|
|
People who are involved in conversation. Especially conversation with The Namer, enigmatic last member of the race that created the Zoids.
I think I said "quality of discussion", rather than "quality discussion" (as in quality meats or quality goal), btw. I think that does change the meaning rather. It strikes me that there's not a clear picture here of what is being decried as "snobbish". For example, if people are discussing a book in the books forum, and I start talking about it without having read it, or start talking about the film of the book, I don't think it is snobbish for the people who have read the book not to treat my opinions with the same weight... Likewise, if you misrepresent Barbelith as being a comic books board, I don't think it is snobbish for people to point out that it is not. If your intention is to communicate something like "Hey, this is an egalitarian place - the only qualification we all have to be here is that we joined. As such, it boots us little to try to make each other feel like we don't belong", then that's cool... |
|
|