All you need to do is project certain 3d-time-varying EM fields onto the brain, that these fields do not need to be very high power (like TMS pulse) but repeating so the brain can tune/latch onto them.
Roughly correct. Repetition is important...though so is complexity over time. All you need to do may be understating the task...it is very difficult to target specific structures without hitting others, to excite and inhibit in proper time, while taking into account the particulars of individual brain structure. For basic effects, your machine sounds very promising.
If so, then all you need is a computer controlled device to emit the fields (trip helmet: array of inductor coils arranged around skull most simply) and software to generate/solve the field shape/frequencies.
If you're like me, you also need a 1950's era chrome and leather dentist chair to affix the device in your test chamber. 
The simplicity of your coil array, again, depends on what you're attempting. Even a single coil over, say, the right ear, would emit a field that would affect brain function in simple ways. I didn't use software for field-math, but I have a strong intuitive bent (even stronger post-machine).
Since you are not forthcoming with specifics: if one were to start this research from the beginning, all they need is search through the possibilities of all 3d-time varying fields for various parts of the brain. I propose that this can be done with neural networks/genetic algorithms, and the software could be turned into an open source project. This program would need only be connected to a multi-channel digital->analog converter, signal amplifier, and fed straight into the inductor coil arrangement that the program solves for. (software cost free, hardware cost hopefully minimal and easy to build, plans free and documented)
You're overthinking this. Genetic algorithms? Hundreds of papers on neuroscience get published every year; trawl 'em. I suppose if you wanted to create a million novel fields you could try that appraoch, but for the first 95% of the work, you can rely on existing research to give you your numbers and targets. As to my forthcomingness, I'm risking a substantial lawsuit and blacklisting being here, and when I can, I'll post more detail. More than that, I cannot promise.
From there, anything is possible: transcendental states, direct emotion control, instant trip (perhaps custom imitations of LSD, DMT, ketamine states, etc)... lots of fun!!!
Yep.
Sine, if you had any sense of adventure, you would leak your research (if it even does exist) (with the internet this is MORE than easy) instead of protecting yourself from NDA's. I can only hope to never be plagued by such a fear-guided scientific attitude. But I am grateful for what you have discussed anyway.
I'm glad you appreciate the thread. If you don't believe me, that's your business; I haven't been forthcoming, but anyone who knows what they're talking about can determine if I'm legit for themselves. Let us take a Gnostic approach, eh? I require no faith. I also recognize its very easy to tell someone else they should break the law and violate business agreements. Let me tell you a story, drAdrenokrome:
I happen to know one of the inventors of the industrial diamond creation process. Early on, his partner claimed to have figured out how to make gem-quality product; not so hard to believe really, since diamond is terrestrially abundant and a simple molecular crystal. Then his partner decided to leak the info, stepping outside of contract. Shortly thereafter, he "committed suicide" (David Kelly style)...and his unleaked research went into the vault. My friend maintains to this day that DeBoers offed him to protect their interests. Despite the "auto-that-ran-on-water" undertones of the story, his conviction is sufficient that I've always believed him...
What does this have to do with me, you ask? Let me lay it out: mince words all we want, my research is Mind Control Technology. Without sounding like a cheap Chris Carter script, some of the things that scared me off to begin with were the unethical directions were going, and questions about where exactly the money and interest were coming from. So, while I appreciate your criticism of my position, you aren't in my shoes. I think I'll handle this my way.
What would be helpful are signal specifications: power, frequency, etc, so that effort isnt WASTED on rediscovering all this. If someone is persistent enough, it will happen though (hopefully).
If you had a sense of adventure, you would be overjoyed with the opportunity to explore and break this ground for yourself instead of bitching that I won't break the law so you can piggyback on my work (if it even does exist). That said...
Along with sifting through my old data to assemble a 'experience transcript' for 'lithers, I have been putting together a lump of links for people to check out with various patents, papers, articles and so forth. It'll be a while yet, since I can't (sadly) write for Barbelith full-time, but when it arrives it should give plenty to chew.
Thanks.
Anytime. Hope upcoming posts are useful to you. |
