|
|
One of the greatest weaknesses of The Matrix is, I think, the manner in which the filmmakers chose to neglect the incredibly high death toll Neo and his allies create.
I'd agree, the series falls apart in the third film because they revert to this very easy manicheanism, with 'real' as good and 'unreal' as bad and expendable. I think the greatest flaw of the final film was the idea that it was better to live in this nasty, run down real world rather than take over The Matrix and turn it into a shiny, supernatural playground where everyone can be a god and have total control over their reality.
The Wachowskis may have copied a lot of plot elements from that first Invisibles arc, but they completely missed the part where Tom talks about how there is no such thing as 'real,' our dreams and thoughts are just as real as the chair you're sitting in. So, according to him, it wouldn't matter so much that we break out of the Matrix, it would be more important for us to reclaim our agency within it, and show everyone how to transcend the limits in the way the Neo and his crew can. That's what the end of the first film indicated would happen, but it just never did.
And, going along with this, if people experience emotion as a result of their lives in the Matrix, then aren't they just as real as the people living in the caves in the 'real world'? And, consequently, the violence that Neo and his gang do will cause a lot of pain, something that is never addressed. I saw Reloaded as analagous to Volume II of The Invisibles, upping the violence and leading our heroes on a path to moral decay. But, the third film never addressed this and completely backed off from any moral complexity. |
|
|