|
|
Yeah, I think you might OTM there, PM. Except - couldn't the Smiths be seen as a dramatic break with the idea of "rock", by being "soft", "intellectual", and wearing glasses and daffodils? Of course that doesn't seem to take away from their nostalgic adoption of an '1890s'/'Romantic' yet 'Working Class' mythology...
Also - w/regards to Modernism wanting a break with the past. I wonder - what about the 99% of Pound's Cantos that take place in Renaissance Italy, or Greece, or Confucian China - and what about The Wasteland, and the ideas Flyboy paraphrased above from Eliot's 'Tradition and the Individual Talent' (an essay which Fly is dubious about but which I think nearly always holds true in the case of poetry)?
I suppose in these cases it's the form rather than the content that gets radicalised - but ideas and images from the past are still being returned to.
I think the dynamic for the next 2-3 years will be less about rock vs. pop (because that boundary is neither contested nor interesting) or even black/white, male/female but rather those that wish to unite different strands of music (in a way different to the "anything goes" apathy of eclecticism) vs. those who wish to pursue their own strands into gentle oblivion.
This seems right too. Certainly, the former bunch seem to be making the most vital music of the moment. |
|
|