|
|
Given the discussions above about various parts of the board being 'anti-psychiatry', I think I'd like to qualify my comments by saying, y'know, just because I found a decent therapist sne she helped me a lot, doesn't mean I don't have a pretty huge critique of psychiatry as a discipline. This includes some anti-psychiatry theories -- mostly via Deleuze and Guattari -- and some really shocking experiences with psychiatrists. I don't see the experiences I've had with psychiatrists as germane to this thread: I wasn't attending appointments by choice, and it was about being diagnosed with something, not getting emotional support. (Indeed, emotional support was fundamentally lacking.)
I realise that people bring their own experiences and deeply-held opinions to an advice thread like this, and also that someone like Ganesh is talking from a position of therapeutic experience. But it seems important to differentiate between the various 'mental health' disciplines, because we're in danger of it becoming hopelessly unclear. Psychiatry is quite different from clinical psychology, which is different again from various kinds of therapy it's possible to obtain. A psychiatrist generally does something very particular involving diagnosis of mental disorders, resulting in various treatment options. So do some clinical psychologists. You can go to a whole bunch of other people whose job is not to diagnose-then-treat, but to figure out problems in other ways. Some of those people, maybe most of them, are bound to be idiots. Some aren't.
Moodgym, on the other hand, really sucks and its makers should be hung from the nearest tree for normative tackiness. (My opinion!) |
|
|