BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The importance of visibility in cultural politics...

 
 
that
16:16 / 11.05.02
Further abuses of the forum...I really am so sorry. But the thing is, I have a take-home exam question about the importance of visibility to those engaged in cultural politics. I am inclined to agree with Hutnyk, that visibility is not an end in and of itself, but that it can represent one of the first stepping stones to redress... but I'm damned if I can find any stuff about visibility, the fight for, and the path beyond, to use as examples or to refer to. I am also not 100% sure if 'cultural politics' refers just to politics concerned with race and ethnicity, but I would guess it would also include gay rights, transgender rights, women's rights, and so on... so, anyone got any useful web resources they could throw my way? My deadline is the 15th... and my poor brain is not happy... Help? Please?
 
 
Shortfatdyke
16:26 / 11.05.02
all i can offer is the discussion i often had with other queer activists: who was in a better position - the gay man who has specific laws discriminating against him, or the lesbian who's officially utterly invisible?

the lesbian avengers' main mission was visibility for dykes. if i'm not totally missing the point, you could try googling sarah schulman (founder of the avengers and a good political writer).

best of luck, chol.
 
 
grant
15:15 / 13.05.02
I'm positive Subcomandante Marcos and the Zapatistas have a lot to say about visibility, as do Ya Basta!.
 
 
grant
16:09 / 13.05.02
Ya Basta! strives to make the invisible visible. The colors orange and yellow represent a warning! We are here with our bodies to warn America's communities about the "new economy".

As America stumbles into the 21st Century, we here in New York City watch passively, as entire communities are rendered invisible by our much-lauded economic growth. We see that "welfare reform" means more war on the poor; that it is illegal to sleep on the streets, let alone protest; that profits for Wall Street mean increasingly unaffordable rents, as jails become the only alternative means of housing. Indeed, while New York has become the world capital for the manufacture of glamorous images, the majority of its citizens have been made to vanish: their dreams, labors, passions, aspirations, communities, their very bodies disappear.

Yet they are not invisible to everyone.

We ask ourselves, not surprisingly; how do we give voice to our helplessness, and how do we warn our communities that there is a real danger?

Within the landscape of Manhattan's media empire, we choose to do so in public, with our very bodies. We show our rage as visibility, as presence....
(More on the site.)

a pdf of a paper (and the same as html ) which says:
"Your word is too hard", people were telling them. They could not follow the ideological discourse of the revolutionaries. After months of an effort to educate the people in their ideology and political plans, the would-be guerrilleros began to listen to them. "In the confrontation of ideas", they confessed later, "we lost. And something new was born: Zapatismo". This movement was no longer embedded in any form of marxism-leninism. But neither was it the expression of the traditional resistence of indigenous peoples, entrenched in their communities, finding a refuge for their local identity in their oppressed isolation or their traditional rebellions against the oppressors. Well rooted in their tradition, explicitly affirming that identity, it was also open to others, to the world. The uprising of the Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional (EZLN), on January 1st., 1994, attracted immediate attention and played a very important role in the revitalization of local identity everywhere --within Mexico as well as abroad. On the one side, it gave visibility and legitimacy to the movement already in place. On the other side, it inspired and activated many people involved in their own local struggles and broke their isolation or disarticulation. It has been, since then, a continual source of inspiration and a necessary reference for many local struggles. Zapatismo does not fit well in any of the categories or classes of 'old' or 'new' social movements. It is a living being, changing continually and involving an amazing diversity of persons, groups and peoples. It is not defined by a specific ideology or doctrine. As I explained in the first paper, it is not a guerrilla or a fundamentalist, nationalist or ethnic movement. The EZLN plays a key role in Zapatismo, continually nourishing it with its creative and audacious initiatives. Zapatismo itself, however, cannot be reduced to the EZLN.
Zapatismo expresses and articulates a wide movement of diverse groups of people -even those that do not recognize themselves as Zapatistas or refuse any affiliation with Zapatismo. They are affirming themselves in their local places, which they are courageously crafting in the shapeless spaces imposed by the market or the State.
 
 
that
16:30 / 13.05.02
Hey - thanks muchly, both of you... brill!
 
 
Tom Coates
21:29 / 14.05.02
I think when you're talking in terms of visibility your ALSO talking about definability - in that the invisible group is often not a group at all. Visibility is used to dismantle / build groups. You might be able to use some of Foucault's work with regard to this - there's got to be something in the 'being defined as other' section which would apply particularly to the visibility associated with being externally defined.

By virtue of having a definition of a group or a type of people based on some criteria, the individuals within that group become miraculously visible AS a group - and can organise themselves around that identity. A good example you could use here would be homosexuality of course - David Halperin's first essay in One Hundred Years of Homosexuality would probably be a good place to start. But you could also use the oft-cited work of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (also on sexuality) as a place where you can look at alternative identities that are completely invisible because noone categorises according to those models any more.

Where - for example - is the gynocomast community? the automonosexualists? the paederasts?

Actually the last one might be a really good example of a community that has suffered because of visibility - although that might outrage too many people (here I am of course referring to the vaguely countenanced cross-generational 'sexual' activity of ancient greece rather than today's paedogeddon).

I think you might be able to use some stuff from a book like Black Athena as well (or any of the ancient texts concerned with race) which intimated that basically dozens of races and skin colours mixed without that skin colour becoming a demarcator of identity - without them being 'visible' on those grounds...

Plus there's a book on subcultures in routledge that might be interesting reading...
 
 
that
07:47 / 15.05.02
Thanks, Tom. I've got to give it in today, so I haven't had time to check out any of the references...sounds like it would've certainly helped me write a much better essay, but I did manage to squeeze something in as an aside.

Much appreciated, everyone.
 
  
Add Your Reply