reacher, whom I discovered in late Spring 06, suddenly in the public eye again. It almost feels like seeing a friend's book published, or a guy you know appearing on posters. It's like, hey, that's my man Jack! You want to point it out to people as you pass a subway ad. "That's Jack Reacher, you should read it!"

Someone organise the Reacher Real-life Reading Group.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
18:17 / 28.02.07
Oh yeah! A special bonus is that I now know the title of the next book
 
 
Blake Head
23:00 / 28.02.07
Miss W: Would Reacher ignore a fat line of coke? Would he prefer a hotter, blacker, wetter stimulant perhaps? Ask yourself that. I think you know the answer.

[actually, it would be quite interesting to see Reacher forced to, ah, indulge, to maintain a disguise in an undercover vice squad type operation. More on that theme below.]

I’ve also picked up a copy of The Hard Way, courtesy of my local Tesco’s Staff Recommends bay. Completely unlike Reacher, I’ve been expending energy waiting for it anxiously (no, really), so I’m almost certainly not going to be waiting a month to read it.

In the meantime, I’ve been reading some of the backlist:

I read Die Trying a while back, and thought it was ok, though the militia aspect of the story and the leader character weren’t hugely interesting in their own right, and the opening kidnap plot was much more gripping, even if it’s becoming obvious that Child writes by tapping into popular roles and scenarios (that other authors might mine with a single character many times) and attaching them together and to his iconic everyman figure.

Persuader was again only ok. The first person novels really struggle to convey the essential Reacher-ness: rather than give you an insight into how he thinks Child seems cramped trying to describe Reacher’s habits from the inside, and it’s obviously much harder to have Reacher talking about himself all the time without it becoming really wooden.

I actually quite liked The Enemy. Less, I think, to do with the plot and more seeing Reacher operating in a military role and getting a bit more sense of the origin of the vigilante men want to be and women want to be with we know today. That said, another novel in the first person, so this is the Child book that read the most like a conventional, un-Reacher-like thriller yet. Addictively written, but with less of the OTT brilliance of the others.

[Persuader Spoilers]

The selling point of Persuader also felt a bit cheeky. Posed with Reacher shooting a cop in the heat of the moment, the fact that he hasn’t and it’s an artificial tease to the reader gets sorted out rather quickly, and the rest of the book treads a much less psychologically interesting path.

[/Persuader Spoilers]

A bit like Without Fail with Reacher working with the Secret Service, the book felt like Child asking “what would it be like if Reacher were in the DEA on a sting operation?”, and you could describe the other novels / sub-plots in a similar way: “how would Reacher react in a kidnapping?”, “what if Reacher were an X for a day?”.

Not that any of that is by necessity a bad thing, or that unusual, but suggests the types of stories that Child is telling about Reacher over the series. Reacher, essentially, isn’t going anywhere, just moving around: he’s not gradually picking up clues to fulfil some vendetta, he’s not attempting to clean up a single city, there’s no career progression - he involves himself in situations where he can help, which often means taking on the most appropriate role: FBI guy, off the books MP guy, bodyguard guy and so on. It’s obviously a technique that gives Child the chance to explore plenty of scenarios that he (and the reader) are interested in, and open-ended enough for the possibilities of the books to stretch as far as his imagination. Which, uh, might not be that far actually, but obviously sufficient to have me wanting to find out how Reacher fares outside of the U.S. Interesting to see if Child introduces a larger, overarching narrative or place in an organisation across the novels if he starts to run out of stock roles though.
 
 
Thorn Davis
08:14 / 02.03.07

I wondered, when I was reading Without Fail, whether he was grooming Neagley - the woman who knows something is up if someone doesn't check out her arse while she's wearing a particular pair of trousers - was being groomed for a series of her own. She was basically Female Reacher, and I wondered if, when he'd run out of Reacher plots, he'd just go back to the beginning and basically re-write them all with a woman as the lead character.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
09:24 / 05.03.07
Dear God. I've read them all.

[spoilers]

My friend has suggested that I try to find the real Reacher. There's obviously some mild mannered pool digger out there who goes on holiday a couple of times a year, and after gives Lee a bell, and Lee asks "So Jack, what did you do on your holiday?" to which Jack responds "I saved the vice president from the most rediculous revenge plot ever concieved, bedded my dead brothers ex-gf, and thought about russian literature to make obscure references to the case." or "stopped the russian mafia from carrying out a suprisingly similar scheme to some mentalist fbi agent, you remember the one. with the green paint?"

What's happened to me. I used to be a Lit student?
 
 
Blake Head
00:05 / 07.03.07
Didn't we all?

Well, not only did I finish The Hard Way, but in a much sleep deprived state I also fell into the manly embrace of Jack Reacher for around four hours the other night which was enough to race through Echo’s Burning. Which was perfect really, because increasingly it’s clear that it’s best to read them in one sitting, preferably while travelling I’m sure [interesting, perhaps, that most of the jackets features vehicles and roads - a subliminal nod to your average book buyer that these are the perfect books for reading on the move?].

I enjoyed Echo’s Burning, although by now the format noted above of Reacher’s early display of superiority over a bunch of clueless thugs, mirrored conclusively in the novel’s denouement with a slightly riskier confrontation, is by now pretty familiar. Reacher fulfilling the role of hard-edged unofficial Western lawman did not disappoint, though it was also fairly evident that there’s a large part of the book devoted to Reacher’s investigative nature gnawing at a problem until he’s able to turn around the initial conception of what’s going on and finally race around trying to found someone to shoot/hit. Also: there’s a phrase in Echo’s Burning which prefigures its use as the title of the new book, which is in turn lifted from the lyrics to a Johnny Winters song.

Main thoughts on The Hard Way so far were that far less of the book focuses on England than I expected and perhaps hoped for, and that Child and the constant reader’s increasing familiarity with Reacher’s indomitable nature makes the descriptive writing around the character much less interesting. Descriptions of Reacher near the end of the book striding around in the darkness, armed and dangerous, invincible, and so on, read like and in fact are used as publisher’s blurb to describe Reacher’s nature, but without the near-parody genius that earlier books contain. I’m really curious as to how that reads to someone not exposed to Child’s books before, because the less he concentrates or refers to the special qualities that make Reacher great, the less probable and less unique Reacher feels as a character, and the more those qualities are indirectly assumed the less substantial it feels. I’m not sure if I’m articulating this very well, but both books actually felt as though the writing was “off” somehow, even though in many ways they contained the usual elements and worked well as thrillers, and I enjoyed them a great deal - though it’s possible (several books in) that I’m reaching my Reacher saturation point. I still want to read about him digging swimming pools though.
 
 
Benny the Ball
06:07 / 09.03.07
I've been walking past a Reacher poster at my tube station for about a month now, chuckling at it, wondering if I should give a book a go.

Anyway, here's a link to Childs site - he's doing a tour for the latest book if anyone wanted to go and meet the author of the man that is Reacher;

The Man Behind the Man
 
 
Alex's Grandma
22:21 / 11.03.07
I bought my father 'The Hard Way' for Christmas, (generally speaking he gets a bottle of scotch and a couple of novels) and it seemed to down very well, so much so that he wrote me a letter about it. It was quite a 'Wonder Years' moment really, especially coming from a guy who's put some of the books I've got him in the past, specifically 'One Hundred Years Of Solitude' and 'Humblodt's Gift' on the fire, no doubt laughing while he was doing it.

Perhaps this is one of the secrets of the Reacher formula, that Jack brings together generations that might otherwise be somewhat estranged in terms of their literary tastes; you can chuckle along with the big guy's antics (while at the same time being secretly in awe of Reacher's mojo,) or you can enjoy them at face value, like a man of action would.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
22:35 / 11.03.07
We may even need a separate spoilers thread for THE HARD WAY and the follow-up ~ BAD LUCK AND TROUBLE I think ~ otherwise you won't see me on this thread until I've allowed myself to read the former. (After April).
 
 
Benny the Ball
19:22 / 06.04.07
Okay - I'm about 130 pages away from finishing The Killing Floor - it's been great, and is a very very easy read - perhaps because of this thread, i'm a little disappointed by how human Jack is, and how little he's laughed - but, having found out that my mum is a big fan and has all the books, I'm sure I'll read on.
 
 
Blake Head
20:03 / 06.04.07
How are you getting on with The Hard Way Miss W?

I’d forgotten all about the fact that I’d added The Visitor to my “read” list, and more precisely how much I enjoyed it. I think it was the first time you see Reacher under more than temporary, situational stress – for a lot of the novel the resolution of the main plot felt secondary to Reacher’s dual desires to protect his home/loved ones and to avoid feeling weighed down by them. And in another sense it was the first novel where Reacher, generally a fairly balanced guy, comes closest to being unhappy or stressed: immobile, he’s clearly trying to compensate for the things he’s doing, or rather not doing, that he comprehends as unhealthy, and the . And I think that comes through in his initial treatment of Lamarr – there’s a genuine sustained antipathy to another character, which I think is quite rare for Reacher, as usually any confrontation moves swiftly towards avoidance or a physical resolution. Here, Reacher feeling trapped, and being trapped, and his consequent abrasiveness, lend him a much greater degree of accessibility and solidness. Thoroughly enjoyed this one - it lacked some of the sillier exaggerations (I’m still looking forward to the swimming pool workout) but worked extremely well as a tight, substantial, serious thriller.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
07:26 / 13.04.07
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

I finished The Hard Way on two legs of a long-haul flight, and found it satisfying enough, but not stand-out. I felt the England setting, much-trumpeted (or so it seemed) as a departure for Reacher and the series, was underused, though it did offer a genuinely interesting alien perspective, rather than the fish-out-of-water near-comedy I'd expected. Rather than stuff about, for instance, Reacher struggling to make do without guns (heroes and villains conveniently manage to get all the guns they need from Amsterdam), and getting confused about "pants" (I had very high expectations of this book, you can tell), there are some quite subtle observations about the amount of nanny-state signage on Britain's roads, and the way London, to Reacher's eyes, is made up of sagging, crumbling buildings propped up by new facades. His perspective is a bit stretched in the scene where they arrive in London and he manages to spot not just the London Eye and Tower Bridge, but his hotel and the American Embassy, all as the plane circles over the South Bank, but overall I was quite impressed the way Child, a British author relocated to the US, and successfully putting across a convincing American tone and way of seeing during the Reacher series (though Reacher, at the start of his wandering, significantly hadn't seen much of America during his life, and was making up for it) conveys England from an outsider's point of view, without reaching for easy gags. There is, as I've just noted on another board, the classic scene where Reacher tries to remember the correct etiquette for pub behaviour ("A pint of your best, landlord. And a half, for the lady. And would any of you gentlemen care to join us..?"), but I was torn between wanting more mileage out of Reacher-in-England and admiring Child for resisting the temptation to let entertaining culture-clash distract from the plot ~ which by then is in its final stages.

I agree, the staccato repetition of "Reacher, striding alone. Unstoppable" is bizarre, as if he's trying to write the back-cover blurb instead of narrative prose ~ as if this has become a shorthand for Reacher's character, flatly telling rather than showing us what he's like. There is, as I remember, a pay-off: doesn't it finally state "Reacher, striding alone in the darkness. With a potato peeler"? but as the peeler is meant to be sinister rather than inherently comic, I don't know if that was intentionally bathetic. (Also, I was perversely disappointed that he didn't put the peeler to any use ~ I was sure it would provide some dark, vengeful punchline.)

Interesting, on paper at least, to have Reacher bedding an older woman (she's 55 or so, isn't she?) and also to have him now feeling like, and being perceived as, an older guy. That could be a worthwhile way forward, as he starts facing people who are actually a lot more fluid, agile and physically fit than himself. But the romance felt even more perfunctory than usual. As a whole, I'd say the whole thing felt kind of routine... enjoyable, but not memorable. I wonder if Child will have to do something more drastic with the formula ~ not just a constant change of location ~ to keep the series alive.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
07:30 / 13.04.07
as a tight, substantial, serious thriller.

Interesting, because I'm sure others on this thread found The Visitor to be the most ludicrous and implausible, twist-wise at least. (I have a soft spot for this novel as I guessed the twist early on; very rare for me).

There was one other line in The Hard Way worth relishing ~ I think it runs "Her body was perfectly toned. Except where it shouldn't be." They then kiss for exactly five minutes (according to Reacher's internal clock, presumably) with wine glasses held up "approximately level at the same height." I am quoting from memory and may be exaggerating, but not much.
 
 
Triplets
19:14 / 02.06.07
I bought The Killing Floor on Friday. It was cheap. I read it on the coach. It was good. Absorbing. I drank lots of water as we went.
 
 
_pin
08:15 / 06.06.07
I'm about halfway through my first, The Enemy, which was all my library had in at the time, but since then three more have been returned and bagged by me. I can't tell you what they are, because I'm in a different house where I'm meant to be packing. Prior to reading this thread and these books, but now massivly aggravated by them, I'm seriously thinking about just throwing away all this stuff. It's a lot of stuff.

Great Reacher moment: Summer moved, apparently, "like she was a willowy person," even though everything else about her suggests that she is, infact, despite height, both willowy, and a person.

Also, I don't want movies. ("Why?"). Did your parents ever show you CSI as a kid? If that show was a movie, they couldn't really implement Fight Club Opening Sequence Forensovision any more times, over their plot, then they do on the show. It would be stupid. On a TV show, think how any times we can have blurry-edged shots of Reacher having realistic acid moments and seeing all the easureents of all the things in his room, or his pancreas, or imagining he's a hooker or a Delta Squad seargent or Reacher himself or, Bones-style, Lee Child himself himself.

Also, it should be set as an MP and he should progress from a guy who'd throw up three times at a crime scene (apparently more then standard) to the fucking man, and it should be called Reacher, and he should be played by Jon Favreau and you know that's strong truth because he was a soft-ass in Friends/West Point and then he runs off to be proper hard (let's pretend he makes it. Let's pretend we could all make it).
 
 
_pin
19:22 / 06.06.07
Is it OK if I write some slash about Reacher and the old guy in the hardware store in The Enemy, where one talks about condoms and one talks about lube and nothing happens between them?
 
  

Page: 123(4)56

 
  
Add Your Reply