|
|
To put it another way, Vo Dai's story is very mch not an object lesson until he meets with Everett's bullet. Then he's dead, and whatever the story meant to him is over, and it's up to Everett to draw some meaning from his life--which Everett fails, or refuses, to do.
If Aaron had chosen to reverse this ending--Everett dies, Vo Dai lives--how would he have written it? Khe Sanh happened in '68; Vo Dai's war would've continued for 7 or 8 more years. It'd be a tremendous challenge, I think, for an American author to write that story. It's hard to understand what went on here in those 8 years.
And if they had both died... eh, I dunno. That would mean War is Hell, I guess. I do feel like Everett's ghosts are trying to tell him something and when he fights them off at the end it represents another failure on his part. What is that crazy grin all about? The rifle is quoting Christ there, by the way--"My Lord, my Lord, why hast Thou forsaken Me?"--which contrasts with Vo Dai's death vision in an interesting what I'm not sure I understand. "Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?" vs "Namu amida butsu"... whatever, this is starting to wander. Thought provoking work. |
|
|