|
|
Most American media outlets that are readily consumed slap a sensationalist stamp on this every time they bring it up...
Well, that's not really a surprise, is it? A high-profile athlete—one who has heretofore projected an image as being one of the gentlemen of the game, with a sane and stable private life to boot—is accused of a violent crime.
I think you'd have gotten the same media response had it been a white athlete, frankly. Imagine if, say, Joe Montana was charged with rape: you'd have a media circus.
As to the money: I'm inclined to discount this as a motive. Bryant's lawyers are going to make this woman's life a living hell. They'll call her a slut, they'll call her a psycho, they'll call her a stalker. They'll challenge the very definitions of "consent" and "rape" (even normally sensible commentators like Gregg Easterbrook have gone all squishy on this)—anything to make her look bad. They'll call her a tease, they'll call her a gold-digger, they'll call her a racist. They will slander and and hurt her to within an inch of what the law allows, and perhaps beyond. She will read horrible things about herself in the paper every morning, and cry herself to sleep every night.
She's must have a damned good reason to put herself through this misery. Do you really think the mere promise of money could motivate a person to do this? |
|
|