|
|
IMHbutstilldemonstrablybetterthanKnowledge+1'sO, the only decent title in the woefully-named MAX range is Fury - now, this could be because it's the one with the best creative team, but I think it's also because it's the only one that has nothing to do with superheroes at all. What I've seen of War Machine is just Iron Man with swearing and badly-drawn tits, and two issues of the crushingly-dull Alias was enough for me: awful art, a really tired idea (morally compromised superpeople! and how ordinary people interact with them! woo!), and Bendis phoning it in -
What?
Phoning it in.
Who?
Bendis.
The guy who -
Yeah, you know, the guy who does the dialogue -
The dialogue that sounds a bit like -
Yeah, that's right -
The West Wing, or maybe a Tarantino movie -
Yeah, so anyway, this Bendis guy -
This Bendis guy -
What was I talking about?
Argh! It's just so played out! But my point is, Fury has no superhero elements: it's a spy/action/war/political satire comic, and although I agree with the point Flux made in another thread, about how that's just another form of the grr!-tough-guys-kick-ass escapism genre, it's quite entertaining.
Plus, it has Janeane Garofalo in it.
Uh, what was the point? Oh yeah, if the MAX imprint is to go anywhere, Marvel has to start using it for more than just 'edgy' new versions of their old characters. I know that's how Vertigo started, but times have changed. |
|
|