BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Cultural appropriation in magical practices.

 
  

Page: 1(2)34

 
 
DecayingInsect
14:04 / 10.08.04
... it is a thread looking at the various issues around cultural appropriation in an effort to find more sustainable models of interacting with other magico-religious cultures that benefit all parties involved.

It does seem to have devloped an oddly censorious tone though...

But seriously though: who bestows legitimacy?

There are even self-styled ethnocentric neopagans out there.
Sometimes they get worked up about who ought to write books about runes etc. Should we be taking them seriously?

On the other hand I'm not impressed with the poseurs either, but do they fool anyone other than themselves?
 
 
rising and revolving
14:39 / 10.08.04
I’d agree that there’s a difference between being respectful and timid, but there’s also a difference between engaging deeply and genuinely with a living religion, and being a clueless arrogant twat dipping a toe in the water and thinking you run the pool. If you are dealing with living Powers, they are the ultimate arbitrators of what goes and what doesn’t. You can expose them to different ideas and keep them updated with new versions, but it’s up to them whether they want to dance with it.

So, if the powers are are going to be the arbitrators - why does it matter what we say?

Why should we even consider these factors, if those whose turf we're dancing on are the ones who make their minds up as to whether we belong?

I ask this merely because I pretty much agree with you. It's the powers who will decide. Which means that it doesn't really matter so much if Mr Young Buck from Sydney-town decides one day that he's going to start fooling about with the loa in a deeply unappreciative fashion. He'll get his come-up-ance - or maybe he won't, if he's amusing enough.

That despite how much his "Free Papa Legba" leafleting campaign pisses off all the local "culturally sensitive" practicioners.
 
 
SteppersFan
18:09 / 10.08.04
Now, speaking almost seriously for a moment -- how's this fit into the discussion of the WET and especially the GD that's down the page?

As I understand it, the GD system (at the time, anyway) was all about learning a bunch of different magickal systems and kinda mixing them up. Mathers mixed 'em up in his rituals anyway.

Now you could make an obvious parallel between the GD and the colonialist, imperial Britain of what it was a part. But maybe that's a bit pat. Maybe there's a sense in which the WET is inherently appropriatist.

Oh, and, let's not be too down on chaos magick, shall we? Bit fashionable... 'specially when some of the ideas in there help one articulate the issue...
 
 
farseer /pokes out an i
14:18 / 12.08.04
So, if the powers are are going to be the arbitrators - why does it matter what we say?

Why should we even consider these factors, if those whose turf we're dancing on are the ones who make their minds up as to whether we belong?


I tend to think that if you're being sincere, that's what the powers respond to (assuming the powers are in some way actually seperated from yourself/the universe/autonomous/etc.) Or perhaps it's that you've convinced yourself of your sincerity? (I just had a flashback to Wesley speaking to the Hamburger-figure Loa, LOL)

Generally speaking, you get out of a particular system what you put into it. If you connect to a symbol intuitively, then use it. If you want to deepen that connection, try to learn more about it, origins, meaning to others, etc. Depending on what your goals are, complete immersion might not be necissary.

I tend to agree with the previous posters who stated that the cultural/symbolic/religious mingling/blending that occurs is natural, irresistable, and part of the human condition. The ancient cultures, over time, assimilated many aspects of each other's own specific 'reality tunnels' so to speak. Sure, sometimes it happened relatively slowly, and sometimes perhaps within a generation. That process seems never ending, and the 'start' of it occurs somewhere... It's difficult to put your finger on where and when this process occurs, because it happens within us all the time, and any 'start' point is potentially pretty arbitrary...

BTW, 'breaking open the head' has some good rants about the value of experiencing the shamanic journey in the 'native' settings...

anyways, didn't mean to tag onto an potentially dead thread. It was a good read to get to this point (although, to me, there seemed to be a bit of misplaced hostility on some folks part. But maybe i read into their words too much.)
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
15:15 / 12.08.04
I always sound overly hostile when I've got endless pages of Quark tables to do.

I agree that syncretisation is a natural process, but think its important to be aware of the issues around it. The Powers are the ultimate arbitrators, but at the same time I'd say that shallow cultural appropriation in the name of arbitrary paradigm shifting does deserve a bit of a critique, as its a fairly widespread practice. I think it's a problematic issue and one worth discussing. I've got more to say on this subject, but I'm taking a little break from all things related to magic for awhile so it'll have to wait.
 
 
trouser the trouserian
07:14 / 13.08.04
Here's an article discussing a recent protest by Hindus over the publication of an academic book - described by some protestors as a pornographic affront to a key Hindu god - Ganesa. This is just one instance of a growing trend whereby Hindus are actively monitoring & protesting what Western academics are writing about their religious beliefs. This has had - in one or two cases (like the book being discussed) the effect of books being withdrawn by publishers, several academics have had 'death threats' - and there have been some efforts between the two groups to find some common ground & understandings.
 
 
SteppersFan
10:06 / 13.08.04
Well, Phil Hine liked the book, while giving a fair and balanced exposition of why some Hindus took exception to it.

So what do we do if the treatment of another culture by academics or others seem OK to us, even in the context of appreciating the issues of cultural appropriation, yet are still objected to by members of that culture? Do we carry on regardless?

Shades of the controversy over Jamaican reggae artists and homophobia somewhere here...
 
 
Unconditional Love
16:44 / 14.08.04
personally i think in that situation i would have a moral duty to comply with that cultures demands as that culture is not mine.

there seems to me something about cultural appropriation that may be tied into liberal guilt as if being a westerner were a bad thing, so many people sought to embrace other cultures to understand them and in some way allieviate the damage done by years of colonialism and slavery, to appease there own conscience and identity, this would also bring in ideas of multiculturalism and global capitalism which in my opinion are seeking to create a multi cultural market place, one way to do this would be to sell culture so that culture becomes an object of consumption, this can be passed off as an apology for acts in the past. yet in effect is seen by some including myself as a continuation of that colonial attitude, it is as if everything can be bought, spirtuality, people, identity.

in a world where cultural identity is to be replaced by corporate consumer identity, then the act of making identity a consumable media is a pertinent way to eventually erode the idea of cultural identity and create a global market controlled with consumable identity providers by producers.

a very big perhaps.
 
 
Unconditional Love
17:04 / 14.08.04
id like to pose a question in relation to chaos magick, what is chaos magick without its appropriation of other mythical structures? can it fuction without a mythical structure culturally specific or otherwise?
 
 
slinkyvagabond
20:06 / 15.08.04
Um...Can any form of magic or ritual function without its mythical structure? I mean, come on, I surely don't even pretend to know everything about anything but every form of the aforementioned I've ever heard about has a framework of some sort, based on "myth" (as I understand the term, basically a body of stories which promote/interpret certain cultural beliefs and ritual practices, also containing references to places and names known and used within that culture). Why pick on chaos magic?
 
 
Unconditional Love
20:25 / 15.08.04
i wish to point out its foundation.
most other magical sytems do have a mythological structure inherant to the system.
this is generally a part of the culture that the magical/spiritual structure evolved in.
chaos magic does have a cultural basis in my opinion, that being the mythic structure of modern mediated culture, chaos magic had a punk ethic attached to it, a deconstruction of western magical institutions as they stood at the time, this area has become so dilute imo, that it has become a form of utilitarian ideaology rather than deconstructing and reorganising, it has become a form of magical consumerism imo, all its ideas are 30 years old, in an information rich western cultural environment you could argue it has become conservative in its outlook an ideaology that refuses to change and wishes to remain true to its roots, is that really possible within culture with such a turn over of consumption of symbology?

coversely should a culture with roots outside of westrn culture be pushed through a western mediated structure totally destroying its own conceptions of its values?
 
 
slinkyvagabond
20:28 / 15.08.04
But I should say that this is one of the first "Temple" threads I've read properly all the way through. It's quite the conundrum and one that I personally worry about ie can I reconcile myself to using certain symbols that are culturally alien to me. There have been certain elements that I have felt connected at kind of an instinctual level to but had to ultimately abandon because I basically felt embarrased using something I was struggling to understand on an intellectual level. Sorry, that's a bit garbled. What I mean is that an immediate connection on a gut level is all well and good but to really utilise the power of the symbol, system or god you feel you've connected with I think you have to understand a bit with your intellect. Its cultural context, history and so on,
That said, I find it weird that (comments about restriction to Anglicanism aside) most of the examples of cultural appropriation by western cultures of another culture pertained to either Asian or Native American traditions. I mean, y'all seem to think its ok to use the Kaballah anytime you want, or that Celtic mythologies are there for the pick n mix. I do agree, as long as there's a modicum of learning and understanding behind that usage. But its not just "foreign" cultures that get misused. I wouldn't know, frankly, what to expect at an Anglican service, so much like I wouldn't use Papa Legba's veve, I wouldn't base a working on that service.
 
 
slinkyvagabond
20:31 / 15.08.04
excuse me. I didn't think anyone else would post inbetween my posts. Sorry for the disjointedness of that.
 
 
Unconditional Love
20:35 / 15.08.04
chaos magic was designed to strip systems of what was useful, the point is, is that respecting of other cultures?
when you just take rather than ask permission arent you just asking for a slap in the face?

alot of it is an unquestioning attitude that that is okay because of such and such, rather than a thoughtful process and consideration of others.

i am reflecting on myself as much as anybody or anything else, ive done everything i am describing,this is not a guilt trip, more a process of reflection, which i think some others are understanding.

i cant be that pious when i am what i am talking about.
well occasionally i can be.
 
 
slinkyvagabond
20:42 / 15.08.04
wolfangel - ok then, no I actually don't think chaos magic can function without its mythical constructs. But as I indicated I don't think it's unique among magical systems in that respect. In order to be empowered I think all the forms must have a back up system, the mythical structure that the magic evolved from.
However, CM is an extremely individualistic practice (which come to think of it, is not very punk these days, DIY seemingly being about small collective action) which is its most Western characteristic, I suppose, embodying Enlightenment values. And I can see where encorporating a highly cultural and community specific activity such as Voudoun ritual or Wicca ritual or Druidic ritual into such a highly individualised form of practice could be seen as, well, insulting and ultimately useless. Still, you have to have something as a focus.
 
 
*
03:09 / 17.09.04
Spoken at a pagan meeting tonight: "To make sure next week's discussion on cultural appropriation in Wicca doesn't get out of hand, we'll have a talking stick..."
 
 
eddie thirteen
13:27 / 17.09.04
With all respect, Wolfangel, you have indeed seemed a little bit holier-than-thou in this thread, but I don't think that means you're at all offbase. I do think you've kinda missed the point when it comes to CM, though...clearly, any magical system that exists to strip religions of what makes them work would itself not work, and wouldn't be practised. Obviously, CM does work for some people; either that or those people wouldn't know whether a magical system was working or not, and so carry on because it's, I dunno, cool or something. I tend to believe that, in most cases, it works for its practicioners...as does Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, chicken worship, or any faith that people subscribe to in the face of adversity. That's the real test -- when everything is going wrong, does your system work?

Chaos Magic did once, but does no longer, work for me. Not the way it did, anyway. I have found that was once playful and enjoyable about it has come to seem -- in the face of genuine adversity -- a take on faith that, in its absurdity, borders on the nihilistic. I agree with you that it seems as though what is really being said is that all systems are inherently equal because all systems are inherently meaningless. Taken to its logical extension, this makes a joke of our lives. Personally, I don't buy that, and I don't buy the notion that all organized religions are systems of control laid down by The Man, or whatever. They're means of interpreting and understanding our own lives, which they can help us do, if we are willing to pay serious attention to them.

The surface skimming inherent in the CM approach to religion does not have to be, but often is, a celebration of ignorance...willful ignorance, if one chooses to go on not really knowing shit about the religions one is working with. To extend the punk rock metaphor, it's one thing (it's DIY, and in a good way) to pick up a guitar and learn two chords and start a band, because what you wanna do *right now* is start a band; it's another thing to still be in that band ten years later and still only know two chords, and adamantly refuse to learn a third, because that wouldn't be cool, or possibly it would require some effort. I think Chaos Magic is a good place for people to start, in many respects -- it gets you actively involved, it gives you inklings of systems you may never have heard of. All to the good. But from there...

Well, I guess it depends on what you want. I suspect that most practicioners of CM are just interested in getting stuff done on a material level; I hope it doesn't offend anybody for me to say so, but I think it's a bit shallow that way. And, for the actual spiritual seeker, it's probably totally worthless. Anyway, it is for me. Can it be a good way to accomplish things? In my experience, yes. But will it lead to an understanding of...well...anything? ...Um...no. It's a shortcut to results. That's it. Results being a good thing to sometimes get, I have a hard time arguing for its abandonment. But...yeah. I'm definitely in favor of the CM practicioner expanding his/her horizons and actually learning about the various belief systems that have only sustained humanity basically forever.

But I think it's a bit pious to lay into people who aren't inclined to do the work. Frankly, a great many professed Jews, Christians, Muslims, etc. -- even those who hail from ethnic groups traditionally associated with those faiths -- really don't know anything about their religion, and don't care to. But they believe it, and it works for them. I don't think any of this is any different. If a person is talking *to you* about a belief system you feel you understand quite well, and it's obvious to you they don't have the first clue what they're saying, and yet they're insistent that they know all, then okay, be pissed. Otherwise, though, I can't see how it's any of your business. Belief is a personal thing.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
15:00 / 17.09.04
Great post, Eddie 13. And nice to see this thread getting a revive.

For me, I identified as a chaos magician for years until I approached another "paradigm", as you do, and had loads of experiences that directly challenged the chaos magic perspective I was then operating from. I discovered a depth and complexity that was missing from anything I'd previously been exposed to, and found myself experiencing things that I'd never really scratched the surface of with years of chaos magic. I never looked back.
 
 
Unconditional Love
21:17 / 17.09.04
yeah i turned into a politically correct preacher man, and i still cant figure out how or why, but i am guessing some kind of mis projected anger all in all.

sorry folks.
 
 
Unconditional Love
07:41 / 18.10.04
perhaps thou all that preaching aside there are quite a few relevant points in this thread, perhaps put better by others, but very relevant none the less.
 
 
Unconditional Love
08:35 / 18.10.04
the term shaman was brought to my attention the other day in an online chat.
people that belong to the native american traditions are beginning to take offense at the term as they rightly point out that it is a term that belongs to the tungus people of siberia and not a catch all term, which it has become for a particular form of spiritual practice.

the idea that "tribal" peoples spiritual practices fall into an overall heading of shamanism strips them of there cultural variety and in some sense there identity.

the practice of core shamanism as it is called has alot to do with this homogenisation and generic approach to peoples identity, in my opinion.
 
 
LVX23
21:13 / 18.10.04
As human culture becomes increasingly connected and localised it's inevitably going to challenge identity and membership. Whether we like it or not, globalisation as a simple byproduct of transportation and communication technologies will ultimately find it's way into every corner of life. No culture is an island. It's fine to defend against appropriation and homogeneity but the simple reality of human nature is that we deeply want access to novelty. We are exceedingly curious and this goes beyond distinctions of race or ancestry. And in the industrialized cultures there's a strong tendency to share information, whether it's ours or someone else's.

I personally tend to object to ownership of spiritual traditions. I think they should be available to everyone and that those who resonate with them and absorb their teachings should be allowed to pass them on, regardless of race or ancestry. It should only matter that it works for you and makes you a better person. They are, after all, ultimatley only found artifacts of the Absolute. Ownership of spirit implies appointment by divinity. This is the problem with religious dogma: each thinks they are the chosen people. If I find meaning in the Torah, or in Rastafarianism, or from eating plants in the Amazonian jungle, does it matter whether I'm white or black or Jewish or Incan?

CM was founded essentially on this notion, as a reaction to fraternity and occultism and exclusion. Results magick was a subcomponent, but the basic maxim was that all of these systems and philosophies, as well as many things regarded as secular or commonplace, can be integrated into one's magickal practice. If chanting Hebrew god names to a Bart Simpson doll, while standing in a pentagram surrounded by white candles, while smoking tryptamines works, then go for it! (Yes, I have done this.)

Ultimately, I'd like to see indigenous cultures preserved and protected but I don't think they stand much of a chance in the long run. The best way to preserve the traditions (or at least their intent) is to archive them and make them readily available to those who are interested. Remixing them into modern culture might dilute the meaning for some, but bring others nearer to their message.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
09:28 / 19.10.04
I agree with all of that LVX, but I think the problems creep in when people take that notion as their starting point, and just absorb the superficial window dressing elements of whichever suitably exotic magical or religious cultures or traditions they may have been exposed to, without really learning anything from them, taking the time to understand them or connecting up to them in any meaningful way.

Some of the usual suspects that occur in the average chaos magicians personal versioning are reconstructions of historical "traditions" that have been remade in a workable format, filling in any gaps with stuff from elsewhere. For instance, the recent example of a practitioner appending elements of Quabbala onto a Northern trad ritual because the western mystery tradition provides an operating system for working with entity that is largely missing from the Eddas. I have certain criticisms of that approach, but that's already going on in another thread.

What I find more problematic, however, is where the absorbed traditions aren't incomplete echoes of a pagan past, but living traditions that you could conceivably go off and learn properly, from people who know what they are talking about, if you were so inclined. There's a lot of stuff out there to learn that is not in books, and which you can't fabricate yourself in a chaos magic reconstructionist sense. You have to put in the effort, earn the right to it, convince someone that your worth passing that stuff onto, that you'll do good things with it, respect it, further it. That takes a level of integrity and commitment to something that seems to be missing from a lot of contemporary magical practice.

It's far easier to just make something up yourself, based on whatever scant elements you've managed to glean, and convince yourself it's the same thing. For instance, you can make yourself a rattle with snake vertebrae, but that doesnt make it an Asson. I think loads of people do this sort of thing all the time though, to a greater or lesser extent. I've been guilty of similar things myself in the past, and it's something I try hard to watch out for. In fact, it's probably one of the most problematic obstacles that comes up in my practice, where my tendency towards creativity tries to outpace my readiness for progression.

One of the main problems I have with popular chaos magic is the tendency to distill complexity down to basic mechanics. Sigils, servitors, godforms, paradigms, etc... and then "hang" other elements onto that framework as if their only purpose is to make a piece of machinery look prettier and more aesthetically pleasing. That notion is often taken as the basis for "making up your own system", because the the components of that system are considered largely superfluous to the dynamics of the magic.

I think that's just wrong, and that any serious involvement with a magico-religious tradition independent of chaos magic and Golden Dawn influenced western occultism will tend to produce experiences that strongly contradict those ideas. If you approach another culture's tradition from this basis, you're setting up a huge obstacle to understanding that tradition on its own terms, and depriving yourself of the opportunity to learn anything beyond what you already think you already know.

That's the point at which natural curiosity, information exchange and the syncretic nature of magic and religion crosses over into cultural appropriation and cultural imperialism.
I don't think it's "wrong" to try and further your knowledge and understanding of magic by learning from other cultures, far from it, but I do think it's important to be aware of all of these factors as you go about it and be constantly vigilant about the way you are approaching this process.
 
 
trouser the trouserian
11:33 / 19.10.04
Here's another quote from Amber Laine Fisher:

"...we must recognize that we are not entitled to the rites and traditions of cultures that did not birth us. We are not entitled to take something from someone else, whitewash it and proclaim it the same as or better than the original. When we do that, we slap that community in the face, because we say to them, "This used to be yours. It used to define you. Now it is ours." That community, especially minority communities already struggling to maintain a unique identity, becomes that much closer to being absorbed by the dominant culture."

This issue is so emotive as its not so much that some people 'borrow' from the spiritual traditions of other cultures, but in so doing, make the claim that the system that they have cobbled together is identical, or in some cases. "better" than the original.

Look at Harley 'Swift Deer' for example, and his "Native American" sex-magick Quodoushka techniques. Swift Deer has claimed to be half-Cherokee and to have grown up on a Cherokee reservation in Texas. Unfortunately, elders of the Cherokee nation have pointed out that it doesn't have any 'reservations' in Texas (or anywhere else) and that there is no such practice as Quodoushka in Cherokee culture. Tribes Demands Apology from HBO

Needless to say, the notion of Quodoushka as a "native American" set of practices has passed into the common New Age melting-pot, whilst the protests of the Cherokee people have been, to a large extent, ignored.

Interesting article here exploring the relationship between the theft of cultural identity and exploitation:

"From the earliest beginnings of european colonialism, the shamanic knowledge, astrological knowledge, healing and medicinal knowledge as well as the histories of the lands of indigenous peoples, have suffered the misinterpretations and distortions of eurocentric anthropologists and archaeologists who twisted and reconstructed the ancient practices of the peoples to support the ideologies of social darwinism. Today these same forms of indigenous knowledge and practice are being reappropriated and reinvented by new age apologists whose global trade as the harbingers of salvation in a world on the brink of destruction sustains them in a lifestyle derived from spiritual and materialist greed while simultaneously disavowing the materialism of modern capitalism. It is as though, faced with the resurgence and renewal of indigenous communities throughout the world and the reassertion of fundamental indigenous rights and the enshrining of these rights within international treaties and covenants, certain elements within the non-indigenous community at large are impelled to seek new ways of asserting their domination over indigenous peoples."
 
 
eye landed
16:25 / 21.10.04
if i have chronic headaches and my doctor gives me pills that do nothing but make me vomit, i have a perfectly legitimate right to visit an acupucturist instead. i dont need to train in the ancient secrets of traditional chinese medicine any more than i need to go to medical school to benefit from surgical removal of a malignant tumor.

its not different on the astral plane. if i can get papa legba to talk to me by noodling around on a drum, i might as well listen to what he as to say. i could probably do a lot more with pl if i moved to haiti and devoted my life to orisha. but i could also do a lot more if i ate a spoonful of mda.

the problem with shallow learning and quick fixes is the possibility of mistakes. i have to trust my western doctor to give me the right pills, and to avoid my pharmacological allergies. i have to trust that my book on santeria was written by somebody who knows her stuff. i have to trust that my drug-induced visions apply to more than just today. im probably wrong at least once.

if im going to appropriate some tai chi to control my physical energy matrix, i had better appropriate something else to align my moral compass. an ideal system would handle it all, but ideal systems must be individual, and so they must involve some appropriation. even classical martial arts schools always involved deviation with each generation. every master has his own style, and every student learns a unique perspective.

the reason we have this postmodern conflict over cultural appropriation is because few cultures are threatened by anything else these days. fewer people than ever before worry about having their way of life wiped out forever by the neighboring tribe (the american tribe notwithstanding). so instead of worrying about whether their culture will survive, they worry about how their culture will change. its very similar to our suspension of biological evolution through science. any retard can survive and breed these days, so what makes a genius more adaptive? the trick is to consciously direct 'evolution', both biologically and culturally. doing so will probably lead to annihilation of the majority. its those who adapt and adopt the most shamelessly who will survive and rule.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
21:03 / 21.10.04
I don’t think anyone in this thread is suggesting that nobody should visit an acupuncturist or practice Tai Chi because they are not Chinese, have not studied Chinese medicine, or were not trained one-on-one by a Tai Chi Master in the discipline’s country of origin. Neither is anyone suggesting that it is impossible to build a relationship with any of the Lwa without having been initiated into a house in Haiti.

However, surely you accept that Tai Chi and Acupuncture are very specific things that need to be studied and internalised. If you’re going to set yourself up as an acupuncturist, then yeah, I do expect you to have gone off and studied Chinese medicine for years. Similarly, there is more to Tai Chi than standing about in a park waving your arms around on slow random arcs. If you want to practice Tai Chi, you have to find a good teacher and work hard at it. Vodou and Santeria are also very specific things that require specific training, have their own ground rules and skill sets, and contain a lifetime of stuff to learn.

Cultural appropriation is what happens when someone watches the Jet Li film ‘Tai Chi Master’, makes up something that looks a bit like what they’ve seen on the telly, and convinces themselves that they are an expert in Tai Chi. Cultural appropriation is what happens when someone watches the James Bond film ‘Live and Let Die’, appends the imagery they’ve seen on the telly to a western magic framework, and convinces themselves they know all there is to know about Vodou and Santeria.
 
 
eye landed
07:37 / 22.10.04
in that case, are you are opposing anything other than your own insecurities? i dont think people who pinch their hegu point to relieve headaches think they could set up a public practice.

thats not a personal attack. obviously, its not your personal insecurities that are at issue.

this thread has been occasionally interesting so far, but what exactly is the problem we are trying to avoid? offense to ethnic groups? sloppiness in magickal practice? impure karma? fraudulent instruction?

i think that the chaos magick dictum 'use whatever works' is also a bruce lee quote regarding martial arts. maybe it helps my muscle tone if i wave my arms in slow random arcs every morning, but trekking to china to study real tai chi for decades would interfere with higher priorities. if thats the case, i shouldnt be teaching a tai chi class, but if some whiny chinese man told me was offending him with my bad form, i wouldnt feel criminal telling him to fuck off. (although in my case, i would tell him to correct me.) on the other hand, when im old and my body is giving out, it might become worth it to study tai chi a bit more carefully.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
09:29 / 22.10.04
in that case, are you are opposing anything other than your own insecurities? thats not a personal attack. obviously, its not your personal insecurities that are at issue.

If it was a personal attack it is expressed ineptly enough for me to have no idea what it is you're driving at... How is it an expression of my "personal insecurities" to imply that someone has to, y'know, actually study Tai Chi, or Acupuncture, or Santeria, or Vodou in order to practice them effectively.

what exactly is the problem we are trying to avoid?

I thought we'd covered that over and over again in this thread...

Sloppiness in magical practice.

Stealing surface elements from other cultures and appending them to a western magic framework, without bothering to go out of your way to study the actual framework that these elements exist within and are taken from.

Not making a distinction between the two approaches.

Viewing the worlds magical traditions through the lens of western magic and chaos magic, as if these are somehow the dominant meta-paradigms that all other traditions must conform to.

The way in which this process could lead to some of the advanced methodologies of these traditions, which currently exist in predominantly third world countries, being drowned out by the loud engines of the western publishing machine producing wave after wave of dumbed down westernised versioning that, through sheer size of voice compared to that of the actual practitioners, produces a skewed perspective on these traditions even within their country of origin.

The threat that the international magical community could lose important and valuable theoretical and practical knowledge as a result of this process.

The fact that the only likely way of halting this process is for practitioners of other cultural traditions to start competing on the western market, selling the mysteries of their tradition to an audience eager for a taste of the exotic who would willingly pay £200 for a copy of the "Voudon Gnostic Workbook".

The way in which this imposed economic situation serves to cheapen and erode the power of teachings that have traditionally been passed on via oral or initiatory means for specific reasons.

The way in which western magicians, who are significantly driving this process - if they think about it at all - justify it with platitudes such as "information wants to be free, maaaan" and, perhaps, "its those who adapt and adopt the most shamelessly who will survive and rule".

The way in which parallels can be drawn between that sort of attitude to other cultures and the attitude that justified colonialism and the slave trade.

The fact that these are extremely emotive issues for many of the other cultures involved, yet are rarely even addressed or considered by western practitioners.

The way in which this prevalent attitude among western practitioners could well be considered fuckwitted, lazy and irresponsible - and that it is largely the responsibility of magicians in the west to look for more sustainable models of cultural interaction. Or else everyone involved stands to lose something to a greater or lesser extent.

The general issues around globalisation as it applies to the spread of information in the occult world, and how this should - at the very least - be approached carefully, intelligently and respectfully. Rather than with a top of the food chain, I can buy your secrets, give me more cool ethnic stuff to spice up my paradigm, attitude of cultural imperialism.

Have we been reading the same thread?

I am all for an internationalist approach to magic. I believe that the western magician can greatly benefit from cross-training in other disciplines, and can learn vast amounts about magic by studying with hir counterparts in other cultures and traditions from around the world. We are all members of the same species and all live on the same planet. To my mind, this is a natural process, just as the hypothetical village shaman, on encountering a shaman from a neighbouring village, would swap notes and a cultural exchange would take place. Because of today's communications technology and a global market, this is now happening on a massive scale in the occult world.

There's no stopping that process, and that could be a brilliant positive thing that could further everyone involved. But it could do with being managed better by the people at the other end, namely us. The cultural exchange does not appear to be happening on equal, balanced or even mutual terms. It has the potential to be a destructive, one-sided process, that propigates dumbed down incomplete material and diminishes the international occult communities collective body of knowledge. This imbalance could urgently benefit from being addressed, or at least discussed more, than it currently is. Hence this thread.

i think that the chaos magick dictum 'use whatever works' is also a bruce lee quote regarding martial arts. maybe it helps my muscle tone if i wave my arms in slow random arcs every morning, but trekking to china to study real tai chi for decades would interfere with higher priorities.

Yes. Whatever works. Tai Chi is not a series of random arm movements designed to improve muscle condition. It is primarily a martial art form designed for self-defence, and secondly a series of movements designed to promote the flow of "chi" along specific energy meridians in the human body based upon the principles of chinese medicine.

These movements have been developed and passed on by generations of practitioners, and you can learn them. You will likely find a competant teacher in your city. You don't have to go to China. But if someone thinks they can just make something up on the fly that is directly comparable to Tai Chi, or Kung Fu, or whatever, without ever having been to a lesson, or even after a handful of years training in the disciplines themselves, then they are a deluded idiot. Plain and simple. Similarly, you don't necessarily have to go to Cuba to learn about Santeria. If you live in or near a major city, there will likely be someone there who practices these things in one form or another. It will be much harder to get them to teach you, as an outsider, than it would be to find a Tai Chi teacher, but not impossible either. And if you claim to be serious about learning what another culture has to offer in terms of magic, yet are completely unwilling to actually engage with practitioners from that culture who operate in your immediate vicinity, then you have to question what you're doing
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
09:41 / 22.10.04
Apart from anything else, anyone who thinks few cultures are threatened by anything else these days (even with a nod to American foreign policy) quite simply has an incredibly narrow and limited worldview... I understand why you wouldn't be willing to engage with another culture on more than a surface level, if you can't even be arsed to engage with world current affairs to the most vague, basic extent.
 
 
Unconditional Love
10:13 / 22.10.04
chaos magicians being the product of western consumerism largely, are operating on the same basis as the function of consumerism, with all its attendent attributes.

its about buying a paradigm rather than earning a tradition.

anybody can buy the attendent objects of a cultural mythology and create the pseudo persona of a magickal practitoner from that culture, but have they actually put the time effort, initiations, rites of passage, done the study, been tested, in some case undergone the physical modifications to be true to that tradition?

i can go and buy a rosary and shave me edd and chant aum, does that make me a buddhist?i could then read a few books by the dalai lama does that make me a tibetan buddhist?

i could also dress in black alot buy the right cds go to the right clubs go to see the right bands, does that make me a goth?

its about commitment, committing the self to something and living that, being that.

rather than being in that oh so safe position of dabbling, change of costume and your somebody else, great if your a liar, con man,thief or actor.

ever wondered why actors are treated like demi gods in western culture? as if acting is the height of success......
 
 
_Boboss
12:11 / 22.10.04
Yeh so there were these fucken hare krishnas right, no word of a lie, two sundays ago just before lunchtime, up the tor fucken ringing their bells and banging their drums and chanting their chants and bounce bounce bounce bounce bounce bounce bounce. fucken right enflamed with prayer they were, on my land. say what you like about the krishnas, but they ain’t anglo-celtic marian christians is they? or druids, who did what they did on the hill before that, not that anyone really knows what it was. (these days you see a druid up there and have a chat, he’s probably doing buddhist meditation after a day of caning mudgely in the town. arguably, they ain't druids.)

the hordes of avallach could be heard seething in the labyrinth beneath: ‘oi hippies! that ain’t how we do the work-ship round these parts! where’s the fucken dead lambs? fucken folk been hangin’ and burnin’ and singin’ and prayin’ for years, but none of this harry harry bollocks. bloody vegetarians’. despite the fairy-king’s grumpiness (just a hangover probably, it having been saturday night just a few hours ago and him loving a knees-up), mum and me went and had a bit of a listen, bit of a bounce bounce etc. and a clap and enjoying the acoustics…and the cunts smiled at us! were happy to have us there joining in, a bit, as much as we wanted to! they even waited til we had to get back home, before the roast burnt, before they started really fucken leaping and shouting and that cos i reckon maybe they thought it would have been an imposition upon our enjoyment of the old hill to do it while we were there, would have freaked the old dear a bit. looking at this sickening episode in the cold, rational light of a built up area, i can only imagine that they thought rama in his solar aspects might be so similar in bearing to lugh that using his old temple would be a good place to sing their sunday praises!! cuuuuunts!!

[i like going there with some mushrooms or e, wine, local spring water, something to burn and a quiet midnight for a bit of jumping, hollering and circle-walking, maybe a firework. this, though quite possibly new, is also a legitimate local tradition, simply because i’ve been there and done it a few times. next time, yeah okay, maybe bells and drums and a rhythmic mantra, and don’t wrap up so warm, let the wind pummel me a bit, and a veggie curry after if i fancy. does the fact that my chancing across these polite and smiley monks inspired these new development make me an evil sith lord? or are they the evil ones for bringing their religimon over here and working it hodge and podge in an ancient pre-existing devotional structure? or is just very important to note that it’s not just white, western, shopaholidreadlochaotes who profess a fluid, adaptive approach to the specifics of their practice, but foreigners, religious minorities and poor people as well!???!!]
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
12:52 / 22.10.04
That's it, distort that argument! Go on! Twist that shit! Pay no attention to anything Gypsy Lantern has said! Way to go! Yeah!
 
 
_Boboss
13:30 / 22.10.04
you never close your eyes any more when i kiss, your lips.

please advise - is it right for the hare krishnas to have brought their alien religious practices to my manor? personally, glad to have them, grateful for the input, but they aren't showing respect to the area's many and ancient geniuses locuses. i think the hill's big enough to hold them quite happily, but much of what's said in this thread would appear to wish to oppose their behaviour. so is it jihad?
 
 
_Boboss
13:40 / 22.10.04
and actually, i've been through gypsy lantern's last post, and i don't think there's any aspect of my anecdote above which has led to any of the conditions he very clearly says he is seeking to avoid. perhaps if it was at all possible to draw an actual distinction between myself and the krishnas, if there was any statement that could be applied to any/either of us which would be more relevant to the situation than a simple 'we all want to enjoy the hill in the way we want to enjoy it', we could begin to play spot the magpie and worry about whether our cultures are distinct in any way that requires us to worry about 'disrespecting' them.
 
 
_Boboss
13:40 / 22.10.04
bring back, that luvvin feelin, woah....
 
  

Page: 1(2)34

 
  
Add Your Reply