BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


He-man and other toy related comics

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
Mr Wolfe
21:44 / 12.06.02
From comicon:

"The proverbial fourth shoe in the 1980’s cartoon/toy/comic books revival has dropped… Following in the footsteps of Devil’s Due/Image Comics’ G.I. Joe, Dreamwave’s Transformers and Wildstorm’s Thundercats, Mattel today announced it has granted the comic book license to He-Man and the Master of the Universe.
According to the Splash’s ‘Ace’ MacDonald, in an announcement similar to Hasbro awarding the G.I. Joe license to the then unknown Josh Blaylock and his Devil’s Due Studio, MV Creations run by Val Staples, of the graphic design and coloring studio Hi-Fi and the co-creator and colorist of the Tales of the Realm half of Funk-o-Tron's Double Take series, has been awarded a “non-exclusive” He-Man license to produce comics, posters, calendars lithographs and wall scrolls. Creative team and further publishing details were not revealed.

Staples is reportedly a long-term ‘MOTU’ fan, and one of the people involved with one of the biggest 'MOTU' websites."
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
21:53 / 12.06.02
Jesus fucking CHRIST.


This shit really had to end.



I mean it.
 
 
Trijhaos
21:54 / 12.06.02
Oh good god, no.

Don't we have enough nostalgia fuled crap saturating the market as it is? I'll admit, I like the new G.I. Joe comic, but I'd much rather see new and interesting stuff come out than this stuff. I thought I left He-man back in the 80's where he belonged.
 
 
Murray Hamhandler
23:26 / 12.06.02
That's all well and good, but when is the fucking Snorks comic coming out? I want to see a millenial twist on those underwater fuckers and I want to see it now.

I can't wait until all of comicdom resembles a saturday morning in 1986. Artistic renaissance, here we come!
 
 
Mystery Gypt
23:56 / 12.06.02
is Ace McDonald what heidi macdonald has become post vertigo?
 
 
Mr Tricks
00:43 / 13.06.02
yikes....

how about SEA MONKEYS the comic . . .
 
 
Spatula Clarke
00:48 / 13.06.02
Next up: Smurfs.
 
 
Solitaire Rose as Tom Servo
02:11 / 13.06.02
This nostalgia shit is going to kill comics dead in their shops. I just read that Battle of the Planets is clocking in at over 150,000 copies for the first issues. That's right, retreads of shitty old stories is outselling stuff that ISN'T just humping the dead corpse of 20 year old licences.

I'm starting to think that Morrison might be wrong about comics becoming the Next Big Thing.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
02:53 / 13.06.02
I think Grant's thing was more that comics will more and more become the breeding ground for ideas that would be mined for ideas for films and other things that would reach the mainstream audience and make a lot of money. That, and that we're entering a minor boom period for sales, which by all indications is true.

This nostalgia for 80's toy franchises creeps me out, we're talking about characters created entirely for the purpose of selling toys to little boys - it's just so crass. I hate that all the old toy characters are now being updated for the tastes of their grown fans, it's just catering to a very disturbing element of people who demand that all their childhood interests grow up with them. It's a crutch for people unwilling to just move on to more adult material - no, we've got to update Destro and Megatron instead. Nevertheless, it's a logical next step in the direction the mainstream of the industry is moving towards - repurposing children's entertainment every decade as the last real generation of comics readers gets older.

What's with that Battle of the Planets thing, by the way? What's the big deal - Alex Ross is painting covers, so what? Is the cult of Alex Ross that completist?
 
 
mondo a-go-go
09:16 / 13.06.02
"is Ace McDonald what heidi macdonald has become post vertigo?"

yes. she fucking rocks.
 
 
DaveBCooper
09:32 / 13.06.02
Totally agree with the folks who’ve said that this is a bad thing.

Warren Ellis once said something on the lines of “don’t pretend that the future of comics depends on asking the fans, because every time the fans are asked what they want, they demand the return of Rom”, and it’s exactly this kind of looking-backwards mentality that stops the medium moving forwards.

Worst thing of all about this kind of nostalgia is that if we’re even half honest, a lot of the things we cherish so much about our childhood or adolescence or whatever are best left in the past, as steps on the path to now.
You can delude yourself that you’re being post-modern or ironic and the like, but the fact remains that a lot of stuff like Mr Benn and Transformers and the Clangers and Blake’s 7 looks old hat now, because it IS old hat.

We can do better than these things now, and we should concentrate on doing so, quite frankly.

DBC
 
 
rizla mission
10:10 / 13.06.02
Getting drunk and talking a load of hooie about Transformers - now that's always going to be fun. But actually .. making new things based on old toys/cartoons and selling them to a market of 80s nostalgia junkies with too much money? That's just fucked.. talk about missing the point..

if anyone's interested, there's a shop in Leicester that's selling proper old Transformers comics for 50p each. They rock.
 
 
some guy
12:19 / 13.06.02
I don't see the problem here. A new crop of books is massively outselling anything else on the market. They're based on characters 20 years old. Newsflash - most of the books on the market are based on characters much older than that. These new books don't replace the books we like. If anything, they open up the door to more independent work; these books basically ARE indie work, crushing DC and Marvel and raking in cash. When the licenses expire, where does that cash go? Into making original books, possibly.

Crap always outsells the good stuff. It's Britney Spears; it's Survivor; it's Men in Black. And yet you can still find quality music, television, film. Comics will be the same way. If Transformers is getting new people in shops (and at those sales figures it must be, it seems), then cannier shop owners can point people in other directions, make recommendations for better books and so on.

The nostalgia argument is a stupid one, smacking of sour grapes and ignoring Barbelith favorites like the first Doom Patrol relaunch or the fact that fucking Watchmen was originally going to relaunch the Charlton heroes.

I haven't read these books, and I don't plan to. But I would bet that most of the people bitching about them haven't read them either. Sure, they might suck. At least, they might suck in the eyes of 30-year-old comic readers who don't understand that some comics are for kids. But they also might not suck. They might be Grant Morrison writing the template for The Invisibles in ZOIDS, for example...

Who was it who said there were no bad characters, only bad writers?
 
 
The Natural Way
12:35 / 13.06.02
"At least, they might suck in the eyes of 30-year-old comic readers who don't understand that some comics are for kids"

Aaah, but that's what people are grouching about: most GI Joe/Transformers/Battle of the Planets readers ARE 30 something adults.

But other than that, I kind of agree w/ you.
 
 
Trijhaos
12:45 / 13.06.02
I like the G.I. Joe comic and if I could find the Transformers comic, I'd probably buy it.

The problem I have with all this nostalgia crap is that they're digging up every property they can and some of those properties should have stayed buried. They weren't all that good the first time around and probably won't be all that good the second time.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
13:33 / 13.06.02
Runce is correct, no one buying those GI Joe/Transformers/Thundercats/Strawberry Shortcake comics is a kid. It's all people in their 20s and 30s who bought those toys when they were kids 15 years ago.
 
 
some guy
14:06 / 13.06.02
Who cares if the people buying Transformers are 65? Every medium is completely dominated by crap. I don't understand why people make such a fuss about this in comics. Even the critical darlings of the industry are mostly just nerd porn.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
14:13 / 13.06.02
If DaveBCooper has done better than Blakes 7, I look forward eagerly to seeing the fruits of his labours.
 
 
The Natural Way
14:14 / 13.06.02
Well, I guess it's here that we part ways...

So Morrison, Moore, Clowes, Lapham....all nerd porn.... Yeah. Not.

What the fuck is "nerd porn" anyway?
 
 
Trijhaos
14:28 / 13.06.02
Nerd porn? Isn't that like an intellectual whankfest?
 
 
Solitaire Rose as Tom Servo
16:15 / 13.06.02
Why is this a bad thing?

Simple. When nostalgia is all you have, you are a dead medium. Yes, Spiderman is 40 years old, but at least he started in comics. GI Joe was a shitty Larry Hama Toy Marketing book that if you read it WITHOUT the taint of nostalgia, you'd be amazed that it got published. Thundercats episodes are a big loud mess and the STAR comic based on them lasted less than 10 issues. For all the warmth about the Transformers, the movie was utterly incomprehensable unless you had watched the TV show.

Comics need to explore NEW things, like other mediums do. To use a WWF analogy, Hulk Hogan came back to the WWF, won the title, got huge ovations, and the ratings sank to their lowest point in a decade. Why? While hard core fans want to see the same thing over and over, the mass of people want something new. That's why the fatbeards HATE Morrison's X-Men, Ennis's Fury and Bendis on everything...they are taking old properties and making them alive and new again, focusing on why they were great COMICS.

Transformers, GI Joe, He-Man and that ilk were toys made by marketing people to appeal to specific demographics. Their comics and cartoons existed to get you to buy those toys. Now, they toys aren't around anymore, and people 20 years after the fact want to wallow in the past.

If someone did a deconstrutionist version of GI Joe, I'd be first in line to buy it. Or a Transformers series that dealt with the fetishization of weaponry...

But they aren't. They are fan-projects no better than Roy Thomas trying to rewrite the entire history of the Justice Society to fit new continuity.
 
 
some guy
16:16 / 13.06.02
I use the term nerd porn to describe the sort of material comic geeks flip out over that holds no interest to the mainstream audience. Most critically acclaimed comics work is nerd porn that the "normal person" would never be interested in. The most obvious example is Watchmen. Total nerd porn. It's an amazing work, but one that possibly can't even function properly outside of a nerd readership.

Alan Moore is complete nerd porn, whose truly interesting and non-genre work is dominated by nerd porn like Swamp Thing and the ABC books. I like him, he's fabulous, but he's writing in a ghetto that the normal human being doesn't give two shits about.

Dark Knight Returns? Nerd porn.

The complete works of Grant Morrison? Nerd porn in capital letters, except possibly - POSSIBLY - The Mystery Play. Kill Your Boyfriend is total nerd porn. I love Grant Morrison, but nothing he does is anything other than niche nerd porn.

Warren Ellis? Transmet is nerd porn for thirteen year olds. Authority and Planetary are the very definitions of nerd porn. Ellis has done nothing of value to non-geeks.

Clowes? Self-reflexive nerd porn.

However, I don't think Lapham is nerd porn. If his medium was prose he'd be a media darling. Lapham is doing what Moore, Ellis, Morrison and the rest SHOULD be doing if they had any interest in getting out of the geek ghetto.

Sandman is complete and utter nerd porn, and those fabled "new readers" it attracted appear to mostly be nerds from other ghettos.

Comics readers bitching about Transformers and the rest appealing to a subsection of geeks are an embarrasment. The fact that they massively outsell everything else justifies their existence and shows just how shit publishers and creators are at producing comics that anyone but an ever-smaller circle of geeks gives a shit about.

Before the onslaught begins, you should know that I consider myself a geek and don't think niche fiction (e.g. most fucking comics) is a bad thing. The niche model works for Mercedes and Apple and it's fine for comics. And before the "at least they could do something NEW" arguments start, I'll bring this closer to Barbelith's heart with a few select choices from Morrison's ouvre:

ZOIDS for fuck's sake!
Animal Man revival.
Doom Patrol revival.
JLA revival.
X-Men revival.

And that's not even getting into the fact that The Filth is just a rehash of The Invisibles. So let's tread lightly on the "new ideas" thing, okay?
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
16:34 / 13.06.02
I'd be willing to go with your argument if you didn't include Daniel Clowes or Kill Your Boyfriend. That's just fucking INSANE. I can't even begin to respect your opinions if you're going to tell me that Kill Your Boyfriend, Ice Haven, Ghost World, and the Caricature short-stories are not accessable. That's just simply not true, and I have had enough experience testing people and their reactions to those comics to know that it's not. Sure, they aren't as accessable as David Rees' work, but they do not deserve to be lumped in with your half-baked British-music-magazine style argument.
 
 
some guy
16:53 / 13.06.02
Of those, I've only read Kill Your Boyfriend and Ghost World. I firmly believe neither of those have much appeal beyond a geek audience. How much money did the Ghost World film make? How many people were actually interested enough to watch it?

Could you persuade your mother to read Kill Your Boyfriend? Would the fortysomething clerk at your local supermarket have any interest in Ghost World.

I really, truly doubt it. For a specific audience, these are great books. For a mainstream audience, they're geek stuff. They're by geeks, they're about geeks and they're for geeks.

And again, this doesn't make them bad. That's not the argument I'm making.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
17:17 / 13.06.02
The thing that you seem to be unable to grasp is that not everything is meant for everyone - a lot of the frustrating thing with comics (but certainly not just comics) is that due to the economics and the culture around comics, a lot of them do not reach their fullest potential audience.

Could I persuade my mom to read Kill Yr Boyfriend? Sure. Could I get yr mom to read it? Who knows. Is there a LOT of people out there who would probably really love Kill Yr Boyfriend but aren't aware of its existence? Yes, I think so. I think there's a lot of people out there who would really dig a lot of comics that exist. It's all about visability.

You have a painfully cynical attitude about audiences - this snobbish attitude that people don't like things simply because they don't KNOW about them.

There's a big reason why comics like the work of Daniel Clowes don't sell all that well in comics stores - the people who go into comics stores are but a tiny fraction of that work's potential audience. If Six Feet Under or the Sopranos can be huge hits because HBO has the money to advertise its existence to the general public, then I really don't think the content of most Clowes, Tomine, Lapham, etc stuff is unappealing or offputting to general audiences at all.

Yr argument depends upon the notion of there existing work that appeals and speaks to every audience, no matter what - that's profoundly stupid. When you make broad statements like "Every medium is completely dominated by crap" you just sound like a snobby jerk. Particularly when you bring Britney Spears into it, the common whipping girl of people who like to make half-assed pronouncements about how horrible popular culture is.
 
 
some guy
17:55 / 13.06.02
The thing that you seem to be unable to grasp is that not everything is meant for everyone

Er, this is actually my entire argument. Please reread my posts. This is why I don't understand people who bitch about Transformers being the top-selling book in the industry. Don't like it? Don't read it.

You have a painfully cynical attitude about audiences - this snobbish attitude that people don't like things simply because they don't KNOW about them.

I should try to explain in different words, because this isn't what I'm saying. It has nothing to do with access and availability. It has to do with the fact that many of the critically acclaimed comics we point to simply do not deal with things that interest the mainstream. There aren't equivalents of many of these books in other media in the mainstream, because people just aren't that interested in them.

There's a big reason why comics like the work of Daniel Clowes don't sell all that well in comics stores - the people who go into comics stores are but a tiny fraction of that work's potential audience.

This doesn't have much to do with what I'm saying. But I still think Clowes is nerd porn. When he had a chance for mainstream exposure with the Ghost World film, people stayed away in droves. Ghost World is a story about geeks. I'm not surprised it didn't make a larger splash outside geekdom. This isn't rocket science. A much better example of a non-nerd porn comic would be Road To Perdition. We will see this reflected in the relative box offices of the two film versions.

I really don't think the content of most Clowes, Tomine, Lapham, etc stuff is unappealing or offputting to general audiences at all.

I think the Clowes stuff is, to a large extent. The Lapham stuff is brilliant and the Tomine work is extremely average. That said I think what Tomine produces isn't a million miles away from the mainstream interest, and I could easily see and Optic Nerve television series even on the WB. This is a Good Thing. It's also beside the point, because Tomine and Lapham are a minority in comics - even critically acclaimed comics. Most of the lauded comics are nerd porn with an achingly tiny potential audience outside of the geeks already buying them.

People who listen to Britney Spears will not be interested in David Boring. People who listen to Britney Spears are the mainstream. Comics will not be saved* by yet more nerd porn by Moore, Morrison or Ellis. They will be saved by craptacular shit that current readers hate and are embarrassed to seek on racks, in much the same way Belle & Sebastian fans cringe at the N'Sync display in their local record shop or film fans watch In The Mood For Love in an empty theater while next door it's standing room only for Men In Black.

My point is that comics fans need to recognize this and not bitch when crap like Transformers outsells their favorite books by several orders of magnitude. We also need to step back objectively and accept that most - not all, but most - of what the industry lauds as worthy and innovative is actually little more than nerd porn for a niche audience of geeks, and realize that much of what our prized creators create holds little interest for the world at large.

Yr argument depends upon the notion of there existing work that appeals and speaks to every audience, no matter what - that's profoundly stupid.

No, it doesn't. It depends on the notion that the geek audience currently catered to by comics appears to max out at 100,000 nerds. Globally. And that what interests us geeks does not, by and large, interest "normal people." And that we have two options:

A) Accept being a niche market and revel in our nerd porn.

B) Accept that becoming a mainstream medium means the stuff we think is crap, such as a Thundercats comic, will sell far more than the stuff we like. It works that way in film, television, books and music and it's foolish to expect it to be different in comics.

I see no problem with option A as long as we all shut up and enjoy it.

When you make broad statements like "Every medium is completely dominated by crap" you just sound like a snobby jerk.

Are there many people out there who don't feel this way?

Particularly when you bring Britney Spears into it, the common whipping girl of people who like to make half-assed pronouncements about how horrible popular culture is.

I enjoy pure pop music. Britney is a shit example of it. I think most people would agree that in any medium, the most popular stuff is crap. There are exceptions, such as the state of UK pop music circa 1996, or Star Wars in 1977, or X-Men circa Byrne/Quitely.

* I don't believe the industry does need saving. I think it can be a healty niche market.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
18:29 / 13.06.02

I should try to explain in different words, because this isn't what I'm saying. It has nothing to do with access and availability. It has to do with the fact that many of the critically acclaimed comics we point to simply do not deal with things that interest the mainstream. There aren't equivalents of many of these books in other media in the mainstream, because people just aren't that interested in them.


No. That's just not right. There are elements of all of the comics we're talking about, from the most high brow to the most lowbrow, throughout contemporary pop culture. You're so wrong that it's off the fucking scales.

People mostly don't read comics because they don't really know about them. There's no money behind comics, even the biggest companies can barely afford to advertise their products to real people. When so much of culture is driven by adverts and cross-promotion, how can you expect people to want to buy things that they don't even know exist? Why should people go to comics stores if they have no expectation that there might be products that may like? It doesn't have much to do with the tastes of the public, really. They like lots of different stuff.



When he had a chance for mainstream exposure with the Ghost World film, people stayed away in droves.

Um, not really. It was a pretty big success commercially for what it was - an 'art house' flick that was slowly released in select markets, and was never marketed to cineplexes. It was sold to exactly the market it belonged to, and it did very well. It's not going to be a blockbuster, but that's not the audience. To label its audience with the derisive term 'geeks' is very insulting, because most of that demographic doesn't really fit in with any description of that epithet.

Most of the lauded comics are nerd porn with an achingly tiny potential audience outside of the geeks already buying them.

Ugh, can you fucking quit it with the "nerd porn" thing? What does this have to do with pornography? Can you intelligently answer that question? Can you stop using the word 'nerd' as though yr a Klansman talking about "niggers"? Can you accept the notion that though some things don't represent the interests of a huge audience, it doesn't mean that the audience that presently is paying might only be a small fraction of what it could be if better exposed?

People who listen to Britney Spears will not be interested in David Boring. People who listen to Britney Spears are the mainstream.

My very existence refutes this moronic claim.

They will be saved by craptacular shit that current readers hate and are embarrassed to seek on racks, in much the same way Belle & Sebastian fans cringe at the N'Sync display in their local record shop or film fans watch In The Mood For Love in an empty theater while next door it's standing room only for Men In Black.

Um, not really. This Transformers thing is a quick fix, facillitated by two of the only popular news/marketing tools of the industry: Wizard and Newsarama. This will not last, and it's not doing anything to expand the base or scope of consumers brought in to comics stores. It has nothing to do with your prejudices about mainstream culture. Comics culture has very little to do with mainstream culture, there's barely an analogy to be made.


And that what interests us geeks does not, by and large, interest "normal people."... "Every medium is completely dominated by crap"/Are there many people out there who don't feel this way?...


The gall! The wrong-headed elitism! The total lack of optimism! The unwillingness to introduce "our" stuff to more people! It's sickening. Laurence, I will not mince words: you have done the unthinkable and revealed yourself to be the most ignorant person on all of Barbelith this side of Andrew Calo. Take a bow.

I enjoy pure pop music. Britney is a shit example of it. I think most people would agree that in any medium, the most popular stuff is crap. There are exceptions, such as the state of UK pop music circa 1996, or Star Wars in 1977, or X-Men circa Byrne/Quitely.

That's such a fucked view of pop culture, I can't even begin to argue with you. It's just dripping with smug self-satisfaction, hate, and ignorance.
 
 
CameronStewart
18:37 / 13.06.02
>>>When he had a chance for mainstream exposure with the Ghost World film, people stayed away in droves.... A much better example of a non-nerd porn comic would be Road To Perdition. We will see this reflected in the relative box offices of the two film versions. <<<

Ghost World was a small, indie flick with minimal advertising that played in very few cities, and even then only in arthouse cinemas, and Road To Perdition is a huge production with big name stars, a critically acclaimed director, a massive advertising push and is likely to be shown in theatres nationwide.

Gee, I wonder which film has the deck stacked in its favour?
 
 
bio k9
18:50 / 13.06.02
Fucking CHRIST.

Since Flux invoked the spectre of the Klan can I just say "Nazis" and get the whole thing over with?

This thread is the first time ive seen LLBs posts and he might be a complete idiot/asshole but, so far, hes attempted to explain and defend his point of view without going out of his way to insult or attack anyone. Maybe he should be given the same courtesy?
 
 
some guy
19:00 / 13.06.02
Sorry in advance if my HTML thingies aren't working...

No. That's just not right. There are elements of all of the comics we're talking about, from the most high brow to the most lowbrow, throughout contemporary pop culture. You're so wrong that it's off the fucking scales.

Then it shouldn't be hard to offer examples, should it?

People mostly don't read comics because they don't really know about them.

Bullshit. Everybody knows about comics. People just don't give a shit. Those people who dropped $350 million on the Spider-Man film know he's from the comics. They still don't want to read them. To put it another way, comics used to sell MILLIONS of copies. The DC average today is 25,000. It's not that comics became hard to find. It's that comics stopped offering stories that most people want to read. Anyway, you're refuting an argument that I'm not making.

When he had a chance for mainstream exposure with the Ghost World film, people stayed away in droves.
Um, not really. It was a pretty big success commercially for what it was - an 'art house' flick


I rest my case. Art house = movie geeks. Ghost World is a fucking geek story for geeks. In any medium. You know what? We're talking about comics on the Internet. We're fucking geeks. Of course we think Ghost World is great. In perspective, it's for a niche audience, which is my entire point. I'm not sure why you're attacking me as some sort of snob, considering I said from the outset that I don't see a problem with niche markets, and I consider myself to be one of the geek demographic.

Can you accept the notion that though some things don't represent the interests of a huge audience, it doesn't mean that the audience that presently is paying might only be a small fraction of what it could be if better exposed?

Sure, but I don't think the "small fraction" in most cases is really all that small. I think most people who would like The Filth are already reading it. It's just not really the sort of thing that's going to entice most of the people planning to watch ER tonight.

People who listen to Britney Spears will not be interested in David Boring. People who listen to Britney Spears are the mainstream.
My very existence refutes this moronic claim.


Dude, I bought Spice Girls records. I'm not claiming any higher ground. There are tiny exceptions to every statement. What's moronic is not reading the Britney comment as a generalization. Of course there will be Britney fans with copies of David Boring on their shelf. I imagine they number in the single digits.

They will be saved by craptacular shit that current readers hate and are embarrassed to seek on racks, in much the same way Belle & Sebastian fans cringe at the N'Sync display in their local record shop or film fans watch In The Mood For Love in an empty theater while next door it's standing room only for Men In Black.
Um, not really. This Transformers thing is a quick fix, facillitated by two of the only popular news/marketing tools of the industry: Wizard and Newsarama. This will not last


Nothing lasts. This is pop culture. The length of the trend is utterly irrelevant. The fact is that hundreds of thousands of people wanted Transformers comics, and less than 20,000 wanted Transmet. And those Transformer figures are actual sales, not retail sales. The first issue is on something like its third printing. There are people out there who do not want what the critical cream of the comics industry is offering. This is what I said several posts ago. The cream of the industry talent is not producing work that interests more than a small niche market of geeks.

Comics culture has very little to do with mainstream culture, there's barely an analogy to be made.

Again, this is one of the things I'm saying. This is also why it shouldn't be difficult to grasp the notion that what interests the comics culture doesn't interest the mainstream culture. Because they're not the same. Because the former is by, for and largely about geeks, and the latter isn't.

The gall! The wrong-headed elitism! The total lack of optimism! The unwillingness to introduce "our" stuff to more people! It's sickening.

Perhaps the most critically lauded comics work ever is Watchmen. Do you HONESTLY think it has mainstream appeal? Do you? Because if you don't, it's time to shut the fuck up. I'm not being elitist because I don't think the comics readership is anything special. I don't think it's any better or worse than any other demographic. But the fact remains that it is a niche group, reading stories made by people largely aware of this fact and catering to it - thereby closing the door even further to a mainstream audience. Yes, there are exceptions. I bet Murder Me Dead would succeed in the mainstream in any other medium. But those exceptions are pitifully few and far between. I am not "unwilling" to introduce "our" stuff to more people. It's just that there's precious little I can actually show the average person! The number of works published by major companies that might appeal to the Friends demographic could probably be counted on two hands. No Watchmen. No Dark Knight. No Kingdom Come or Marvels or Swamp Thing or any of the other huge critical favorites. What exactly are you going to give that sorority girl you sit next to in class? The woman the next cubicle over? Your mechanic?

I enjoy pure pop music. Britney is a shit example of it. I think most people would agree that in any medium, the most popular stuff is crap. There are exceptions, such as the state of UK pop music circa 1996, or Star Wars in 1977, or X-Men circa Byrne/Quitely.
That's such a fucked view of pop culture, I can't even begin to argue with you. It's just dripping with smug self-satisfaction, hate, and ignorance.


It's not smug. I know the difference between liking something and knowing it's actually good. I enjoyed Attack of the Clones. It's a crap film. There's no self-satisfaction there. I wish more of the bands, comics and films I think are critically superior had more mainstream success. I don't begrudge the people who like mainstream culture, and I don't hate them. It's as though you're so pre-disposed to seeing a dissenter in a certain way that you can't actually read and process what I've written. I truly think the bulk of the popular works in any given medium are generally very different than the bulk of the critically acclaimed works in any given medium. We can discuss the 25 most popular comics, books, films, albums etc. and I imagine most of them will have received critical drubbings and reveal themselve to not actually be very good. I don't understand why you think this is a controversial viewpoint.
 
 
some guy
19:04 / 13.06.02
Ghost World was a small, indie flick with minimal advertising that played in very few cities, and even then only in arthouse cinemas, and Road To Perdition is a huge production with big name stars, a critically acclaimed director, a massive advertising push and is likely to be shown in theatres nationwide.
Gee, I wonder which film has the deck stacked in its favour?


I really wish people would read a litlte more carefully. I enjoyed Ghost World, both the comic and the film. I adore the Road to Perdition comic. It doesn't surprise me that GW was picked up for an indie feature and RtP as a mainstream film, because the source material had already revealed the former to be a niche market story and the latter as something of mainstream interest. This doesn't mean one is better than the other. It also shouldn't be surprising to anyone.

All it does is reinforce what I said about most of the critically acclaimed comics being niche work. I don't see why that wouldn't be the case even when transferred to other media.
 
 
Jack Fear
19:06 / 13.06.02
Now, I am thinking, would be good time for everyone to shut off the computer and go for a long walk.

The thread will still be here when you get back.
 
 
some guy
19:06 / 13.06.02
On "nerd porn."

I am a nerd. JLA/Planetary excites me. It likely excites nobody but comic geeks like myself. I am aware of this fact, and can therefore label the book as a niche product intended for a geek audience with little chance of mainstream appeal.

This is not hate. This is not a pejorative. This is common sense.
 
 
CameronStewart
19:10 / 13.06.02
>>>I really wish people would read a litlte more carefully. <<<

I read exactly what you wrote. You said that the box-office returns of Road To Perdition are likely to be much higher than the returns of Ghost World.

I'm saying that this has everything to do with advertising and availability, and little to do with subject matter.
 
 
_pin
19:14 / 13.06.02
Actually, yr comments are wrong- since some guy got employed at my local book shop, he's managed to get Clowes comics to the front of the store. When they had a refit, they move the fucking comic section to the front of the store. He's slowly managed to get more and more Fantagraphics stuff in. To the point where the was a big enough market and the local multiplex showed Ghost World.

It's safe to assume that people are buying the stuff this guy is getting in and putting out. They simply need to get exposure to it. Stop painting yrself as some great and shining example of deviant thoght, so "out there" instead of all the "normal people". You can have yr geek hat for being so "out there" and yr knowing smirk hat for being so self depricating. Now can eveyrone else have their "fans of good art that people like" hats and get on with functioning in the real world?

And shut up about Star Wars for fucks sake- call me whatever the fuck you like for having a go at such an obvious target, but was this really some great and shining example of a popculture renaisaince when all that spwed forth from the great cultural machines was great and all the kids had their minds opened to groovy gonzo ideas? Bollocks it was.
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply