BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


School shooting at Virginia Tech

 
  

Page: 12(3)4

 
 
miss wonderstarr
06:47 / 19.04.07
I had the impression he took the photos beforehand? The clips were apparently compiled and edited ~ not something you'd do in two hours. And he had this Ismael Ax code-name, which suggests some kind of longer-standing... internal fiction about yourself. (Fictionsuit, even).

You're right, though: what actually pisses me off most about this case, apart from the horrible, needless deaths of course, is that this guy is getting what he wanted. His name is now world-famous. Those he killed are in a list of 30.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
07:29 / 19.04.07
I had the impression he took the photos beforehand? The clips were apparently compiled and edited ~ not something you'd do in two hours

I'm not sure, to be honest - it's my understanding that Cho prepared the telling video, note, etc, after the initial shootings, when there wasn't much he could do except give himself up to the US prison system.

Or, I suppose, 'go out in a blaze of glory.'
 
 
Kirk Ultra
07:44 / 19.04.07
Boboss - Kirk, I just want it noted that my criticism of your position hasn't altered in the slightest. I am of the opinion that you have failed to engage properly with what I have written. I will however respect Id's request to keep this debate out of this thread.

I'VE failed to engage in what YOU'VE written? The only thing you wrote is this:

I do wish you'd stop going on about how making guns illegal only makes sure that criminals have guns, Kirk. That may be true as a matter of definition, but the broader point which I suspect is embedded in your argument - that making guns illegal won't really do anything to prevent and lessen gun crime - is at worst complete bollocks and at best highly debatable.

On the incident itself. Horrible horrible business. I wonder if the guy was angry or whether he wasn't just dead inside. Numb. Trying to feel something.

I can't make sense of it at all and it makes me feel sick.


That's 100% of what you'd posted in this thread so far, unless I'm missing something. Are you posting under multiple names? All you said was that you wished I wouldn't talk about making guns illegal encouraging black market gun sales, and that it was bollocks. You couldn't possibly have said less. I responded to what you wrote in the same post that I responded to Fraser in. How have I not engaged in your incredibly nuanced, intricate post? I've been bending over backwards to respond to every argument directed towards me, and I've been trying to explain my position very carefully, even though pretty much half the responses to my posts have been sarcasm and personal attacks. You wrote a single paragraph based around the word "bollocks," and some how I'm the one who's not engaging?

The position that gun control doesn't work because of black market gun sales is a perfectly legitimate position to take. Illegal guns are very easy to get in most big cities. In an earlier post I even named a street in San Francisco where people walk up and down the street all day selling them. You may not believe that guns would be available through a black market, that's perfectly fine, but you can't just declare it to be "bollocks," declare that it shouldn't be discussed, and then claim I'm ignoring you when I've responded directly to you. Please explain to me how I haven't engaged in what you said.

Tann - Gun ownership was highest among middle-aged,
college- educated people of rural small-town
America.


That's a good point, but the presence of gun lovers in small towns doesn't really preclude the existence of people who live in dangerous places and might need a weapon to protect themselves.

Incidentally, Kleck's findings have been criticised by a number of other reports, so it isn't quite as simple as:

Elijah mentioned some stats. There you go.


Sorry, I didn't mean for that to come off as "Elijah mentioned some stats, there you go they're absolute proof of my case." You can't win arguments like that based on one case and I figured the numbers would be shaky anyways. I meant it more as "There you go, here are some examples of that side of the argument." But then again, this guy's studies being criticized doesn't really mean that there are no people anywhere with a need to defend themselves.

Tann also mentioned a school shooting which had been stopped by a group in which two people had guns, and I talked a tiny bit about how a lot of people needed weapons to protect themselves after things went bad in Hurricane Katrina, when the US government essentially abandoned a chunk of the country to anarchy and chaos.

If we are talking about the Bronx, say, rather than Sierra Leone, that's quite an interesting statement.

Very very good point. Most debate about gun rights in the US usually completely leave out the international gun trade which, in its legal form and illegal form, is contributing to huge amounts of conflict all over the world. The guns-for-self-defense argument becomes a lot trickier on this level. If you're looking at it from the global perspective of wanting to keep the peace and stop the wars and genocides going on, ending the gun trade (as well as ending the war on drugs and fixing/dismantling the WTO and world bank, fighting globalization, cutting down on oil, etc) would be the way go. Though if I was an individual person living alone in some place as crazy as Sierra Leone, I'd probably think anybody trying to disarm me was a maniac. Worldwide weapons trading happens on a lot of levels too. Governments sell them too each other, mafias sneak them across borders, intelligence agencies give them to rebel groups. It becomes a much much more complex issue, but as a quick response I guess I'd say I think international weapons trading on all levels should be slowed down, if not stopped, as quickly as possible (along with all the other things I listed above), and whether or not its a good idea for people to own guns would vary from situation to situation and region to region.

It might be weird speculation, but couldn't the problem of people snapping and going on these rampages be more attributed to a collective mentality of fear and distrust rather than the gun-culture itself?

I think so. The America/Canada comparison keeps coming up, and I think that's a pretty good example. I feel like Americans culture really winds people up and then doesn't give them anywhere to go. Now that his multimedia package has shown up his specific psychology will become a matter of study, which is very important, but these events usually bring up a lot more denial about the state of our culture than it does a desire to examine ourselves (outside of message boards like this of course). But that's not really a surprise.

One thing this shooting highlights is the poor state of our mental health system. According to the news reports I saw today the shooter had actually been institutionalized for a three days, but it's exceedingly difficult for them to keep somebody longer than that, whether the patient wants to stay or not. A lot of mentally ill people are just thrown in the streets in this country because there aren't any more state run facilities to keep them in. It sounds like everybody around him knew he was unbalanced. I can't help but think that with a better mental health system this guy might not have fallen through the cracks.
 
 
sleazenation
10:14 / 19.04.07
Er Kirk and Boboss could you either take this to PM or start a new thread?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
10:23 / 19.04.07
Flowers moved to change the topic summary to reflect discussion about gun control in the US, which proposition was passed by hir fellow moderators. This would need to be changed again before it was reasonable to ask people to stop discussing gun control in the US. You are a moderator, and it is within your power to propose this change.
 
 
sleazenation
10:37 / 19.04.07
Fair enough.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
11:27 / 19.04.07
Speaking personally, I can see id's point - having an argument about gun control generally, especially since these araguments tend to be profoundly fractious, might well be seen as inappropriate in a thread aimed at a specific, tragic and very recent shooting.

On t'other hand, I hate to say it, but hundreds of Iraqis were killed yesterday and that didn't get a thread. If there had been a thread, it might well have wandered all over the questions of the broader political and logistical complications of Iraq. On one level, gun control is pretty much key to this discussion, and I think we have to accept that if we choose not to introduce what is clearly a very divisive topic into this thread, we are doing so as a decision based on taste, and one which may shut down avenues for discussion. However, a thread on gun control which references this shooting may be more workable than a thread on this shooting that references gun control.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
12:36 / 19.04.07
I despaired to see the Standard (I think) headline, "KILLER COPIED HORROR VIDEO". How can anyone in good faith and their right mind try to pin yet another horrific crime on specific media texts? I understand that in the face of such senseless loss, people scrabble for a cause and scapegoat, so that in turn there's something to tackle, something to take on and solve ~ it's a lot harder to tackle the complexities of an individual's alienation, fantasies and brain chemistry ~ but how is it possible to genuinely believe this can be reduced down to "guy watches film, copies film ~ let's ban film".
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
12:55 / 19.04.07
The papers coverage has been about as shitty as one might expect, the Daily Mail goes with a still from the video of the killer pointing the gun at the camera and the headline 'The Last Thing They Saw', The Sun have a full body picture of him with a gun in each hand and the headline 'Time to Die', the Mirror have much the same picture as the Mail and have chosen 'Killing Machine'. I'm not shocked or surprised about it, just wish that this could be used in counterpoint the next time they fulmigate about something that has gone too far, to show that they wallow in it the same as the rest of us.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
12:56 / 19.04.07
('wallowing in it' not meant to be a value judgement on anyone in this thread btw)
 
 
miss wonderstarr
13:33 / 19.04.07
The Sun have a full body picture of him with a gun in each hand and the headline 'Time to Die',

JOURNALISTS COPIED SCIENCE FICTION FILM
 
 
Evil Scientist
13:57 / 19.04.07
The Guardian had the image of him pointing guns at the camera too, so not exactly covered in glory. Although I suppose they did focus on other stories for the headline news and didn't put a massive sensationalist title on the photo.
 
 
Hieronymus
14:21 / 19.04.07
christ, i'm with id and sleaze on this one. Is there a small chance the flog-your-agenda-parade could excise itself from the murder of 33 people till they're at least buried and mourned? Or at least separate the threads?

Not 24 hours after the news on this breaks and suddenly the punditry on everything--from pro-gun rights to gun control advocacy groups to Dr Phil fucking blaming video games-- starts propping up the dead for whatever heartless topic of the week they think needs chatting up.

Makes me a little nauseous.
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
14:30 / 19.04.07
Small props to the CBC: they've decided not to air any of the pictures, audio or video from the package.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
14:41 / 19.04.07
It's important, certainly, to keep focused on the important things about this event - the opportunity it provides for denouncing the failings of other people on Barbelith. Nice one, H.

Now, I have already explained how one moderates a topic summary. The fact that the topic summary is unchanged presumably either means that no moderator of the Switchboard has decided that the summary should be changed back, or that another moderator has subsequently disagreed the proposal. This entire issue could be further explored in the moderation requests thread in the Policy.

Failing that, or while waiting for it to go through, why not do something useful? Collate the posts in this thread on gun control, copy them over to the thread on US/European attitudes to gun control, take it from there?
 
 
Hieronymus
15:10 / 19.04.07
It's important, certainly, to keep focused on the important things about this event - the opportunity it provides for sanctimoniously denouncing the failings of other people on Barbelith. Nice one, H.

What a smug and condescending reply to my complaint, Haus. Thanks. Despite your attempt to misconstrue a legitimate concern about the inappropriateness of a gun control debate over the bodies of recent dead, your suggestions are appreciated. Policy is where I should take this next.
 
 
Elijah, Freelance Rabbi
15:10 / 19.04.07
Talking with a co worker yesterday about why this sort of thing DOESN'T happen more often in Canada a few things came up.

I think it is primarily an issue of the availability of a variety of social services. Keep in mind, my knowledge of much of this is 20 odd years old. It seems like Canada does a better job of taking care of its citizens then the USA does. Socialized medicine being the big one to me, if you are sick you CAN go to a doctor, whether you have a good job or not.

The killer seemed to be mad at the materialistic culture of the USA in general. While I don't doubt that in Canada there are people who are much better off financially then others, the fact that the government actually seems to care about the poor people there might take away some of the class anger.
 
 
grant
15:25 / 19.04.07
It's my impression that the guns the fellow bought weren't actually bought legally, since he'd been involuntarily admitted to psychiatric care a couple years earlier, and (I believe) Virginia has a law about selling guns to someone with that history.

I'm not sure about that.

But obviously, now, this was a premeditated thing. And, I suppose, based on the posing and the ranting, a mediated thing as well. He didn't just snap, he bought one gun more than 30 days before buying the next one.
 
 
jamesPD
15:39 / 19.04.07
There was a mention on BBC News (TV, but probably online also) that claimed the only mental health restriction on purchasing the gun was ticking a box marked 'no mental health problems'. So I guess it puts the responsibility onto the customer rather than shop keeper. Perhaps the least to expect would be for Virginia to impose background checks before gun purchases as is the case in other states.
 
 
Elijah, Freelance Rabbi
16:08 / 19.04.07
I think a small tangent to clarify things for people who have not purchased firearms before could be helpful.

Form 4473 is a federally required form to purchase a firearm from any licensed dealer in the USA. Per that link to wikipedia providing false information on the form is a felony.

On the form there are a series of questions, which you can see here. This part of the process is, I believe, in place so the salesperson can get a feeling for the person filling out the form. When I sold guns at a shop a few years back there were a few people I refused to sell to, because they would pause for an extremely long time before answering one or more of the questions. I might have been wrong, but it was within my right as a retailer to refuse service. These also serve as a way to trump up the charges against someone involved in a crime, because, as I said, lying on the form is a felony.

The next step of the process is a call to NICS for the criminal background check. In VA a background check IS needed to purchase a handgun, but the state agency rather then the FBI is contacted.

Being found mentally incompetent in court should have been enough to cause him to fail the background check. As I said up thread, the check box on his court papers saying he was a danger to self and others was apparently not checked.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
16:09 / 19.04.07
Really? I heard that there should have been a mark on his record that meant that he was not to be sold a firearm, but the right box had not been checked by the hospital, with the result that the sale was technically legal but should not have taken place.

And this is where, begging Hieronymus' pardon, the issue of the availability of guns becomes quite a lot more relevant, because it was the assumption that, assuming that there was no compelling reason why he should not be sold a firearm, he should be sold a firearm. If the assumption had been that he should not be sold a firearm unless there was a compelling reason for him to be sold one, then that would change the situation - in order to get hold of a firearm, he would have needed to have some sort of criminal contacts, which the average student in his twenties simply would not have. I mentioned this above - in Britain, the number of people able to embark on spree killings is heavily restricted, and so whereas we do have gun crime, we don't have the specific situation where young people in bad emotional shape are able to obtain and use firearms to murder their peers. When we do have these spree killings, they are committed by gun enthusiasts - a much smaller group. I think you have to consider that along with any considerations of the American mindset - if you give everybody easy access to guns (and if he had not been permitted to buy one, he might easily have borrowed or stolen one, or purchased one from a private citizen), it would not have been nearly so possible for him to have committed these crimes.

Whether the solution to that is mnore guns (armed teachers?) or fewer, and whether it is even an issue worth discussing, might be best left to another thread. However, this, I think, comes under "discussion of the situation as information becomes available", so remains relevant whether ot not anyone edits out the supplement to the topic summary.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
16:16 / 19.04.07
Crosspost with Elijah there, obvs.
 
 
Elijah, Freelance Rabbi
16:19 / 19.04.07
with the result that the sale was technically legal but should not have taken place.

It was technically legal from the standpoint of the shop, the killer committed a felony by lying on the form, however.
 
 
grant
18:53 / 19.04.07
On March 28, this author & analyst warned: During the spring of 2007, school professionals and paraprofessionals, law enforcement officials, and mental health personnel should be aware we are entering the most active "School Shooting Season" since 9/11. From the end of March through the end of May, this window of time could be very deadly. I sincerely hope I am wrong.

If past patterns are repeated, however, these next two months could ignite wildfires of deadly outbursts in school settings that are similar but radically more violent than in recent memory.


Loren Coleman is a child abuse and suicide policy expert (and a famous cryptozoologist, though, which is an odd connection). He's got some qualifications, although he's not a doctor or anything.

He does agree with this psychiatrist that showing the gunman's videos on national news is something of a disaster.
 
 
grant
19:09 / 19.04.07
From an On the Media interview with Loren Coleman:

BOB GARFIELD: Clearly, we see individuals copying at least aspects from previous episodes. But apart from a hunch, or, you know, a series of anecdotal information that seems to coincide, is there any real science to demonstrate that there is, in fact, a copycat effect?

LOREN COLEMAN: Yes, indeed, and it's called the Werther Effect. There's 30 years of research, and mostly from Dr. David Phillips in California, a sociologist, and myself, and other individuals who studied newspaper reports of suicides. For instance, the research done on the suicide of Marilyn Monroe showed that there was 197 copycat suicides over and above the national average during the month after her suicide. And you can see this with Freddie Prinze, you can see it with Kurt Cobain, and so the celebrity suicides get a lot of attention. But there's also been serious research done on suicides that appear in the newspapers and how they increase with more coverage, front-page coverage versus back-of-the-paper coverage.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
11:08 / 20.04.07
It was technically legal from the standpoint of the shop, the killer committed a felony by lying on the form, however.

Just so. However, if you are relying on people who are intent on murder-suicides to tell the truth when purchasing weapons, your system probably needs a bit of an overhaul.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
13:17 / 20.04.07
I notice that although the usual suspects have been jumping up and down shouting "Look, he's posing like that scene in Oldboy! He's holding two guns like in that film where a guy holds two guns!" there's been no 'ban these sick films!' follow-up, at least, not yet. I wonder if this is because these killings happened far away, that even the Daily Mail is hesitating to suggest a change of law in the United States or whether Fleet Streets finest are going to suggest these films be banned in the UK 'to stop something similar happening here'.
 
 
grant
13:35 / 20.04.07
Coleman's discussion of "suicide clusters" (and his hypothesis that school shootings are a form of externalized or outward-pointing suicide) brings me back to this old thread on suicide bombers, especially the opening bit of history about the Japanese suicide clusters of 1932-34 (which is, more or less, where we got kamikazes from, which is, more or less, where we got suicide bombers from).

What sticks out to me is the role that newspaper headlines played in that suicide rage -- constantly lionizing the desperate lovers as heroes who "reached Heaven," which set the stage for the patriotic love of the divine winds (kami-kaze), who expressed the same heaven-reaching love in the late 30s & early 40s as the romantic kids did in the early 30s, but in a different way.

Coleman's March warning was predicated on the media coverage of the Dawson College shootings from last October, and the immediate copycats of that. I don't know enough about his theory to know why spring was more dangerous than February, but he seems to have been correct about the power of those images (and media imagery in general).

(Personally, you know, this means that I'm part of the problem, possibly on three different levels.)
 
 
garyancheta
04:32 / 24.04.07
Aside from the posts above, I wanted to point out something that not many people have been pointing out: therapy and psychiatry are something that is not talked about in most asian communities. Many Asian Americans do not get diagnosed or get mental health because there are stigmas against such therapy, especially if you're first or second generation immigrants coming to America. I know I had to seek out counseling at points and I had to keep it hidden from my Asian American parents because of the stigma attached to it.

I think this points out that there needs to be more outreach counseling programs for Asian Americans. I hope this is a wake up call that helps open up Asian Americans to look for counseling for themselves and for their children.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
09:58 / 24.04.07
I wish that people would stop pretending that having the government declare something illegal will magically make that thing go away.

Common sense dictates that if you make possesion of a gun illegal then you can arrest people for possesion of a gun. That tends to cut gun crime because some of the people who potentially could use a gun will no longer have a gun. Criminals will still have them but on average less people would get shot.

In terms of what happened at Virginia Tech an alienated young person may have been less likely to go and pick up a weapon that would allow him to shoot 32 people. If he had picked up a knife, which would have been more readily available in a country with heavy gun control someone in the building may have been able to stop him in the first classroom. That's the simple argument for banning the Glock 9mm from sale to just about anyone who wants one.
 
 
grant
18:07 / 03.05.07
Inevitable, I suppose.

Chinese-American student prevented from graduating, labeled a potential terrorist for creating an interactive map of his school.
 
 
*
05:39 / 04.05.07
Fucking hell, is all I have to say to that.
 
 
LykeX
08:30 / 04.05.07
And, of course, it has to be a chinese-american. It couldn't just be any student. It couldn't just be that the school authorities had gotten a little jumpy in gereral. No, in America it is apparently essential to add a little racism into the mix.
 
 
jentacular dreams
09:04 / 04.05.07
No charges have been filed, but he's considered a 'terroristic threat'(sic)? Surely Cho wasn't a terrorist, as his actions and intents didn't feed into a specific political goal. How so then this person? Bah!
 
 
sleazenation
09:24 / 05.05.07
Well, Cho wasn't Chinese either.
 
  

Page: 12(3)4

 
  
Add Your Reply