BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Wire Season 1: Crime and Punishment

 
  

Page: (1)23

 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
10:00 / 07.09.07
”They be out the game early." - D’Angelo

So a little while ago it was suggested that season-specific threads were started for The Wire, so that people who want to talk about the show can do so without running into spoilers. This is particularly an issue with a programme that most people in the UK will only have been able to see on DVD. I also think that The Wire is a show that really stands up to close, close watching.

So, quick guidelines: no spoilers beyond the last episode of season 1 for this thread. But everything within that season is fair game, so watch out if you’re still making your way through it. And yes, I do have snappy titles for each season. Three is War and Peace, for example.

Season 1, then. Where to start? It fascinates me that there are things about the early episodes of The Wire that do show it finding its feet. Some of this only happens in the very first episode, and seems obviously uncharacteristic in the way that pilot shows often are: that first pre-credits scene with McNulty and the guy talking about Snot Boogie is just a little more mawkish and obvious than The Wire usually is, a little more like yr regular cop show – and then at the end when D’Angelo sees Gant’s body, there’s the flashback reminding us who Gant is and that we saw him earlier in the episode, which is the kind of borderline-intelligence-insulting “tell, don’t show” trick this show usually does the very opposite of.

But also in general there’s a little more exposition and “viewer friendly” introductions to things: in David Simon’s own way, this is him being quite patient in explaining “this is how police work happens, or doesn’t” and the same for a drug operation like Barksdale’s. Without spoiling, later seasons tend to be more quick to drop the viewer in the middle of a new world and leave you to sink or swim when it comes to figuring out that world’s language, codes, structures and patterns of behaviour. In one way, and one way only, some of season 1 reminds me of Murder One: taking you through just one case, right from the beginning, stage by stage.

Except of course, we see it from both sides. I’m not sure it can be underestimated how important it is that The Wire spends as much time in season 1 introducing you to D’Angelo, Bodie, Poot and Wallace as it does introducing the Detail – and then stays with those characters for as long as it can. It kind of makes you realise how conservative pretty much all other cop shows are. Even the ones that show the police in a morally ambiguous light still assume that the viewing public will not want to follow the lives of small-time drug dealers as major characters – and most cop shows are pretty blatant in taking the line that any ‘good’ cop is essentially a hero, and most criminals are essentially one-note scum.

Man, look how much I’ve written and I’m not even skimming the surface! We could spend this whole thread just talking about how the show treats the police force as an institution in season 1 (in a way that feels real to anyone who’s worked in an institution, that totally skewers what’s fucked up about the police without ever falling into writing off the people who are doing their best with the job they have), or we could talk about the way it handles character, or just the whole bloody tragedy of it, and how it’s shown to be equal parts the result of individual venality and political inhumanity, with a dash of arbitrary chance… How you never know what the consequences of your actions might be when they get fed through other people’s agendas and the system… “What the fuck did I do?”, indeed. It always amazes me how this show can be so bold in its politics and yet so subtle, so unflinching in the way it places responsibility for the fucked-up situation in the ‘jects on America’s structures of inequality, without ever avoiding individual responsibility, either (what Bodie and Poot do at the end of the season is still their choice).

I’m going to stop there because this is supposed to be about season 1, and I’m about to go off on one of those “watching The Wire can help make you a better person” rants. Okay, let’s zoom in again. Favourite moment from episode 1? I love the ones that really ring true to certain kinds of work. McNulty and Bunk telling each other off for “giving a fuck when it ain’t your turn to give a fuck”. The whole thing with D’Angelo showing up bright and early for work, clothes picked out, enthusiastic, only to be told he’s been demoted – and his subsequent dynamic with Bodie – “I mean, I don’t know how y’all do up in the Towers, but down here? You wanna count it.” – and Wallace – the whole presidents debate – aww, Wallace. Shit.
 
 
Spaniel
11:38 / 07.09.07
It's worth considering - and this isn't really aimed at you fly, rather at people in general - that part of show finding it's feet has nothing to do with the actual programme makers getting up to speed, but in how the programme rubs up against other vested interests and how those vested interests impact the show.

In the case of the Wire, that flashback was a response to notes from HBO. Simon included it reluctantly in the knowledge that he had to win these people over. Who knows what other compromises were made, especially in those early shows.

Sorry, probably not the kind of response you were looking for from post numero deux.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
11:58 / 07.09.07
I'm sure that's true - you can see the same thing in other shows such as, say, the pilot of Six Feet Under, which Alan Ball was asked to make "more over the top", hence the tone not being what it later became. Or even the way that The Sopranos used to have more "action".

I think The Wire does get more confident as it goes on, though - I don't really believe in auteurs who have masterplans that are conceived fully-formed and then carried out 100% as they were originally conceived. Not everything is about network interference.
 
 
Spaniel
12:26 / 07.09.07
Oh absolutely, I don't believe in auteurs either, however people often miss out the realities of making a TV show - doing the job in the real world - when they're critiquing the creators, their vision, or even what makes it onto our screens.

I'm not saying we can't criticise the finished product for what it is, mind. one of the incredible things about the Wire is just how in tune with the creators' vision it would appear to be.

Wars were fought and fists bloodied, I imagine.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
12:36 / 07.09.07
Okay.

What do you think about the content of the show?
 
 
Spaniel
13:15 / 07.09.07
The lack of exposition is interesting, isn't it, in that it's really, really daring. As daring - in a different way, obvs - as trying to sell a show full of black people. David Simon spoke about this in one of the many interviews I found online, giving the extreme example of events that make literally no (or very little) sense in the context of what we have seen. In this day and age that's the kind of thing that can seriously alienate even your broadminded viewer.

My partner almost stopped watching the show after Kima started beating on that kid. She just didn't feel the character was built up that way, and felt that the creators didn't have a handle on who she was, and were (perhaps) more concerned with getting a good ruck into the show than they were with constructing believable human beings. I, however, knew better: that the show isn't concerned with establishing its characters' personalities in that shorthand way that Hollywood does so well. It's not concerned with traditional character arcs. People in the Wire have the capacity to surprise us, and that can be very off-putting when you're not used to it.

Thinking about it, you really do have to learn how to watch this show.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
14:07 / 07.09.07
Yeah - that Kima moment is shocking if you're used to cop shows and the traditional way in which characters are built up in pretty much all entertainment. The whole scene is set up to wrong foot us and make us expect her to intervene to stop Bodie getting beaten on. Kima's sexuality and maybe even ethnicity has a lot to do with this, because the entertainment media, when it's not busy demonising, has a tendency to think that a very simplistic form of 'positive' representation is enough to merit, I dunno, an award or something.

But Kima is 100% cop, she loves being a cop, she wants nothing more than to be a cop, she is thoroughly immersed in cop culture. Of course she's going to beat on some corner boy who dared to hit a cop. Of course.
 
 
Spaniel
14:33 / 07.09.07
Kima's sexuality and maybe even ethnicity has a lot to do with this

Indeed. That a lesbian, being a marginalized individual, would be unlikely to behave in that way - that "lesbian" in some way equals "goodie", was almost certainly there in my partner's unconcious thinking.

(I didn't want to mention that, though, as it would have lead to an argument.)

Of course Omar is a walking talking example of how the show deconstructs these kinds of expectations/prejudices.
 
 
Spaniel
14:50 / 07.09.07
BARBELITH! THE WIRE IS WITHOUT A DOUBT ONE OF THE MOST ENJOYABLE SHOWS I HAVE EVER ENCOUNTERED, IT IS NOT LIKE EATING SPROUTS AND TURNIPS!

sorry, needed to get that off my chest.
 
 
Mug Chum
18:44 / 07.09.07
It's funny, I didn't find Kima's reaction towards Bodie that much of a fuzz, in the sense that I knew the show from season 2 (and only afterwards went back to 1) so I was expecting these little moments showing that these people have the ineherent 'blindspots' and gray areas that can come with each 'side' ("you beat on A COP?!"). Or maybe I was still baffled with Prez's scene a few episodes earlier -- Kima's moment didn't even come close to how I was punched in the head at what Prez (lovely short name) did to that kid and how he was handled by the police.

And yes, the lack of awkward and rupturing exposition in the show overall is unbelievable, even at it's worst moments like the flashback -- just watch that episode then have a go at something like 24, Lost or CSI (never mind the fact they 'have' to remind you because of ads, but they really go much beyond than that basic requirement -- you can really feel your attention span relaxing a bit too much). In that regards, if anyone is interested in that particular quality of the show, you should visit a blog named "Wax Banks" -- there's some really interesting comparisons with other shows that shine a light on much of how The Wire works contrasting to "X acts" storytelling and how basically it's dumbstrucking they can alone make a show about how very little can happen or about burocracy and boredom (that alone would be jaring, but the fact is... it's not just that; that's just a punctuation of a very elaborate text -- elaborate not in the sense of contrived or overly architected and artificial, quite the contrary; the flow is a major hook).

And Wallace... Christ. His last scene reminded me a bit of City Of God. But in what that film's scene was horrifying and of pure hellish decadence, Wallace's scene in The Wire had well defined people and background building up to a unbelievable tragedy that suddenly blows up to a million when you realize he's just one 'meaningless' death out of a drowning number. It's heart-breaking to watch nowadays the scenes of him taking care of those little kids.
 
 
HCE
20:24 / 07.09.07
I may have to re-watch season 1 to refresh my memory as to what happened when, so I don't drop any spoilers. I think I am a little less amazed than everybody else because the Wire is the first show of its kind I have watched in many years, so I have nothing to compare it to, really. Thus, general observations:

1. Quality of acting and depth of characterization:
Top marks. The actors all seem to hit their notes remarkably well, from young to old. I love that the show captures so many subtle shadings -- there are as many ways to be a teenaged boy as there are young men in the show. They show a realistic range of responses both within and among characters. I love the scenes on the couch in front of the towers - that's when you get to peek behind the tough masks and see the young hoppers and low-level players trying to make sense of the game, themselves, each other, their lives. Fucking great acting.

2. Writing - The key marker of the quality of the writing is, for me, that I don't really notice it. It sounds like speech to me, rather than like something some people sat down in a room to try to write, and I think that's a really remarkable accomplishment.

3. Look and sound - Vincent Peranio does the set design - isn't he John Waters' design guy? The man knows his business. The photography is also fantastic, and used very well. The style is so subtle - there's nothing super flashy about, no nauseating camera jiggle, no making things moody just to make it look slick - and yet it's not pretending to be a documentary, either. There's a specific scene from season 3 that stands out in my mind at present and is making it hard for me to recall a similar scene from season 1, but essentially what they do is that at certain key points the camera will pause and let you absorb a really beautifully composed and lit shot, so that you have time to feel the emotional resonance of some key moment that's just taken place. It's a great and very subtle way of cluing you in without relying on big theatrics. The music, too, is unobtrusive but present enough to give a very definite city feel to the show.

I want to say more about the different characters but I really worry about spoilers, so I'll re-watch a few episodes to get my bearings and post again.
 
 
Mug Chum
21:56 / 07.09.07
The style is so subtle - there's nothing super flashy about, no nauseating camera jiggle, no making things moody just to make it look slick - and yet it's not pretending to be a documentary, either.

That's a really good point. At my first viewings I was even sort of lost on that. It seemed like a show from the nineties in that regard, in what appeared to be a stiff tv model, while most shows were going for flashy bad notion of what "filmic"-ish experience means in their photographies and camera-work (people would tell me 24 and Lost were great 'cause they were much more like [long] movies; that CSI was all Fight Club-ish in the aesthetic and green pallete visual department etc).

It's not even wide-screen. It feels like it's saying "this is television. Doesn't mean it's always like this or that it should be like this, but I won't try to keep making myself appear to have a weak notion of cinematic credential (as if that's obviously something to desire in the 1st place). I won't pretend you're in a cinema when you're not, specially when it doesn't have that much difference in language in what you're asking for, and since there's tons of difference in language in what you're not asking for and paying attention to. It's stiff, unflinching and it'll have lots of hours in this novel; So I'll won't bulshit on you about any dazzle, our media language won't be touched in an immediate way and from that initial honest point we might reach further ground into what and how we'll comunicate instead of pretending to exist dramatic meaning and relevance in our context in shaking the camera while pointed at a donut in dark green slick photography or whatever else was being used in popular films five years ago."

So, the thing I really like today in it is that it feels like a -- to the very little experience I've had with -- british tv drama in sorts, in the camera's heavy and nude coldness (without being cheaply cynical) -- the prime example for me on that is the shot when Daniels receives the call about the kid Prez blinded and the camera sits there as it fades out on him sitting in bed while taking in the new fresh shit just thrown on his lap, and we go to the credits music which speaks for me volumes to what the basis of the overall style and aesthetics of the show is about (really, if there's ever a music which encapsulated a show it's the one in the final credits -- it's quite a perfect translation of something into another language).

It feels at first like 90's american tv in what appears as stiffness, tv's low production value and unimaginative language; but that stiffness ends up coming off as the basis for the unflinching and weighting-on-shoulders rigid and cold looker, intentionally or not.
 
 
The Falcon
22:21 / 07.09.07
*sigh*

So, I suppose I really should have bought this instead of the BSG S1 DVD I was weighing it against just this Tuesday past? (Which is pretty okay so far, and the first two pages of that thread are a treat.)

Is it as good as Homicide? As good as Oz?
 
 
The Falcon
22:22 / 07.09.07
In my defence, I think I was really in the mood for spaceships, which will I'm certain be a nonexistent commodity in The Wire.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
22:37 / 07.09.07
Better than both Homicide and Oz. In yr defence, I dunno if it's better than BSG, just 'cos of genre difference.
 
 
sleazenation
23:37 / 07.09.07
It's certainly more consistant, particularly in terms of writing quality, than BSG, but as Fly points out - it ain't going to fill a spaceship shaped hole, if that's what you're looking for.
 
 
Mug Chum
23:45 / 07.09.07
it ain't going to fill a spaceship shaped hole

Agreed. It's not 'my favorite' show but I think it's the 'best'.
 
 
Spaniel
09:20 / 08.09.07
Better than Homicide and Oz, deffo, and I likey me a bit of both.

Really, all this talk of cinematography makes me want to harp on about season 2. Those docks are sooooooo beautiful.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
12:34 / 08.09.07
What stays with me most about Season One is the sense that the "villains" were just doing business, and that drug dealing was just a career, really like any other. I think D'Angelo says in the first season that he's doing the only job a black man's allowed to succeed in.


As contemporary discourses around drugs and drug dealing are usually some blanket moral panic about evil dealers preying on youth, it was strangely appealing and fascinating to see it as just a business: with all the petty frustrations, all the daily boredom, all the snubs from above and the sucking-up for promotion, all the management worries and petty politics between ranks as a normal job.

The clockers on the benches were killing time and whining about their job just as an office worker would ~ just as a police would. They were fucked around by their managers, who were fucked around by people above them, for the same stupid reasons about favour banks and who's got pull with who, and who owes someone something on a level above your head that nobody's going to explain to you. Management pisses on middle management, and then middle management takes it out on the drones.

I think it's Season 2, though not a spoiler (could be Season 1) that Stringer actually goes to night classes in business, dutifully hanging back to ask the professor about how to rebrand a product that's got bad credibility; he's the keenest, most solemnly studious member of the class. Drug dealing doesn't have glamour, or illicit excitement; it's work. It's the kind of work D'Angelo would probably be doing legally, in retail, office supplies or something ~ and doing pretty well ~ if he was one step up out of the projects. None of these people are doing it cause they're "bad", let alone evil. They're doing it because it's the only job around.

So it's the culture of the Towers that I relished most about Season 1, and Season 2, though it was marginalised by the to me, less interesting story of blue-collar dockers. I liked the stripped down economy of dialect, where verbs are swallowed or dropped ("he gone"), and the moral codes everyone seems broadly to accept with a shrug (the game is the game, but some things you don't do) and the tragedy inherent in just how hard it is to get out of the game, and what your fate's almost inevitably going to be if you stay in... the way it's made clear that to get as old as Avon, Stringer and Omar, you've got to be fucking successful and fucking tough. It's a miracle if you reach 30.

That kind of overhanging pressure and fatalism was missing from the lives of the Detail, who seemed to carry on pretty blithely and with comparative liberty and luxury... which is why I found their story considerably less interesting.

I haven't seen Season 3, but I'm hoping it marks a return to the milieu of 1.
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
12:50 / 08.09.07
I'm going to write a bit about Prez's arc, and why it was one of the most appealing things for me about S1 (and sets up some real tragedy in later seasons), but I have a lot of obligations around the house over the next few days.

But in brief -- am I the only person that found Prez really resonant? A fuck-up who knows he's a fuck-up and can't stop being angry and aggressive about it, who finally finds some purpose in life. The only (to my recollection) unabashed "happy ending" in S1, too.
 
 
sleazenation
15:08 / 08.09.07
So it's the culture of the Towers that I relished most about Season

But I don't think we ever saw the Towers. Didn't we only ever see the pit?
 
 
miss wonderstarr
16:57 / 08.09.07
OK, the projects.
 
 
Spaniel
17:07 / 08.09.07
Conversely, I found the Detail to be (marginally) more compelling than the depiction of the daily grind in the projects. I suppose that's because I had some expectation that project life was grimy and hard and really rough at the edges. Somehow, however, I was shocked and surprised to find that, hey, in reality police work is one completely fucked-up business. The bureaucracy, the compartmentalisation, the agendas, the egos, the boredom, the chaos, the futility - that was stuff that I wasn't used to seeing, and - as ashamed as I am to admit - part of my brane had bought the endless parade of lies we are told about the pristine, hi-tech, shiny, heroicness of modern day policing.

Back to Fly's contention that watching the Wire is good for people: Season 1 really helped disabuse me of some very unexamined stuff.
 
 
Spaniel
18:50 / 08.09.07
part of my brane had bought the endless parade of lies we are told about the pristine, hi-tech, shiny, heroicness of modern day policing.

Only part, mind. I'm not unforgivably stupid and naive.
 
 
Imaginary Mongoose Solutions
19:27 / 08.09.07
I'm checking this out based on recommendation from everyone here as well as pretty much everyone who has ever watched TV.

Still, Homicide is my all time favourite cop show... at least the first few seasons.
 
 
Spaniel
19:58 / 08.09.07
as well as pretty much everyone who has ever watched TV.

Oh, for that to be true. It's loved, sure, but not enough people have actually seen it.
 
 
Phex: Dorset Doom
22:17 / 10.09.07
It's a critical smash for sure, with some papers and magazines calling it the best American TV show ever made.
Something I wanted to bring up:

For all it's touted realism two of the show's major characters -Omar and McNulty- are pretty unrealistic. McNulty is a stock hard-boiled cop: alchoholic, Irish-American, pisses off his commanding officer, wife busting his balls for alimony, but ultimate a good police. With lesser writers, and with a less restrained actor, he would have sunk the show. He doesn't. Instead they concentrate on something integral, but overlooked, in the hard-boiled cop: their intelligence. McNulty is always the smartest guy in the room and wants everybody to know it, leading to his anger and on to his drinking, rather than being a crusader who wants to clean up the 'jects because they need cleaning.
Omar on the other hand is too damn good at doing what he does, the failed hit on Avon aside, to fit in with the realistic world he lives in. He can wage a one-man guerrilla war on the Barksdale clan with a $10-000 bounty on his head, stroll into enemy territory (in long black trenchcoat natch) and have everybody running scared, get a stash house to give up their goods just by standing outside and asking, he can be openly gay in a hyper-masculine environment and still have everybody afraid of him. All while whistling "The farmer in the dell" and not swearing once. And still, this guy who, in a more enlightened world, would be the protagonist of an action movie (which I'm calling OMA: One Man Army or possibly Omar: Robbin' Hoods) feels (almost) right in a police procedural.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
22:35 / 10.09.07
Omar is definitely a figure with something mythic about him. Whether that's unrealistic or not, I don't know: urban legends are usually based on real people.

I'd dispute that McNulty is always the smartest guy in the room, even if he thinks that. There are different forms of intelligence, sure, but even in terms of just detective work, Lester Freamon eclipses him, and I think McNulty would even recognise that Lester is at least his equal even by the end of season 1.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
22:40 / 10.09.07
The other thing about Omar is that, without spoiling, he's at this most violent when he's introduced. I mean, kneecapping that motherfucker - okay, as Omar later says, he ain't never pulled a gun on no worling man, somebody who wasn't in the game, but still - if he'd asked Wallace where the stash was at, and Wallace had tried to stand up to him, what would he have done, and what would we think of him then?
 
 
Elijah, Freelance Rabbi
02:47 / 11.09.07
I am glad to see this thread, as I have recently finished watching season one (ah unemployment) and was afraid of spoiling the rest in the main thread.

This is easily the best cop show I have ever watched. My wife is from Baltimore originally, and her father knew the writer (and some of the people who became characters) of the book which Homicide was spun off of. She hated that Homicide had turned into such network TV shit for the last few seasons, with less interesting but better looking characters added left and right.

The Wire is great for the sense that people were cast because they could act the part, not because 18-26 year olds would want to fuck them. There were parts of the show that made me really uncomfortable, but in the right way, because of the subject matter, not because something was handled poorly.

I think my favorite moments took place in the pit, when D and company were just sitting around talking about stuff. the conversation about McNuggets and D teaching Wallace and Bodie to play chess. These scenes really worked for me, I think more so then the 'cops around the office' scenes because they were so new.

My favorite character, though, had to be Det Freamon. I just loved the doll house furniture and the way he was tagged as another of the worthless losers but kept dropping leads without saying a word until someone decided to actually talk to him. Great writing and acting.
 
 
Not in the Face
08:00 / 11.09.07
I'd disagree that McNulty thinks he's the smartest guy in the room, in many ways he's the most priggish and he knows it. Its made pretty clear from the start that Bunk is as good as police as McNulty.

For me Lester was the one who seemed unrealistic - highly intelligent (although we don't find that out till later), who had spent his life in property making dolls furniture. What I think made Lester interesting, like Elijah says, in series 1 is the long, long time it takes him to get involved and yet the amount of screen time he had. You as the viewer knew that something was going on with him, but not what it was.

For Omar, the initial scene of him knee-capping the teen is crucial to the character. As Phex says he's almost too good but its that level of cold violence that shows how. Omar's success depends on those holding the drugs being more afraid of him than their own bosses - otherwise they would put up a fight. Omar almost seems to be viewed as a cost of doing business because even Avon seems to recognise why his stash was given up without a fight. But if Omar kept knee-capping the same characters the show is telling us are everyday people not 'evil drug-dealers' then we are going view him very differently.

I haven't re-watched season 1, but the impression I got though was that Omar's hit on the Barksdales was to some degree a mistake and that he hadn't previously targeted anyone that big.

It is interesting that, despite the fact the Towers are clearly the heart of the Barksdale territory, all we see of them is the forecourt in episode 2. Even in later series when the Towers are mentioned in more detail we never see inside them. I don't know if this is because that environment is unrepresentative of urban Baltimore in general (its never really shown in the later series either) or because it would make a poor venue for a long-term observation.
 
 
Spaniel
08:10 / 11.09.07
McNulty, good police? Interesting assertion. Upon a supericial analysis the guy does indeed look like a stock character, but of course the Wire being the Wire he's actually far more complex. For a start he isn't simply a good guy, he's a guy with a huge ego, who's prepared to 'cause serious problems for his friends in order to get his way, or get his moment in the sun. All that "what did I do?" stuff isn't just about Petey's aforementioned unpredictability factor - to my mind McNulty is painted as a guy that's easily smart enough to know that his actions can and do cause others difficulty and pain. Christ, it's hard not to view his endless battle with Rawls as at least partially motivated by vanity. For all that, though, McNulty's heart is usually dancing around the right place, but in the Wire even concepts such as the right place are slippery fish.

But going back to McNulty's stock and heroic qualities, I think they make a lot of sense, particularly in the context of the first season. The Wire is a very complicated show, and McNulty, along with D'Angelo, is our bridge into the world. It helps that he's easily identifiable, and it helps that, at least in those first few episodes, he comes off as primarily a good guy. People have a tendancy to overplay the realism card when discussing the Wire, and miss out the fact that sometimes it's useful to use more conventionally fictional devices to tell your story and make your point - and this is something the creators of the Wire have obviously grasped.

As for Omar, yeah, sure, the guy maps across fantasy in many ways, but it is worth noting that David Simon is on record as saying that he's an amalgamation of a number of very real people.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
08:16 / 11.09.07
I always thought it was a way of really reinforcing the idea that the police just don't go into the Towers, any further than the forecourt. Obviously Avon would never go anywhere near them either. The Towers have a sort of mythic quality as well, actually - there's this whole idea that you can't even begin to imagine what it's like in there...
 
 
Spaniel
08:17 / 11.09.07
For me Lester was the one who seemed unrealistic - highly intelligent (although we don't find that out till later), who had spent his life in property making dolls furniture.

I'm wondering why that's nrealistic (I assume the word we're really looking for is implausible). I know a number of highly intelligent people who are happy (or indeed unhappy but resigned) to a quiet or unambitious life. One of the lessons learnt in the Wire is that attempts to change the world might well be futile, a lesson which a hardbitten, smart guy like Freamon - a man who works for that most flawed of organisations: the Baltimore Police Force - learnt the hard way. It's worth noting that Lester is much more cynical character than McNulty, and seems much more content to tow the line.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
08:31 / 11.09.07
I don't think he's more cynical than McNulty at all! It really depends on your definition of cynicism. Lester is someone who has had the full weight of the department brought down on him for fucking with the chain of the command, which he did for much the same reasons Jimmy does it - partly because it was the right thing to do, and partly to show the bosses that he didn't give a fuck what they thought. Now, having been banished to the pawn shop for a number of years, months and days that he can record down to the day, Lester knows two things. The first is that a little bit of compromise and diplomacy is not a bad thing if it helps you do the work, real police work, the kind that's worth doing. And the second is that while that kind of police work is worth doing, the job cannot be your entire life.

To see him as just some bookish guy who makes doll furniture, "a housecat... I doubt he can even find his service weapon", is to not really have met him at all!Lester is several steps ahead of anyone else in the unit in terms of what he's learnt about life, I think. And while he clearly wasn't happy to be stuck in the pawn shop, as Bunk tells us, those miniatures have made him a load of money, even aside from them being a craft I believe he takes pride in. Lester is smart, wise (he's often the negotiator between McNulty and Daniels), and one charming motherfucker. He's not unrealistic, he's just a really tough act to follow. But worth aspiring to.
 
  

Page: (1)23

 
  
Add Your Reply