BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Future of Media – help needed

 
 
Trudy Kockenlocker
11:27 / 20.02.09
Can the Barbelith hive might help me out on a project I’m kick starting? It's looking into the future of media, specifically news/print media.

I’m looking for opinion or articles on the following:

The most interesting, most dynamic, most influential shifts in the media world over the last few years
Predictions for near and far future developments
Interesting media business models you might have come across
Brave new ventures, technology, brands, relationships, joint ventures
Interesting media commentators
Predictions, articles, stuff you like, stuff you don't
What’s out there that’s great but no one knows about it yet
What’s the next Twitter? What future for Twitter?

Please chuck anything you have at this thread!
 
 
Mr Tricks
15:24 / 20.02.09
Over at the Office we've been having a sort of Print publishing death watch there might be something useful there.
 
 
grant
17:21 / 20.02.09
Twitter's on its way out, I'm afraid.

The marketers and PR people have discovered it. The feeds are all filling with irrelevancies. (I've turned it into a feed for my blog; I'm part of the problem.)

Print media - I think is facing two problems. One is the highly atomized nature of the internet. There's a special niche for nearly everybody on the net, so if you only bought Magazine X or Local Paper Y for, say, the Dave Barry column or some restaurant reviewer, you can get that on the web now.

The other is the way mega-corporations have been buying up local papers, essentially making them *less* atomized and more homogenized - reprinting the same stories from a much smaller pool, cutting down on different perspectives and eliminating local coverage in smaller markets entirely. Which is a problem when something happens in a small market (like, say, Palm Beach County) that has national repercussions (like, oh, screwing up the national presidential election).

I don't know that there's a way out of that bind - too general interest for the net, too narrow for major corporate backers.
 
 
grant
17:25 / 20.02.09
What's out that's new?
I've been very into aggregators of one sort or another lately, especially Reddit (where a community selects interesting links and ranks by voting) and Twine (where a smaller community places links by topic of interest - you subscribe to a "Twine" specializing in anime, or gnosticism, or gnostic anime, and try to get other people interested in the same thing to post links to what they find interesting).

The problem with both of these is that they're entirely secondary - the only new material they generate is commentary, by and large.
 
 
ceilingsarecool
06:47 / 08.03.09
Hm...I'm still trying to figure out why Facebook has exploded. I see a throwback to mid-19th century news approaches using 21st century technologies to distribute the information: back then publications were expected to have a slant, just like blogs do now. I'm hoping that a byproduct will be a new wave of critical thinking/information dissection and that neutral review sites (for example, I recently relied on apartmentratings.com) will have increasing importance in everything from evaluating news sources to buying shoes.
 
  
Add Your Reply