BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Martin Amis Thread

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
Glenn Close But No Cigar
19:31 / 01.04.07
Have done an advanced google search for a general Amis thread on Barbelith, and have been surprised not to turn one up. I'm intrigued to find out your thoughts on this writer. Is he brilliant, or over-rated? A trenchant critic of capitalism (I'm thinking 'Money', primarily, but this concern inflects almost all of his novels), or a posh twit who loves a laff at ver proles? Is he guilty of the charges of racism and sexism that are often levelled at him, of which there is an example here
Also, what are the highlights and lowlights of his oeuvre, and is he still relevant (and on what terms) to the world today?
 
 
Dusto
20:38 / 01.04.07
The only novel of his that I've finished was Night Train. Which I thought was okay. I also tried Time's Arrow and The Information. Neither was bad, but neither drew me in, and they ended up falling by the wayside. I understand from someone whose taste I trust that The Rachel Papers is worth checking out, so I'll have to gove that go. Other than that I don't have much to contribute to this thread. But why'd he tell Julian Barnes to fuck off? I kind of like Julian Barnes.
 
 
Glenn Close But No Cigar
21:20 / 01.04.07
Hmm, I think you've drawn the short straw on the Amis books you've read. Although not without their problems (see link in my intro post, for e.g.) Money and London Fields are reckoned to be by far and away his best, and IMO worth checking out, if only to chuck 'em across the room.

Re: Barnes, I made a tired-brained boo-boo. It was actually JB who told MA to fuck off first, after MA left his literary agent, and JB's wife, Pat Kavanagh. Details of the incident, and the writer's recent kissy make-up, here

Having said that, I suspect Barnes felt that Amis had told him fuck off with the opening shot in 'wifegate'.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
02:00 / 02.04.07
I'd maintain that anyone who doesn't like 'Money' and to slightly lesser extent 'London Fields', basically lacks a soul.

In 'Money' in particular, John Self's tragic-comic journey through the London and New York of the Eighties remains a pretty gripping, hellishly funny account. Like the stock market, John's fortunes go up and down, until (well this being Amis, I don't suppose I'm spoiling it for anyone) they finally crash. For a while back there, Amis was genuinely brilliant - all the promise of the earlier stuff (all of it good, but hardly world-beating) had come true.

And 'London Fields' remains a misunderstood book - it isn't really about Keith or Guy, for all they've got centrestage for most of it, so much as why Ms Six can't get on with things anymore. For a mainstream novel, it's genuinely extreme.

And then after that, in my humble, the fall. For whatever reason, and I wouldn't care to speculate, Martin seemed to come to the conclusion that being himself wasn't enough, that he should be more like Primo Levi, Saul Bellow, and so on, and take on the major political crimes of the 20th century, the Holocaust, nuclear weapons, and, quite recently Stalinist Russia, ie, events that he's got no direct experience of, and is therefore, being the kind of writer he is, (declaritive, opinionated, given to wild but funny speculation) pretty much inevitably going to make a mess of.

And he seems to take himself so seriously these days.

The recent stuff about Islam is, frankly, a disgrace.
 
 
Thorn Davis
10:44 / 02.04.07
London Fields and Money are - as Alex's Grandma correctly observes - really superb. In particular, London Fields's Marmaduke is one of the greatest villains in fiction.

I wasn't so keen on either The Rachel Papers or Success, which are two of his earlier books. The shift in sympathy in Success seemed a bit obvious to me, while The Rachel Papers just... the jokes didn't really work, and the plot twists were a bit nothing. It seemed like a first novel that shouldn't have been published, like the shit one that you have to write to realise what mistakes you're making.
 
 
Glenn Close But No Cigar
15:31 / 02.04.07
I think MA's memoir 'Experience', and the anthology of his literary criticism 'The War Against Cliche' are also very much worth reading. The 'Islamism' stuff, however, can go hang.

And 'London Fields' remains a misunderstood book - it isn't really about Keith or Guy, for all they've got centrestage for most of it, so much as why Ms Six can't get on with things anymore. For a mainstream novel, it's genuinely extreme (Alex's Grandma)

I'm intrigued by this reading, centred as it is on a character who's not so much a character at all, but arguably rather a cypher or stand in for the 20th Century, or perhaps the millennial moment (at one stage, Amis reminds us that la Six 'Is Modern. Nicola is Modern' ). Is the book, then, about the suicide of a century, and if so is that century the 20th, or the 21st?

To put it another way, is Nicola Six Jenny Sparks for grown ups?
 
 
All Acting Regiment
15:42 / 02.04.07
And then after that, in my humble, the fall. For whatever reason, and I wouldn't care to speculate, Martin seemed to come to the conclusion that being himself wasn't enough, that he should be more like Primo Levi, Saul Bellow, and so on, and take on the major political crimes of the 20th century, the Holocaust, nuclear weapons, and, quite recently Stalinist Russia, ie, events that he's got no direct experience of, and is therefore, being the kind of writer he is, (declaritive, opinionated, given to wild but funny speculation) pretty much inevitably going to make a mess of.

Yeah, my thoughts exactly. Methinks the move might have been made to sell more things to Americans?
 
 
All Acting Regiment
15:44 / 02.04.07
...re: the above, notice the missing definite article from the Russian prison camp one, House of Meetings (not The House of Meetings). Very Amy Tan, Jhumpa Lahiri style, yes? Also set in 'the east'? To sell more? Does any of that make any sense at all?
 
 
Glenn Close But No Cigar
15:53 / 02.04.07
I'm not sure it's about selling things to 'the Americans' in a monetary sense, but I do think it's possibly about America as a place that offers its writers (inc. Amis' most important influences, Bellow and Nabokov) a broader, more at-the-centre-of-world-events canvas that the UK offers its own. Given that MA couldn't write the Great American Novel without coming across as a presumptious limey, he's attempting to occupy the 'epic' spaces of the Holocaust, Stalinist Russia, and TWOT.

Not that he does these particularly succesfully, but at least he won't get a smack-down from, say, Updike, or Roth.

Me, I'd like him to attempt a Great American Novel. Money and London Fields (and, to a lesser degree, The Information, the third part of his 'London' trilogy) were Great British Novels.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
18:07 / 02.04.07
Yeah I would too. Certainly, I'd like to see him writing about America again - he seems to have got into his head that he's in some way inferior to the big beasts of US literature, which when he's on form I don't think is necessarily the case. Hopefully the stuff about Russia's now out of his system after 'House Of Meetings', which is the first novel of his I couldn't get on with, although I do know people who enjoyed it. If he does write about America though, he should at least try and stay clear of 9/11, which still seems too recent and catastrophic and event to be an appropriate subject for a novel really. Like the Kennedy assasination, I imagine it could another ten years before anyone's seriously able to get to grips with it. You have to wait for the dust to settle, I think.

As far as Nicola Six goes, she does seem meant to be a very much a Twentith century girl, but beyond that, I'm not sure what she could be said to stand for. She might be a kind of adult Jenny Sparks figure, but she's a much more explicitly feminine character, and to be honest, I think Amis himself might resist any attempt to flag her up as, say, 'woman in the Twentieth century', seeing as she's basically suicidal from page one onwards. There was an interview on The South Bank Show when 'London Fields' came out, in which Amis protested, 'look I'm not saying they're all asking for it, or anything like that' and then kind of fudged the question of Nicola generally, being visibly much happier talking about Marmaduke and Keith instead.
 
 
Dusto
20:09 / 02.04.07
Hmm, sounds like I should give London Fields a try.
 
 
COBRAnomicon!
20:42 / 02.04.07
Weird; I was just thinking how much my tastes have veered away fom Amis. Ten years ago, I thought he was the apex (and the stuff I wrote back then really, really suffered from my trying too hard to emulate The Information). I've recently reread Money and The Information, and, while I think he's quite good, he's nowhere near the pedestal-sitting god I used to think he was. I think my biggest problem, ultimately, is the worldview that seeps out of his books is just so overwhelmingly nasty. It can be fun to indulge in now and then, but reading multiple books back-to-back is just too much of a misanthropy overdose, and I can be a pretty grouchy bastard on my own.

One tangential thought I've had recently: Norman Mailer's newest book, wherein a devil recoints his role in shaping the childhood of Adolf Hitler, is pretty much a failure. But as I was finishing it, I thought that Amis could probably have done spectacular things with that concept.
 
 
Glenn Close But No Cigar
21:39 / 02.04.07
POSSIBLE SPOILERS BELOW


AG, Not sure that Nicola is 'woman in the twentieth century' but rather a kind of feminine embodiment / avatar of the 20thC / Modernism, operating in a similar way to Britannia / Lady Liberty. Difference is, of course, that we get to see her shit, fuck, and eventually erase herself etc. - as you said, she is (like a fin de siecle Molly Bloom perhaps?) a very 20thC girl. If this is Amis' intention, it inoculates him from the charge of 'they're all asking for it' somewhat, in so far as she is not intended to be a character, but rather a principle - a utopian dream and a death camp rolled into one, as truthful as Cubism and as mendacious as Soviet Socialist Realism. She's also, of course, the Devil ('Old Nick', 'Six: Six'), but one in the Blakean / Miltonian mode. We could still criticise Amis' use of a Britannia-esque figure from a Marina Warner-type perspective, but I think N6 is a more complex beast than the notion of Amis as an unalloyed misogynist allows.

Some more thoughts... Mark Asprey is a co-conspirator, with N6, in N6's murder by the narrator. Remaining off stage throughout the book, Asprey is in some senses a heteronym of / stand in for the off-stage Amis (check out the shared initials). He is also arguably the novel's only truly postmodern character. What this means in terms of killing the 20th Century / Modernism or the 20th Century / Modern novel is ripe for analysis, and perhaps piss-taking.

I'm wondering if we might be able to take LF as, in the end, a hopeful novel? The 20th century brings about it's own end, with us as the duped murderer? The futures it presents are embodied by Kim and Marmaduke – brutality and peace, uninflected, interestingly, with pomo ifs and buts.

Fuck, this is a great book. Much as I enjoy parsing comics, thinking about LF feels so much richer an experience...
 
 
Alex's Grandma
05:20 / 03.04.07
SPOILERS

He is also arguably the novel's only truly postmodern character.

Yeah, certainly the references to Asprey's trial for plagirism would make sense with that reading. Also, the diary scene where Nicola (as the avenging spirit of Modernism - Britannia's a good comparison, or generally mistreated muse?) burns his one decent attempt at a novel. (Which, incidentally, directly echoes a scene in 'A Dance To The Music Of Time' by Anthony Powell, something that Amis can't have been unaware of.) Has the intelligence of 'London Fields' been underrated because of the slightly uncomfortable material to do with Enola Gay and Big Boy?
 
 
Twig the Wonder Kid
12:19 / 03.04.07

The simplest way of summing up Amis is - he's an eighties author.

His eighties books (Other People, Money and London Fields) were superb, but his nineties, noughties and, to a lesser extent, his seventies work ... not so good.

He's also what you might call a blokey author - I don't know many women who have finished one of his books.

"Pretentious" might be another word you could use in connection with his work too. Although, when he's good, you tend to forgive him that.
 
 
HCE
13:24 / 03.04.07
Money is one of the worst, most self-indulgent pieces of crap I have ever had the misfortune to read in my life and I am shocked to hear it praised. Well, not really shocked, no. This is what passes for a trenchant critique these days, this deathly boring pap. It's like Jeremy's video for "This is outrageous" in novel form.
 
 
Janean Patience
14:51 / 03.04.07
Mark Asprey is a co-conspirator, with N6, in N6's murder by the narrator. Remaining off stage throughout the book, Asprey is in some senses a heteronym of / stand in for the off-stage Amis (check out the shared initials). He is also arguably the novel's only truly postmodern character.

Mark Asprey is a plagiarist, plain and simple, and it's his Note About The Title that precedes the book. Nicola draws Sam in because she owes Mark a book, and all the goings on in and around Mark's house are manipulations toward getting that book. They seem to work.

Proof Asprey's a plagiarist? The Clench family praise his musical, The Goblet. This is the work that's stolen from Howard W Campbell in Vonnegut's Mother Night, which Amis has said he's a fan of.
 
 
Glenn Close But No Cigar
16:10 / 03.04.07
Not sure that there's anything that plain or simple about Asprey being a plagiarist - it's not just musicals he plagiarises, but the notion of the 'successful' novelist (witness the trappings of his apartment, and the disgust / envy they provoke in the narrator), and arguably the notion of genuine feeling, something he transforms into quotation, in both life and art. While of course the 'novel for a novel' idea is a driver in LF, and literary revenge is a key Amis theme, there's a lot of broader 'the novel dies / the century dies' stuff here too, and while Nicola's 'murder' of Asprey's (we're to take it genuinely felt, non-plagiarised or ersatz) novel is intimately tied to his conspiring in her assisted suicide / murder, then again, pretty much everyone in LF is complicit in Nicola's death - Keith, Guy, Sam, Amis, and even the reader who turns the pages. She draws us all into her eschatological plan...

Presume some of you know that David Cronenberg is slated to film London Fields, with Amis as co-scriptwriter. As Amis films tend to be a bit rubbish anyone (Rachel Papers, Dead Babies), this modest proposal can't really hurt: the principles of LF (a novel, after all, set in W11) should be played by the principles in Richard Curtis' Notting Hill.

Julia Roberts IS Nicola Six!
Hugh Grant IS Guy Clinch!
Rhys Ifans IS Keith Talent!

It's perhaps worth pointing out that, while they will doubtless be little more than questionable caricatures (Thelonious the pimp, anyone?) there will be at least some black people in Cronenberg and Amis' Portobello tale. Curtis' vision of Notting Hill was about as racially mixed as Last of the Summer Wine...
 
 
Alex's Grandma
16:35 / 03.04.07
Slightly off-topic, but that seems like a big step for David Cronenberg. If it gets off the ground (Gary Oldman was rumoured to be trying to shoot 'Money' a few years ago - he'd have been ideal as John Self, but nothing came of it) it'll be interesting, to say the least, to see how he handles the more overtly comic aspects of the material. Bruce Robinson, if he's still directing these days, I could see, but David Cronenberg seems a fairly odd choice.

Incidentally, Amis thought the film of 'The Rachel Papers' was 'a piece of shit', but apparently liked 'Dead Babies'. Which I suppose he should have done, seeing as a couple of nods to the internet aside, it pretty much was the novel put on camera, scene for scene.
 
 
Twig the Wonder Kid
18:28 / 03.04.07
Proof Asprey's a plagiarist? The Clench family praise his musical, The Goblet. This is the work that's stolen from Howard W Campbell in Vonnegut's Mother Night, which Amis has said he's a fan of.

I seem to recall a plagiarism issue over Times Arrow when it came out, accusations that it was borrowed from Slaughterhouse 5. Although Amis is clearly a big Vonnegut fan, and the full title: "Time's Arrow, or the Nature of the Offence" seems to suggest a homage.

But a homage and a rip off are still essentially the same thing I suppose. And the point is that Amis took a whole novel to say what Vonnegut did in a single paragraph.
 
 
Twig the Wonder Kid
18:36 / 03.04.07
Oh, and gourami's post can't pass uncommented

Money is one of the worst, most self-indulgent pieces of crap I have ever had the misfortune to read in my life and I am shocked to hear it praised. Well, not really shocked, no. This is what passes for a trenchant critique these days, this deathly boring pap.

Did you dislike Money but like his other works, or are you simply an Amis Hata?

For "self-indulgent" read "post-modern", this was after all the eighties. You may be right, that a book like that wouldn't work these days - which may explain Amis's more recent career.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
00:39 / 04.04.07
I'd be interested to hear about what books do pass for a trenchant cultural critique these days, gourami, in your opinion.

'Money' was written twenty five years ago, all right, but it's still influential, so for the sake of argument, that needn't be an issue.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
08:36 / 04.04.07
I don't think there's anything wrong with being an Amis Hata on principle. The Rachel Papers, London Fields, the jaw-droppingly atrocious short story collection Heavy Water*, the beginning of Night Train, and a whole bunch of non-fiction things** are, I think, a sound enough evidence base for me to decide that he is simultaneously morally repugnant, politically objectionable and aesthetically tiresome bordering on unreadable. I'd prepared to give Money an open minded chance, but only if I were given some, on a week-to-week basis, while I waded through the thing.

Amis seems if not responsible for then at least emblematic of so much of what is wrong with not just the modern English novel, but English culture more widely. The ready acceptance of class privilege. The willingness to mistake pomposity for seriousness, loquaciousness for intelligence, and mean-spiritedness for incisiveness. The idea that it's 'contrarian', rather than in line with dominant norms, to be 'un-PC'.

He is, indeed, emblematic, perhaps even iconic, of the 1980s, and yet not the 1980s, because so much of what he represents is still in full force now. He is a parasite.

*Featuring such highlights as "Imagine if our society was homonormative rather than heteronormative!" (although Mart would never use words like that, ALL RIGHT, he's not some PC feminazi pinko!), "Imagine if poetry was the most popular and financially viable form of entertainment!" (yes, that's TWO intellectually lazy Elsewords conceipts passing as short stories in ONE insubstantial collection - the man is a hack), and "Watch how easily a white man easily cuckolds and makes a mockery of a black man simply by pretending to be the right kind of liberal!" Anyone who thinks this is good satire needs trepanning.

**To a piece, each one the ill-informed quasi-poetic blatherings of a man who a) has never made much of an effort to hide his contempt for anyone who is not a rich white heterosexual male, and b) must surely chuckle regularly to himself at being one of the beneficaries of the current culture of 'literature' in the UK, in which it is assumed that a best-selling but 'respectable' novelist will of course be able to knock out three pages worth of musings on Al-Queda or the porn industry or some other 'issue', and that there is no need for any kind of serious quality checking to take place before publishing such risible prattle.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
08:51 / 04.04.07
The jaw-droppingly atrocious short story collection Heavy Water*, the beginning of Night Train, and a whole bunch of non-fiction things**

Fair enough, but isn't that a bit like criticising OJ in the wake of the incident? In the sense that, regardless of what came after, for a while back there the guy was really flying?
 
 
Alex's Grandma
11:26 / 04.04.07
A few years before, I should stress, whatever did or didn't happen on that fateful night in OJ's world. Which Amis may or may not have written an article about.

Pretty clearly, it's a bad scene if otherwise thoughtful individuals are paid handsomely to sling off bird-wittted opinions while performing their morning ablutions, but at least, like Bono, Amis is taking care of business, right?

And other such ramblings. Amis should arguably have shot himself in the early Nineties - I suppose part of his angst is to do with what he perceives to be his failure to mature, but on the other hand, he's British, so why should he bother? The lot of the avant garde-ish UK writer being much the same as that of, I don't know, a uniquely gifted artist who routinely sets fire to hir Action Men, Sindys and Lego communities. In the sense that it doesn't really matter until (as wth Rushdie!) the police get involved.

I'm going to have a lie down now.

Sorry, everyone, if I have ruined this thread.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
11:31 / 04.04.07
I suppose part of his angst is to do with what he perceives to be his failure to mature

I don't get any sense of angst from Amis in 2007! In fact he seems very convinced he has matured - that now he tackles 'real issues', and he seems very pleased with himself about it!

Although I suspect as is sometimes the case, Granny, you may mean the opposite of what you say. You fantasist.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
11:52 / 04.04.07
Well, I don't know. Amis seems, to me, like a man who is not at peace with himself. There's the morbid interest in posterity, and so on.

Paradoxically, the more Amis seems to worry about this, the less good he gets.

In the hard med dream I've made of my universe, though, Amis will triumph. Just like his father did.
 
 
Glenn Close But No Cigar
16:07 / 04.04.07
he is simultaneously morally repugnant, politically objectionable and aesthetically tiresome bordering on unreadable. - Flyboy

Hmm, while I agree it's possible to read Amis' novels as politically objectionable, I'm not sure it's as simple as Amis rallying against an imagined horde of PC policepersons gone differently sane by telling the 'difficult truth' about women, black people, the working classes etc. None of his creations are - whatever their class / race / gender-indentification / sexuality etc. - intended as well rounded, truthful character studies. Rather, they're purposefully created as marionettes, grotesques, cyphers, caricatures, in the tradition of Swift, Voltaire, Dickens etc. While this doesn't exonerate him from charges of various forms of gross insensitivity, it remains an important point. This is not literary realism. Amis is not our go-to man when it comes to providing a window on the interior life of, well, anyone. Thank Christ for that.

It seems to me that many people who object to Amis' work (and this may or may not include Flyboy, I don't want to presume) want the novel to do a particular job: namely, to give a voice to those who do not have one, or have one that has been distorted. This is a fine ambition, but I'm not sure it's the only ambition one might have for literature. Equally, while reading a text through the lens of the unequal power relationships implied by its characterisation is an extremely valuable approach, it is one that is at times unable to distinguish between literary modes - reportage, polemic, comedy, satire etc. In Amis' case, it's also worth remembering that his novels are nearly all 'authored' by an unreliable narrator (Charles Highway, John Self, Sam etc), whose views we should not necessarily take to be MA's. Furthermore, I think it's possible to find a non-repugnant moral centre of sorts in all of his novels, and I personally don't find him 'aesthetically tiresome'. Flyboy, can you expand on why you think this?

That said, his recent journalism on 'Islamism' makes my eyes bleed. As Pankaj Mishra wrote, MA went on "for more than 10,000 words without describing an individual experience of Muslim societies deeper than Christopher Hitchens's acquisition of an Osama T-shirt". Pow!


And as for his use of text-message language in 'Yellow Dog', he can FL8 my Rs.
 
 
Twig the Wonder Kid
09:07 / 05.04.07
Amis should arguably have shot himself in the early Nineties

If he had he would be remembered as one of the greatest novelists of all time. But he didn't so he's now become a Paul rather than a John, with a long string of Frog Chori.

In some ways I think Will Self took over the Amis mantle in the 1990s, as he wrote on similar themes, with a similar florid satirical style.

But then Will Self went shit too.

I'm loving this thread because I have really conflicting feelings about Amis. I can still re-read London Fields and be blown away by it, but then more recent stuff - especially when he tries to write as BLACK!/YOOT!/WOMAN! - is just hilariously bad.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
11:54 / 05.04.07
Saying something is 'satire' isn't an automatic get-out clause from its content. A lot of satire actually relies of previously held assumptions and prejudices in order to work, and a lot of the time the satire really just reinforces those beliefs. Juvenal was a brilliant satirist, but he also amongst other things happily played into and perpetuated Roman prejudices about Greek people. There's no 'moral centre' in Little Britain, which would arguably be called satire, but that doesn't change the fact that it actively reinforces and perpetuates various nasty stereotypes.

In terms of aesthetics, I'd rather do it the other way round: if anyone can find a passage (a paragraph, maybe), or Amis' fiction that they think is aesthetically pleasing or particularly effective in some way, then I'll attempt to explain why I think it'sin fact smug, florid and overblown dribble (if I do think that).
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
11:57 / 05.04.07
Sorry, misread something there, in that the phrase 'moral centre' didn't crop up where I remembered as I typed my answer. I thought you were saying there wasn't a moral centre in Amis' novels in the sense that he gives everybody an equally rough ride.

To be honest I find the idea that his novels DO have a moral centre pretty surprising. What non-repugnant values and principles do you think we can find in Amis?
 
 
Glenn Close But No Cigar
12:55 / 05.04.07
Saying something is 'satire' isn't an automatic get-out clause from its content.

True, as I pointed out when I wrote:

this doesn't exonerate him from charges of various forms of gross insensitivity

I assume you're not accusing me of letting Amis off the hook, 'cause it's clear from the above that I'm not.

What non-repugnant values and principles do you think we can find in Amis?

For starters, almost every novel he's written has been concerned, implicitly or explicitly, with male violence. It'd be hard to argue that this is something that he is in any way for. Instead, it is deeply, deeply implicated in almost every horror he writes about, from capitalism, to nuclear weapons, to the gulag. As he writes in the first para of 'Yellow Dog': 'Male violence did it'.

Like Twig the Wonder Kid, I too have really conflicted feelings about Amis. I'm certainly not looking to paper over the problems in his work, nor am I looking to covert anyone to it. I do think, though, that there are things of worth in his novels, especially his London trilogy, and I don't want to dismiss them on the grounds that his unreliable narrators at times mouth politically objectionable views. Amis' recent journalism, however, is another matter, seeing as in that case authorial opinion is much more clear cut. It's tempting to read one through the lens of the other, but that would be to perhaps a) misunderstand the nature of a 'text', and b) to map the older author onto the younger.

if anyone can find a passage (a paragraph, maybe), or Amis' fiction that they think is aesthetically pleasing or particularly effective in some way, then I'll attempt to explain why I think it'sin fact smug, florid and overblown dribble (if I do think that)

Sounds like fun. I post the below (the opening para of London Fields) not in the spirit of converting Flyboy to MA, but in the hope of being entertained by his analysis.

"This is a true story but I can't believe it's really happening.
It's a murder story, too. I can't believe my luck.
And a love story (I think), of all strange things, so late in the century, so late in the goddamned day.
This is the story of a murder. It hasn't happened yet. But it will. (It had better.) I know the murderer, I know the murdereee. I know the time, I know the place. I know the motive (her motive) and I know the means. I know who will be the foil, the fool, the poor foal, also utterly destroyed. And I couldn't stop them, I don't think, even if I wanted to. The girl will die. It's what she always wanted. You can't stop people, once they start. You can't stop people, once they start creating.
What a gift. This page is briefly stained by my tears of gratitude. Novelists don't usually have it so good, do they, when something real happens (something unified, dramatic and pretty saleable), and they just write it down?"

Robot Wars, commence!
 
 
Alex's Grandma
17:11 / 05.04.07
Hm. I'm not sure If I'd necessarily have picked that passage myself. It's a bit arch, isn't it?
 
 
Glenn Close But No Cigar
17:42 / 05.04.07
I chose the passage 'cause it's related to a lot of the LF stuff we've been discussing up-thread, and also has the difficult 'The girl will die. It's what she always wanted' line. Then again, it is rather arch, I agree. Other suggestions very welcome.
 
 
Glenn Close But No Cigar
15:15 / 09.04.07
Just occurred to me that there's a rolling joke in 'The Information' that might shed some light on the charge that MA is anti-'PC'. Therein, the protagonist Richard Tull refers ironically to the faceless burgulars that rob his nemesis Gwyn's flat as 'her', 'she' etc.. Amis writes these scenes very much with the intention of making us think Tull is a tool who feels frightened at what he feels is the erosion of his white male privilege by Police Constable Gone-Madd.
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply