BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Hinterland - SPOILERS

 
  

Page: 1234(5)678

 
 
Whisky Priestess
03:27 / 01.06.05
OK, here goes:

HINTERLAND
by DAVID BARNETT

B*b K**ry writes: (I can take out the name, assuming it's not a pseudonym, if you like)

In this first novel, a thoroughly modern young man comes face-to-face with the dangerous half-realities lurking between the corners (sic) of contemporary urban Britain. In fine tradition it starts with a taxi-ride to somewhere somehow different - an oddly unmemorable nightclub down a street the years left stranded. The next morning, what should be a walk in the park turns wild, and the town reveals an unsettling side of itself. A brooding sense of long-buried mystery and personal significance, suspended on strands of paranoia and coincidence, (sic sic sic sic) follows David to the office next day, where he works as a reporter on the local daily paper. A rash of resurgent local legends and an art viewing later, he's not quite back to normal. Far outside his conscious awareness, the comforting drone of daily life becomes a feverish buzz, heard in every echo of a place that's becoming distinctly non-ordinary.

(Is it just the time or is the above actually quite hard to understand? What do you mean, B*b?)

That's just the first para, folks! More when my fingies are less tired and stupid.
 
 
Spaniel
11:20 / 03.06.05
Whisky, I think we can do without the sics.

The style's unusual but I understand it fine. In fact, its idiosyncracies are good fun, imo.
 
 
_Boboss
11:46 / 03.06.05
ah, that would be me. no pseudonym, unless you count 'bob', my true name being 'not-bob'.

it's not the clearest review of all time, that's very fair, apart from the general doubleplusgood i wanted to get across. there was a brief anecdote at the start which was edited out, concerning the way that reading the printout of hinterland got me pathetically lost on a very easy train journey, which i think made the lead-in to the above paragraph seem a bit smoother. editor obviously disagreed. i'm not a regular at the game although i tried it for a bit - i find it very hard to write reviews without either gushing or slagging unreasonably, or giving away the end, hence i often avoid much of the material, trying to recreate how it felt as i was reading. not a greatest moment for me or my pen though, not arguing that.

sorry it made you sic as a parrot - the magazine was named after a book by william burroughs, a bit of loose association is what it's missing in my opinion. it rubs people bad though, not much you can do, just one of them things.

and really 'between corners' doesn't carry any meaning at all? i thought it worked okay in setting the paradoxical nature of the flips dave's head has to do as it relearns its environment. you pays your money though.

and now i know how smacky sam coleridge felt when asked by hobblin' george byron to explain his explantion. so there we am.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
14:34 / 03.06.05
Has anyone else noticed how Sax don't seem to come around here no more ?

Too busy 'doing drugs' in the Groucho these days, I guess.

With his new friends.

He wants to remember that this message board put him where he is now, and that it can put him back down too.

( Unless of course he's just gone on holiday for a couple of weeks, or something - I haven't really had his home under surveillance for long enough to say for sure, yet. )
 
 
Benny the Ball
20:07 / 07.06.05
Well, Wandsworth libraries now have a copy of Hinterland, and I've got it on loan. It's in a pile, under Bleak House (which is taking forever to finish thanks to work) and Valis and Dirk Gently, but it's there, ready to go. I read most of the first chapter on my short walk home from the library, and liked it, so looking forward to reading it.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
00:15 / 08.06.05
I'm sorry, Gumbitch, I was being confused, tired and probably a bit mean when I wrote the above (check the time sig on the post). You have no idea how many times I had to retype it to get it right cos my fingers wouldn't do the keyboard. (Will try and add the rest when I've got a sec).

I didn't mean to have a go, I ws just being facetious (and a bit fascist) really. You write a hell of a lot better than some of the other reviewers, which is even more impressive considering you don't do this as a regular thing.

Plus hey, I've never even had anything on the letters page, so whaddoIknow?
 
 
Sax
07:45 / 10.06.05
Has anyone else noticed how Sax don't seem to come around here no more ?

I'm baaaaack! Just returned from a sojourn in Greece, donchaknow. Which, for various reasons, was something of an ordeal at times. Still, story for another day.

Glad to see Gumbitch's outed himself as the author of the review. Very nice piece of writing, that was, even if the original was mangled a bit by the subs (that first par he mentions was really good).
 
 
Sax
10:32 / 10.06.05
And if anyone wants to wallow in schadenfreude at my expense, check out the review in the latest issue of SFX. Double ouch.
 
 
Sax
12:16 / 16.06.05
Aaaand more: Good review in the Big Issue in the North this week. Makes up for the SFX mauling.
 
 
LykeX
18:20 / 16.06.05
I've just finished it (as in an hour ago) and I really liked it. I may have some intelligent critique later when I've had some time to think, but don't count on it.

Rock on!
 
 
Liger Null
22:01 / 16.06.05
Just finished it. It's wonderful, though I kind of wish the business with the paintings had been explored a bit more, but that's just me.

I've decided that Beautiful Freak by the Eels is the perfect soundtrack for this book:

Going over to Susan's house
walking south down Baxter Street
nothing hiding behind this picket fence...



Also, what is Red Mist, and where can I get some? Because it must pack a helluva wallop
 
 
Sax
06:41 / 17.06.05
On soundtracking, Liger, for some reason I always imagined the novel finishing to She Sells Sanctuary by The Cult. Maybe one to mention when Hollywood buys the rights.

And thanks for the nice words, the both of you. Much appreciated.
 
 
Sax
05:57 / 01.07.05
Review in today's Sun (UK tabloid. Only sells about, ooh, three million or so). No shit.
 
 
Ariadne
06:34 / 01.07.05
The Sun! Wow. Hmmm, does this mean I have to actually, like, buy the Sun? What if someone sees me? Although it could be a defence against all the baby-eating anti-capitalist anarchists who are supposedly roaming the streets of Edinburgh and scaring old ladies - I can fight them off with my rolled up paper-of-the-people.
Oh, there's a thought - will it be in the Scottish Sun?
Anyway, congratulations, Sax, I hope it sells out across the land.
 
 
Sax
08:36 / 01.07.05
Me too.

In other news, I also now have an agent.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
14:15 / 04.07.05
How ironic that these days you have to get a novel published before an agent (whose job it is to, er, get your novel published) will take you on ...

Which is my way of saying nice one, Sax.

Was the Sun review good? Cos if so that's amazingly valuable publicity and your sales'll probably go through the roof (assuming Sun readers read anything but the Sun, that is ...)
 
 
Benny the Ball
10:02 / 06.07.05
Just finished it, nice one Sax. Although a lot of the stuff there-in has been seen in other books, it was a great read, really easy and engaging, kind of reminded me of Eureka Street in it's tone and character.

Anyway, just wanted to say well done again, and when's the next one due?
 
 
Sax
10:14 / 06.07.05
Cheers, BtB. You're right, of course, that I have plundered modern popular culture, and a lot of it will be familiar to SF/F readers. You'd be amazed, though, how many non-genre readers think it's inescapably weird and worry about my state of mind.

As to when the next one's due... dunno. It's a very different beast to Hinterland and I'm just doing a few revisions and edits on it now, then it's off to my agent to flog around.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
15:08 / 03.08.05
I think it's generally considered that SFX are a bunch of hoors. Anyone fancy typing out the review and thereby admitting they still read SFX for me?

Yep, our library now has a copy and I've just finished reading it. I did like it, a nice sense of the deranged and I'll probably be getting round to buying my own copy sometime soon, and I'm not just saying it because it's written by a Barbeloid.

In fact, it made me think of a younger, British Jonathan Carroll. Or perhaps, touches of Carroll, touches of Mieville?

I did feel though that, as with Carroll's earlier work, the ending was a bit weak. I was expecting more of a confrontation between him and the guy with the case, and after talking to him he spends the last of his money going utterly nuts in a grotty flat for a few weeks and then goes to Arcadia? I felt like I was missing something and only the page numbers reassured me that, in fact, pages hadn't been ripped out of the book.

And 'David barnett' at the top of each page?
 
 
Sax
09:32 / 04.08.05
You might be right about the ending. Put it down to youth; my follow-ups have more strongly-defined conclusions, I think.

Thanks for reading and commenting, Lady. I like the Carroll/Mieville comparisons, naturally.

As for the name on the top of the pages, I'm not sure if it's a stylistic thing (the cover by-line is a mix of caps and lower case) or just a cock-up. There are several typos which should have been spotted in the main body of the book, so I'm erring on the side of cock-up.

However, I'm told a second printing is planned for later this year, mainly to include some review lines, so hopefully they'll be ironed out then.

Buy those rare first editions now, folks!
 
 
Loomis
09:45 / 04.08.05
So if we bring our copy on Saturday will you sign it Sax?

And I'm talking something personal that will make it more valuable. None of that "best wishes" crap you gave me last time.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
13:46 / 04.08.05
"You're my wife now, Loomis."

Something like that?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
11:29 / 10.08.05
Just finished it this morning... nice one, Sax. Thoroughly enjoyable.
Not sure if it was just an obvious association because of the cover comment, but some of your more "normal" urban scenes put me in mind of a certain Joolz Denby, which is by no means a bad thing. Kind of an "it's grim up north" vibe, but quite informal and colloquial.

For a while I was worried that the ending would see the whole thing tumble into a pit of Neil Gaiman-ness (don't get me wrong, the rest of the book hadn't, I just wondered how Arcadia was gonna bring all this together- fortunately I was way off), but it didn't even go close to that particular edge. I think my favourite elements were the beast and the painting- I've always found a particular eeriness to those things.

Loved it. More, please!
 
 
Sax
12:30 / 10.08.05
Why thank you, kind sir.

You might be interested in this website about The Crying Boy. Unfortunately, it's in Dutch, but there are some spooky pix.
 
 
Sax
06:59 / 26.09.05
Good review from The Fortean Times.

I only tell you because I love you.

And heads up to the people who have mentioned Hinterland on their blogs. You know who you are and I'll be linking to you when my new website goes up in a couple of weeks.
 
 
Sax
09:43 / 26.09.05
And another from the Yorkshire Post.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
12:27 / 26.09.05
Oi. Sax. Stop dicking around online and write us another novel.
 
 
lonely as a cloud...
12:39 / 26.09.05
From the Fortean Times review - "Should he confront his own inner demons or dirty great big real ones?" - hehehe, nice one...!
 
 
LykeX
07:59 / 29.09.05
I've just now finished it for the second time and I'm happy to say that it was at least as good as the first time. I noticed more typos, though.
Also, I got word from my library that they've bought a copy.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
08:36 / 29.09.05
Saw a copy in the really classy second-hand bookshop in Stokey. I know that means no money for you, Sax, but to my mind that's the definition of being a "proper novelist".
 
 
Sax
09:34 / 29.09.05
Yeah, the typos are really fucking annoying, LykeX. I did spot a load at proof stage but half of them never got sorted. But thanks for reading twice!

And Stoatie - yeah, second hand is Good! That actually gives me a nice warm feeling. Just hope the copy you saw doesn't say WITH LOVE TO MUM AND DAD on the first page.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
17:09 / 29.09.05
It's a strictly quality shop, too, Sax... they don't just take any old shit.
 
 
Ganesh
21:25 / 03.10.05
Gave us 20p for it, which weren't bad.

(Ho ho.)
 
 
Sax
09:30 / 04.10.05
If you knew how that made me feel you wouldn't say that.
 
 
Ganesh
11:01 / 04.10.05
*guilt twinges*
 
  

Page: 1234(5)678

 
  
Add Your Reply