I wonder why people would give the cold war, raging, self-destructive loners, like the Hulk or Wolverine, so much praise? The maturing Batman (the Frank Miller/Tim Burton-translation consumed all his titles)? The alcoholic, girl-troubled, self-loathing Thing? Godzilla? the Sandman (consorts with devils, creates nightmares, drives folk insane, as required by the job)?
Because its more than a soundbite or a 'cliche'. It's variety and a whole range of writing to choose from within the medium of comics.
I would argue that the "raging, self-destructive loners" are popular with adolesents rather than adults. Same with the girl-troubled, self-loathing Thing (is he really an alcoholic now?). Throw Spidey in there too. These stories have their place. They are meant for young boys. And they should be.
It also told parents, "Whoa, this stuff maybe just for adults. What happened to the old days of corny bank robberies and smiling, photogenic radioactive teenagers?"
My folks didn't say that. Hell, most adults that haven't read comics before woln't read Maus, never mind Batman, because its comics.
But hey, if the Hulk, Hellblazer, and Batman's new clothes did'nt take morality into question (people getting explicitly killed/tortured to death/going insane), and didn't move the medium forward, then I guess we are probably meant to disagree.
The Hulk is just treading the same ground as Godzilla and Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde but in purple short pants. The problem isn't whether or not superhero comics can deal with mature themes, the problem is they fail to do it in a mature manner. And not everone wants to read about people who solve their problems with their fists. |