BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The slow life

 
 
No star here laces
07:50 / 06.07.01
I wonder if this is significant?

quote:Though not far from the bustle and
industrial stench of Turin, {the small Italian town of} Bra smells of lilacs, and leisure is the law. It is both the home of an international movement that promotes “slow food” (the opposite of American fast food) and one of 31 Italian municipalities that have joined a sister cause, the “slow cities.” By local decree these cities have declared themselves havens from the accelerating pace of life in the global economy. In Bra, population 27,866, the town fathers have declared that all small food shops be closed every Thursday and Sunday. They forbid cars in the town square, on the ground that traffic is “a precursor to stress.” All fruits and vegetables served in local schools must be organic. The city offers cut-rate mortgages to homeowners who
renovate using a local butter-colored stucco and reserves choice commercial real estate for family shops selling handmade chocolates or specialty cheeses. And if the movement leaders get their way, the slow ethos will gradually spread across Europe.


I like the idea of this as a movement, because it seems we've had 200 years or so of dominance by the Anglo-Saxon Protestant work ethic (meme?) and maybe it's time for a more Mediterranean attitude to life to spread itself around. Certainly seems like a nice life, but I wonder what the economic repercussions would be? Would living simply and slowly free up resources for the deprived, or simply sink us into recession? What kind of governmental/economic set-up would arise from a dominance of Mediterranean thought? (One suspects maybe nobody would bother to think of one...)

Is this whole topic horribly culturally prejudiced or can we stop quibbling this kind of crap in the post-postmodern era and just use these concepts like any other concept? (and please if you want to discuss this bit in any detail - start another thread)

[ 06-07-2001: Message edited by: Plato the Soul Brother ]
 
 
grant
14:16 / 06.07.01
Well of COURSE it'd lead to a recession.

Question is, would that be altogether bad?
 
 
netbanshee
15:01 / 06.07.01
That kind of pace is what seems to be so attractive nowadays but at the same time I wonder if it would come as a shock to the system. Getting used to urban hustle and bustle offers its own brand of neighborhood life that I've come to enjoy. Plus if it keeps me from my ultimate goal of being a transcient network being sometime in the future due to the lack of technological outlets, I may become more mad than previously thought. The sorry life of a tech junkie, I guess.
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
15:11 / 06.07.01
Here in California, where technology, inter-office gyms, recreational facilities, and 'telecommuting' have made the 60-80 hour work week the norm we're having a hell of a recession. Sure, there's plenty of other reasons why our recession is going on but at least in a 'slow town' I wouldn't have had to work my ass of for the past few year in order to get it.

How 'bout, reasonable hours merged with a solid business model topped with a bit of reality check about having a life outside of work.

Ah hell, I better buy another lottery ticket this week.
 
 
SMS
16:44 / 06.07.01
If you're working all the time, you're not spending. This is hell on the economy. I imagine the nice balance is going to be culturally dependent, somewhat. Maybe forty hour work weeks would be nice for some and slower 35 or less would be better for others. It would be nice to have both in the world, and to encourage people to live where they can be content with the lifestyle.
 
 
Fist Fun
10:41 / 13.07.01
It seems like a very pleasant existence. Although I am sure alot fo people would hate it as well. It would be nice if people who want to live in this way could without being pushed into a different lifestyle by economic necessity. For economic necessity read fitter, healthier, more productive.
 
 
Tom Coates
16:19 / 22.05.02
It certainly seems to me that there's a certain amount of nostalgia associated with the fascination with this kind of existence. And that nostalgia may not actually be particularly helpful or healthy. Having said that as I get older I do find myself thinking of slower, more peaceful ways of life, and I wonder whether it is in fact the case that life is getting faster and less satisfying, or whether that is merely the perception that one has when one gets older...
 
 
Captain Zoom
21:54 / 22.05.02
When I opened my store I was determined that I would have afternoon siestas for about an hour each day. But it doesn't really work. Too many people are too used to having the convenience of whatever they want being available whenever they want it.

I try to keep a small-town mentality about my store. I'll order things for people without taking a deposit and hold onto things for people indefinitely. That kind of service is sorely lacking in large-scale consumer culture nowadays. I'm maybe not for a completely drastic change of culture, but a slow and steady change I'm all for. People are honestly shocked when I tell them that I'll let their kids come here on a weekend and play games for 3 hours and not charge anything, but I feel that the whole shop locally thing is meant to promote a community feel between all areas of a community.

Sorry, rambling. Western consumer culture has fostered an attitude of "I want it and I want it now". It's unfortunate, but true. I don't think we'll see a change, gradual or no, to a more relaxed consumer culture with large department stores becoming the norm for shopping. A culture like the one Lyra describes is dependant on small business owners. And, speaking from experience, it's right fucking hard to compete in the market here.

Zoom. (once again worrying that he's made little sense.)
 
 
Gibreel
09:35 / 26.05.02
It's all about choice. If you want a slow life, it should be yours. If you want a fast one, bingo. But it's not that simple is it? The fast set have greater earning power and political clout - because that's often what they're after (money and power as well as sheer speed). If you want a slow life you are labelled 'lazy'. Therefore, being slow is lazy. I think Western speed cultures are starting to hit a wall. All but the most freakish are getting hacked off with the 'rat race'. So waddya do?
 
 
alas
18:25 / 26.05.02
The people with the highest "social capital"--the most and deepest human connections that are critical in moments of crisis and stress--are people who work 20 hrs. per week; more than people who work "full time"--which does, in the US anyway, mean 60-80 hrs. per week, 50-51 weeks per year.
These people tend, more than, for example, stay at home parents or full time workers, to volunteer for non-profit organizations, work for political causes, etc. We need people to have more time to pursue happiness.

There's no reason we couldn't push for a more sane work week: in fact, that's where unions in the US were headed earlier in the 20th century when they finally got the "40 hr" work week, 2 day weekend, established, They wanted a 20 hr. work week.

Besides that kind of work schedule, here's what I'd like to see, in my utopia:
+Real health care, perhaps modeled on the Cuban system, universally available, unconnected from your employment status.
+Real "social security" for children, disabled persons, and the elderly; connected to the cost of living, and not skimpy.
+A push towards a required 5-year, mid-life retirement/sabbatical. Could be taken in one go or in various 1-year chunks. You'd pay a huge tax if you refused to take one by age 45.
+Mandatory siesta time--all businesses close from 1-3 pm. (You go, Zoom--I love your attitude toward business.)
+Serious regulation of corporations, including "death penalty" statutes--revoking charters and claiming all assets for serious violations of cultural rules--social, economic or environmental.
+Serious emphasis on broad-based funding for individual and community arts projects.

I don't think this kind of thinking has to be classified as simple "nostalgia." It's not "natural" that we work harder and harder for less and less as time passes; our current economy and those who profit from it would like us to view that insane cycle as an immutable fact of life, but it doesn't have to be that way; we have the right to seek to shape our culture,even when we are daily seeing our power to do so pulled away from us.

Just because you "slow" down your work, doesn't mean that you are doing nothing in the off time. Of course, this would require a broad based social commitment to work to create a culture that has life to offer outside the house, that values public spaces, public life, much more than much of the US, anyway, does. But I think that's where cities have the most to offer, because there is much more public space in real cities than in suburbia or rural areas.

Idealistic, yes. But why not, damnit? "Pessimism of the intellect; optimism of the will."
 
  
Add Your Reply