|
|
can i just add, akira, that the lack of sense of tone meant the lack of some important content/meaning in a txt message that began this thread, one which caused me distress and pain that was, it so happens thankfully, mistaken.
i think you have taken (id)entity's message in one particular way and then, having done so, declined to just make a serious, unfettered apology (one meritted in the asking, i might add, imho). that one mistakes a tone in a text is not surprising. but not admitting to others that this can be the case and blithely blundering with the matter is not so exusable, especially in this community. the point of the thread is about mistaking tone etc in 'net communication and i feel that your intransigence has derailed the issue of the thread.
please satisfactorily close the issues id and others have raised and then revisit the purpose of the thread? that'd be nice, ta. |
|
|