BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Cultural appropriation in magical practices.

 
  

Page: 12(3)4

 
 
Gypsy Lantern
14:10 / 22.10.04
Gambit. In theory, I see no problem with Hare Krishna's making use of a "holy site" in the British landscape as a place of worship, if that holy site has not been utilised as such for several hundreds of years, they see some level of connectivity between what it appears to symbolically represent in the landscape and a similar concept in their own religion, and if it is approached with full respect to what you might consider the genus loci of the site itself. Neither do I have a problem with pracitioners of African and African diaspora tradititional religions utilising similar sites and redefining them in terms of their beliefs. Which happens.

To my mind, this process can infuse something dormant, say an old druid site that hasnt been used for worship in over 1000 years, with the new energy of a living religion. If it is done with respect to what is already there, a synthesis may take place between the two and both may be enriched. If it's not done respectfully, it's akin to trampling all over something without bothering to understand it. There can be massive differences between approaches to syncretism, and that is really the point of this thread.

The various problematic scenarios I've underlined above that occur when western magicians appropriate superficial elements from living traditions, without bothering to engage with those traditions or really put the effort in to learn anything new from them, is blatantly not comparable to the kind of strawman argument you've just painted. You do seem to be ignoring most of the points I made in my last post. Either that or you didnt read it properly. Please explain what you mean.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
14:29 / 22.10.04
'we all want to enjoy the hill in the way we want to enjoy it', we could begin to play spot the magpie and worry about whether our cultures are distinct in any way that requires us to worry about 'disrespecting' them.

Christ... how many times do I have to spell it out? Different cultural traditions have different skill sets and bodies of knowledge that need to be learned. Just as Wing Chun and acupuncture operate off a different basis to western boxing and medicine, and need to be studied and learned on their own terms to really benefit from. And vice versa. One aspect of cultural imperialism is when western magicians approach other cultural traditions in terms of a western magical perspective, strip mining them for the novelty value of the exotic rather than actually trying to learn from these traditions on terms dictated by the practitioners. This is problematic for a variety of reasons already outlined at length, and which you've conveniantly avoided making any reference to whatesoever in your humourous anecdote.
 
 
Chiropteran
17:40 / 22.10.04
So as long as that group of Hari Krishnas don't start going around claiming to be High Druids....

~L
 
 
_Boboss
10:27 / 24.10.04
hrrm. yes, looking back it seems something does happen to get me rather over-excited on a friday afternoon. apologies for excessive knobbishness there (but not, y'know, in general) - sorry.

the thing with the hill is, it's not a dead site at all. there's quite possibly thousands of solo practitioners like myself who claim a special relationhip with it. various groups use it as a gathering spot for all sorts of occasions - the annual pagan special days, 9/9/99, the eclipse in the same year and what have you. the wider local secular community often uses it as a marker on more civic occasions, for lighting beacons and things.

one of the site's qualities, i feel, is the way it is seen as a summit of ineffable 'holiness' by those who go there, who of course can't but process that sense via their own prior knowledge and preferences. i suppose that explains how i consider the hare krishnas to have approached the site with all due reverence, even though the words 'hare rama' had probably not been heard there prior to eighty years ago. if the loci has any genius at all, i think it can work out that the fact and acts of prayer and dedication are themselves respect enough. it is worth mentining here i think how one of the area's most significant defining traditions since the dissolution is that of western hermeticism, which has doubtlessly encouraged this view despite usually associating the site with solar phallic influences. this affords a scenario where the hare krishnas, cidergnostic druids and many others can all commune with the site to their own satisfaction, something that appears to be readily appreciated by even the most monastic of the hill's worshippers.


'Sloppiness in magical practice.

the process of cultural frottage i describd so irritatingly in my anecdote, which i think is of value to this thread in its account of a concrete example in a discussion that's kept mainly to the hypothetical, sparked several ideas for the next time i get an hour to myself up the hill.

'Stealing surface elements from other cultures and appending them to a western magic framework, without bothering to go out of your way to study the actual framework that these elements exist within and are taken from.'

okay, so i've taken rhythmic drumming, dancing and chanting, or will have, but won't be saying 'hare rama'. these techniques exist within any culture i might try to claim to be a native of, and i daresay that could be true of almost anyone. the hare krishnas seemed to be having a whale of a time, presumably having considered themselves that their ceremony was not likely to be weakened in its favour to rama even though avallach is probably listening in. of course, walking up there on a sunday to pray certainly isn't a something the hks can claim they first thought of.

Not making a distinction between the two approaches.

the main aim, from what i saw, of their practice and my own (when i do it) can be happily boiled down to a combination of 'invoke often' and 'enflame with prayer'. i don't know if standing in towers on the top of windy hills is inimical to normal hk practice or not. i feel that the only distinction between the approaches exists in my head, my bookshelf, and theirs'. neither of us thought it was worth getting beefy over.

'Viewing the worlds magical traditions through the lens of western magic and chaos magic, as if these are somehow the dominant meta-paradigms that all other traditions must conform to.'

my monkish friends' tradition obviously comes from somewhere quite different, but they seemed to be happily displaying a chaotic 'do what works' approach, with heavy traditional overtones.

'The way in which this process could lead to some of the advanced methodologies of these traditions, which currently exist in predominantly third world countries, being drowned out by the loud engines of the western publishing machine producing wave after wave of dumbed down westernised versioning that, through sheer size of voice compared to that of the actual practitioners, produces a skewed perspective on these traditions even within their country of origin. The threat that the international magical community could lose important and valuable theoretical and practical knowledge as a result of this process.

i felt i learnt something new and, hopefully, strong that morning. i felt the krishnas were demonstrating an admirable flexibility not normally associated by me with folk in monastic orders. the hill was getting the kind of once-over that's it's enjoyed for thousands of years. what's the danger?

'The fact that the only likely way of halting this process is for practitioners of other cultural traditions to start competing on the western market, selling the mysteries of their tradition to an audience eager for a taste of the exotic who would willingly pay £200 for a copy of the "Voudon Gnostic Workbook".

The way in which this imposed economic situation serves to cheapen and erode the power of teachings that have traditionally been passed on via oral or initiatory means for specific reasons.'


'monky-see, monkey do' remains a valid traditional means of transmitting information between cultures. i stumbled upon a mini-initiation that morning, am glad to have done so.

'The way in which western magicians, who are significantly driving this process - if they think about it at all - justify it with platitudes such as "information wants to be free, maaaan" and, perhaps, "its those who adapt and adopt the most shamelessly who will survive and rule".

The way in which parallels can be drawn between that sort of attitude to other cultures and the attitude that justified colonialism and the slave trade.'

The fact that these are extremely emotive issues for many of the other cultures involved, yet are rarely even addressed or considered by western practitioners.


or, as i saw, eastern ones. when the god's on you and you know you need to listen, how on earth are you meant to stop and say 'oh, i wonder if that guy's god will mind?'

cultural appropriation, the demon at hand, in my experience becomes an abject irrelevance when applied to a specific instance of different traditions coming into contact. if it is ever possible to draw a clean line between 'my' culture and another one, and then for these two discrete entities to meet, they will just as likely fuck as fight.

again, sorry for earlier combative tone.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
14:27 / 24.10.04
Dancing, drumming and chanting are not the sole preserve of any single cultural tradition. They exist as a part of religious worship within most cultures. However, things like Vodou, Santeria, Tantra, and so on, contain a diversity of advanced practices and initiatory processes that far more complex than a bunch of people getting together at the top of a hill on a Saturday night and jumping about in worship of their favoured entities. If you think that’s all there is to magic, and all magical traditions from around the world can be easily reduced to that common denominator, then you rather prove my point about the proliferation of dumbed down information about global magico-religious traditions.

Believe me. Five years of heavy involvement with such a non-western tradition and I’m a total beginner in it. There is so much stuff to learn, and it has to be earned, learned, passed onto you by someone with enough faith in you and what you’re about to consider you worth teaching, paid for in one way or another, sometimes at great personal cost. Cultural imperialism is when a western magician looks at the surface elements of something they happen upon, assume they know all about it based on their own western cultural perspective, and cobble together a makeshift version of what they’ve seen, often emphasising the novelty value and foreign exoticism, without actually bothering to ask the practitioners themselves for permission, let alone trying to earn their respect enough so they’ll actually teach you about it properly. “What’s the point in that? I know best. It’s just a bunch of crazy Asian guys jumping about on top of a hill and shouting the name of their God. I know how to do that already. It’s all the same isn’t it?” Gah!

It’s an emotive subject for me personally, because I am trying to broaden my knowledge base and skill set by learning from another culture’s living magico-religious tradition. I’m in the firing line for accusations of cultural appropriation as much as anyone, and I have to live with the implications of that on a day-to-day basis. If you’re going to be operating in this way, then I think at the very least it’s crucial to have a sophisticated understanding of the issues around cultural appropriation. Or else a potentially fruitful cultural exchange is going to take place on an unequal footing, with all the attendant problems already highlighted.

Lastly, Hare Krishna is possible a bad example to cite, as I’d bet a fiver that the “eastern monks” you were looking at, were in fact no more eastern than I am, and possibly participating themselves in the same kind of process of cultural appropriation with regards to eastern religion that this thread is criticising. Depending on their individual approach and relationship to what they are doing. Which is ultimately what it comes down to. I’m in no sense trying to argue that magicians must only work with the magical tradition of their place of birth or ancestry. Or trying to limit people in their choice of path out of some philosophy of “political correctness”, whatever that means. Such a perspective would make me massively hypocritical, considering the traditions I work with myself.

The point of this thread for me, is to examine the raft of issues that arise from this process I am personally involved in and contributing to, so that I can approach what I am doing as respectfully and intelligently as possible, identify the possible pitfalls and problematic situations that might arise from my actions, and hopefully come up with some sort of road map that will lead to a model of cultural exchange that makes everybody happy and is mutually rewarding. Of course magical traditions, when they are exposed to one another, often want to fuck more than they want to fight. This thread is about making sure the sex is consensual.
 
 
FinderWolf
20:22 / 24.10.04
Over on CNN, they have a story about a Satanist who was officially recognized as being such by the Royal Navy:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/10/24/uk.devilworship/index.html
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
11:32 / 25.10.04
Interesting article, but I'm struggling to find any connection between it and the subject matter of this thread...
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
11:58 / 25.10.04
Given that this form of Satanism is a Western religious tradition (painfully so, in fact), and is in fact arguably primarily a self-realisation technique with really distinctive marketing, I'm not sure what this has to do with cultural appropriation, Finderwolf. Are you suggesting that Satanism is appropriating Hebrew traditions to provide context to a primarily New Age philosophy, and that this appropriation has been inscribed by the representation of Satanism as a "religion" by the Royal Navy? I am confused.

On cultural appropriation - is part of this an instinct, or rather a set of instincts? I was at a New Age wedding a few weeks ago and was struck by how desperately short of decent metaphors the New Age is - it's all moons, stars, fires, crystals SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP. As such, there's a gap that needs to be filled somehow, and other traditions' phraseology and paraphernalia - chakras, dreamcatchers et alia - get pulled into it.

Actually, the dreamcatcher is an interesting one. Some years ago, there was a Head Shop thread that touched on the idea of the selling of other cultural identities to the West, and the selling of Western culture to the East and South. The extremes of that position could perhaps be represented as "the rapacious monoculture of the West is isolating and making historical genuine living cultures, while making the members of those cultures take on the slave costume of blue jeans and T-shirts" and "Blue jeans and T-shirts are great - they are comfortable, hard-wearing and great value. Why do you want to insult people by suggesting that their decision to stop wearing local dress and wear blue jeans and T-shirts is motivated by anything other than a desire for the comfort and style of a jeans/T-shirt combo?". I was vaguely minded of this while looking at the "dramcatcher" thread and wondering to myself why exactly one would decide to work in the idiom of the dreamcatcher, and then why one would put a sigil in the middle.

Of course, in one way this does largely pass the "living culture" test Gypsy Lantern proposes - the cultures that employed the dreamcatcher have largely faded from the world, possibly leaving it as a handy bit of design that can be separated from its origins (which, from my extremely limited understanding of the issue, are various and severasl, but often related to various forms of spider legend) and integrated into whatever magical practice you are putting together.

However, the cultures don't exist any more because the people were systematically exterminated and their culture systematically destroyed by the ancestors of the people who are now buying dreamcatchers on the grounds that it is a way to establish a link between their own lives and practices and some nebulous, cinematic pre-Columbian/Native American spiritual ideal, which can then be accessorised like a charm bracelet. This I find a bit troubling.

Forgive me if this has been addressed earlier, but how does the perception of cultural imperialism fit in with the perception of geopolitical imperialism? And how do you "neutralise" it? Through deference, through humility, through long study? Or just by stating categorically that the uses you are putting things to are the right uses for you, and that while you are grateful to others for empowering these symbols you reserve the right to mix, alter and generally customise these symbols according to your aims and desires?
 
 
trouser the trouserian
12:06 / 25.10.04
Lastly, Hare Krishna is possible a bad example to cite, as I’d bet a fiver that the "eastern monks" you were looking at, were in fact no more eastern than I am, and possibly participating themselves in the same kind of process of cultural appropriation with regards to eastern religion that this thread is criticising.

The Hare Krishnas are members of the "International Society for Krishna Consciousness" (ISKCON), founded by Bhaktivedanta Swami Srila Prabhupada, an initiate of the Brahma-Madhva-Gaudiya Vaishnava Sampradaya. ISCON was founded in New York, in 1966. Some exponents of ISKCON say that what they're doing is a contemporary continuation of the medieval Bhakta movement popularised in the 1500s by Caitanya - the argument that ISKCON is a continuation of a historical Hindu lineage has been used in a variety of court cases. However, ISKCON's founder, Swami Prabhupada has also stated that the movement is nothing to do with contemporary Hinduism, and that ISKCON is the only 'true' exponent of the Vedic faith.

In 2001, 79 former students of ISKCON-run schools filed a $400m lawsuit alleging that widespread and systematic child abuse within ISKCON schools during the 70s & 80s was covered up by its leaders. The movement has admitted that such abuse did occurr, but leaders argued that the organisation as a whole could not be held responsible for the crimes of some of its devotees.
In 2002, ISKCON temples in the USA filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy.
 
 
trouser the trouserian
15:03 / 25.10.04
Another interesting article on this topic: Weaving a tangled web? Pagan ethics, and issues of history, 'race' and identity in pagan identity

However, the cultures don't exist any more because the people were systematically exterminated and their culture systematically destroyed by the ancestors of the people who are now buying dreamcatchers on the grounds that it is a way to establish a link between their own lives and practices and some nebulous, cinematic pre-Columbian/Native American spiritual ideal, which can then be accessorised like a charm bracelet. This I find a bit troubling.

Good points, Haus. IMO, the arguments over the appropriation of spiritual tradiitons cannot be seperated from the geopolitical aspects. If those indigenous peoples who are making the most "noise" about the theft & repackaging of their spiritual traditions are irritated by new agers romanticising their spiritual relationship to the land - land they no longer have - or are continually fighting to hang on to, can we blame them?

We, the Indigenous Peoples from various regions of the world, have come to Seattle to express our great concern over how the World Trade Organization is destroying Mother Earth and the cultural and biological diversity of which we are a part.

And then there's the related biopiracy issue, biopiracy being defined as the illegal appropriation of life - micro-organisms, plants, and animals (including humans) - and the traditional cultural knowledge that accompanies it. There have been some successes in countering biopiracy by multinationals. For example, in 1986 a US scientist was granted a patent on a strain of the Amazonian ayahuasca vine, but in 1999 a council representing some 400 indigenous groups were successful in having the ayahuasca patent cancelled by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
 
 
Ulysses Lazarus
08:30 / 07.11.05
I've recently had this discussion come to my attention because of Anton Channing's wonderful piece discussing the same sort of issues. The issue seems incredibly sticky to me, with the answer lying somewhere deep in the grey. That said, there are few things I find more distasteful than brie-chomping middle-class twats going on about their 'respect for other cultures' in the form of the collection of 'artifacts' or watered-down attempts at aping other culture's sprituality. In America, this mostly takes the form of the Cherohonky- the white man who seems completely convinced that his 1/32nd Native American heritage ties him to a pop expression (and almost blackface-style exaggeration) of Red Indian medicine man magic.

The discussion on this matter seems long overdue to me, and I hope that it will go a long way towards understanding the lessons to be pulled from chaos magic theory now that it seems dead as a dynamic, vibrant and innovative movement.

two questions for the group:

1) How does this tie into, say, Catholic kitsch? Do we then say that athiests who adorn their homes with ironic images of the Madonna are guilty of some crime against Catholics?

2) Beyond any of the cultural appropriation issues- which I consider relevant- isn't the argument for magic!ians really about sloppy magic!? While those in the discussion may or may not agree with GL and others about the inappropriateness of appropriating another culture's gods, doesn't the discussion really end for practical purposes with sloppy magic! vs. thoughtful magic!? I raise this issue because I think it can go some way towards consensus on this issue. Simply put, if yr ignorant of any tradition but using it anyway, yr magic! is bound to be shit.

I will now go back and read relevant questions about the laxness of spiritual practice among people of the host culture- i.e. 'pop' expressions of devotion to Ganesh, Buddha, &c.

I'm looking forward to hearing more from people on this.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
09:04 / 07.11.05
Beyond any of the cultural appropriation issues- which I consider relevant- isn't the argument for magic!ians really about sloppy magic!?

Since when did being a MAJYK!one!!1!ian absolve one of need to examine this kind of consideration? How is a sloppy New-Ager with a dreamcatcher, or the HCM practitioner who blithely announces that the Lwa represent the shadow side of the Tree of Life, any better than the brie-muncher with the "ethnic" rugs?

Sure, utilising another culture's Gods or spirits in an offhand and disrespectful way is going to produce sloppy magic, but I'd hardly say that's the only, or even the main, problem.
 
 
Unconditional Love
15:03 / 07.11.05
Since starting this thread, i have personally explored many different traditional systems, i have even tried working with a multicultural altar, it didnt work for me personally.

What i have found is that i had to make a choice, Its very nice to have the variety to choose from and the differing options to investigate and explore, but to keep flitting between them like a kid in a candy store, is where some of the major elements of disrespect start to appear, it is the attitude of spiritual shopping.

Its taken me many years to settle into a spiritual practice that works and also to find myself within that practice, having the devotion to that practice thou since discovering it has not been an issue. If anything for me that was always the problem with pick n' mix magic it lacked devotion because i didnt value the spiritual doctrine of the tradition i was engaging with, i valued it as a tool and not as a living cultural spirit that i would enter into a life long relationship with, it sounds like marriage, it is a kind of communion, an intimate relationship.

I found i was lacking that kind of deep relationship with my spiritual work when i wasnt decided/devoted to a tradition/practice. My research became half hearted because only half of my heart was involved in the process of relating to my explorations, the rest of me was waiting in the wing for the next occult fad to begin, so i could see its growth before the wave crashed upon the shore.

Certainly their is a rush in catching the growth of something new, but at what point is it that magical systems as trends and fashions go streaming through because at some point they fit a larger cultural agenda, at what point do they cross and become gross materialistic expressions?

commodified visions for credit card shamans.

As i heard a stand up comic comment recently, do japanese people have english words like happy and fortune and evil tattoed on there bodies because these words look cool?
 
 
trouser the trouserian
15:56 / 07.11.05
For anyone interested in engaging further with this difficult subject I'd reccomend Michael F. Brown's Who owns Native Culture? - support & resources website here

Brown's book provides a useful overview of the complex issues involved and reviews various cases such as the conflict over Devils Tower in the USA and the Hindmarsh case in Australia, to name but two.

One of the criticisms that's been launched against Chaos Magic in this regard is the notion that magical techniques, regardless of their cultural specifity, are essentially similar. As Pete Carroll wrote in one article:

Underlying all systems from Witchcraft to Tibetan Sorcery, that the eclectically minded magician may use, there is a fundamental unity of practical technique depending on visualisation, the creation of thought entities and altered states of consciousness achieved by either quiescent or ecstatic meditations. The eclectic point of view implies that belief itself can be regarded as a technique for achieving one's aims. A further implication of the principle of relativity of belief is that all beliefs are considered to be arbitrary and contingent.

and in another:

...all systems do use some practical techniques which occur in other traditions and which in total form an identifiable and quantifiable set of practical actions. By experiencing and mastering this body of techniques we can understand how any system or tradition functions and we can make any tradition work for us. You can call this the ultimate in dilettantism, if you wish-we call it illumination.

So, if you ascribe to this belief (whoops!) then for example there would be no appreciable difference between say, singing a rune-poem, chanting a seed-mantra or simply repeating "My mum's monkey makes many mistakes" - as the 'practical action' is held to be the same.

On reflection, this viewpoint is not too dissimilar (IMO) to the Perennialist position as expounded by Aldous Huxley (and others) that there is a 'single truth' shared by all the world's religions - a direct understanding of 'reality' that transcends historical and cultural limitations - i.e. that there is a level of "mystical experience" that transcends cultural or doctrinal plurality, or that all spiritual paths share a common goal.
 
 
*
16:13 / 07.11.05
I want to address this:

1) How does this tie into, say, Catholic kitsch? Do we then say that athiests who adorn their homes with ironic images of the Madonna are guilty of some crime against Catholics?

As I see it, it gets back to power dynamics. The Catholic Church is large enough and powerful enough that they have some measure of control over their own representation by world media. This representation is harmed comparatively little by atheists subverting it in an ironic manner— although it certainly is disrespectful and to some extent damaging, it's not colonialist in the way that it would be if the issue were, say, white American atheists ironically appropriating the iconography of a little-understood Brazilian Catholic sect with distinctive practices which were held up as exotic and bizarre.
 
 
Ulysses Lazarus
17:05 / 07.11.05
Since when did being a MAJYK!one!!1!ian absolve one of need to examine this kind of consideration? How is a sloppy New-Ager with a dreamcatcher, or the HCM practitioner who blithely announces that the Lwa represent the shadow side of the Tree of Life, any better than the brie-muncher with the "ethnic" rugs?

Sure, utilising another culture's Gods or spirits in an offhand and disrespectful way is going to produce sloppy magic, but I'd hardly say that's the only, or even the main, problem.


I don't consider any of the above groups different, and I agree that other issues are in play when discussing the issue. But to me, there seems little argument that, as you say, utilizing a culture's gods inappropriately leads to bad results. My point is- shouldn't that be enough?

I mean, it's like a discussion on circumcision that gets led down the "is male circumcision as bad as female circumcision" path in that it entirely misses the fucking point that mutilating infants is bad. Similarly, while I largely agree with the criticism of cultural appropriation, what I'm trying to do is cut the counterargument off at the knees by reframing it in terms of bad magic!. Surely, we can discuss the issues regarding cultural appropriation, but I feel that those issues become easier to discuss once we all agree that it's just BAD PRACTICE, regardless of the (wholly relevant and worthy of discussion) ethical issues involved.
 
 
Unconditional Love
17:50 / 07.11.05
I pose a question is magic without ethics bad practice?

Shouldnt magic contain a moral imperative to improve the practitioner and the greater community for mutually beneficial alround goodness and joy.

Or should it perhaps be self fulfilling no matter what the consequence? As long as it works that must be effective magic.

No dig, just questions.
 
 
Dead Megatron
18:46 / 07.11.05
Anything without ethics is bad (althjough sometimes it can be really fun), so yes, I think

Me, I'm from Brazil, the world's cultural syncretism Meca. Everything in our culture (and I mean everything) has been taken from a previous culture, with European, native, African, and Asian elements (the whole freaking planet), so I am all for it. In fact, every neo-American civilization (and by neo-American I mean anything that started after 1500 AD and the coming of the "ALMIGHTY WHITE MAN - insert Darth Vader theme here) is formed from the collage of ther parents cultures. And this is an ongoing process, specially down here. The problem is when the new syncretic form of the cultural item in question destroys the original source, if it still exists. That may or may not happen, there's no rule (sad enough, it usually does)
 
 
Goodness Gracious Meme
19:18 / 07.11.05
Thanks for those links/refs, trouser. I love this thread.

Just wanted to say that this:

The problem is when the new syncretic form of the cultural item in question destroys the original source,

Seems one of the crucial points here. I might add, when the new form ignores, denies or over-writes the source.

And this is an issue, as GL and others have pointed out, intimately connected to issues of globalisation, and long histories of colonialism/extreme shifts in power between the consumers/refashioners and the origin sources.

Some people have seemingly suggested that 'the powers can look after themselves'. But what about the followers of those powers? What happens when, as per trousers example, the notion of Quodoushka as a "native American" set of practices has passed into the common New Age melting-pot, whilst the protests of the Cherokee people have been, to a large extent, ignored.
 
 
trouser the trouserian
20:47 / 07.11.05
Surely, we can discuss the issues regarding cultural appropriation, but I feel that those issues become easier to discuss once we all agree that it's just BAD PRACTICE

Well, not everyone here agrees that it is "bad practice". And isn't it rather simplistic to make a sweeping statement like if yr ignorant of any tradition but using it anyway, yr magic! is bound to be shit

Case in point. When I started doing magical work with Kali, I knew fuck all about her. She wasn't part of "my tradition" - heck, I don't think I even had a sense of "tradition" during that period of my life. All I had was some recurrent dream imagery and sporadic contact with one other magician who basically advised me to "go with what feels right" - which is largely what I did. Was the magic I did then "shit"? I'd say not. Naive perhaps; but exciting and intense in a way that still outshines a lot of the stuff I did later in my life.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
21:13 / 07.11.05
(Slight sidetrack here)

Naive perhaps; but exciting and intense in a way that still outshines a lot of the stuff I did later in my life.

I'm curious, trouser--what do you think made this magic more intense? Was it a general spontenaity, or the fact that you were more willing to work with a supposedly risky deity outwith Her cultural context (which someone else, having different information to hand, might be afraid to do)?
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
21:16 / 07.11.05
Also, I'd contend that recurring dream imagery could be construed as an expression of a being's willingness or desire to work with us. I've made my position on cultural appropriation in magic pretty clear; even so, if I wake up from yet another vivid dream of buying rum and cigars to be treated to a vision of a disembodied head on my nightstand, Ellegua gets his booze and smokes the next Monday, no arguments.
 
 
Dead Megatron
22:36 / 07.11.05
I think Kali is cool. I have a mental picture of her as some mega-wiarrior goddess who kicks serious ass. The kind of god I would call upon only when I'm really pissed of, I mean, ready to kill someone. MOst of what I know of her comes from movies (Indiana Jones, remember?) and internet search, bu I really started to feel like that after I saw on cable an opera reproduction of what was supposed to be ans ancient chant/mantra in honor of Kali from her thugees followers or something (dead gods, I wish I remembered the words - something ending with "Kali-ka" or whatnot), who chanted it before battle.

As matter of fact, I have a little mantra of my own in which I call upon every "warrior god" or "evil demon" I can remember, to focus my will. It goes something like: "Ares, Hachiman, and Ahriman; Sekhmet, Kali, and Gorgonae..." and so on. It's still a work in progress

Talking about recontextualizing...
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
22:43 / 07.11.05
I belive that would be "Kali Ma", DM. And I'm really not sure that mantra's a terrribly good idea...
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
22:47 / 07.11.05
Wikipedia article on Kali, with useful links.
 
 
trouser the trouserian
05:12 / 08.11.05
Mordant, I think that spontaneity was certainly a factor - a feeling of being drawn who knows where... - with very little to go on, few expectations & just a notion that I was going somewhere you know?. The one friend I had who was an experienced magician gave me a poster reproduction of a painting showing Kali in her youthful aspect, which helped. I found out from somewhere (can't recall where) that there was a relationship between Kali and the lunar cycle, so I performed simple devotional rituals to her in her maiden-mother-crone aspects according to the lunar cycle, which was a direct influence of the Alexandrian coven I'd been involved in a year or so previously.
I honestly don't think I'd come across the notion that Kali is "risky" or been exposed to much that portrayed her in that Indiana Jones "orientalist" fashion. I did find a book entitled "A Goat to Kali" which purported to be an accurate account of William Sleeman's campaigns against the Thuggee and contained a prayer to Kali which I incorporated into my devotions which started: "Because thou lovest the burning ground, I have made a burning ground of my heart..." (just found this in my magical notebook for 1979-82). I think this initial Kali phase probably lasted no more than five-six months. But I returned to her, and, spurred by those initial experiences found/wove a thread that's run through my life for the past twenty-odd years.
 
 
Ulysses Lazarus
08:13 / 08.11.05
Well, not everyone here agrees that it is "bad practice". And isn't it rather simplistic to make a sweeping statement like if yr ignorant of any tradition but using it anyway, yr magic! is bound to be shit

It wasn't meant as the missing theorem of magic!, mate, it was just meant as an intuitive statement. I still have a hard time believing that ignorance of a deity employed is going to bring about stellar results altho perhaps there is a point to be made about the un/subconcious. Ultimately, however, convincing me isn't what it's about, is it?

Still, I think the issue is getting very confused. Taking yr example of work with Kali, let's contextualize this a bit more. After you did work with Kali, I suspect that you did not immediately begin writing articles, manifestoes and treatises on Kali in preparation for yr book deal.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
08:41 / 08.11.05
I still have a hard time believing that ignorance of a deity employed is going to bring about stellar results altho perhaps there is a point to be made about the un/subconcious.

Complete ignorance, maybe; also, it depends on the purpose of the working. if you decided to evoke a particular deity for something completely unrelated, f'rexample, Kali to empower a love-spell, the best-case scenario would be the mere faliure of the working. There's also the issue of deities as complex beings--a working for poetic inspiration that called upon Odin might well be a resounding success, but might also bring about a wide variety of alarming side-effects, as His other aspects will not simply be left at the door.

On the other hand, consider this scenario: You possess at least a rough understanding of a being's field of operations, and feel a genuine connection to or fascination with that being. You're approaching hir with humility and respect, a recognition of how little you know and far you've got to go. The main aim of your work, the overarching goal, is not to win a new car, come up with a kickass idea for a story, or get chicks, but to create a better relationship with Hir, and gain a deeper understanding of Hir mysteries.

That's not shit magic. That can be some of the most amazing work you'll ever do.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
08:58 / 08.11.05
After you did work with Kali, I suspect that you did not immediately begin writing articles, manifestoes and treatises on Kali in preparation for yr book deal.

I've read this a few times now and I don't get what it has to do with magic. Are you comparing book deals with magical workings? Do you really think that you need an equivalent amount of information to work with a deity as to write a treatise?
 
 
trouser the trouserian
09:40 / 08.11.05
I still have a hard time believing that ignorance of a deity employed is going to bring about stellar results

Possibly not, but on what basis can one evaluate another person's experience? What constitutes, for you, a "stellar" result? Can you really predict how another person's going to respond to a practice they've done, just because you don't think they've done it appropriately?

But the reason I brought this up in the first is to try and illustrate the complexities of the process of magical discovery, which in my experience at least, have taken me in unexpected directions and led me to discover nuances & complexities behind the surface of other people's mouthings and declaractions. You can start from a position of complete ignorance about anything but there's always the possibility that you might eventually move towards a more nuanced understanding through practice & personal investigation - at least, if you feel moved to do so. I spent years having people tell me that Kali was a "dark goddess" or a "crone" and that I "shouldn't work with her", blah blah blah. One of the reasons that I became interested in the whole cultural appropriation/imperialism debate was that I wanted to know where these popular imaginings of the practices I was engaging with came from, so I started looking into the roots of orientalism, the essentialist and universalist philosophies that powered them, and Postcolonial critiques of Eurocentric formulations of other cultures.

Mordant, why do you think asking Kali to fulfill one's desires for love would fail?
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
10:02 / 08.11.05
Not fail, necessarily. I would certainly accept that love is one of the mysteries of Kali. I can't help imagining, though, that anyone naively petitioning a Goddess who embodies both the most devouring and destructive passion and the most warm and nurturing maternal love just to help get that new chap in the office to go out for a drink would either get pointedly ignored or find that hir life was suddenly terribly eventful.
 
 
Dead Megatron
15:49 / 08.11.05
Thanks, M. Carnival. You wouldn't happen to know the whole chant, would you?

And that mantra is not even supposed to be a teribly good idea, it's to be used when ferocity and a certain ammount of cruelty is in order (fights ans such). Rare instances, thankfully
 
 
trouser the trouserian
15:57 / 08.11.05
Megatron

actually, Kalika is a variant way of addressing Kali. You'll find in Indian texts she's often referred to as Kalika. See Sri Kalika Devi for more info.
 
 
Chiropteran
16:44 / 08.11.05
Are you comparing book deals with magical workings? Do you really think that you need an equivalent amount of information to work with a deity as to write a treatise?

I think the point was more about having a cross-cultural spiritual experience and immediately touting oneself to others as a (published) authority -- The Loa at the Gate, by Lepidopteran, in which I present my own limited experience as the definitive way of working with the lwa. (The point further being that this isn't what the trouserian jumped to do as soon as ze "met" Kali.)
 
 
Chiropteran
16:45 / 08.11.05
(Argh. Sorry to drop into the thread and speak for you, John - bad habit. :S)
 
  

Page: 12(3)4

 
  
Add Your Reply